CNET Networks Entertainment GameSpot | GameFAQs | SportsGamer | Metacritic | MP3.com | TV.com
Home | About Metacritic | About Metascores | What's New | Wireless Versions | Discussion Forums | Advertising Inquiries | Contact Us | RSS
Metacritic.com: We Deal With Criticism
     Help
> Switch to Advanced Search  
Film Video/DVD Music Games TV

Film

Upcoming Release Calendar
Weekend Box Office
Film Awards & Top 10s By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
How Metascores Are Calculated
Discuss Film In Our Forums

 

Wide Releases

sort by name sort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

 

Limited Releases

sort by name sort by score

97 4 Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days
83 Alexandra
43 Anamorph
35 Babysitters, The
32 Backseat
80 Band's Visit, The
62 Battle for Haditha
47 Bella
63 Blind Mountain
71 Blindsight
47 Boarding Gate
60 Body of War
58 Bra Boys
70 Caramel
54 Cashback
44 Chaos Theory
32 Chapter 27
69 Chicago 10
82 Chop Shop
46 CJ7
78 Counterfeiters, The
30 Cover
49 Dark Matter
35 Deal
62 Dhamma Brothers, The
92 Diving Bell and the Butterfly, The
73 Duchess of Langeais, The
20 Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed
58 Fall, The
43 Favor, The
58 First Saturday in May, The
57 Flawless
87 Flight of the Red Balloon, The
xx From Within
44 Frontier(s)
57 Fugitive Pieces
41 Funny Games
66 George A. Romero's Diary of the Dead
61 Girls Rock!
55 Glass: A Portrait of Philip in Twelve Parts
57 Grand, The
58 Hats Off
68 Honeydripper
xx Jack and Jill vs. the World
67 Jellyfish
xx Kiss the Bride
37 Life Before Her Eyes, The
72 Life of Reilly, The
50 Look
65 Married Life
35 Meet Bill
63 Miss Pettigrew Lives for a Day
55 Mister Lonely
52 My Blueberry Nights
71 My Brother Is an Only Child
55 Noise
62 OSS 117: Cairo - Nest of Spies
83 Paranoid Park
55 Pathology
48 Penelope
90 Persepolis
62 Planet B-Boy
xx Plumm Summer, A
67 Praying with Lior
46 Previous Engagement, A
72 Priceless
17 Prom Night
69 Redbelt
79 Reprise
72 Roman de gare
48 Run, Fat Boy, Run
50 Sangre de mi sangre
85 Savages, The
24 Sex and Death 101
66 Shelter
75 Shotgun Stories
40 Sleepwalking
67 Snow Angels
67 Son of Rambow
71 Standard Operating Procedure
76 Stuff and Dough
64 Surfwise
xx Tashan
82 Taxi to the Dark Side
57 Teeth
56 Then She Found Me
55 Tracey Fragments, The
57 Turn the River
72 Tuya's Marriage
83 U2 3D
59 Under the Same Moon
76 Unforeseen, The
66 Unsettled
90 Up the Yangtze
55 Vice
79 Visitor, The
64 Water Lilies
45 Where in the World Is Osama Bin Laden?
57 Without the King
75 Witnesses, The
63 XXY
67 Year My Parents Went on Vacation, The
75 Young@Heart
45 Zombie Strippers

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

 



Printer-Friendly Version Email This Page Discuss In Our Forums

Alexander
Warner Bros.

Alexander reviews
Critic Score
Metascore: 39 Metascore out of 100
User Score  
4.4 out of 10
based on 42 reviews
Read critic reviews
How did we calculate this?
based on 140 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie

MPAA RATING: R for violence and some sexuality/nudity

Starring Colin Farrell, Angelina Jolie, Val Kilmer, Anthony Hopkins, Jared Leto, Rosario Dawson, Christopher Plummer, and Jonathan Rhys-Meyers

Based on the true story of one of history's most luminous and influential leaders, Alexander takes a bold, honest look at Alexander's life and his relationships. (Warner Bros.)


GENRE(S): Adventure  |  Drama  |  War  
WRITTEN BY: Oliver Stone
Christopher Kyle
Laeta Kalogridis
 
DIRECTED BY: Oliver Stone  
RELEASE DATE: DVD: August 2, 2005 
Theatrical: November 24, 2004 
RUNNING TIME: 173 minutes, Color 
ORIGIN: USA / UK / Germany / Netherlands 

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

88
Chicago Tribune Michael Wilmington
Vast, riveting, madly audacious movie biography.
Read Full Review
83
Seattle Post-Intelligencer William Arnold
It's boldly acted, absorbing and satisfying as a history lesson and chock-full of extravagantly brutal battle sequences.
Read Full Review
80
Empire Ian Nathan
Unwieldy and flawed, but Stone remains a tornado in an era of airless formula and -- to paraphrase our Ptolemy -- its failings are greater than most films’ successes.
Read Full Review
70
Los Angeles Times Kenneth Turan
If, as the Virgil quote that starts the film claims, fortune favors the bold, Alexander has not been nearly bold enough.
Read Full Review
70
New York Magazine Ken Tucker
As one of the few movies around not pushing state-of-the-art animation or Jude Law, Alexander is a damn good date movie.
Read Full Review
70
Time Richard Corliss
Makes for a long, lumpy trip with a charismatic guide and some brilliant detours.
Read Full Review
63
Boston Globe Wesley Morris
The best there is to say is that it's better than ''Troy."
Read Full Review
63
Miami Herald Rene Rodriguez
What Alexander lacks in narrative clarity, it makes up for with pomp and pageantry.
Read Full Review
60
Dallas Observer Gregory Weinkauf
The creators of Alexander set out to make an epic, and they can't be faulted for the many elements that succeed on this scale; what's unfortunate is that they don't quite deliver a camp classic.
Read Full Review
60
The Hollywood Reporter Kirk Honeycutt
Since the movie lacks a vision of what Alexander was really about as a man and a figure in history, it falls back all too frequently on movie spectacle.
Read Full Review
50
Variety Todd McCarthy
At best an honorable failure, an intelligent and ambitious picture that crucially lacks dramatic flair and emotional involvement.
Read Full Review
50
Newsweek David Ansen
Sometimes stunning, ultimately stupefying epic .
Read Full Review
50
ReelViews James Berardinelli
By de-mythologizing Alexander, Stone has turned him into an unbelievable individual. We accept great deeds from great people, not from sniveling whiners.
Read Full Review
50
LA Weekly Scott Foundas
What Stone has delivered instead is no folie de grandeur, but rather the last thing one would have expected from him: an honorable failure.
Read Full Review
50
Chicago Reader J.R. Jones
Despite a three-hour running time Stone is too occupied with psychodrama to explore Alexander's innovations in battle, and Farrell, clearly out of his depth, seems less a leader of men than a Hellenistic James Dean.
Read Full Review
50
Slate David Edelstein
Forget Alexander: The film is a pedestal to Angelina the great.
Read Full Review
50
Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert
[Stone] gives us provocative notes and sketches but not a final draft. The film doesn't feel at ease with itself. It says too much, and yet leaves too much unsaid.
Read Full Review
50
The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Rick Groen
Call it "Alexander the Grate," because, over the marathon of its three-hour running time, this wonky epic really does get on your nerves.
Read Full Review
50
New York Daily News Jack Mathews
Farrell plays all this as if he means it, but he seems slight in the role and without great physical presence. In a scene in which Alexander is roaring at his troops to rouse them to battle, he sounds like Mighty Mouse pretending to be Superman.
Read Full Review
42
Entertainment Weekly Owen Gleiberman
An exhausted epic, one that Stone has directed with an almost startling lack of personality or vision.
Read Full Review
40
TV Guide Ken Fox
There are two stunning battle sequences, and that rose-tinted bloodbath is a stroke of the eccentric genius for which Stone is famous.
Read Full Review
40
Washington Post Desson Thomson
Enjoyable in some places, but dreadful in others. It's boring here and exciting there. And it's almost always goofy.
Read Full Review
40
Salon.com Stephanie Zacharek
Never have a great historical hero's accomplishments seemed so inconsequential, or so damned hard to figure out.
Read Full Review
40
The New Yorker Anthony Lane
The happy couple (Farrell/Dawson) do enjoy one great scene together, and it's the high point of the movie-a naked tussle, in which she puts a knife to his throat. The whole sequence is quick, funny, and arousing, in sharp contrast to the rest of Alexander, which is sluggish, unsmiling.
Read Full Review
38
USA Today Mike Clark
A movie that has neither dramatic focus nor a single memorable performance, aside from one or two that are memorable for the wrong reasons?
Read Full Review
38
New York Post Lou Lumenick
As huge a travesty and a bore as 1956's "Alexander the Great," in which Richard Burton looked equally uncomfortable as a blond.
Read Full Review
38
Premiere Peter Debruge
An ambitious disaster, Alexander is the rare historical portrait that leaves you feeling as though you know less about its subject than you did upon entering the theater.
Read Full Review
33
Portland Oregonian Shawn Levy
A dreary, overlong and occasionally laughable classical epic about the great Macedonian world conqueror, it's guilty of a sin that no Stone film has ever committed: It's boring.
Read Full Review
30
The New Republic Stanley Kauffmann
After the three hours--though it seemed longer--I was still bewildered. Stone is a unique and fiery talent. Why did he make this film?
Read Full Review
30
The Onion (A.V. Club) Scott Tobias
Stone has made an excruciating disaster for the ages.
Read Full Review
30
The New York Times Manohla Dargis
This is the costliest, most logistically complex feature of the filmmaker's career, and it appears that the effort to wrangle so many beasts, from elephants to movie stars and money men, along with the headaches that come with sweeping period films, got the better of him.
Read Full Review
30
Village Voice Michael Atkinson
Although inexplicable brogues and burrs appear and disappear, and although Stone post-produces the dickens of his movie trying to generate the maximum spit-fog of sound and fury, Alexander manages to be as dull as the Victor Mature films of the 1950s, which barely moved at all.
Read Full Review
30
Washington Post Stephen Hunter
Like every other second of more than 10,000 seconds in Alexander, it doesn't engage in the least.
Read Full Review
30
Film Threat Merle Bertrand
A movie celebrating the life of the greatest military conqueror the world has ever known should feature a bit more conquering.
Read Full Review
30
Wall Street Journal Joe Morgenstern
There's no zest to the general depravity, no coherence to the script or the spectacle -- clarity is missing in some of the camera work -- and, most important, no character to give a Greek fig about.
25
Christian Science Monitor David Sterritt
It's astounding that the ingenious creator of "JFK" and "Wall Street" could make an epic on war and empire that's so utterly simplistic and unreflective.
Read Full Review
25
San Francisco Chronicle Mick LaSalle
Stone tries to make us like Alexander because he's good, when he should have made us want to watch Alexander because he's amazing.
Read Full Review
25
Philadelphia Inquirer Carrie Rickey
Both the sex and the battle sequences here look like football plays drawn by an NFL coach and shot by the wide receiver's mother. Usually, even when I don't like a Stone film I admire its frenzied energy, but the editing here is as lethargic as the compositions are perfunctory.
Read Full Review
25
Rolling Stone Peter Travers
Alexander breaks the key rule that makes movies move: Show, don't tell.
Read Full Review
25
Baltimore Sun Michael Sragow
The movie is a monument to egomania - and I don't mean Alexander's.
Read Full Review
25
Charlotte Observer Lawrence Toppman
This movie is an act of hubris so huge that, in Alexander's time, it would draw lightning bolts from contemptuous gods. Today it will get sniggers from stunned critics and a collective yawn from a public unlikely to share Stone's egomania.
Read Full Review
11
Austin Chronicle Marc Savlov
It is, in a word, boring, and that's the most un-Oliver Stone adjective I can think of.
Read Full Review

What Our Users Said

Vote Now!The average user rating for this movie is 4.4 (out of 10) based on 140 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

[Anonymous] gave it a6:
If this movie was confusing you obviously don't appreciate history enough to seen nor is it the care or you just weren't paying attention. This movie was not the best I have ever seen nor is it the worst. Alexander is bold and I appreciate it. And to say that the boys are "a little on the thin side and would not have stood at battle" is bias and idiotic.

Tom I. gave it a0:
Very disappointing film. Tried to be an epic but was confusing. Poor acting, the battle scenes were awful. The narration was poor and confused. The 8 year flash back scene was in the wrong place.The camera shots while in a battle scene were too close to actors and you lost all perspective. The story lingered too long on the homosexual side of his life. The fighters were not plausible as they were generally slim boys with makeup and would not have stood up in a battle. See Gladiator if you wish to see how battle scenes should be shot. Don't waste your money by going to see would be my advice.

Tom V. gave it a1:
Unmitigated dreck. Audience, what was left after the first 2 hours, had to be put on suicide watch.

M Kha gave it a0:
Worst ever. I haven't seen any demonstration of Alexander's "greatness"!! Talking about conquering Tyre and Egypt? Did I miss Part I of the movie or am I supposed to take it for granted that he's great by acting like a foolish drunk 99% of the time!

Jessi H. gave it a9:
I loved it. To fully appreciate this, you need to enjoy history, have an open mind, and actually be able to *pay* *attention* to what the 'characters' are saying. Alexander did a *lot,* and Stone is trying to include as much as he can, coherently, to give us the best picture all around of who Alexander really was. And I think that for the most part he did a really good job of acheiving this. I don't care how they marketed the film. I do, however, think that they should have gotten linguistic coaches for their actors in major roles - you cannot have what sounds like a Scottish Crateros, an Irish Alexander, etc. - it takes the viewers out of the movie enough for them to have to tell themselves to ignore that element (and can annoy many people throughout). I really enjoyed this; but I also happen to be the kind of person that loves long movies, enjoys history, has an open mind, and pays attention to what's being said and not said by the characters.

Eduardo R. gave it a10:
A brilliant film. Epic and well made.

Anders H. gave it a0:
A small baby could have played Alexanders just as good as Colin Farrel. Angelina Jolie's looks is the only positive thing about this movie.

Read more user comments...

Discuss this movie in our forums

Return to top of page
Home | FILM | DVD/VIDEO | MUSIC | GAMES | TV | Forums | About Metacritic metacritic.com

About CNET Networks | Jobs | Advertise | Partnerships                                Visit other CNET Networks sites:

Copyright ©2007 CNET Networks, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use