Movies
Weekend Box Office
Film Awards & Top 10s By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
Best / Worst of the Decade
Wide Releases
Now In Theaters
49
2012
41
Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel
84
Avatar![]()
69
Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans
53
Blind Side
53
Book of Eli, The
55
Christmas Carol, A
57
Daybreakers
43
Dear John
27
Did You Hear About the Morgans?
55
Edge of Darkness
45
Extraordinary Measures
83
Fantastic Mr. Fox![]()
42
From Paris with Love
65
Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus, The
74
Invictus
57
It's Complicated
34
Law Abiding Citizen
33
Leap Year
33
Legion
42
Lovely Bones, The
54
Men Who Stare At Goats, The
34
Ninja Assassin
19
Old Dogs
xx
Percy Jackson & The Olympians: The Lightning Thief
39
Planet 51
79
Precious: Based on the Novel by Sapphire
73
Princess & the Frog, The
64
Road, The
57
Sherlock Holmes
27
Spy Next Door, The
36
Tooth Fairy
44
Twilight Saga: New Moon, The
83
Up in the Air![]()
xx
Valentine's Day
25
When in Rome
71
Where the Wild Things Are
xx
WolfMan, The
63
Youth in Revolt
Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.
Limited Releases
Now In Theaters
46
44 Inch Chest
83
Ajami![]()
73
Amreeka
xx
Barefoot to Timbuktu
19
Bitch Slap
24
Boondock Saints II: All Saints Day, The
76
Broken Embraces
64
Cloud 9
65
Coco Before Chanel
84
Cove, The![]()
84
Crazy Heart![]()
21
Crazy on the Outside
48
Creation
xx
Daddy Long Legs
81
Damned United, The![]()
68
Departures
62
District 13: Ultimatum
85
Education, An![]()
71
Eyes Wide Open
24
Falling Awake
81
Fish Tank![]()
56
For My Father
xx
From Mexico with Love
43
Frozen
68
Girl on the Train, The
52
Killing Kasztner
74
Last Station, The
43
Little Traitor, The
51
Loss of a Teardrop Diamond, The
73
Me and Orson Welles
76
Messenger, The
57
Missing Person, The
67
Most Dangerous Man in America: Daniel Ellsberg and the Pentagon Papers, The
xx
My Name is Khan
49
Nine
63
North Face
xx
October Country
67
Off and Running
52
Paranoids, The
49
Pop Star on Ice
49
Private Lives of Pippa Lee, The
xx
Promised Lands (Re-release)
69
Red Riding Trilogy, The
29
Saint John of Las Vegas
69
September Issue, The
36
Serious Moonlight
63
Shinjuku Incident, The
77
Single Man, A
xx
Still Bill
76
Terribly Happy
74
That Evening Sun
19
To Save a Life
68
Town Called Panic, A
59
Until the Light Takes Us
xx
Videocracy
65
Waiting for Armageddon
82
White Ribbon![]()
43
Women in Trouble
xx
Word is Out
64
Young Victoria, The
Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.
28 Days Later...
EMAILPRINTFox Searchlight Pictures

Generally favorable reviews
Based on 39 critic reviews
How did we calculate this?
Based on 160 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie >
Movie Info
Genre(s): Suspense/Thriller
Written by: Alex Garland
Directed by: Danny Boyle
Release Date:
Theatrical: June 27, 2003
DVD: October 21, 2003
Running Time: 112 minutes, Color
Origin: Netherlands / UK / USA
Summary
RATING: R for strong violence and gore, language and nudity
Starring Alex Palmer, Bindu De Stoppani, Jukka Hiltunen, David Schneider, Cillian Murphy, Toby Sedgwick, Naomie Harris, and Noah Huntley
When a group of animal rights activists frees primates from a research facility, a deadly virus which causes murderous behavior is unleashed.
Also On Metacritic
FILM: 28 Weeks Later... A Life Less Ordinary Millions Shallow Grave Sunshine The Beach Trainspotting
Also On The Web: Internet Movie Database View The Trailer Official Studio Site
What The Critics Said
All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...
Slate David Edelstein
This is finally the zombie flick as cautionary political tale, and as humanist parable. It's not the flesh-gouging zombie we have to worry about, the filmmakers suggest, but the soul-gouging zombie within.
Read Full Review >New York Magazine Peter Rainer
A first-rate zombie movie. The best tribute I can offer is that it makes you want to go out directly afterward and down some expensive single-malt scotch.
Read Full Review >Los Angeles Times Manohla Dargis
At once an old-fashioned freakout and an environmental cautionary tale (mess with Mother Nature and she'll mess with you right back), the film combines two genre standbys -- lethal contagion and the undead -- and gives them a wicked, contemporary spin.
Read Full Review >Wall Street Journal Joe Morgenstern
Rarely has so scary a thriller been so well made, and never has digital video -- by the English cinematographer Anthony Dod Mantle -- been put to grittier use.
Baltimore Sun Chris Kaltenbach
It's a zombie flick that moves -- no stumbling, staggering living dead here -- in an atmosphere that feels like a Gothic docudrama, and it's freaky beyond all reason.
Read Full Review >Premiere Glenn Kenny
The genuine article, a hard-core horror picture from start to finish... Prepare to get seriously stresed.
Read Full Review >Miami Herald Rene Rodriguez
But this smart, genuinely creepy movie also feels real, which is why its horrors hit so hard. Fans of the scary stuff, run, don't walk.
Read Full Review >New York Post Megan Lehmann
In place of elaborate sets, clever filmmaking gives the impression of a central London emptied of people and cars, to eerie effect - and this opening reel is nothing short of magnificent.
Read Full Review >Rolling Stone Peter Travers
Boyle and screenwriter Alex Garland plumb the violence of the mind with slashing wit and shocking gravity. Happy nightmares.
Read Full Review >Portland Oregonian Shawn Levy
Cinematographer Anthony Dod Mantle, a veteran of low-tech Dogme films, work wonders with a digital camera, pausing to take in the beauty of the countryside or an eerily empty London It's virtuosic without ever quite being showy.
Read Full Review >Entertainment Weekly Owen Gleiberman
A swankily austere piece of jeepers-creepers sci-fi.
Read Full Review >Chicago Reader Jonathan Rosenbaum
Fresh and edgy; the images of a wasted London and the details of a paramilitary organization in the countryside are both creepy and persuasive.
Read Full Review >Dallas Observer Luke Y. Thompson
The deep thematic concerns are never fully developed, but the characters are, and the story compels. Also, the movie's pretty scary.
Read Full Review >Time Richard Corliss
Boyle's ingenuity with the camera gives this fraught journey plenty of menace and pizazz.
Read Full Review >LA Weekly John Powers
The movie is mercifully uncontaminated by the smarty-pants self-reflexiveness that has sucked the lifeblood from nearly all post-"Scream" horror pictures. Clever enough not to be too clever, Boyle and Garland play their story straight -- they just want to give you the creeps -- and, by so doing, bring the undead back to cinematic life.
Read Full Review >The New York Times Dana Stevens
Mr. Boyle has hardly lost his sly, provocative perversity or his ear for the rhythms of unchecked violence, but he does seem to be maturing. It's as if, in contemplating the annihilation of the human race, he has discovered his inner humanist.
Read Full Review >Village Voice Michael Atkinson
On one hand a seat-o'-pants digital-video quickie designed for blunt trauma, and on the other a veritable index of classic genre-stuff, Boyle's film creates an acute sense of movie-viewing danger.
Read Full Review >Austin Chronicle Kimberley Jones
Theres gore, all right, although the real terror lies in the tease, and the often dark, herky-jerky DV format ratchets up the tension to an almost unbearable degree.
Read Full Review >The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Rick Groen
Around about the third act, the picture does what no self-respecting virus ever would -- relents, turns confused, and lets our immune system fight back with thoughts of its own, with distracting cavils about the logic of the plot and the slightness of the themes.
Read Full Review >USA Today Claudia Puig
The look of the film, shot on digital video, is haunting and gritty. The cleaner, prettier look of 35mm would have detracted from the immediacy and sense of foreboding created in this artful blend of sci-fi and pseudo-realism.
Read Full Review >Boston Globe Ty Burr
A damn-near great end-of-the-world zombie movie, terrifying on the basic heebie-jeebie level, respectful toward its B-movie forebears, and all the more unnerving for coming out in this fretful era of SARS and germ warfare.
Read Full Review >Seattle Post-Intelligencer William Arnold
Boyle gives us some truly harrowing sequences and a succession of images that stick in the mind like a bad dream.
Read Full Review >ReelViews James Berardinelli
Solid performances, an intelligent script, and sure-handed direction. The result is a movie that kept me involved from start to finish.
Read Full Review >Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert
A tough, smart, ingenious movie that leads its characters into situations where everything depends on their (and our) understanding of human nature.
Read Full Review >San Francisco Chronicle Mick LaSalle
By the finish, the movie is getting by on little but adrenaline and audience goodwill. Still, that goodwill runs fairly deep, because, taken all in all, 28 Days Later is a superior motion picture.
Read Full Review >Christian Science Monitor David Sterritt
It's not a pretty picture, but it won't be soon forgotten by thriller fans with nerves and stomachs steely enough to take its violence in stride.
Read Full Review >Film Threat Rick Kisonak
Manages to be impressively unsettling given the flaws in its foundation.
Read Full Review >TV Guide Maitland McDonagh
Heir to a long tradition of apocalyptic scare stories, the film wears its influences proudly.
Read Full Review >Variety Derek Elley
Shows a rather arrogant disdain for its audience in between occasional flashes of flair.
Read Full Review >Salon.com Andrew O'Hehir
It's undoubtedly a canny and clever twist on the standard zombie-attack yarn, but anybody who's making grand claims for 28 Days Later simply hasn't seen enough horror movies.
Read Full Review >New York Daily News Jack Mathews
[Boyle] shrugs off any intellectual pretense to rollick in a dead-on scare fest. On that level, 28 Days Later is indeed a frightfully good time.
Read Full Review >Charlotte Observer Lawrence Toppman
I think Garland and Boyle just want to make our flesh creep by showing someone else's flesh decaying. If that's their aim, they achieved it.
Read Full Review >Film Threat Rich Cline
Director Danny Boyle ("Trainspotting") has a terrific eye, so the film as a whole is very well directed, with clever camera work that builds the tension and actually jolts us out of our seats a few times.
Read Full Review >The Onion (A.V. Club) Nathan Rabin
Like his makeshift societies, Garland's tantalizing set-ups tend to unravel in unsatisfying ways.
Read Full Review >Washington Post Desson Thomson
Creepy and truly suspenseful in some places, unintentionally comic or plain awful in others.
Read Full Review >Chicago Tribune Michael Wilmington
Boyle's new movie is mostly a zombie fiasco, closer to the vacuities of "The Beach" than the scintillating social satire of "Trainspotting."
Read Full Review >The New Yorker Anthony Lane
There are two drawbacks here. One is a shortage of superior zombies, although where one goes to rent extra zombies I have no idea...Second, we have a serious shortage of fright. [30 June 2003, p. 102]
Washington Post Ann Hornaday
Unrelentingly grim, unremittingly gross and unforgivably unattractive, 28 Days Later is an orgy of troubling images and bestial sound effects.
Read Full Review >What Our Users Said
The average user rating for this movie is 6.8 (out of 10) based on 160 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.
[Anonymous] gave it a5:
Unlike the vast number of 28 Days fans who completely underrated 28 Weeks Later for its "gaping plot holes, poor sense of direction, and unbelievable plot", I'm not going to bash 28 Days. I am going to dispel the idea that the concept for this film is original, however...Okay, so for a FILM 28 days later is an original concept, but Capcom already had the umbrella virus years before this ever showed up. It's not original. Fact. Deal with it. My biggest problem with 28 days isn't its lack of originality though, it's the lack of 'purpose'. The characters' really don't seem to have any specific goals or aspirations, they're just meandering through a post-apocalyptic setting for most of the film before the director finally decides to turn things around an hour and a half later (yes, when the survivors pick up the military's radio signal). After that, the film has some pretty interesting and unique twists, but that's also about right where it ends. I don't think this is an inherently better film than 28 Weeks later just because it had a low budget. I'm not an elitist hack who thinks that sequels are inherently inferior either. I actually felt that Days was uninteresting throughout most of its length before things finally began to pick up at the finale. At the finale, it was 'too little, too late'... A good horror movie, but not a good movie. 28 Weeks Later was both.
Mike D. gave it a0:
28 months after I watched this movie and I still think it's the worst movie of the last century. Not only is it boring but it lacks all horror/suspense. Do not watch. Save yourself the time.
Edgar M. gave it a4:
Just another way to do a zombie movie. In this version a virus escapes because of a raid by PETA type activists on a research facility in the UK. Apparently the virus causes those who are infected to fly into a rage and dismember the first person they see. Sound familiar? Somehow, they attack only uninfected humans, not each other. But humankind may be safe after all since not one infected person strays beyond the UK so the world is safe from Perfidious Albion's latest blunder. Nothing really connects. It's just another freak show with a happy ending, i.e., the lovers survive and the bad guys are all gone.
[Anonymous] gave it a4:
This is a good zombie flick because it takes itself seriously. This is a bad film because it takes itself too seriously. Whilst a believeable post-apocalyptic setting would be intereting, it is just a little bit hard to believe in the hectic machinations in the plot. Also, the anti-military undertone is quite inappropriate - an asect which is exacerbated in the sequel [you think the zombies are bad, but hey! at least they're not soldiers!]
Jeff C. gave it a0:
People who direct music videos shouldn't direct movies.
Michael R gave it a5:
Its passable.You're not missing anything horrifying if you don't see this movie.Its nowhere near as great as dawn of the dead which this movie seems to resemble only it has less zombies and a different ending.
Chase G. gave it a10:
To me, what Days has always held over the head of Weeks is simply this...mood. 28 Days Later has an unparalleled mood and style in its execution, in almost everything it does. It doesn't just describe events to you, like some movies do, but it portrays it in such a way that it's genuinely chilling and believable. In comparison to Weeks, Days doesn't hold what it has over you like a bludgeon, it doesn't attempt to beat you with the speed of the zombies, or the gore. But it places it in supreme positions in the film to have the utmost effect, at the climax, at the low-point, etc. And the best part about it, is that it manages to achieve a constant level of edginess, a constant thrill even when there's nothing on the screen, it manages all of this without a guitar-blasting soundtrack (however awesome the Weeks theme is) or cameras explicitly showing that zombies are just running at you, spewing blood as they go. In fact, you are often scared in this movie simply by the fact that you don't really see what's scaring you, which is a true sign of mastery in the genre. On the other end of the spectrum, all performances in this film are excellent, the chemistry between Seline and Jim is believable especially. All characters have an edge of sympathy, and portray to you that not everyone to survive the apocalypse will be beefy, bulky men with chain guns. It defies a lot of things that would be expected of it, and ditches all normal conventions, pulling it off with grace and poise. It's a must see for anyone who can stand the level of intensity. It's a must see for anyone who can stand the.
