For 29 reviews, this critic has graded:
  • 55% higher than the average critic
  • 6% same as the average critic
  • 39% lower than the average critic
On average, this critic grades 4.1 points lower than other critics. (0-100 point scale)

Keith Staskiewicz's Scores

  • TV
Average review score: 59
Highest review score:
Critic Score 91
Lowest review score:
Score distribution:
  1. Positive: 14 out of 29
  2. Negative: 4 out of 29
29 tv reviews
    • Metascore: 54
    • Keith Staskiewicz 91
    This is one tasty meal.
    • Metascore: 74
    • Keith Staskiewicz 91
    While the show is not yet as boundary-pushing as Chappelle's, it is funny, and that should never be taken for granted.
    • Metascore: 82
    • Keith Staskiewicz 83
    Luther avoids some genre cliches--we know the killer's identity from the get-go, which sidesteps the time-stamp predictability of a Law & Order episode--but plunges headfirst into others.
    • Metascore: 82
    • Keith Staskiewicz 83
    This powerful documentary about the lingering effects of military conflict makes the point that PTSD existed long before we named it.
    • Metascore: 78
    • Keith Staskiewicz 83
    Fishburne's gravitas helps do the Supreme Court justice...justice.
    • Metascore: 50
    • Keith Staskiewicz 83
    It has sharp writing and endearing characters.
    • Metascore: 69
    • Keith Staskiewicz 83
    The pilot is promising, with sharp dialogue, a solid supporting cast, and Kaling's appealing unapologetic protagonist. [28 Sep 2012, p.64]
    • Metascore: 58
    • Keith Staskiewicz 75
    A few key tweaks to the story and Joseph Fiennes' puckish interpretation of the king's right-hand sorcerer keep the legend from getting too stale
    • Metascore: 60
    • Keith Staskiewicz 67
    Suits follows a slick, big-time lawyer (Gabriel Macht) who hires a mnemonic genius without a law degree (Patrick J. Adams), and the rest is likely just what we can expect from every remaining episode: kinda fun, moderately enjoyable, and reassuringly unchanging.
    • Metascore: 45
    • Keith Staskiewicz 67
    A template house-party plot and goofy supporting characters end up steering it toward something more predicable. [20 Jan 2012, p.71]
    • Metascore: 55
    • Keith Staskiewicz 58
    Morgan plays two roles: a hilariously absurdist reconteur and a race-and gender-obsessed observational comic who seems to have wandered in from the mid-90s. Of course, it's the former that produces nearly all of the hour's belly laughs, but unfortunately it's the latter that spends most of the time at the mic. [12 Nov 2010, p.70]
    • Metascore: 63
    • Keith Staskiewicz 58
    The complicated setup, the filmic style, the attempts of a laugh track all have you expecting more than the regular relationship cliches.
    • Metascore: 65
    • Keith Staskiewicz 58
    A lot like Shark tank but without the drama or the competitive spirit. [2 Sep 2011, p.68]
    • Metascore: 52
    • Keith Staskiewicz 50
    The pilot's simple conceit--avoid the dreaded office drug test--is padded with an almost endless amount of jokes involving bodily waste, genitalia, and more bodily waste. Which is fine by me, if only they didn't commit an unforgivable sin for a show about potheads: trying too hard.
    • Metascore: 56
    • Keith Staskiewicz 50
    It's a relatively interesting premise, but once the interrogations start, it turns silly very fast.
    • Metascore: 46
    • Keith Staskiewicz 50
    While many from the original cast, including Jon Heder, lend their voices, the film's core of discomforting weirdness has been scrapped for cartoon zaniness.
    • Metascore: 66
    • Keith Staskiewicz 50
    [Mankind is] filled with overdone battle reenactments, unqualified celebrity talking heads, and slo-mo iron smelting set to electronic dance music.
    • Metascore: 36
    • Keith Staskiewicz 42
    Male characters are incompetent but lovable, and their wives nagging but wise, as if both groups had been snatched straight out of ads for beer and yogurt, respectively.
    • Metascore: 39
    • Keith Staskiewicz 42
    Obviously, he is supposed to be insufferable, but there's not enough else in the show to distract you from just how much you want to shove the tiny egomaniac into his Louis Vuitton lunch box.
    • Metascore: 33
    • Keith Staskiewicz 33
    An eventless, tedious, campaign-ad-bland Juneau Shore. [22 Jun 2012, p.54]
    • Metascore: 21
    • Keith Staskiewicz 16
    The Shanna Moakler-fronted show is as shallow as a kiddie pool, and filled with as many whiny brats. [26 Nov 2010, p.68]
    • Metascore: 30
    • Keith Staskiewicz 0
    The acting is stiff, the dialogue is atrocious, and after 10 minutes you'll want to take a long, hot shower.