GAMES: GameSpot | GameFAQs MUSIC: Last.fm | MP3.com MOVIES: Metacritic | Movietome TV: TV.com
Home | About Metacritic | About Metascores | What's New | Wireless Versions | Discussion Forums | Advertising Inquiries | Contact Us | RSS
Metacritic.com: We Deal With Criticism
     Help
> Switch to Advanced Search  
Film Video/DVD Music Games TV

Books

All-Time High Scores
Best Of 2006
Best Of 2005
Best Of 2004
How Metascores Are Calculated
Discuss Books In Our Forums

 

Upcoming & Recent Releases

sort by name sort by score

 

Upcoming & Recent Releases

sort by name sort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed books.

 

 



Printer-Friendly Version Email This Page Discuss In Our Forums

Seeing
by Jose Saramago

Seeing reviews
Critic Score
Metascore: 74 Metascore out of 100
User Score  
8.6 out of 10
based on 18 reviews
read critic reviews
how did we calculate this?
based on 5 votes
read user comments
rate this book

The Portugese, Nobel Prize-winning author's latest satirical, fable-like novel is a sequel to his acclaimed work "Blindness." Set four years later, "Seeing" reveals what happens after national elections go awry when a majority of ballots are left blank.

Harcourt, 320 pages
04/10/2006
$25.00

ISBN: 0151012385

Fiction
General Literature & Fiction

NOTES:
Translated from the Portuguese by Margaret Jull Costa.

What The Critics Said

All reviews are classified as one of five grades: Outstanding (4 points), Favorable (3), Mixed (2), Unfavorable (1) and Terrible (0). To calculate the Metascore, we divide total points achieved by the total points possible (i.e., 4 x the number of reviews), with the resulting percentage (multiplied by 100) being the Metascore. Learn more...

The Guardian Ursula K Le Guin
Jose Saramago will be 84 this year. He has written a novel that says more about the days we are living in than any book I have read. He writes with wit, with heartbreaking dignity, and with the simplicity of a great artist in full control of his art. Let us listen to a true elder of our people, a man of tears, a man of wisdom.
Read Full Review
Salon Sarah Goldstein
Saramago... is a deliberate, attentive writer; he knows exactly what his words mean, and all of them--despite what he may have thought more than a half-century ago--are completely worthwhile.
Read Full Review
The Independent Julian Evans
Nothing I can remember reading tells me more, and with such arresting humour and simplicity, about the imposture of the times we live in.
Read Full Review
Kirkus Reviews
Very nearly equal to the magnificent Blindness: another invaluable gift from a matchless writer.
Read Full Review
Sydney Morning Herald Andrew Riemer
Many people will be offended, I think, by what Saramago has to say about our world. More, I hope, will find this black fable irresistible.
Read Full Review
TLS: The Times Literary Supplement Tim Souster
This provocative and sometimes frustrating book is not purely political; it is odder than any shout of anguish.
Read Full Review
Washington Post Gustavo Perez Firmat
Although Saramago's dense, garrulous prose -- masterfully rendered in Margaret Jull Costa's translation -- may not be to everyone's taste, the clarity and compassion of his vision make Seeing worthy of its name and its author.
Read Full Review
Library Journal Jack Shreve
Saramago's clear eye for acknowledging things as they are barrages us with valuable insights suggesting that the dynamics of human governance are not as rational as we like to think. [1 Apr 2006, p. 82]
The New Yorker
Initially, readers may miss the previous novel’s intensity of feeling, but this one’s lightness proves deceptive.
Read Full Review
Boston Globe Julia Ramey
The satisfaction of a Saramago novel, like that of life itself, is rarely a resolution to its central drama; it is the people and moments one enjoys along the way.
Read Full Review
Chicago Tribune Jack Fuller
[Jose Saramago]'s writing style can be off-putting at first, with run-on sentences that sometimes encompass all parts of a dialogue (with nary a quotation mark), parenthetical asides, overblown philosophical digressions and self-consciousness. But give it a chance. The stylistic idiosyncrasies fade as you get used to Saramago's rhythm and the odd quirks of the narrator, including his at-times-painful use of cliches. In effect, everything about this novel is postmodern, except its acute observation of human reality.
Read Full Review
Los Angeles Times Art Winslow
Though Saramago's allegory fits in a loose tradition of works from writers such as Coetzee and Orwell, it is heavily laced with humor as well, a lampoon reminiscent of politicized and slightly surreal tales as woven by the Albanian writer Ismail Kadare and the Uruguayan Eduardo Galeano. [9 Apr2006]
Slate Michael Wood
The tone of the work is strange; a kind of domesticated alienation effect, Brecht made bureaucratic. But the irony is too firm and funny, and the characters too engaged with their fates and those of others, for the work to feel abstract as we read it.
Read Full Review
The New York Times Book Review Terrence Rafferty
[Saramago] ends up with a much better book than he seems to have started out to write, but in the end "Seeing" is merely a sequel to a popular work--the sort of product that gives movie producers a bad name and does not generally win points for wisdom.
Read Full Review
New York Observer Chris Lehmann
At times, it gets away from him, and he succumbs to metafiction gimmicks like commenting on gaps in the narrative’s chronology and plausibility. But Seeing nonetheless builds into a compelling saga of state intrigue [24 Apr2006]
Daily Telegraph
[Seeing is] a rather basic novel, and seems casually done, and it's thoroughly Portuguese, but it does catch the universal human note.
Read Full Review
Publishers Weekly
The allegorical blindness/sight framework is weak and obvious, and Saramago's capital city sometimes reminds one of Dr. Seuss's Whoville. Yet it works.
Read Full Review
Entertainment Weekly Troy Patterson
There may be a political allegory in there somewhere, but the Portuguese Nobel winner's storytelling is so hazy that it's hard to see the point.
Read Full Review

What Our Users Said

Vote Now!The average user rating for this book is 8.6 (out of 10) based on 5 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

shana b gave it an8:
I loved this book but would have loved it less had I not read Blindness first. Blindness gets a 10. They are paired novels written years apart. Saramago takes getting used to--he writes in long long sentences that are more like paragraphs and there are very few paragraph ends. It just goes on. Once you get used to it, it's not a problem. I've read all of his novels translated into English and these two are the ones I bought to have in my bookcase because I will read them again. This is obviously not a review, just jotting down notes. Read reviews to get the plots.

Discuss this book in our forums

Return to top of page
Home | FILM | DVD/VIDEO | MUSIC | GAMES | TV | Forums | About Metacritic metacritic.com

Popular on CBS sites: iPhone 3G | Fantasy Football | Moneywatch | Antivirus Software | Recipes | E3 2009

About CBS Interactive | Jobs | Advertise

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use