2014 Oscars: Full Winners List + Reviews of the Show

  • Publish Date: March 3, 2014
  • Comments: ↓ 5 user comments

Expect the expected

Films With Most 2014 Oscar Wins
1 Gravity 7 wins
2 12 Years a Slave 3 wins
  Dallas Buyers Club 3 wins

As predicted for months and by nearly everyone, 12 Years a Slave and Gravity were the big winners at the 86th Annual Academy Awards, held Sunday night in Hollywood. The former, capping an awards season in which it was honored more than any other film, took home best picture honors, while Gravity dominated the technical categories to lead all films this year with seven total Oscar wins. As a whole, the night was surprisingly free of surprises, with only the short film categories providing any sort of Oscar pool-busting suspense.

In a moment, we'll reveal how accurate the experts (and our own users) were in making their predictions prior to the ceremony, and we'll also sample the critical response to the broadcast and the performance of host Ellen DeGeneres. First, let's look at the awards themselves.

The winners and losers

Listed below are this year's winners in each of the 24 Academy Award categories, compared to the consensus predictions of industry experts (more on that below).

Category Predicted Winner Actual Winner
Best Picture y12 Years a Slave 12 Years a Slave
Director y Alfonso Cuarón
Alfonso Cuarón
Lead Actress y Cate Blanchett
Blue Jasmine
Cate Blanchett
Blue Jasmine
Lead Actor y Matthew McConaughey
Dallas Buyers Club
Matthew McConaughey
Dallas Buyers Club
Supporting Actress y Lupita Nyong'o
12 Years a Slave
Lupita Nyong'o
12 Years a Slave
Supporting Actor y Jared Leto
Dallas Buyers Club
Jared Leto
Dallas Buyers Club
Original Screenplay n Eric W Singer, David O. Russell
American Hustle
Spike Jonze
Adapted Screenplay y John Ridley
12 Years a Slave
John Ridley
12 Years a Slave
Animated Feature y Frozen Frozen
Animated Short n Get a Horse! Mr. Hublot
Documentary Feature y 20 Feet From Stardom 20 Feet From Stardom
Documentary Short y The Lady in Number 6 The Lady in Number 6
Foreign-Language Feature y The Great Beauty The Great Beauty
Live-Action Short n The Voorman Problem Helium
Original Score y Steven Price
Steven Price
Original Song y "Let It Go"
"Let It Go"
Cinematography y Emmanuel Lubezki
Emmanuel Lubezki
Costume Design y The Great Gatsby The Great Gatsby
Film Editing y Gravity Gravity
Makeup & Hairstyling y Dallas Buyers Club Dallas Buyers Club
Production Design y The Great Gatsby The Great Gatsby
Sound Editing y Gravity Gravity
Sound Mixing y Gravity Gravity
Visual Effects y Gravity Gravity

How accurate were the predictions?


As you can see above, the experts we surveyed last week performed almost flawlessly as a group, with their consensus picks proving to be correct in 21 of the 24 (88%) Oscar categories. (Two of those wrong predictions were in the short film categories, and the third was in a category where experts were almost evenly divided, with many actually picking the ultimate winner.) Last year, by comparison, the experts made just 17 correct predictions. Out of the over 60 experts we surveyed, the most accurate were:

  • Dave Karger (Fandango) and Peter Travers (Rolling Stone), each with 22 of 24 correct
  • Thelma Adams (Yahoo), Brad Brevet (Rope of Silicon), Kyle Buchanan (Vulture), Gregory Ellwood (HitFix), Peter Hartlaub (San Francisco Chronicle), Tim Hayne (Moviefone), Tariq Khan (Fox News), Mary Milliken (Reuters), Elizabeth Weitzman (NY Daily News), and Glenn Whipp (Los Angeles Times), each with 21 of 24 correct

At the other end of the spectrum, the least accurate experts (among those making picks in all 24 categories) were:

  • Richard Brody (The New Yorker) and Joe Neumaier (NY Daily News), each with 15 correct guesses out of 24

Metacritic users

As a group, Metacritic users were almost as accurate as the experts, correctly predicting 20 of the 24 (83%) categories. That's a huge improvement over last year, when users had just 15 of 24 picks correct. The most accurate of the over 3,500 Metacritic users submitting picks this year were:

  • 1 anonymous user (we'll just call her "Adele Dazim"), with a perfect 24 of 24 score
  • Jacek Kopański, Ryan McDermond, and another anonymous user, with 23 of 24 correct

How was the telecast?

Last night's broadcast was again produced by Craig Zadan and Neil Meron, returning from the widely panned 2013 show. And while this year's telecast didn't quite reach the depths of its predecessor—thanks mainly to critics finding Ellen DeGeneres more suited to the task of hosting than Seth MacFarlane—it also won't go down as a memorable entry in Oscars history. Below are some of the comments from TV critics' morning-after reviews; click any link to read the full review.

AP Frazier Moore

It had its high moments and a bare minimum of deficits. ... DeGeneres did what any host should do: Stay involved and make sure everyone has fun.

Boston Globe Sarah Rodman

As is typical, the show ran long but that didn't inspire anyone in the production to edit out any of the elements of bloat.

Contra Costa Times Chuck Barney

Ellen DeGeneres was clearly in her comfort zone as Oscar host Sunday night ... Not everything worked, of course, but overall, it was a winning stint.

The Daily Beast Marlow Stern

The '14 Oscars were actually quite good. In fact, they were better than good. They were excellent, and the best they've been in a decade.

Deadline Lisa de Moraes

When tonight's disjointed show finally ended ... DeGeneres had reminded us she's likeable as all get out, but her improvised bits did not work so well – Amy Poehler and Tina Fey did it much better at the Golden Globes.

Denver Post Joanne Ostrow

The show's sum total was underwhelming.

HitFix Alan Sepinwall

It was a long, disjointed ceremony, and what was fun and likely to endure came entirely from the winners and their speeches.

The Hollywood Reporter Tim Goodman

As a television event, this year's Oscars was more like an endurance test. It was a turgid affair, badly directed, poorly produced and featuring an endless string of either tired or wince-inducing moments by DeGeneres, who, by the last 30 or so minutes, seemed to have given up entirely.

Los Angeles Times Mary McNamara

Watching DeGeneres wander through the audience to pat "Marty" and "Brad" on the shoulder or hand Jennifer Lawrence and Bradley Cooper pieces of pizza was not as hilarious as many people clearly thought it would be. ... The silver lining, or if you're feeling generous, the intent of DeGeneres' low-key-to-the-point-of-flatlining performance was that it provided a backdrop against which the winners, and the musical nominees, could shine.

New York Daily News David Hinckley

DeGeneres took comfort-hosting a step further by repeatedly sacrificing humor for camaraderie.

The New Yorker Richard Brody

I don’t entirely blame Ellen DeGeneres for the course of the evening. I don’t know enough about the parcelling-out of power backstage to know how guided or vetted she was by the producers—whether the writers were hers or imposed upon her. But, having accepted the job, she seems, at the very least, to have accepted the regulations, and she toed the line with a dutiful eagerness in a desperate cause; she worked hard to maintain a show of good cheer and good times while being denied the free-wheeling disinhibition that goes with real comedy. It was mainly the undue exertions that came through.

Newsday Verne Gay

After 86 years, the Oscars has lost its youthful spark because youthful sparks only seem to get it in trouble; it's Woody Grant, stumbling his way toward Lincoln, Neb., a little bit dazed and a little bit confused in the modern world of annual TV awards presentations, where even the Tonys have more life force.

People Tom Gliatto

The Academy needs to keep Ellen DeGeneres on the short list of stars who really know how to manage this glamorous beast.

Pittsburgh Post-Gazette Rob Owen

Funny but not too mean, willing to joke at the expense of big-name stars but rarely crude, Ms. DeGeneres brought predictable respectability to Sunday's 86th Academy Awards. Too bad this particular brand of predictable respectability was a bore.

Slate Willa Paskin

After the opening monologue, Ellen spent too much time in the audience, often doing a whole lot of nothing: saying hi to famous people, copping their chairs, asking for money. These bits were dull and baggy, as was the show in general.

The Telegraph David Gritten

It may sound like damning with faint praise, but this was certainly the best Oscar telecast in the past four years.

Time James Poniewozik

It was not very risk-taking or memorable, and I'd have a hard time coming up with a line from the host you're likely to remember and quote in years to come, or maybe even tomorrow.

TV Guide Matt Roush

DeGeneres was a friendly, funny and refreshingly grounded host in a classy, though typically overstuffed and overlong, ceremony distinguished by some memorably moving speeches.

USA Today Robert Bianco

Choose a better host, you get a better show. Choose a really good host, as DeGeneres proved to be Sunday, and you get the best Oscar broadcast since, well, the last time she hosted.

Vanity Fair Richard Lawson

Injecting her usually sunny, amiable humor with a curious strain of sarcasm, DeGeneres certainly earned some laughs, but the show was decidedly less goofy and big-hearted than it's been in other years.

Variety Brian Lowry

All told, it was a ho-hum evening, but not an embarrassing one – a long sit, punctuated by occasional moments, and genuine suspense regarding the eventual coronation of "12 Years a Slave." And if that sounds like a small victory, in Oscar terms, it's the equivalent of defying gravity.

Vulture Matt Zoller Seitz

The Academy Awards telecast was too long. It didn't spend its time wisely. The repartee was weak. There were too many montages and too many moments where the stars, the host included, seemed full of themselves. And it was still awesome. Why? Probably because the Oscars telecast is by its nature un-screw-upable.

Washington Post Hank Stuever

By reverting to basic awards-show conviviality and glamour, the show got slightly more classy, but it also overindulged in its reverential Hollywood worship — weighing down the first half with meaningless clip montages, telling us about budding filmmaker awards and taking care of other industry-supporting business that the Academy likes to conduct but nobody likes to watch. ... At 3 1/2 hours, the show ran about as long as usual; it just seemed much longer.

The Wrap Tim Molloy

The Oscars had too many long stretches of oddly paired stars asked to read dull introductions.

What do you think?

Were you happy with the winners? What did you think of the telecast, and DeGeneres as the host? Let us know in the comments section below.

Comments (5)

  • DanBurrito  

    I really think Monsters University should have at least gotten nominated for the Best animated feature Oscar. I know Frozen was obviously going to win from the second the reviews poured in but MU deserved a nomination. And "Happy" should have won Best original song. Oh well. At least Ellen was a good host.

  • lanpenge  

    Ellen did great as a host! I didn't find this prestigious gathering boring at all. www.pengepungen.dk

  • fnnelson  

    Well said, Toecutter.

  • Toecutter71  

    Gravity, i will say just this...before 20 years movie like Gravity wouldn't get half Oscar...i really can not see where in which sections of movie expression lies the value and "greatness" of the Graaavity( like was pronounced by one of main scientist in the world which field of research is the Gravity like main force of universe which is known to human kind) , I'd really like to hear an explanation of any members of the film academy , Sandra Bullock, who is one of the most charming women acting phenomenon of she's generation, lost in this movie all of she's acting charm and acting identity , Sandra is obviously very poorly advised ,that this could be "D" movie , the movie which can successfully make a change in direction of she's acting career , to movies that seek " deeper exploration of own acting abilities, Gravity for sure isn't "D movie", it maybe was look like during the script reading, because of his chamber atmosphere ," Or maybe motive for bunch of oscars no.. i must not even think that can be one big reason.that in the light of political events and crises around Ukraine , Russia , which is the umpteenth time the movie "main culprit" for the chaos in an ordered universe , and the AFA decided that an excess act of patriotism in shape of backfilling the movie whit oscar's and defamation of Russia will be warmly appreciated by almighty's,(in reality still the only way to get to the iSS is by Russian missiles) but this movie is not about any kind of reality, he present fictional near future in which poor Cloony (which acting career is obviously in deep crisis) essentially acting role of Captain America in middle age with perhaps less power but because vast experience, which he ordered that the death is dignified as Doc Holliday, whistle his favorite song, riding gamma rays at sunset on Neptune, and Dr.she.leave impression of person which actually adore Actress Sandra Bullock and she deepest secret was that she always want to be like Sandra Bullock in she's charming movies....isn't that little odd.
    Than again all that is just one more in row fact about how deep is hollywood deviation.. much worse than that was case whit creativity crisis from middle of 40's until on the scene was become pleyade of young , brave and full of emotional energy people, for which door was open by Sam Peckinpah, Arthur Pen and few others
    GRAVITY zero points

  • LamontRaymond  

    Adele Dazim! Hilarious..... John Travolta is genius, and that user is really freakin' smart.

What Our Users Are Talking About

  1. /feature/music-releases-for-week-of-february-13-2017 Image
    Music Monday (2/13): This Week's New Albums + Videos
    February 13, 2017 - 2 comments
    1. JasonDietz : @michaeln: It should come out sometime this year, though there's still no firm date. He reportedly finished recording... Read »
    2. michaeln : What ever happened to that LP that Beck said would launch soon after his last one? Read »
  2. /feature/game-publisher-rankings-for-2016-releases Image
    Metacritic's 7th Annual Game Publisher Rankings
    February 13, 2017 - 4 comments
    1. LamontRaymond : @SilexEco - which is why they call it a "Publisher Ranking" - Sony is a publisher..... Next stop, rocket science. Read »
    2. SilexEco : Electronic Arts?????? Sony???? Sony has been never created any game, only their second/third-parties. Go home... Read »
    3. Twarone : As usual, quite an interesting list. A couple of suggestions to make things bit more fair (that actually wouldn't... Read »
    4. TheRealBryan : Damn EA winning was quite a shock. Read »
  3. /feature/predict-2017-oscar-winners Image
    Make Your 2017 Oscar Predictions!
    February 1, 2017 - 4 comments
    1. 3-16-2016 : The Witch (2016) for Best Picture of ALL TIME!! Read »
    2. Abdoolblyat : The Witch (2016) for Best Picture of ALL TIME!! Read »
    3. getwiththetimes : The Witch (2016) for Best Picture of ALL TIME!! Read »
  4. /feature/game-publisher-rankings-for-2015-releases Image
    Metacritic's 6th Annual Game Publisher Rankings
    February 4, 2016 - 5 comments
    1. alvargon : ¿Where is CD Project Red? Read »