Keith Staskiewicz, Entertainment Weekly
Select another critic »
For 29 reviews, this critic has graded:
-
55% higher than the average critic
-
6% same as the average critic
-
39% lower than the average critic
On average, this critic grades 4.1 points lower than other critics.
(0-100 point scale)
Keith Staskiewicz's Scores
- TV
| Average review score: | 59 |
|---|---|
| Highest review score: |
Critic Score
91
|
| Lowest review score: |
Critic Score
0
|
- By critic score
-
- Posted Jan 6, 2011
- Read full review
-
-
Keith Staskiewicz 91
While the show is not yet as boundary-pushing as Chappelle's, it is funny, and that should never be taken for granted.- Posted Jan 30, 2012
- Read full review
-
-
-
Keith Staskiewicz 83
Luther avoids some genre cliches--we know the killer's identity from the get-go, which sidesteps the time-stamp predictability of a Law & Order episode--but plunges headfirst into others. -
-
-
Keith Staskiewicz 83
This powerful documentary about the lingering effects of military conflict makes the point that PTSD existed long before we named it.Posted Dec 9, 2010 -
-
-
Keith Staskiewicz 83
Fishburne's gravitas helps do the Supreme Court justice...justice.- Posted Feb 23, 2011
- Read full review
-
-
- Posted Apr 2, 2012
- Read full review
-
-
Keith Staskiewicz 83
The pilot is promising, with sharp dialogue, a solid supporting cast, and Kaling's appealing unapologetic protagonist. [28 Sep 2012, p.64]Posted Sep 21, 2012 -
-
-
Keith Staskiewicz 75
A few key tweaks to the story and Joseph Fiennes' puckish interpretation of the king's right-hand sorcerer keep the legend from getting too stale- Posted Mar 28, 2011
- Read full review
-
-
-
Keith Staskiewicz 67
Suits follows a slick, big-time lawyer (Gabriel Macht) who hires a mnemonic genius without a law degree (Patrick J. Adams), and the rest is likely just what we can expect from every remaining episode: kinda fun, moderately enjoyable, and reassuringly unchanging.- Posted Jun 20, 2011
- Read full review
-
-
-
Keith Staskiewicz 67
A template house-party plot and goofy supporting characters end up steering it toward something more predicable. [20 Jan 2012, p.71]- Posted Jan 13, 2012
- Read full review
-
-
-
Keith Staskiewicz 58
Morgan plays two roles: a hilariously absurdist reconteur and a race-and gender-obsessed observational comic who seems to have wandered in from the mid-90s. Of course, it's the former that produces nearly all of the hour's belly laughs, but unfortunately it's the latter that spends most of the time at the mic. [12 Nov 2010, p.70]Posted Dec 10, 2010 -
-
-
Keith Staskiewicz 58
The complicated setup, the filmic style, the attempts of a laugh track all have you expecting more than the regular relationship cliches.- Posted Feb 1, 2011
- Read full review
-
-
-
Keith Staskiewicz 58
A lot like Shark tank but without the drama or the competitive spirit. [2 Sep 2011, p.68]- Posted Aug 26, 2011
- Read full review
-
-
-
Keith Staskiewicz 50
The pilot's simple conceit--avoid the dreaded office drug test--is padded with an almost endless amount of jokes involving bodily waste, genitalia, and more bodily waste. Which is fine by me, if only they didn't commit an unforgivable sin for a show about potheads: trying too hard.- Posted Apr 5, 2011
- Read full review
-
-
-
Keith Staskiewicz 50
It's a relatively interesting premise, but once the interrogations start, it turns silly very fast.Posted Jul 29, 2011 -
-
-
Keith Staskiewicz 50
While many from the original cast, including Jon Heder, lend their voices, the film's core of discomforting weirdness has been scrapped for cartoon zaniness.- Posted Jan 9, 2012
- Read full review
-
-
-
Keith Staskiewicz 50
[Mankind is] filled with overdone battle reenactments, unqualified celebrity talking heads, and slo-mo iron smelting set to electronic dance music.- Posted Nov 12, 2012
- Read full review
-
-
-
Keith Staskiewicz 42
Male characters are incompetent but lovable, and their wives nagging but wise, as if both groups had been snatched straight out of ads for beer and yogurt, respectively.- Posted Oct 17, 2011
- Read full review
-
-
-
Keith Staskiewicz 42
Obviously, he is supposed to be insufferable, but there's not enough else in the show to distract you from just how much you want to shove the tiny egomaniac into his Louis Vuitton lunch box.- Posted Oct 25, 2011
- Read full review
-
-
-
Keith Staskiewicz 33
An eventless, tedious, campaign-ad-bland Juneau Shore. [22 Jun 2012, p.54]Posted Jun 15, 2012 -
-
-
Keith Staskiewicz 16
The Shanna Moakler-fronted show is as shallow as a kiddie pool, and filled with as many whiny brats. [26 Nov 2010, p.68]Posted Dec 9, 2010 -
-
-
Keith Staskiewicz 0
The acting is stiff, the dialogue is atrocious, and after 10 minutes you'll want to take a long, hot shower.- Posted May 9, 2011
- Read full review
-