All Critics

  • Movies
  • TV
view
per page

  1. Brooke Hauser

    Premiere
    2 Movies
    Average review score: 100

    On average, this critic grades
    40 points higher than other critics.

  2. Nancy DeWolf Smith

    Wall Street Journal
    1 Movie
    Average review score: 90

    On average, this critic grades
    30 points higher than other critics.

  3. Allison Benedikt

    Chicago Tribune
    1 Movie
    Average review score: 88

    On average, this critic grades
    28 points higher than other critics.

  4. Leah Greenblatt

    Entertainment Weekly
    2 Movies
    Average review score: 87

    On average, this critic grades
    27 points higher than other critics.

  5. Katie Walsh

    The Playlist
    23 Movies
    Average review score: 84

    On average, this critic grades
    24 points higher than other critics.

  6. Emma Bernstein

    The Playlist
    1 Movie
    Average review score: 83

    On average, this critic grades
    23 points higher than other critics.

  7. Nell Minow

    Chicago Sun-Times
    6 Movies
    Average review score: 81

    On average, this critic grades
    21 points higher than other critics.

  8. Jonathan Curiel

    San Francisco Chronicle
    91 Movies
    Average review score: 80

    On average, this critic grades
    20 points higher than other critics.

  9. Robert Lloyd

    Los Angeles Times
    1 Movie
    Average review score: 80

    On average, this critic grades
    20 points higher than other critics.

  10. Mary Corliss

    Time
    2 Movies
    Average review score: 80

    On average, this critic grades
    20 points higher than other critics.

  11. Roger Ebert

    RogerEbert.com
    11 Movies
    Average review score: 78

    On average, this critic grades
    18 points higher than other critics.

  12. Sheila O'Malley

    RogerEbert.com
    17 Movies
    Average review score: 78

    On average, this critic grades
    18 points higher than other critics.

  13. Calvin Wilson

    St. Louis Post-Dispatch
    130 Movies
    Average review score: 78

    On average, this critic grades
    18 points higher than other critics.

  14. Amanda May Meyncke

    Film.com
    6 Movies
    Average review score: 77

    On average, this critic grades
    18 points higher than other critics.

  15. Eric Kohn

    indieWIRE
    434 Movies
    Average review score: 77

    On average, this critic grades
    17 points higher than other critics.

  16. Christopher Bell

    The Playlist
    4 Movies
    Average review score: 77

    On average, this critic grades
    17 points higher than other critics.

  17. K.J. Doughton

    Film Threat
    22 Movies
    Average review score: 76

    On average, this critic grades
    17 points higher than other critics.

  18. Nicole Herrington

    The New York Times
    3 Movies
    Average review score: 76

    On average, this critic grades
    16 points higher than other critics.

  19. Matthew Leyland

    Total Film
    11 Movies
    Average review score: 76

    On average, this critic grades
    16 points higher than other critics.

  20. Brad Laidman

    Film Threat
    27 Movies
    Average review score: 75

    On average, this critic grades
    15 points higher than other critics.

  21. Howard Karren

    Premiere
    2 Movies
    Average review score: 75

    On average, this critic grades
    15 points higher than other critics.

  22. F. X. Feeney

    Mr. Showbiz
    20 Movies
    Average review score: 75

    On average, this critic grades
    15 points higher than other critics.

  23. Jim Emerson

    Chicago Sun-Times
    2 Movies
    Average review score: 75

    On average, this critic grades
    15 points higher than other critics.

  24. James Wegg

    Film Threat
    4 Movies
    Average review score: 75

    On average, this critic grades
    15 points higher than other critics.

  25. Brandon Harris

    The Playlist
    1 Movie
    Average review score: 75

    On average, this critic grades
    15 points higher than other critics.

  26. Gene Siskel

    Chicago Tribune
    86 Movies
    Average review score: 74

    On average, this critic grades
    14 points higher than other critics.

  27. Jay Boyar

    Orlando Sentinel
    10 Movies
    Average review score: 74

    On average, this critic grades
    14 points higher than other critics.

  28. Boyd van Hoeij

    The Hollywood Reporter
    19 Movies
    Average review score: 73

    On average, this critic grades
    13 points higher than other critics.

prev
Page:

Recent User Reviews

  1. cassidy233491 | 21 and Over
    Oct 16, 2013
    1
    I was recently persuaded by my four male roommates to watch the comedy film “21 & Over”. The movie did not have any well known actors; the thr three lead roles were Miles Teller, Skylar Astin, and Justin Chon. The focus of the movie was on three high school best friends that meet up at their friend Jeff’s college campus to celebrate his 21st birthday. The setting of the film is present day on a college campus, mostly during the night of Jeff’s birthday.
    The majority of the film consists of the three friends binge drinking on the night of one of the boy’s 21st birthday. The movie starts by two of the friends surprising Jeff on his doorstep to celebrate his birthday. Jeff is very hesitant to go out and celebrate because he has a medical school interview the following morning. After a lot of persuasion, Jeff finally agrees to go out for one drink. Of course, the next scene cuts to a very drunk Jeff who has clearly had more than one drink. The boys attend a number of bars and eventually Jeff throws up and passes out. His friends believe it is time to go home, but they realize they are not sure when their friends house is. The friends had met a pretty sorority girl at one of the bars earlier and they believe their only way of finding out where Jeff lives is to find her. The rest of the movie consists of the boys searching for their friends house to get him back home and rested before his big medical school interview in the morning.
    The acting in this movie was very poor. There was no surprise that the lead actors are not popular or found in many other movies. The characters did not portray their emotions in a way that allowed the audience to connect or understand, making it hard to believe the storyline. The monotone voices of the characters made it nearly impossible to have much interest or excitement about what was going on.
    The camera angles and shots were also poorly execute in this film. Most shots were eye level, completely disregarding any angled shots to get messages across. The only camera technique that was attempted was close up shots during scenes that were meant to be emotional or intimate. It seemed as though most of the shots used in the movie were only meant to show the audience a standard view; no messages were able to be portrayed or expressed through the shots in the film. Everything about the film was basic, and this included the filmmaking techniques. The target audience of this film is definitely a younger crowd of high school and college kids, so perhaps the directors believed they could get away with the poor filmmaking techniques.
    My overall reaction to the film was not a good one. The story line was something that has been done multiple times before. It seemed as though the director and screenwriters were desperately trying to be like successful comedies before them, such as “The Hangover”. There was nothing new or exciting about this movie. In addition to the poor and overused storyline, the acting was terrible. The interaction of the characters seemed forced and there was little believable emotion. Perhaps if the filming techniques were stronger the film could have been a little better, but even the camera shots, editing, and background music were also less than par. In addition to the poor filming, any female character in the movie was only talked about in a sexualized way; whether it was the boys trying to sleep with the sorority girl or them spanking other college girls, it was clear the boys viewed the girls only as sexual objects. It is also evident the target audience of the film is young men. There was nothing enjoyable about this “comedy” and I would not recommend seeing it. That was the last time I will take a movie suggestion from my roommates.    … Full Review »
  2. StaticSpine | The Jacket
    Oct 16, 2013
    8
    A good thriller with thick and depressive atmosphere with elements of science fiction, I'd say the atmosphere is the main advantage of the movie. The story is decent too, also the actors made a good job.… Full Review »
  3. joao1198pedro | Now You See Me
    Oct 16, 2013
    3
    this movie had great actors that I'm a fan and an interesting plot about magic, but the movie is very boring and is full of things quite annoying part until the end was good but the tail end collapsed the entire movie.… Full Review »
  4. joao1198pedro | Iron Man 3
    Oct 16, 2013
    5
    it is the biggest disappointment of a movie superheroes marvel,I can even have a little fun but still they do not take the film too seriously,too bad for marvel… Full Review »
  5. joao1198pedro | Iron Man
    Oct 16, 2013
    7
    a good movie that Marvel took advantage of a character who is not very dear public, is the second best movie marvel, they put the right person for the role of iron man (robert downey jr.).… Full Review »

Most talked about trailers

See all »
See all trailers »