Advanced Search >
Help Me Search

Movies

Weekend Box Office
Film Awards & Top 10s By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores

Wide Releases
Now In Theaters

sort by namesort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

Limited Releases
Now In Theaters

sort by namesort by score

58 (Untitled)
96 35 Shots of Rum
56 Adam
72 Adela
39 Adventures of Power
78 Afghan Star
61 After the Storm
66 Afterschool
xx All the Best
58 American Casino
72 Amreeka
48 Antichrist
73 Araya
62 Art & Copy
55 As Seen Through These Eyes
76 Baader Meinhof Complex, The
86 Beaches of Agnes, The
13 Beautiful Life, A
70 Beeswax
35 Beyond a Reasonable Doubt
71 Big Fan
66 Black Dynamite
51 Blind Date
xx Blind Pig Who Wants to Fly
76 Bliss
35 Blue Tooth Virgin, The
26 Boondock Saints II: All Saints Day, The
57 Boys Are Back, The
45 Brief Interviews with Hideous Men
81 Bright Star
70 Bronson
45 Burning Plain, The
xx Carriers
55 Casi Divas
57 Chelsea on the Rocks
62 Cloud 9
65 Coco Before Chanel
69 Cold Souls
59 Collapse
44 Confessionsofa Ex-Doofus-ItchyFooted Mutha
82 Cove, The
75 Crude
82 Damned United, The
67 Departures
xx Dil Bole Hadippa
71 Disgrace
xx Do Knot Disturb
70 Earth Days
24 Eating Out 3: All You Can Eat
85 Education, An
55 Endgame
xx Eulogy for a Vampire
xx Everyone Else
xx Fatal Promises
56 Fifty Dead Men Walking
62 Five Minutes of Heaven
74 Flame & Citron
49 Food Beware: The French Organic Revolution
80 Food, Inc.
28 Free Style
xx From Mexico with Love
50 Fuel
25 Gentlemen Broncos
50 Give Me Your Hand
58 Gogol Bordello Non-Stop
72 Good Hair
89 Goodbye Solo
52 Grace
66 Harmony and Me
81 Headless Woman, The
xx Heretics, The
63 Horse Boy, The
73 House of the Devil, The
xx How to Seduce Difficult Women
74 Humpday
94 Hurt Locker, The
29 I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell
16 If One Thing Matters: A Film About Wolfgang Tillmans
75 In Search of Beethoven
83 In the Loop
61 Intimate Enemies
42 Irene in Time
70 It Might Get Loud
46 Killing Kasztner
19 Labor Day
xx Laila's Birthday
41 Little Ashes
41 Little Traitor, The
66 Liverpool
34 Looking for Palladin
80 Lorna's Silence
83 Maid, The
xx Ministers, The
59 More Than a Game
67 Most Dangerous Man in America: Daniel Ellsberg and the Pentagon Papers, The
34 Motherhood
62 My One and Only
xx Mystery Team
48 New York, I Love You
73 Night and Day
66 No Impact Man
47 Ong Bak 2: The Beginning
34 Other Man, The
xx Painter Sam Francis, The
54 Paper Heart
xx Paradise
68 Paranormal Activity
68 Paris
44 Peter and Vandy
35 Play the Game
77 Precious: Based on the Novel by Sapphire
xx Pretty Ugly People
65 Providence Effect, The
76 Rembrandt's J'accuse
69 September Issue, The
79 Serious Man, A
40 Shrink
61 Skin
77 Skin Too Few: The Days of Nick Drake, A
xx Skiptracers
46 Splinterheads
39 St. Trinian's
89 Still Walking
50 Stoning of Soraya M., The
55 Storm
65 Tetro
70 That Evening Sun
72 Thirst
xx Tim Burton's The Nightmare Before Christmas 3D (re-release)
61 Trucker
xx Turning Green
83 U2 3D
66 Unmade Beds
66 Unmistaken Child
70 Visual Acoustics
55 Walt & El Grupo
67 Way We Get By, The
69 We Live in Public
64 Wedding Song, The
64 Where is Where?
xx White on Rice
74 Woman in Berlin, A
69 World's Greatest Dad
70 Yes Men Fix the World
69 Yoo-Hoo, Mrs. Goldberg
xx You, the Living

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

Ararat

EMAILPRINTMiramax Films

Ararat reviews
62
7.8 User Score:

Generally favorable reviews

Based on 25 critic reviews
How did we calculate this?

Based on 39 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie >

Movie Info

Genre(s): Drama

Written by: Atom Egoyan

Directed by: Atom Egoyan

Release Date:
Theatrical: November 15, 2002
DVD: July 22, 2003

Running Time: 116 minutes, Color

Origin: Canada / France

Summary

RATING: R for violence, sexuality/nudity and language

Starring David Alpay, Arsinée Khanjian, Charles Aznavour, Christopher Plummer, Eric Bogosian, Brent Carver, Bruce Greenwood, and Elias Koteas

The estranged members of a contemporary Armenian family are faced both with Turkey's denial of their catastrophic past and with their own complicated present. (Miramax)

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

83

Entertainment Weekly Lisa Schwarzbaum

As ever, Egoyan assembles a devoted repertory cast, including Christopher Plummer.

Read Full Review >
83

Seattle Post-Intelligencer Sean Axmaker

Ararat is less about history than the necessity of dialogue and debate, and the devastating effects of stifling dialogue.

Read Full Review >
80

Chicago Reader Jonathan Rosenbaum

Expresses with uncommon power the highly relevant issue of public indifference to genocide, which is especially well dramatized by a scene with Elias Koteas as an actor playing a Turk.

Read Full Review >
80

The New York Times Stephen Holden

Until its final moments this almost great movie feels as if it's racing against itself in a neck-and-neck battle between its troubled heart and its egg-shaped head. The heart wins by a nose.

Read Full Review >
75

San Francisco Chronicle Mick LaSalle

This is a heartfelt piece, and while passion alone can't carry a movie, it sure helps. Ararat is uneven because Egoyan couldn't tell it smoothly.

Read Full Review >
75

Chicago Tribune Michael Wilmington

This toweringly ambitious picture confronts a brilliant director, Atom Egoyan, with a major historical event and a profound theme.

Read Full Review >
70

Dallas Observer Gregory Weinkauf

The resulting project matters much and should be seen, but how much it'll be FELT depends on your specific level of patience for a director who presumes audience comprehension to be at about a fourth-grade level (at least he's a shoo-in for Hollywood).

Read Full Review >
70

Los Angeles Times Kevin Thomas

Egoyan's oblique, layered attack ultimately pays off, evoking a strong emotional connection between past and present, the historical and the personal, in a flowing, cinematic manner in collaboration with his frequent cameraman, Paul Sarossy. The film makes use of an intoxicating array of Armenian music.

Read Full Review >
70

TV Guide Ken Fox

We only experience the horror of the genocide through several layers of artifice -- first Saroyan's, then Egoyan's own -- a sad acknowledgement that with each story told, we're drawn that much further from the truth.

Read Full Review >
70

Film Threat David Grove

Ararat isn't a great film because it's too convoluted and personal at times, but it's a showcase of technical mastery; the way Egoyan interweaves the stories of the historical recreation, the relationship between the son and his stepsister and the mystery of the art historian's dead husbands, is endlessly compelling.

Read Full Review >
63

Boston Globe Wesley Morris

The screenplay's intelligence begins to break down in Egoyan's formal choices. Ideas never elude Egoyan, but boy does Saroyan's epic look uncertain and cruddy.

Read Full Review >
63

New York Post Jonathan Foreman

Egoyan treats the Armenian genocide and its aftermath as a metaphor for cruelty and denial -- an exercise in either pretension or timidity that exploits this tragedy.

Read Full Review >
63

USA Today Mike Clark

Has its moments -- and almost as many subplots.

Read Full Review >
63

Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert

Perhaps this movie was so close to Egoyan's heart that he was never able to stand back and get a good perspective on it -- that he is as conflicted as his characters, and as confused in the face of shifting points of view.

Read Full Review >
63

ReelViews James Berardinelli

Whatever the reason, the characters often seem only half-formed and there's a strange artificiality about the entire endeavor. Egoyan has never been a realist, and his style has contributed to his ability to deliver a knockout punch. Here, that punch is missing.

Read Full Review >
60

Variety Todd McCarthy

Egoyan's pedantic, lecturing approach makes the film a bit of a slog, although the basic material has an intrinsic interest that makes one at least want to know more about the historical events.

Read Full Review >
60

Washington Post Desson Thomson

Doesn't connect with its audience in the one place that matters most: the heart.

Read Full Review >
60

The Onion (A.V. Club) Keith Phipps

Though typically engaging, Ararat occasionally suffers from what's previously been a virtue in Egoyan's filmmaking. His distancing techniques, rather than sharpening his ability to deal with a subject that lends itself to high emotion -- sometimes just seem distancing.

Read Full Review >
60

LA Weekly Jon Strickland

Egoyan has always constructed dense ensemble films, and here again the writer-director hopes to reinforce his themes by piling layer upon layer of character. Unfortunately, the layers end up cluttering the story.

Read Full Review >
58

Portland Oregonian Shawn Levy

An impressive work in many regards -- the acting, the photography, the pace -- but it would've been even more so had Egoyan gone with his gut and been less indulgent of his brain.

Read Full Review >
50

Christian Science Monitor David Sterritt

Egoyan is one of Canada's most ambitious and original filmmakers, but the power of this intricate drama falls short of its aspirations, despite his personal investment in the subject, since he is of Armenian ancestry himself.

Read Full Review >
50

Village Voice Dennis Lim

If the movie feels cumbersome and overstuffed, it's because Egoyan's characters, so often aphasic, are this time driven by a compulsion to speak -- though the noisy tumble of words mostly underscores their failure to communicate.

Read Full Review >
50

New York Daily News Jami Bernard

Only two hours long but it may take your mind another day to get through it. Egoyan has stuffed a lot into this personal and strenuously opaque film, which perhaps explains why its over-plotted, elliptical structure seems so onerous.

Read Full Review >
50

The New Yorker Anthony Lane

If I were a Turkish official, I would not be too worried by this picture. Nothing so slippery can stir up indignation. [18 November 2002, p. 104]

50

The New Republic Stanley Kauffmann

All in the cast are competent, and some of the slaughter scenes make us ache, but the overlaid material does not enrich, it impedes.

Read Full Review >

What Our Users Said

The average user rating for this movie is 7.8 (out of 10) based on 39 User Votes

Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

Gregory T. gave it a6:
The story should be told, just as the Jewish retell their historical plight. Egoyan weaves good story lines well but does a less than artistically present the horrors the Armeinians endured. A simple scene with Kurds and Turks performing all the documented haneous acts is less compelling than a story line devoted to the perpetualness of these acts.

Anichka V. gave it a10:
Yes, we must remember the past and doesn't matter how sad and devastating it kwas. the Armenians had this loss and let the world know about it.

Heghine K. gave it a 10:
This movie is not just a movie, It tells the true dramatic story of Armenians_the Genocide of 1915. The world knows that...

Craig B. gave it an 8:
As a person who is neither Armenian nor Turkish, I am really just evaluating the film based on its entertainment value and, in that respect, I think this film is hugely successful. There is a great deal of emotional truth in every film that I have seen by Atom Egoyan, and that is especially true in this film where he has an obvious connection. Politically, the film opened my eyes to certain historical events of which I had previously not been aware. Maybe someday the Turks will produce a film maker of talent comparable to Egoyan, and maybe someday that person will create a film that tells the other side of the story in a manner that would be as interesting to watch as this film was. Until then, we have this very compelling version of the Armenian take on history.

David K. gave it a 3:
C'est un film indigne de M. Egoyan. Je suis vraiment decu. Le cote artistique est masquee par le souci de faire la propagande. Les faits qu'on nous presente comme des faits historiques sont manipules par souci de creer un opinion publique. Dommage...

Mounia C. gave it a 2:
A horrible propoganda which is made to hurt the feelings of the turkish nation by showing tham as horrible monsters. The historical truths are completely ignored. Ottoman army is shown as invaders in their own land and a rebellion movementin an empire is presented as an invasion. The violance scenes are pumping hatred against a nation which soon overthroned the ottoman empire. Humiliating...

Daniel F. gave it a 0:
It is a propoganda movie twisting historical facts and an atomic bomb against the dialogue between the turkish and armenian nations. An anti-turkish scandal... On top of all, A diplomat killer terorist is presented a hero. An insult against both nations.

Read more user comments >

Popular on CBS sites: SEC Football | NFL | Video Game Cheats | iPhone | Video Game Reviews | Notebooks | Antivirus Software

About CBS Interactive | Jobs | Advertise

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use