Advanced Search >
Help Me Search

Movies

Weekend Box Office
Film Awards & Top 10s By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
Best / Worst of the Decade

Wide Releases
Now In Theaters

sort by namesort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

Limited Releases
Now In Theaters

sort by namesort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

Harold & Kumar Escape from Guantanamo Bay

EMAILPRINTNew Line Cinema

Harold & Kumar Escape from Guantanamo Bay reviews
57
6.5 User Score:

Mixed or average reviews

Based on 27 critic reviews
How did we calculate this?

Based on 82 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie >

Movie Info

Genre(s): Adventure  |  Comedy

Written by: Jon Hurwitz
Hayden Schlossberg

Directed by: Jon Hurwitz
Hayden Schlossberg

Release Date:
Theatrical: April 25, 2008
DVD: July 29, 2008

Running Time: 102 minutes, Color

Origin: USA

Summary

RATING: R for strong crude and sexual content, graphic nudity, pervasive language and drug use

Starring John Cho, Kal Penn, Rob Corddry, Roger Bart, and Neil Patrick Harris

Harold and Kumar Escape From Guantanamo Bay marks the triumphant return of these two hilarious, slacker anti-heroes. Their last adventure found them traveling across country to find a White Castle hamburger in order to satisfy a weed-induced case of "the munchies." This time, the boys get themselves in trouble trying to sneak a bong on board a flight to Amsterdam. Now, being suspected of terrorism, they are forced to run from the law and try to find a way to prove their innocence. What follows is an irreverent and epic journey of deep thoughts, deeper inhaling and a wild trip around the world that is as "un-PC" as it gets. (New Line Cinema)

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

78

Austin Chronicle Josh Rosenblatt

Anyone can come up with jokes about incestuous rednecks or pubic hair that "looks like Osama bin Laden's beard," but it takes guts to make a comedy in which the Indian-American hero accuses an African-American TSA agent of racial profiling, all so he won't get caught smuggling weed onto a plane.

Read Full Review >
75

The Onion (A.V. Club) Scott Tobias

The big payoff, of course, is Neil Patrick Harris reprising his role as "Neil Patrick Harris."

Read Full Review >
75

Philadelphia Inquirer Steven Rea

It's not exactly high art, but it's certainly high.

Read Full Review >
75

Premiere Jenni Miller

At the screening I attended, someone walked in wearing a shirt that read "I HEART BONGS," so that gives you a pretty good idea of the target audience. Maybe this time they will rouse themselves from the couch and make it possible for us to follow Harold and Kumar through more adventures.

Read Full Review >
70

The New York Times A.O. Scott

Precisely because their attitudes are so bluntly hedonistic and apolitical, Harold and Kumar manage to be fairly persuasive when they get around to criticizing the status quo, which the movie has the wit to acknowledge itself as part of.

Read Full Review >
70

Variety Joe Leydon

An over-the-top and beyond-PC comedy that sometimes deftly, sometimes slapdashedly infuses party-hearty anarchy with hectoring moral outrage.

Read Full Review >
70

The New Yorker David Denby

They are Abbott & Costello with dirty mouths--indomitable, ungovernable, and possibly immortal.

Read Full Review >
70

Film Threat Pete Vonder Haar

Honestly, the most shocking thing put forth in Harold and Kumar Escape from Guantanamo Bay just might be the proposition that George W. Bush is actually a pretty cool guy.

Read Full Review >
70

Salon.com Stephanie Zacharek

That rare sequel that builds on the movie that came before it without crushing its attributes to death. "Escape" doesn't feel belabored. Giddy, freewheeling and sweet-natured, it pulls off the effect of seeming spontaneous, a tall task by itself.

Read Full Review >
70

Time Richard Corliss

Harold and Kumar are pothead patriots in the first feel-good torture film.

Read Full Review >
67

Entertainment Weekly Owen Gleiberman

Harold and Kumar, fortunately, never lose their verbally relentless way of delivering raunch as pure common sense.

Read Full Review >
63

TV Guide Maitland McDonagh

If only the wit weren't overwhelmed by lame jokes about body parts, functions and fluids.

Read Full Review >
63

USA Today Claudia Puig

Mostly, Harold is a guilty pleasure that retains the anarchic charms of the original.

Read Full Review >
63

ReelViews James Berardinelli

The movie is unpolished, unabashedly un-PC, and takes on as many "sacred cows" as it can uncover in a slightly-too-long 105 minutes.

Read Full Review >
63

The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Liam Lacey

No political tract, but it can be surprisingly bold.

Read Full Review >
60

Chicago Reader J.R. Jones

The jokes all revolve around weed, stereotypes, and Neil Patrick Harris; the stereotype stuff is by far the funniest.

Read Full Review >
50

New York Post Lou Lumenick

Among the variations of gags from the original are a threesome involving Harold, Kumar and a giant bag of marijuana.

Read Full Review >
50

Boston Globe Wesley Morris

Is a truly political stoner movie even possible? The entire point of getting high is to take some of the sting out of life. The movie goes after easy targets and goes soft on the harder issues.

Read Full Review >
50

Christian Science Monitor Peter Rainer

It exploits post-9/11 anxieties as fodder for goofball gooniness. "Dr. Strangelove" it's not.

Read Full Review >
50

The Hollywood Reporter John DeFore

Lacks the fresh charm that made their first such an unexpected (if guilty) pleasure.

Read Full Review >
50

Dallas Observer Robert Wilonsky

Mostly dumb, no matter how desperately and even valiantly it aims for "thinky."

Read Full Review >
50

Charlotte Observer Lawrence Toppman

It can devote itself entirely to bodily functions or, having established its grossness quotient, take the high road toward satire like its 2004 predecessor, "Harold & Kumar Go to White Castle." It fails mainly because it does neither.

Read Full Review >
50

Chicago Tribune Michael Phillips

You find yourself smiling at some of the bits, wincing through many, many others, and ultimately wondering if the pacing would've improved had either H or K developed a terrible cocaine habit.

Read Full Review >
42

Seattle Post-Intelligencer William Arnold

The movie is sporadically funny in an anarchistic way. But Cho and Penn don't have the needed personality or comic identity to sustain a franchise and their non-drug humor is so crude and scatological that -- to say the least -- it leaves a very bad taste in the mouth.

Read Full Review >
40

New York Daily News Joe Neumaier

It's a big fat missed opportunity.

Read Full Review >
40

Slate Dana Stevens

It betrays the spirit of the stoner comedy, which has traditionally been subversive--when it wasn't detailing the love affair between two marginally functional young men and their stash of sweet, sweet herb.

Read Full Review >
30

Village Voice J. Hoberman

A largely mind-numbing experience.

Read Full Review >

What Our Users Said

The average user rating for this movie is 6.5 (out of 10) based on 82 User Votes

Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

Daniel V. gave it a6:
I was disappointed with how this movie differs from the original. There were funny moments, but overall, it was bland. The guy second in command of homeland security was hilarious, though. And, had he not been included in this film, I do not think it would have been so funny. (The ghetto seen was also very funny). So, if you have seen the first one, and have not gotten a chance to see this one, you are not missing out.

Beth C. gave it a3:
I surprisingly enjoyed the first one and thought that any film that had the guts to call itself, "Escape from Guantanamo Bay" would have some good political satire. I was very disappointed. The film really has very little to do with Gitmo and the characters leave Cuba almost immediately (losing an opportunity for culture clash humor). Instead, there is lots of adolescent gross out humor. The Homeland Security Officer is way too broad to be really funny, although there is a good scene where his assistant attempts to speak to Harold's parents in Korean (and they answer in English). I gave up on the video at the halfway point.

Dan C gave it a3:
Where the original was fresh, funny, and clever, the sequel is anything but. The reliance on pathetic and not-funny toilet humor is sad and off-putting. The misogyny is in full bloom, and not in a funny or clever way. Glimpses of what the movie could have been come from the hilarious scenes with Neil Patrick Harris, proving once again that he belongs in a class by himself, and the good-natured final montage in Amsterdam. The final montage captures all the goofy and sweet comedic energy that this movie could have had, but totally missed. A major disappointment.

Carl W gave it a10:
Absolutely hilarious! I am in the 30-45 demographic and loved it. Sure a lot of the jokes are cheap toilet humour but there was a lot more to the movie than that. I give the movie a 10 even though there were some parts I didn't like because it was just so funny, clever and well directed. Rober Corddry as the Homeland Security Officer is pure gold. Seriously anyone who disliked this movie and I can see that a few people gave it a zero, should take a long hard look at themselves.

Paul F. gave it an8:
Basically much more funny than I thought it would be. I thought it was just going to be a big underlining political statement. There were a couple of priceless scenes, especially the ones with George W. Bush and Dougie Howser (Neil Patrick Harris). Though a bit formulalic (saw the first one after seeing this one) I really hope the make a third one. Harold and Kumar go together like Cheech and Chong but better as their personalities are distinctive from one another. In any case I highly recommend this movie but not for those who do not like crude humor as this definitely has its share. The movie does not depend on it but simply uses all mediums at it disposal.

Joe S. gave it a0:
We loved the first one. This one is awful. Explicit nudity and excessive crudity substitute for clever humor. What a disappointment!

e c gave it a6:
Joe A. used the term "anti-racist" for someone who makes fun of white people. ummm, last time i checked, that's just "racist." there's no "reverse-racism" or "anti-racism" . . . the definition of racism is: racial prejudice or discrimination. if you are an African-American and you hate whites, you are racist. if you are white and you hate African-Americans, you are racist. sorry, that comment just bothered me a lot.

Read more user comments >

Popular on CBS sites: College Signing Day | Olympics | Lost | iPhone | Cell Phones | Video Game Reviews | Free Music

About CBS Interactive | Jobs | Advertise

© 2010 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy (UPDATED) | Terms of Use