Advanced Search >
Help Me Search

Movies

Weekend Box Office
Film Awards & Top 10s By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores

Wide Releases
Now In Theaters

sort by namesort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

Limited Releases
Now In Theaters

sort by namesort by score

58 (Untitled)
96 35 Shots of Rum
56 Adam
39 Adventures of Power
66 Afterschool
73 Amreeka
49 Antichrist
76 Baader Meinhof Complex, The
86 Beaches of Agnes, The
71 Big Fan
65 Black Dynamite
76 Bliss
26 Boondock Saints II: All Saints Day, The
44 Brief Interviews with Hideous Men
81 Bright Star
76 Broken Embraces
70 Bronson
62 Cloud 9
65 Coco Before Chanel
69 Cold Souls
60 Collapse
82 Cove, The
75 Crude
82 Damned United, The
53 Dare
50 Defamation
67 Departures
70 Earth Days
85 Education, An
55 Endgame
88 Fantastic Mr. Fox
31 Fix
49 Food Beware: The French Organic Revolution
80 Food, Inc.
xx From Mexico with Love
28 Gentlemen Broncos
72 Good Hair
89 Goodbye Solo
63 Horse Boy, The
74 House of the Devil, The
xx How to Seduce Difficult Women
26 I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell
70 It Might Get Loud
46 Killing Kasztner
43 Little Traitor, The
34 Looking for Palladin
80 Lorna's Silence
46 Love Hurts
84 Maid, The
45 Mammoth
75 Messenger, The
55 Missing Person, The
59 More Than a Game
34 Motherhood
62 My One and Only
48 New York, I Love You
66 No Impact Man
26 Oh My God
68 Paranormal Activity
68 Paris
79 Precious: Based on the Novel by Sapphire
73 Red Cliff
69 September Issue, The
79 Serious Man, A
65 Skin
41 Splinterheads
42 Staten Island
50 Stoning of Soraya M., The
58 Storm
82 Sun, The
49 Ten9Eight: Shoot for the Moon
73 That Evening Sun
61 Trucker
49 Turning Green
83 U2 3D
45 Uncertainty
67 Visual Acoustics
32 War on Kids
67 Way We Get By, The
65 Wedding Song, The
xx White on Rice
59 William Kunstler: Disturbing the Universe
74 Woman in Berlin, A
43 Women in Trouble
69 Yoo-Hoo, Mrs. Goldberg

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

Ararat

EMAILPRINTMiramax Films

Ararat reviews
62
7.8 User Score:

Generally favorable reviews

Based on 25 critic reviews
How did we calculate this?

Based on 39 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie >

Movie Info

Genre(s): Drama

Written by: Atom Egoyan

Directed by: Atom Egoyan

Release Date:
Theatrical: November 15, 2002
DVD: July 22, 2003

Running Time: 116 minutes, Color

Origin: Canada / France

Summary

RATING: R for violence, sexuality/nudity and language

Starring David Alpay, Arsinée Khanjian, Charles Aznavour, Christopher Plummer, Eric Bogosian, Brent Carver, Bruce Greenwood, and Elias Koteas

The estranged members of a contemporary Armenian family are faced both with Turkey's denial of their catastrophic past and with their own complicated present. (Miramax)

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

83

Entertainment Weekly Lisa Schwarzbaum

As ever, Egoyan assembles a devoted repertory cast, including Christopher Plummer.

Read Full Review >
83

Seattle Post-Intelligencer Sean Axmaker

Ararat is less about history than the necessity of dialogue and debate, and the devastating effects of stifling dialogue.

Read Full Review >
80

Chicago Reader Jonathan Rosenbaum

Expresses with uncommon power the highly relevant issue of public indifference to genocide, which is especially well dramatized by a scene with Elias Koteas as an actor playing a Turk.

Read Full Review >
80

The New York Times Stephen Holden

Until its final moments this almost great movie feels as if it's racing against itself in a neck-and-neck battle between its troubled heart and its egg-shaped head. The heart wins by a nose.

Read Full Review >
75

San Francisco Chronicle Mick LaSalle

This is a heartfelt piece, and while passion alone can't carry a movie, it sure helps. Ararat is uneven because Egoyan couldn't tell it smoothly.

Read Full Review >
75

Chicago Tribune Michael Wilmington

This toweringly ambitious picture confronts a brilliant director, Atom Egoyan, with a major historical event and a profound theme.

Read Full Review >
70

Dallas Observer Gregory Weinkauf

The resulting project matters much and should be seen, but how much it'll be FELT depends on your specific level of patience for a director who presumes audience comprehension to be at about a fourth-grade level (at least he's a shoo-in for Hollywood).

Read Full Review >
70

Los Angeles Times Kevin Thomas

Egoyan's oblique, layered attack ultimately pays off, evoking a strong emotional connection between past and present, the historical and the personal, in a flowing, cinematic manner in collaboration with his frequent cameraman, Paul Sarossy. The film makes use of an intoxicating array of Armenian music.

Read Full Review >
70

TV Guide Ken Fox

We only experience the horror of the genocide through several layers of artifice -- first Saroyan's, then Egoyan's own -- a sad acknowledgement that with each story told, we're drawn that much further from the truth.

Read Full Review >
70

Film Threat David Grove

Ararat isn't a great film because it's too convoluted and personal at times, but it's a showcase of technical mastery; the way Egoyan interweaves the stories of the historical recreation, the relationship between the son and his stepsister and the mystery of the art historian's dead husbands, is endlessly compelling.

Read Full Review >
63

Boston Globe Wesley Morris

The screenplay's intelligence begins to break down in Egoyan's formal choices. Ideas never elude Egoyan, but boy does Saroyan's epic look uncertain and cruddy.

Read Full Review >
63

New York Post Jonathan Foreman

Egoyan treats the Armenian genocide and its aftermath as a metaphor for cruelty and denial -- an exercise in either pretension or timidity that exploits this tragedy.

Read Full Review >
63

USA Today Mike Clark

Has its moments -- and almost as many subplots.

Read Full Review >
63

Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert

Perhaps this movie was so close to Egoyan's heart that he was never able to stand back and get a good perspective on it -- that he is as conflicted as his characters, and as confused in the face of shifting points of view.

Read Full Review >
63

ReelViews James Berardinelli

Whatever the reason, the characters often seem only half-formed and there's a strange artificiality about the entire endeavor. Egoyan has never been a realist, and his style has contributed to his ability to deliver a knockout punch. Here, that punch is missing.

Read Full Review >
60

Variety Todd McCarthy

Egoyan's pedantic, lecturing approach makes the film a bit of a slog, although the basic material has an intrinsic interest that makes one at least want to know more about the historical events.

Read Full Review >
60

Washington Post Desson Thomson

Doesn't connect with its audience in the one place that matters most: the heart.

Read Full Review >
60

The Onion (A.V. Club) Keith Phipps

Though typically engaging, Ararat occasionally suffers from what's previously been a virtue in Egoyan's filmmaking. His distancing techniques, rather than sharpening his ability to deal with a subject that lends itself to high emotion -- sometimes just seem distancing.

Read Full Review >
60

LA Weekly Jon Strickland

Egoyan has always constructed dense ensemble films, and here again the writer-director hopes to reinforce his themes by piling layer upon layer of character. Unfortunately, the layers end up cluttering the story.

Read Full Review >
58

Portland Oregonian Shawn Levy

An impressive work in many regards -- the acting, the photography, the pace -- but it would've been even more so had Egoyan gone with his gut and been less indulgent of his brain.

Read Full Review >
50

Christian Science Monitor David Sterritt

Egoyan is one of Canada's most ambitious and original filmmakers, but the power of this intricate drama falls short of its aspirations, despite his personal investment in the subject, since he is of Armenian ancestry himself.

Read Full Review >
50

Village Voice Dennis Lim

If the movie feels cumbersome and overstuffed, it's because Egoyan's characters, so often aphasic, are this time driven by a compulsion to speak -- though the noisy tumble of words mostly underscores their failure to communicate.

Read Full Review >
50

New York Daily News Jami Bernard

Only two hours long but it may take your mind another day to get through it. Egoyan has stuffed a lot into this personal and strenuously opaque film, which perhaps explains why its over-plotted, elliptical structure seems so onerous.

Read Full Review >
50

The New Yorker Anthony Lane

If I were a Turkish official, I would not be too worried by this picture. Nothing so slippery can stir up indignation. [18 November 2002, p. 104]

50

The New Republic Stanley Kauffmann

All in the cast are competent, and some of the slaughter scenes make us ache, but the overlaid material does not enrich, it impedes.

Read Full Review >

What Our Users Said

The average user rating for this movie is 7.8 (out of 10) based on 39 User Votes

Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

Gregory T. gave it a6:
The story should be told, just as the Jewish retell their historical plight. Egoyan weaves good story lines well but does a less than artistically present the horrors the Armeinians endured. A simple scene with Kurds and Turks performing all the documented haneous acts is less compelling than a story line devoted to the perpetualness of these acts.

Anichka V. gave it a10:
Yes, we must remember the past and doesn't matter how sad and devastating it kwas. the Armenians had this loss and let the world know about it.

Heghine K. gave it a 10:
This movie is not just a movie, It tells the true dramatic story of Armenians_the Genocide of 1915. The world knows that...

Craig B. gave it an 8:
As a person who is neither Armenian nor Turkish, I am really just evaluating the film based on its entertainment value and, in that respect, I think this film is hugely successful. There is a great deal of emotional truth in every film that I have seen by Atom Egoyan, and that is especially true in this film where he has an obvious connection. Politically, the film opened my eyes to certain historical events of which I had previously not been aware. Maybe someday the Turks will produce a film maker of talent comparable to Egoyan, and maybe someday that person will create a film that tells the other side of the story in a manner that would be as interesting to watch as this film was. Until then, we have this very compelling version of the Armenian take on history.

David K. gave it a 3:
C'est un film indigne de M. Egoyan. Je suis vraiment decu. Le cote artistique est masquee par le souci de faire la propagande. Les faits qu'on nous presente comme des faits historiques sont manipules par souci de creer un opinion publique. Dommage...

Mounia C. gave it a 2:
A horrible propoganda which is made to hurt the feelings of the turkish nation by showing tham as horrible monsters. The historical truths are completely ignored. Ottoman army is shown as invaders in their own land and a rebellion movementin an empire is presented as an invasion. The violance scenes are pumping hatred against a nation which soon overthroned the ottoman empire. Humiliating...

Daniel F. gave it a 0:
It is a propoganda movie twisting historical facts and an atomic bomb against the dialogue between the turkish and armenian nations. An anti-turkish scandal... On top of all, A diplomat killer terorist is presented a hero. An insult against both nations.

Read more user comments >

Popular on CBS sites: SEC Football | NFL | Video Game Cheats | iPhone | Video Game Reviews | Notebooks | Antivirus Software

About CBS Interactive | Jobs | Advertise

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy (UPDATED) | Terms of Use