|
Upcoming Release Calendar
27
Babylon A.D. Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.
85
Alexandra Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.
|
9 Songs
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
||||||||||||
MPAA RATING: Not Rated
Starring Kieran O'Brien, Margo Stilley, Black Rebel Motorcycle Club, The Dandy Warhols, Elbow, Franz Ferdinand, Michael Nyman, Primal Scream, Super Furry Animals, and The Von Bondies
Matt, a young glaciologist, soars across the vast, silent, icebound immensities of the South Pole as he recalls his love affair with Lisa. They meet at a mobbed rock concert in a vast music hall -- London's Brixton Academy. They are in bed at night’s end. Together, over a period of several months, they pursue a mutual sexual passion whose inevitable stages (familiar to anyone who's ever been in love) unfold in counterpoint to the nine live-concert songs of the story's title. (Tartan Films)
| GENRE(S): | Drama | Foreign | Musical | Romance |
| WRITTEN BY: | Michael Winterbottom |
| DIRECTED BY: | Michael Winterbottom |
| RELEASE DATE: |
DVD: November 22, 2005 Theatrical: July 22, 2005 |
| RUNNING TIME: | 71 minutes, Color |
| ORIGIN: | UK |
Also known as "Nine Songs"; Best Cinematography, 2004 San Sebastián International Film Festival
All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...
The average user rating for this movie is 5.8 (out of 10) based on 19 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.
Tim e gave it an8:
If you like porn you'll love this. This is full on sex. Even Skinamax has their limits.
Bill K. gave it a1:
BORING. To address Laura's point, I think the critics DID understand that, but a good filmmaker would've done it better, and had a story to go with it. It's just tedious. There is no plot here. They go to the club, they have sex. Repeat over and over for 69 minutes. The sex scenes won't offend you, just put you to sleep. I gave it a 1 for the live music.
Laura U. gave it an8:
The film is surprisingly bleak - it reflects so well the emptiness of a relationship where the partners are so intimately acquainted with each other's bodies but are not interested in getting to know each other as people. We are given a touching depiction of a barren relationship, and it is only a pity that so many critics failed to see that. If Winterbottom had decided to give us a picture of a rounded relationship, the film probably could not have examined the sexual aspects so deeply without being so long it was really tedious. And one has to ask whether Stilley would have been able to carry it off, whereas she was obviously capable of having sex with enthusiasm. I just wish I could still do it so well - or that I still looked as good!
Ken B. gave it a7:
The plot was uninspiring but the sex, although casual, was an example for all to imitate - gentle and loving. But what pleased me was that the female actor was depicted as explicitly as the male. Too many films, such as Catherine Breillat's "Anatomy of Hell" treat the female lead with a defference not given to the male. For example - the notice upfront in "Anatomy of Hell" that the female lead's body was not exposed in the film - the female body exposed was that of a stand-in. Yet the male leads genitals were not only explicity shown but were shown erect.
zabriskie j. gave it a6:
Empty for the sake of emptiness, which is such a rare pleasure in the realm of obsolete meaningfulness.
Whezz gave it a0:
This film is a vile, nausiating and contrived piece of trash ever translated to celluloid. It is void of character development, decent screenplay and acting. This seems to be nothing but a copy of 'Intimacy' another poor British effort. They both appear to be testing the limits of how much errect penis and penetration you are now allowed to show at the local cinema! This film comes in at 67 minutes. I mean if you are trying to make a serious film about character development and hoping for an audience empathy with the characters this is no where enough time. Also parts if this film are filled with live scenes from the Brixton Accademy. Why? What relevance does this have to a film about character development and relationships? Nothing, the films only objective is to make money for the bands featured and the controversy caused by the explicit and grim sex scenes. This films predictable screenplay can be described very simply. 1. Rock gig 2. Sex 3. Arguement....and repeat until all bands have been exhausted. A load of utter tripe that I had to endure for my film studies course and I left feeling nausous and wondering why it was ever made.
Jonathan H. gave it a10:
Any movie which tries to show sex the way it is deserves a 10 in my book. I live in a part of the US (Utah) where many sexually repressed (& therefore abused & damaged & deranged) people live - where many people like who hate their own bodies & the sexual parts of their natures. I grew up in the culture hear which fears & loathes sex & true honest naked human bodies. When I was growing up I hated & resented the sexual feelings I started to have. Now as a mature adult who's rejected the abusive repressive culture of his youth, I am very pleased and honored that Salt Lake City is as of today one of the places which is showing this film in the US. I commend the film makers for trying to portray sex the way it is - in a way far better than the fakey nonsense of Hollywood, and in a better way than the fakey nonsense of the crass forms of "porn." I know that that porn was a term created by people who didn't like the wall paintings at Pompeii, and I think that non-fakey non-coercive "porn" is highly useful, but fakey porn which has moans and other accouterments which are fake isn't useful. I think we need more portrayals of true human sexuality. It’s not all that flashy. It’s not fake & restful either. It’s just plain old wonderful sex. In “9 Songs” one type of sex is shown - the type where the female prefers that the male leave his condom on long term. But the couple is young, and 20 something young adults rightly play the field, and that’s good. Anyway, one local represse-culture-advocating newspaper in Salt Lake referred to this film as a type of “porn.” I would say that it’s not, any more than getting up in the morning and taking a shower, or seeing yourself naked in the mirror, or even your masturbating or having sex is “porn.” A far better term is >life<. Sex is part of life. To the repressed repressing people I say: Get used to it! Learn to love it!

| Return to top of page |

Popular on CBS sites: Fantasy Football | Miley Cyrus | MLB | iPhone 3G | GPS | Recipes | Shwayze | NFL
About CNET Networks | Jobs | Advertise
© 2008 CNET Networks, Inc., a CBS Company. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use