CNET Networks Entertainment GameSpot | GameFAQs | SportsGamer | Metacritic | MP3.com | TV.com
Home | About Metacritic | About Metascores | What's New | Wireless Versions | Discussion Forums | Advertising Inquiries | Contact Us | RSS
Metacritic.com: We Deal With Criticism
     Help
> Switch to Advanced Search  
Film Video/DVD Music Games TV

Books

All-Time High Scores
Best Of 2006
Best Of 2005
Best Of 2004
How Metascores Are Calculated
Discuss Books In Our Forums

 

Upcoming & Recent Releases

sort by name sort by score

 

Upcoming & Recent Releases

sort by name sort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed books.

 

 



Printer-Friendly Version Email This Page Discuss In Our Forums

Arthur & George
by Julian Barnes

Arthur & George reviews
Critic Score
Metascore: 79 Metascore out of 100
User Score  
8.2 out of 10
based on 33 reviews
read critic reviews
how did we calculate this?
based on 5 votes
read user comments
rate this book

Set in Victorian England, Barnes' acclaimed literary thriller (which finally reached U.S. shores in January 2006) is loosely based on the true lives of a country lawyer who is falsely imprisoned and the writer (Arthur Conan Doyle) who sets out to save him.

Knopf, 400 pages
01/10/2006
$24.95

ISBN: 030726310X

Fiction
General Literature & Fiction
Historical Fiction

NOTES:
Shortlisted for the 2005 Man Booker Prize. Originally published in the UK in 2005.

What The Critics Said

All reviews are classified as one of five grades: Outstanding (4 points), Favorable (3), Mixed (2), Unfavorable (1) and Terrible (0). To calculate the Metascore, we divide total points achieved by the total points possible (i.e., 4 x the number of reviews), with the resulting percentage (multiplied by 100) being the Metascore. Learn more...

Entertainment Weekly Jennifer Reese
A stout, satisfying, and uncharacteristically old-fashioned novel.
Read Full Review
LA Weekly Brendan Bernhard
Will Barnes ever write a dull or mediocre novel? On the strength of this one and all the others that preceded it, the prospect seems increasingly unlikely.
Read Full Review
Washington Post Michael Dirda
Barnes's writing is, as usual, masterly throughout Arthur & George, not only as the pages shift from one man's consciousness to the other's but also in the way their author keeps the reader on edge.
Read Full Review
Daily Telegraph Caroline Moore
[Arthur & George] is both meticulously researched and vividly imagined, both gripping and thoughtful.
Read Full Review
The Globe And Mail [Toronto] Zsuzsi Gardner
Using mere kitchen scraps of historical information, [Barnes] has added marrow, muscles, nerves and a pumping heart to a footnote in British legal history, animated long-interred bones in a way no biography ever could. [8 Oct 2005]
The Guardian Tim Adams
Julian Barnes... has taken the bones of a long-dead history and imbued them with vivid and memorable life.
Read Full Review
The Independent Simon O'Hagan
It's one of Barnes's best, a beautiful and engrossing work which brings together some classic Barnesian themes (love, identity), introduces some new ones (spirituality, guilt and innocence), and hangs them all on a real-life miscarriage of justice from 100 years ago that was always going to be a gift for the first writer to spot its potential for re-imagining.
Read Full Review
Atlantic Monthly Elizabeth Judd
Arthur & George succeeds as an effortlessly gripping detective novel, a stirring morality tale, and an inspired riff on the fault lines threatening the English and their centuries of unshakable self-regard.
Read Full Review
Christian Science Monitor Marjorie Kehe
This engaging tale is as pleasing a read as they come, and yet it is also the chance to admire the skillful work of a top contemporary novelist.
Read Full Review
The Onion A.V. Club Noel Murray
Barnes has a terrific story to tell, and he doesn't muck it up.
Read Full Review
Booklist Donna Seaman
Barnes turns this historically based tale of prejudice, malevolence, and madness versus honor, stoicism, and ingenuity into a brilliantly incisive and emotionally powerful inquiry into the nature of delusion and hope, perception and interpretation. [1 Jan 2006, p. 22]
Kirkus Reviews
[Barnes's] past novels have been praised for their brilliance but occasionally faulted for a dry style overburdened with detail. Here, with a mystery at the heart of the narrative, every detail is a potential, welcome clue. [1 Oct 2005, p. 1041]
Publishers Weekly
A triumph of storytelling. [7 Nov 2005, p. 47]
San Francisco Chronicle Heller McAlpin
Barnes' novel contains as many facets as a well-cut diamond.
Read Full Review
Salon Laura Miller
The mingling of a little detection into the literary author's work has produced his most substantial novel yet.
Read Full Review
New York Review Of Books John Lanchester
[Arthur & George] balances a certain formal tension... with a richer, three-dimensional fictional world; there is a great deal in it of factual interest, but this is blended with the fully imagined inner worlds of good fiction. It is not a playful book, but it is not without humor. Both its jokes and its sadnesses are earned.
Read Full Review
TLS: The Times Literary Supplement Jon Barnes
Julian Barnes has given us a quieter novel full of the unsatisfactory loose ends and petty injustices of real life, one that the placid, gentle George Edalji, turning the cream-coloured pages by the fireside, might have better appreciated and understood--and one by which he would have been thrilled and flattered and moved beyond words.
Read Full Review
Chicago Sun-Times Annie Tully
Anyone looking for a bit of Sherlockian adventure will be pleased with Barnes' tale as well.
Read Full Review
The Independent Andrew Taylor
For most of the time this beguiling and enormously readable novel seduces us into believing it all makes sense.
Read Full Review
London Review Of Books Theo Tait
The chances are that readers will be gripped, charmed and amused--but may feel a nagging "so what?"€™ loom as they near the end.
Read Full Review
Los Angeles Times Merle Rubin
Barnes' imaginative re-creation of Arthur's and George's life stories is a reminder that human vitality continues through literature. [15 Jan 2006]
The Economist
Julian Barnes's new novel is a departure. Don't expect a dance of ideas or a virtuosic concert of voices. Not that they're exactly missing, but there is less sparkle. Aptly so, perhaps. Of the book's two heroes, the more heroic is the one who loves railway timetables.
Read Full Review
Wall Street Journal John Freeman
"Arthur & George" accomplishes more than opening up the lives of two men drawn into a system's cruel machinery. The book shows how essential, and difficult, it is to imagine the pain that the law can inflict.
Read Full Review
The New York Times Book Review Terrence Rafferty
"Arthur and George" conceals its contemplation of the imponderables slyly, discreetly hiding it behind the curtains while scenes of Dickensian force and color play out in firelit rooms. Barnes narrates in a preternaturally calm, controlled third person, alternating skillfully between Arthur and George.
Read Full Review
Village Voice Alexis Soloski
As in previous books, Barnes negotiates the actual and the imagined effortlessly. And yet, there's a hollowness, or perhaps hermeticism, at the novel's core.
Read Full Review
The New York Times Michiko Kakutani
A serviceable but decidedly sluggish book.
Read Full Review
Boston Globe Gail Caldwell
The results are mostly admirable, as Barnes has created brilliantly intimate portraits of two men whose crossed paths will define them both. But perhaps because ''Arthur & George" is a piece of rich history transformed into fiction, it also suffers from its own excesses.
Read Full Review
The Guardian Natasha Walter
Although this novel is never less than intelligent, it is rarely much more than that either.
Read Full Review
The Spectator Sebastian Smee
The whole book is thoroughly involving and full of particulars. But somehow I came to the end of it feeling that some kind of clinching artifice--something beyond wonderful writing and great sensitivity that might have transformed the tale and lifted it onto the plane of art--had been approached but not quite achieved.
Read Full Review
The Nation Terry Eagleton
There is a great deal to be admired in this lucid, sophisticated narrative, but one can see why it didn't win the Man Booker Prize.
Read Full Review
Chicago Tribune Art Winslow
"Arthur & George" is not freehand fiction, since it is limited in ways by the historical record, and at times one feels Barnes' imaginative sense has been constrained by that too. [29 Jan 2006]
New York Observer David Thomson
What an ending there might be if Holmes himself, or Holmesian deductive lightning, were suddenly found to be crazed or wrong. But Julian Barnes dodges that moment in a book where he’s persuaded himself to sound like Dr. Watson. [16 Jan 2006, p. 21]
Daily Telegraph Lewis Jones
How can so light and playful a writer have written so dull a book? He might have had such fun. Instead, he plods through rough acres of exposition, editorialising humourlessly as he goes.
Read Full Review

What Our Users Said

Vote Now!The average user rating for this book is 8.2 (out of 10) based on 5 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

Peter J gave it a9:
Impeccably controlled, sweepingly thematic, moving, informative, and at times challenging and pacy. It takes a masterful writer to keep the readers' captivated attention whilst often skipping between two divergent characters, but Barnes achieves this perfectly, allowing for a crescent of thought-provoking comparisons between the eponymous two. Really got into the mind of Conan Doyle too, allowing, as another reader has commented, for a truly inspirational portrait. A thoroughly entertaining detective story, biographical exploration and philosophical musing on belief and truth.

Simon H gave it a9:
A great read - romance, philosophy and a great mystery; what more do you want for your money?

Tony A gave it a10:
A completely delightfull book. Engrossing, amusing, sad & thoughtful. I read this aloud to my wife and we both loved the story and the two protagonists. We laughed out loud often, but felt the sad struggles of the two men keenly.

Bill D gave it an8:
The book worked best for me as a revealing, inspirational portrait of a truly remarkable man -- Arthur Conan Doyle was much more than the creator of Sherlock Holmes. The story that contains the biographical information is interesting, but the author seems oddly detached from the material.

seamus m gave it a5:
I had to givr up reading this book after about 180 pages. A sluggish read with little excitement.

Discuss this book in our forums

Return to top of page
Home | FILM | DVD/VIDEO | MUSIC | GAMES | TV | Forums | About Metacritic metacritic.com

About CNET Networks | Jobs | Advertise | Partnerships                                Visit other CNET Networks sites:

Copyright ©2007 CNET Networks, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use