CNET Networks Entertainment GameSpot | GameFAQs | SportsGamer | Metacritic | MP3.com | TV.com
Home | About Metacritic | About Metascores | What's New | Wireless Versions | Discussion Forums | Advertising Inquiries | Contact Us | RSS
Metacritic.com: We Deal With Criticism
     Help
> Switch to Advanced Search  
Film Video/DVD Music Games TV

Film

Upcoming Release Calendar
Weekend Box Office
Film Awards & Top 10s By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
How Metascores Are Calculated
Discuss Film In Our Forums

 

Wide Releases

sort by name sort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

 

Limited Releases

sort by name sort by score

83 Alexandra
80 Band's Visit, The
76 Beauty in Trouble
47 Bella
80 Bigger, Stronger, Faster*
59 Blind Mountain
55 Bra Boys
60 Brick Lane
70 Caramel
49 Children of Huang Shi, The
83 Chop Shop
83 Chris & Don. A Love Story
78 Counterfeiters, The
52 Diminished Capacity
64 Dreams with Sharp Teeth
73 Duchess of Langeais, The
84 Edge of Heaven, The
52 Elsa & Fred
79 Encounters at the End of the World
62 Expired
64 Fall, The
51 Finding Amanda
57 Flawless
86 Flight of the Red Balloon, The
63 Foot Fist Way, The
60 Fugitive Pieces
45 Full Grown Men
55 Glass: A Portrait of Philip in Twelve Parts
69 Go-Getter, The
74 Gonzo: The Life and Work of Dr. Hunter S. Thompson
63 Gunnin for that #1 Spot
68 Heartbeat Detector
34 Holding Trevor
68 Honeydripper
55 Irina Palm
69 Jellyfish
60 Jihad for Love, A
68 Kabluey
62 Kiss the Bride
63 Kit Kittredge: An American Girl
82 Last Mistress, The
38 Life Before Her Eyes, The
70 Love Songs
64 Married Life
30 Meet Bill
33 Miss Conception
53 Mister Lonely
75 Mongol
52 Mother of Tears, The
52 My Blueberry Nights
71 My Brother Is an Only Child
84 My Winnipeg
61 On the Rumba River
69 Operation Filmmaker
61 OSS 117: Cairo - Nest of Spies
83 Paranoid Park
72 Priceless
51 Promotion, The
55 Quid Pro Quo
29 Red Roses and Petrol
79 Reprise
71 Roman de gare
56 Sangre de mi sangre
51 Savage Grace
76 Shotgun Stories
66 Son of Rambow
70 Standard Operating Procedure
62 Stuck
72 Surfwise
81 Tell No One
56 Then She Found Me
xx Thoda Pyaar Thoda Magic
71 To the Limit
54 Tracey Fragments, The
70 Trumbo
72 Tuya's Marriage
83 U2 3D
56 Unknown Woman
86 Up the Yangtze
79 Visitor, The
62 Wackness, The
37 War, Inc.
64 Water Lilies
66 When Did You Last See Your Father?
55 Without the King
72 Woman on the Beach
64 XXY
67 Year My Parents Went on Vacation, The
75 Young@Heart

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

 



Printer-Friendly Version Email This Page Discuss In Our Forums

Closer
Columbia Pictures / Sony Pictures Entertainment

Closer reviews
Critic Score
Metascore: 65 Metascore out of 100
User Score  
6.2 out of 10
based on 42 reviews
Read critic reviews
How did we calculate this?
based on 159 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie

MPAA RATING: R for sequences of graphic sexual dialogue, nudity/sexuality and language

Starring Natalie Portman, Jude Law, Julia Roberts, Clive Owen, Nick Hobbs, and Colin Stinton

A bitingly funny and honest look at modern relationships, Closer is the story of four strangers -- their chance meetings, instant attractions and casual betrayals. (Sony Pictures)


GENRE(S): Drama  
WRITTEN BY: Patrick Marber (also play)  
DIRECTED BY: Mike Nichols  
RELEASE DATE: DVD: March 29, 2005 
Theatrical: December 3, 2004 
RUNNING TIME: 100 minutes, Color 
ORIGIN: USA 

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

100
Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert
They are all so very articulate, which is refreshing in a time when literate and evocative speech has been devalued in the movies.
Read Full Review
90
Time Richard Corliss
Funny, hurtful, splendidly acted.
Read Full Review
89
Austin Chronicle Marc Savlov
Closer is an un-love story as honest and naked as Cupid in the devil's dock, the whole truth, and nothing but.
Read Full Review
88
Boston Globe Wesley Morris
From Marber's fiercely polished writing, Nichols wrings every drop of acid, yet it's a show of the director's goodness that a movie fundamentally preoccupied with interpersonal ugliness is allowed to end on a convincing note of beauty.
Read Full Review
88
Rolling Stone Peter Travers
Mike Nichols' haunting, hypnotic Closer vibrates with eroticism, bruising laughs and dynamite performances from four attractive actors doing decidedly unattractive things.
Read Full Review
88
Chicago Tribune Michael Wilmington
Few directors are more adept at playing with all this anguish and exhilaration than Mike Nichols.
Read Full Review
88
ReelViews James Berardinelli
This is most definitely NOT a date movie. But if you appreciate films that are more substance than style, that take challenges and don't follow formulas, and that feature Oscar-caliber performances, Closer is not to be missed.
Read Full Review
80
Washington Post Stephen Hunter
If you're the sort of person who laughs at funerals, train wrecks, earnest political documentaries and stories about the rape of nature, you'll love Closer.
Read Full Review
80
Film Threat Pete Vonder Haar
An intelligently written, well-acted, and thoughtful film about adult relationships. I’m surprised it came out of Hollywood.
Read Full Review
80
Empire Kim Newman
It’s almost as structurally daring as "Memento," demanding that the audience fills in the gaps.
Read Full Review
80
Dallas Observer Bill Gallo
Full of intellectual stimulation as well as low, dark pleasures--"Carnal Knowledge" redux!
Read Full Review
80
Newsweek Sean Smith
Here's a surprise: of the four actors in Closer, Clive Owen is the least famous, but he delivers the most memorable performance.
Read Full Review
80
New York Magazine Ken Tucker
Closer is marred by some drippy music courtesy of Damien Rice and a small-surprise ending that feels like gimmicky irony. But the film's core idea is compelling.
Read Full Review
80
The Onion (A.V. Club) Scott Tobias
Dramatically leaps through time, covering months or sometimes years in the span of a single cut. The effect is jarring and exhilarating, but it also bucks the common idea that relationships deepen over time.
Read Full Review
75
Premiere Glenn Kenny
Most of the dialogue is pretty fresh, and it’s delivered with great brio, particularly by Owen. Roberts, alas, is not at her best here, but she has almost nothing to work with.
Read Full Review
75
Philadelphia Inquirer Steven Rea
Closer, in the end, lacks a certain heft. The language and the actions of the characters are brutal and devastating. The movie itself, a little too nice.
Read Full Review
75
Christian Science Monitor David Sterritt
It's too emotionally honest and psychologically dense for its own good. It's a movie that demands more than one viewing to absorb all its ideas and feelings.
Read Full Review
75
New York Post Lou Lumenick
An impeccably acted and directed - but quite icy - portrait of deception and betrayal.
Read Full Review
75
The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Rick Groen
Despite Marber's sardonic wit and Nichols's intelligent direction, the film winds up in the ironic position of practising exactly what it preaches: Closer invites and even gains our intimacy, only to finish by driving us ever farther away.
Read Full Review
70
TV Guide Maitland McDonagh
Overall, Owen and Law are more nuanced than Roberts and Portman, but Portman's dewy youth is 90 percent of Alice (the remaining 10 is an eleventh-hour twist), and Nichols uses the unkindly costumed Roberts so skillfully that her performance looks like a revelation.
Read Full Review
70
Village Voice Dennis Lim
Closer casts a smugly amused eye on the human capacity for betrayal. But because it also seeks to congratulate its audience for its urbane unshockability, it never strays beyond the limits of middlebrow complacency.
Read Full Review
70
Variety Todd McCarthy
The caustic wit and brute force of Patrick Marber's acclaimed play come across with a softened edge in Mike Nichols' bigscreen version of Closer.
Read Full Review
70
The New Republic Stanley Kauffmann
The finish is so asymmetrical that it, too, seems a comment on the kind of film this might once have been.
Read Full Review
67
Entertainment Weekly Lisa Schwarzbaum
The last thing Marber's quartet of modern miserables needs is to be admired; they are the very worst of average people, but on screen they have become the very best of the baddest.
Read Full Review
67
Portland Oregonian Shawn Levy
It's in its aspiration to depict deceit and obsession, selfishness and recklessness, bitterness, revenge and fury that the film's power lies. There and in Clive Owen's sure and powerful hands.
Read Full Review
67
Seattle Post-Intelligencer William Arnold
While its execution is fine, the movie is almost shockingly vapid.
Read Full Review
63
USA Today Claudia Puig
Offers a bleak though thought-provoking take on relationships. The challenge for the viewer is in caring enough to become invested in characters who seem hellbent on hurting one another.
Read Full Review
63
Charlotte Observer Lawrence Toppman
It's the most claustrophobic, airless movie of the year, a menage a quatre among unstable, manipulative, needy people who prey on each other like sharks at a feeding frenzy of the emotions.
Read Full Review
60
Slate David Edelstein
Closer is in the same arena as Labute, and I found it sour and airless, with the feel of a mathematical proof. The acting is superb, though, with one key exception. Jude Law.
Read Full Review
60
Los Angeles Times Kenneth Turan
Despite involved acting and Nichols' impeccable professionalism as a director, the end result is, to quote one of the characters, "a bunch of sad strangers photographed beautifully."
Read Full Review
60
Chicago Reader Jonathan Rosenbaum
The actors are brilliant, the dialogue extremely clever, and the direction assured. But by the end I couldn't have cared less about any of the characters.
Read Full Review
60
The New York Times Dana Stevens
Unlike most movie love stories, Closer does have the virtue of unpredictability. The problem is that, while parts are provocative and forceful, the film as a whole collapses into a welter of misplaced intensity.
Read Full Review
60
The New Yorker Anthony Lane
The Nichols of 1971 was bold and speedy, keeping pace with Jack Nicholson's contempt, whereas the more civilized Nichols of 2004 seems a beat behind the lines, waiting for peace or charity to break out. They never do.
Read Full Review
50
LA Weekly Ella Taylor
Strip away the cavernous lofts, the minimalist art galleries and the pricey consulting rooms, and you have four characters unable to earn their keep with the audience.
Read Full Review
50
Miami Herald Rene Rodriguez
One of the most pessimistic movies about love Hollywood has ever made, a star-studded, glossy anti-date movie.
Read Full Review
50
The Hollywood Reporter Kirk Honeycutt
Determined to be faithful to the strong, often shocking language and in-your-face drama in Marber's mannered writing, Nichols and his actors find no way to lift Closer into a realm that enlightens.
Read Full Review
50
Salon.com Stephanie Zacharek
So bloodless that it feels like an act of arty dishonesty.
Read Full Review
50
New York Daily News Jack Mathews
Despite four very strong performances, Closer is hard emotional work to sit through. It's impossible to empathize with either the viciously insecure Larry or the unscrupulous, childlike Dan.
Read Full Review
50
San Francisco Chronicle Mick LaSalle
Whenever Roberts is onscreen, Closer freezes and starts to atrophy. And when she's off, tender shoots of life begin to sprout.
Read Full Review
50
Baltimore Sun Michael Sragow
The word "yuppie" has fallen out of favor from overuse, but Closer's young urban professionals are so vain and superficial they may bring it back as the ultimate putdown. This movie is a yuppie nightmare.
Read Full Review
30
Wall Street Journal Joe Morgenstern
Bring Zoloft and a tank of oxygen to Closer, an airless, ultimately joyless drama of sexual politics.
30
Washington Post Desson Thomson
Everything is tearful confessions, angry interrogations and breakups. But there's nothing underneath.
Read Full Review

What Our Users Said

Vote Now!The average user rating for this movie is 6.2 (out of 10) based on 159 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

Ignat K. gave it a10:
One of the very few movies showing true relations - with uniquely truthful direct speech between the characters, and amazing music selection!

Abby l gave it a7:
Closer was a surprising twist on love. Those who claim it is 'the worst' movie they have ever seen, have obviously never viewed the movies Norbit and Epic Movie. The characters were involved, the only disappointing part was that this movie was borderline pornography, not in the visual sense.

Darren R gave it a10:
This is a film so complex and clever that it is bound to go over the heads of most of the viewing audience. Every word that is spoken has a double meaning to it, and if viewed with the understanding of this ironic level, the experience is far richer.

Dave C. gave it a2:
Cloying, affected and tiresomely self-important. Performances are lacklustre, from the insufferably dull Clive Owen to the overemployed Julia Roberts and the altogether useless Natalie Portman. Even the usually impressive Jude Law doesn't do this a lot of favours. Not that it's an easy task to be asked to spew out such trite, pretentious dialogue at the behest of a pretentious director.

Ma R. gave it a3:
Pseudointellectual writing and great performances. Dialogue is mediocre and contrived. Not grounded in reality.

Duncan B. gave it a1:
I have a profound loathing of this film. Real people do not talk like this. It asks hard questions like "Why do rich, beautiful, vain, self centered, urbanites treat love as a commodity and sex as a form of power politics". The film looks great as do the actors but it is presented as an authentic look at modern relationships, but this is as divorced from reality as any fantasy. The characters are emotional children, real people do not act or talk like the people in this film, it is a rich coffee table intellectuals view of humanity. This is a world view that has not been informed by genuine hardship. It is an A Level students view of modern love. I like a bleak film as much as anyone, the bleaker and more pessimistic the better, but this film lacked a key ingredient: RELEVANCE. This film explores the sexual politics of a metro-sexual elite, it is not a genuine universal exploration of love and the damage it does.

Fred gave it a2:
This movie tries to do a lot. It tries to be thought provoking, it tries to be raw, it tries to be deep and it tries to be brutally honest. It was not truly any of things. The dialogue was forced and contrived, attempts to be profound merely come off as beautiful, spoilt people displaying their idiotic and warped notions of life, formularized to the last drop. The film is so horribly self conscious it made me grimace to watch it, it was as though the only thought given to the film was that raw automatically equals artistic quality. I hate to say it, but it does not. A soulless and sterile movie that is void of any depth, despite far too obvious attempts to the contrary. It is the Da Vinci Code of films; garbage that is made to appeal to the pseudo intellectuals.

Read more user comments...

Discuss this movie in our forums

Return to top of page
Home | FILM | DVD/VIDEO | MUSIC | GAMES | TV | Forums | About Metacritic metacritic.com

Popular on CBS sites: World News | Fantasy Football | Amy Winehouse | Baseball | E3 | Batman | Firefox 3 | iPhone 3G

About CNET Networks | Jobs | Advertise

© 2008 CNET Networks, Inc., a CBS Company. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use