Advanced Search >
Help Me Search

Movies

Weekend Box Office
Film Awards & Top 10s By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
Best / Worst of the Decade

Wide Releases
Now In Theaters

sort by namesort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

Limited Releases
Now In Theaters

sort by namesort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

Antichrist

EMAILPRINTIFC Films

Antichrist reviews
49
6.9 User Score:

Mixed or average reviews

Based on 34 critic reviews
How did we calculate this?

Based on 25 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie >

Movie Info

Genre(s): Drama  |  Horror

Written by: Anders Thomas Jensen

Directed by: Lars von Trier

Release Date:
Theatrical: October 23, 2009

Running Time: 109 minutes, Color | Black and White

Origin: USA

Language(s): Denmark | Germany | France | Sweden | Italy | Poland

Summary

RATING: Not Rated

Starring Willem Dafoe, and Charlotte Gainsbourg

Lars Von Trier is back with the beautiful, terrifying, and altogether engrossing Antichrist. The talk of 2009 Cannes Film Festival, where star Charlotte Gainsbourg took home the award for Best Actress, the full, unedited version of this eagerly-awaited film promises to captivate audiences this fall. A grieving couple retreat to ’Eden’, their isolated cabin in the woods, where they hope to repair their broken hearts and troubled marriage. But nature takes its course and things go from bad to worse. (IFC Films)

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

89

Austin Chronicle Marc Savlov

Possibly the best argument against couples therapy ever, Antichrist is a tour-de-force trip inside the mind of a dangerously depressed man. That man is Danish filmmaker von Trier, and he has gone on record as having conceived and executed Antichrist in the wake of a deep depression.

Read Full Review >
88

New York Post V.A. Musetto

Very few actors would have the courage to allow von Trier to put them through what Dafoe and Gainsbourg experienced in the name of art.

Read Full Review >
88

Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert

More than anything else, I responded to the performances. Feature films may be fiction, but they are certainly documentaries showing actors in front of a camera. Both Dafoe and Gainsbourg have been risk takers, as anyone working with von Trier must be. The ways they're called upon to act in this film are extraordinary. They respond without hesitation. More important, they convince.

Read Full Review >
88

Boston Globe Ty Burr

Like a nightmare you recall during waking hours, and then only in its vast outlines, Antichrist has the power to haunt beyond words. For better and for worse, it is exactly the movie von Trier wanted to make and a piece of staggeringly pure cinema.

Read Full Review >
88

Chicago Tribune Michael Phillips

I’m inclined to agree with a colleague who told me he could swing with Antichrist when it was simply unstable but couldn’t go with it when it turned insane.

Read Full Review >
83

The Onion (A.V. Club) Noel Murray

Antichrist is a boldly personal film, tossing all von Trier’s ideas about faith, fear, and human nature into an unfettered phantasmagoria, full of repulsive visions and fierce scorn. It’s also the most lush-looking movie von Trier has made in about 20 years.

Read Full Review >
80

Salon.com Andrew O'Hehir

Taken as a whole, Antichrist is a gorgeous, mesmerizing construction, and almost every one of its frames shimmers with demented, imaginary life... It offers more proof, if we need any, that von Trier is one of the most accomplished cinema artists of our time, and also perhaps the most deeply trapped in his own head.

Read Full Review >
80

Empire Kim Newman

A star rating is not much help, since von Trier’s self-conscious arrogance is calculated to split audiences into extremist factions, but Antichrist delivers enough beauty, terror and wonder to qualify as the strangest and most original horror movie of the year.

Read Full Review >
70

Chicago Reader J.R. Jones

I can’t deny this is filled with powerfully primal images, but at least one of them--an eviscerated fox that bellows at Dafoe, “Chaos reigns!”­--made me burst out laughing.

Read Full Review >
70

Wall Street Journal Joe Morgenstern

By turns repellent, powerful and ludicrous, Antichrist piles horror on horror with pitiless passion.

Read Full Review >
67

Portland Oregonian Shawn Levy

There’s a lot of hate in this film. But a lot of talent, too. It borders on despicable, but you can’t ignore it.

Read Full Review >
63

St. Louis Post-Dispatch Calvin Wilson

Tests the loyalty of fans that may expect his work to be extreme, but not to such an extent.

Read Full Review >
63

ReelViews James Berardinelli

Bottom line: Do I recommend Antichrist? Tough to do, but tough not to. For those who are intrigued by the controversy, it may be worth the sacrifice, if only so you can evaluate it from a position of knowledge.

Read Full Review >
60

The Hollywood Reporter Peter Brunette

Visually gorgeous to a fault and teeming with grandiose if often fascinating ideas that overwhelm the modest story that serves as their vehicle, this may be the least artistically successful film von Trier has ever made.

Read Full Review >
60

NPR Mark Jenkins

For a hymn to panic and hostility, the movie is curiously artful. But only the most sympathetic viewers will find that its poetry outweighs its belligerence.

Read Full Review >
50

San Francisco Chronicle Mick LaSalle

For 70 minutes, Antichrist is a rare exploration of pain, featuring two actors collaborating with each other in agonizing and intimate ways. It also contains some of the best work Gainsbourg has ever done on screen. And then - if I put it more gently I wouldn't really be saying it - director Lars von Trier loses his mind.

Read Full Review >
50

Washington Post Ann Hornaday

Antichrist finally embodies the contradiction of von Trier: He's a gifted, even visionary, artist mired in his own pulp pretentiousness.

Read Full Review >
50

The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Liam Lacey

The trouble is that Antichrist feels progressively symptomatic of a director losing heart.

Read Full Review >
50

Rolling Stone Peter Travers

Depending on your reaction to the cinematic outrages perpetrated by Danish director Lars von Trier (remember Dogville?), you might want to add or subtract two stars from the halfway (half-assed?) rating I just gave Antichrist.

Read Full Review >
50

The New Yorker Anthony Lane

It would be a shock if Antichrist had turned out to be anything but shocking.

Read Full Review >
50

Entertainment Weekly Owen Gleiberman

The trouble is, it's all too exhibitionistic to ring true. The impotent folly of Antichrist is that von Trier has made it his mission to shock the bourgeoisie in an era when they can no longer be shocked.

Read Full Review >
40

Village Voice J. Hoberman

Antichrist, which, above all, wants to make pain visceral, is less successful at projecting authentic experience--the shock tactics are ultimately numbing.

Read Full Review >
40

Arizona Republic Bill Goodykoontz

Trouble is, it all adds up to . . . not much.

Read Full Review >
33

Christian Science Monitor Peter Rainer

Allegorical in the worst ways, Antichrist is about as profound as a slasher movie.

Read Full Review >
30

New York Magazine David Edelstein

Von Trier has said he wanted to make a genre horror picture, but he couldn’t even come up with a decent metaphor: The climax is out of a Grade C hack-’em-up with people chasing each other through the woods with axes and knives.

Read Full Review >
30

The New York Times A.O. Scott

The scandal of Antichrist is not that it is grisly or upsetting but that it is so ponderous, so conceptually thin and so dull.

Read Full Review >
30

Variety Todd McCarthy

Lars von Trier cuts a big fat art-film fart with Antichrist. As if deliberately courting critical abuse, the Danish bad boy densely packs this theological-psychological horror opus with grotesque, self-consciously provocative images.

Read Full Review >
25

USA Today Claudia Puig

Antichrist is probably the most disturbing, bleak and self-indulgent film ever made.

Read Full Review >
25

Philadelphia Inquirer Steven Rea

I'm ripping up my Lars Von Trier fan club card.

Read Full Review >
20

New York Daily News Joe Neumaier

Von Trier ("Breaking the Waves," "Dogville") has no barriers, which absolutely can be a good thing. Here, though, his uninhibited nature is an omen of the pretentious butchery to come.

Read Full Review >
20

Los Angeles Times Betsy Sharkey

Female sexuality has evolved into pure evil here with Von Trier looking ever so much like the Marquis de Sade of filmmaking.

Read Full Review >
20

Time Out New York Joshua Rothkopf

The new movie is a joke, a toxic cocktail of banal psychobabble, laughably arty slo-mo flourishes and unmotivated sexual violence that only brain-in-jar types could take as a serious statement.

Read Full Review >
10

Film Threat Matthew Sorrento

If only von Trier could work beyond the poster art concept. Antichrist stubbornly fails as a gothic nightmare and meanders as a misanthropic two-character drama.

Read Full Review >
10

Slate Dana Stevens

The last 20 minutes are horrifically violent, relentlessly claustrophobic, and irredeemably pointless. Von Trier has us on the hot seat, and he's going to walk us through his most primitive sexual nightmares--not because they'll bring us to a greater understanding of madness or love or grief, but just because he bloody well feels like it.

Read Full Review >

What Our Users Said

The average user rating for this movie is 6.9 (out of 10) based on 25 User Votes

Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

Harvey B gave it a9:
"Antichrist" has some of the most beautiful cinematography ever seen. This is filled with metaphors and symbolism that truly captivate you into the film. This is a slasher film worth seeing, and although it gets far too graphic at times or "torture porn", it only amplifies the mood and tone of the film. Skip films like "Paranormal" activity and "Stepfather" and get this on video on demand so you can see why this is a visceral experience. you will not be disappointed.

Marc gave it a4:
Some great camera work, but boils down to two characters in exponential agony and grief for 2hrs and its torture to sit through, mainly because I found no empathy with two thoroughly unlikable leads, personally I cared more for the disemboweled fox. In short I became so bored with everything that was going on and by the time Gainsborough started mutilating Defoe and her own genitals I really had just lost interest, not shocking just self indulgent garbage really.

Jim F. gave it a9:
The prologue, epilogue, and first three chapters contain some of the some of the most beautiful and mysterious and exciting filmmaking I've seen in ages. The fourth chapter is the most horrific and insane and upsetting filmmaking I hope I'll ever see. But that's all to be expected from a film about nature, I guess. The performances are, as usual for a Lars Von Trier film, riveting and seductive. This is certainly his coldest and most brutal film, and also his lushest. And, as usual, he raises more question than he answers, and for the people who hate Lars and his cinematic provocations this is just the most potent fuel for the fires of their contempt. But I think he's one of the most consistently fascinating filmmakers working today.

SJ gave it a10:
In what will be marked in history as one of the most controversial, literally pornographic & thought provoking pieces of art within the film medium, Lars von Trier has presented an anomaly questioning the foundations of religions themselves, as well as an experience to enmesh the audience well into the film. From practically every facet of quality, Antichrist excels in all areas: Regarding special effects, film grain & use of colours; image filtering, characters, soundtrack, artistic literary techniques; dialogue & themes with direct connotations towards the human condition. This is naming but a few of a potential from a most complex myriad.

Joshua S. gave it a5:
A film that ultimately seems to polarize its viewers, Von Trier's "Antichrist", left me scratching my head. I admired the performers and their courage onscreen, the photography was stunning and moody, but by the end I felt like I had been told 3/4 of a story and wasn't let in on the point. Truth be told, I left more bored with the film philosophically than I left fascinated by the imagery and the acting. Does Von Trier have a point about... I don't know... something? Or is this merely an exercise in self congratulatory film-making where the final product is meant merely for himself? It has an undeniable impact on the audience, but the pointlessness of the film simply left me shrugging my shoulders, not understanding what the fuss was about.

ulala r gave it a10:
I have regained my faith in cinema, that it can take part on a more equal basis in a philosophical, humanistic discourse.

lex g gave it a4:
Seemed rather pointless to me.

Read more user comments >

Popular on CBS sites: College Signing Day | Olympics | Lost | iPhone | Cell Phones | Video Game Reviews | Free Music

About CBS Interactive | Jobs | Advertise

© 2010 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy (UPDATED) | Terms of Use