Movies
Weekend Box Office
Film Awards & Top 10s By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
Best / Worst of the Decade
Wide Releases
Now In Theaters
49
2012
41
Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel
84
Avatar![]()
69
Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans
53
Blind Side
53
Book of Eli, The
55
Christmas Carol, A
57
Daybreakers
43
Dear John
27
Did You Hear About the Morgans?
55
Edge of Darkness
45
Extraordinary Measures
83
Fantastic Mr. Fox![]()
42
From Paris with Love
65
Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus, The
74
Invictus
57
It's Complicated
34
Law Abiding Citizen
33
Leap Year
33
Legion
42
Lovely Bones, The
54
Men Who Stare At Goats, The
34
Ninja Assassin
19
Old Dogs
xx
Percy Jackson & The Olympians: The Lightning Thief
39
Planet 51
79
Precious: Based on the Novel by Sapphire
73
Princess & the Frog, The
64
Road, The
57
Sherlock Holmes
27
Spy Next Door, The
36
Tooth Fairy
44
Twilight Saga: New Moon, The
83
Up in the Air![]()
43
Valentine's Day
25
When in Rome
71
Where the Wild Things Are
xx
WolfMan, The
63
Youth in Revolt
Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.
Limited Releases
Now In Theaters
46
44 Inch Chest
83
Ajami![]()
73
Amreeka
xx
Barefoot to Timbuktu
19
Bitch Slap
24
Boondock Saints II: All Saints Day, The
76
Broken Embraces
64
Cloud 9
65
Coco Before Chanel
84
Cove, The![]()
84
Crazy Heart![]()
21
Crazy on the Outside
48
Creation
xx
Daddy Long Legs
81
Damned United, The![]()
68
Departures
62
District 13: Ultimatum
85
Education, An![]()
71
Eyes Wide Open
24
Falling Awake
81
Fish Tank![]()
56
For My Father
xx
From Mexico with Love
43
Frozen
68
Girl on the Train, The
52
Killing Kasztner
74
Last Station, The
43
Little Traitor, The
51
Loss of a Teardrop Diamond, The
73
Me and Orson Welles
76
Messenger, The
57
Missing Person, The
67
Most Dangerous Man in America: Daniel Ellsberg and the Pentagon Papers, The
xx
My Name is Khan
49
Nine
63
North Face
59
October Country
67
Off and Running
52
Paranoids, The
49
Pop Star on Ice
49
Private Lives of Pippa Lee, The
xx
Promised Lands (Re-release)
69
Red Riding Trilogy, The
29
Saint John of Las Vegas
69
September Issue, The
36
Serious Moonlight
63
Shinjuku Incident, The
77
Single Man, A
xx
Still Bill
76
Terribly Happy
74
That Evening Sun
19
To Save a Life
68
Town Called Panic, A
59
Until the Light Takes Us
57
Videocracy
65
Waiting for Armageddon
82
White Ribbon![]()
43
Women in Trouble
xx
Word is Out
64
Young Victoria, The
Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.
Closer
EMAILPRINTColumbia Pictures / Sony Pictures Entertainment

Generally favorable reviews
Based on 42 critic reviews
How did we calculate this?
Based on 165 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie >
Movie Info
Genre(s): Drama
Written by: Patrick Marber (also play)
Directed by: Mike Nichols
Release Date:
Theatrical: December 3, 2004
DVD: March 29, 2005
Running Time: 100 minutes, Color
Origin: USA
Summary
RATING: R for sequences of graphic sexual dialogue, nudity/sexuality and language
Starring Natalie Portman, Jude Law, Julia Roberts, Clive Owen, Nick Hobbs, and Colin Stinton
A bitingly funny and honest look at modern relationships, Closer is the story of four strangers -- their chance meetings, instant attractions and casual betrayals. (Sony Pictures)
Also On Metacritic
FILM: Charlie Wilson's War Postcards from the Edge Primary Colors Silkwood The Birdcage The Graduate What Planet Are You From? Working Girl
Also On The Web: Internet Movie Database View The Trailer Official Studio Site
What The Critics Said
All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...
Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert
They are all so very articulate, which is refreshing in a time when literate and evocative speech has been devalued in the movies.
Read Full Review >Austin Chronicle Marc Savlov
Closer is an un-love story as honest and naked as Cupid in the devil's dock, the whole truth, and nothing but.
Read Full Review >Boston Globe Wesley Morris
From Marber's fiercely polished writing, Nichols wrings every drop of acid, yet it's a show of the director's goodness that a movie fundamentally preoccupied with interpersonal ugliness is allowed to end on a convincing note of beauty.
Read Full Review >Rolling Stone Peter Travers
Mike Nichols' haunting, hypnotic Closer vibrates with eroticism, bruising laughs and dynamite performances from four attractive actors doing decidedly unattractive things.
Read Full Review >Chicago Tribune Michael Wilmington
Few directors are more adept at playing with all this anguish and exhilaration than Mike Nichols.
Read Full Review >ReelViews James Berardinelli
This is most definitely NOT a date movie. But if you appreciate films that are more substance than style, that take challenges and don't follow formulas, and that feature Oscar-caliber performances, Closer is not to be missed.
Read Full Review >Washington Post Stephen Hunter
If you're the sort of person who laughs at funerals, train wrecks, earnest political documentaries and stories about the rape of nature, you'll love Closer.
Read Full Review >Film Threat Pete Vonder Haar
An intelligently written, well-acted, and thoughtful film about adult relationships. Im surprised it came out of Hollywood.
Read Full Review >Empire Kim Newman
Its almost as structurally daring as "Memento," demanding that the audience fills in the gaps.
Read Full Review >Dallas Observer Bill Gallo
Full of intellectual stimulation as well as low, dark pleasures--"Carnal Knowledge" redux!
Read Full Review >Newsweek Sean Smith
Here's a surprise: of the four actors in Closer, Clive Owen is the least famous, but he delivers the most memorable performance.
Read Full Review >New York Magazine Ken Tucker
Closer is marred by some drippy music courtesy of Damien Rice and a small-surprise ending that feels like gimmicky irony. But the film's core idea is compelling.
Read Full Review >The Onion (A.V. Club) Scott Tobias
Dramatically leaps through time, covering months or sometimes years in the span of a single cut. The effect is jarring and exhilarating, but it also bucks the common idea that relationships deepen over time.
Read Full Review >Premiere Glenn Kenny
Most of the dialogue is pretty fresh, and its delivered with great brio, particularly by Owen. Roberts, alas, is not at her best here, but she has almost nothing to work with.
Read Full Review >Philadelphia Inquirer Steven Rea
Closer, in the end, lacks a certain heft. The language and the actions of the characters are brutal and devastating. The movie itself, a little too nice.
Read Full Review >Christian Science Monitor David Sterritt
It's too emotionally honest and psychologically dense for its own good. It's a movie that demands more than one viewing to absorb all its ideas and feelings.
Read Full Review >New York Post Lou Lumenick
An impeccably acted and directed - but quite icy - portrait of deception and betrayal.
Read Full Review >The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Rick Groen
Despite Marber's sardonic wit and Nichols's intelligent direction, the film winds up in the ironic position of practising exactly what it preaches: Closer invites and even gains our intimacy, only to finish by driving us ever farther away.
Read Full Review >TV Guide Maitland McDonagh
Overall, Owen and Law are more nuanced than Roberts and Portman, but Portman's dewy youth is 90 percent of Alice (the remaining 10 is an eleventh-hour twist), and Nichols uses the unkindly costumed Roberts so skillfully that her performance looks like a revelation.
Read Full Review >Village Voice Dennis Lim
Closer casts a smugly amused eye on the human capacity for betrayal. But because it also seeks to congratulate its audience for its urbane unshockability, it never strays beyond the limits of middlebrow complacency.
Read Full Review >Variety Todd McCarthy
The caustic wit and brute force of Patrick Marber's acclaimed play come across with a softened edge in Mike Nichols' bigscreen version of Closer.
Read Full Review >The New Republic Stanley Kauffmann
The finish is so asymmetrical that it, too, seems a comment on the kind of film this might once have been.
Read Full Review >Entertainment Weekly Lisa Schwarzbaum
The last thing Marber's quartet of modern miserables needs is to be admired; they are the very worst of average people, but on screen they have become the very best of the baddest.
Read Full Review >Portland Oregonian Shawn Levy
It's in its aspiration to depict deceit and obsession, selfishness and recklessness, bitterness, revenge and fury that the film's power lies. There and in Clive Owen's sure and powerful hands.
Read Full Review >Seattle Post-Intelligencer William Arnold
While its execution is fine, the movie is almost shockingly vapid.
Read Full Review >USA Today Claudia Puig
Offers a bleak though thought-provoking take on relationships. The challenge for the viewer is in caring enough to become invested in characters who seem hellbent on hurting one another.
Read Full Review >Charlotte Observer Lawrence Toppman
It's the most claustrophobic, airless movie of the year, a menage a quatre among unstable, manipulative, needy people who prey on each other like sharks at a feeding frenzy of the emotions.
Read Full Review >Slate David Edelstein
Closer is in the same arena as Labute, and I found it sour and airless, with the feel of a mathematical proof. The acting is superb, though, with one key exception. Jude Law.
Read Full Review >Los Angeles Times Kenneth Turan
Despite involved acting and Nichols' impeccable professionalism as a director, the end result is, to quote one of the characters, "a bunch of sad strangers photographed beautifully."
Read Full Review >Chicago Reader Jonathan Rosenbaum
The actors are brilliant, the dialogue extremely clever, and the direction assured. But by the end I couldn't have cared less about any of the characters.
Read Full Review >The New York Times Dana Stevens
Unlike most movie love stories, Closer does have the virtue of unpredictability. The problem is that, while parts are provocative and forceful, the film as a whole collapses into a welter of misplaced intensity.
Read Full Review >The New Yorker Anthony Lane
The Nichols of 1971 was bold and speedy, keeping pace with Jack Nicholson's contempt, whereas the more civilized Nichols of 2004 seems a beat behind the lines, waiting for peace or charity to break out. They never do.
Read Full Review >LA Weekly Ella Taylor
Strip away the cavernous lofts, the minimalist art galleries and the pricey consulting rooms, and you have four characters unable to earn their keep with the audience.
Read Full Review >Miami Herald Rene Rodriguez
One of the most pessimistic movies about love Hollywood has ever made, a star-studded, glossy anti-date movie.
Read Full Review >The Hollywood Reporter Kirk Honeycutt
Determined to be faithful to the strong, often shocking language and in-your-face drama in Marber's mannered writing, Nichols and his actors find no way to lift Closer into a realm that enlightens.
Read Full Review >Salon.com Stephanie Zacharek
So bloodless that it feels like an act of arty dishonesty.
Read Full Review >New York Daily News Jack Mathews
Despite four very strong performances, Closer is hard emotional work to sit through. It's impossible to empathize with either the viciously insecure Larry or the unscrupulous, childlike Dan.
Read Full Review >San Francisco Chronicle Mick LaSalle
Whenever Roberts is onscreen, Closer freezes and starts to atrophy. And when she's off, tender shoots of life begin to sprout.
Read Full Review >Baltimore Sun Michael Sragow
The word "yuppie" has fallen out of favor from overuse, but Closer's young urban professionals are so vain and superficial they may bring it back as the ultimate putdown. This movie is a yuppie nightmare.
Read Full Review >Wall Street Journal Joe Morgenstern
Bring Zoloft and a tank of oxygen to Closer, an airless, ultimately joyless drama of sexual politics.
Washington Post Desson Thomson
Everything is tearful confessions, angry interrogations and breakups. But there's nothing underneath.
Read Full Review >What Our Users Said
The average user rating for this movie is 6.2 (out of 10) based on 165 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.
Joel T. gave it a0:
Insufferably pretentious plot, insufferably contrived dialogue, insufferably self-important film. In short: insufferable. A hollow and disappointing offering from Nichols. And Natalie Portman may be purty, but she's a soulless phony. I don't think that piece of driftwood could act her way out of a paper bag if it had a hole cut it in. Don't get what all the fuss is about over her performance.
Ignat K. gave it a10:
One of the very few movies showing true relations - with uniquely truthful direct speech between the characters, and amazing music selection!
Abby l gave it a7:
Closer was a surprising twist on love. Those who claim it is 'the worst' movie they have ever seen, have obviously never viewed the movies Norbit and Epic Movie. The characters were involved, the only disappointing part was that this movie was borderline pornography, not in the visual sense.
Darren R gave it a10:
This is a film so complex and clever that it is bound to go over the heads of most of the viewing audience. Every word that is spoken has a double meaning to it, and if viewed with the understanding of this ironic level, the experience is far richer.
Dave C. gave it a2:
Cloying, affected and tiresomely self-important. Performances are lacklustre, from the insufferably dull Clive Owen to the overemployed Julia Roberts and the altogether useless Natalie Portman. Even the usually impressive Jude Law doesn't do this a lot of favours. Not that it's an easy task to be asked to spew out such trite, pretentious dialogue at the behest of a pretentious director.
Ma R. gave it a3:
Pseudointellectual writing and great performances. Dialogue is mediocre and contrived. Not grounded in reality.
Duncan B. gave it a1:
I have a profound loathing of this film. Real people do not talk like this. It asks hard questions like "Why do rich, beautiful, vain, self centered, urbanites treat love as a commodity and sex as a form of power politics". The film looks great as do the actors but it is presented as an authentic look at modern relationships, but this is as divorced from reality as any fantasy. The characters are emotional children, real people do not act or talk like the people in this film, it is a rich coffee table intellectuals view of humanity. This is a world view that has not been informed by genuine hardship. It is an A Level students view of modern love. I like a bleak film as much as anyone, the bleaker and more pessimistic the better, but this film lacked a key ingredient: RELEVANCE. This film explores the sexual politics of a metro-sexual elite, it is not a genuine universal exploration of love and the damage it does.
