Advanced Search >
Help Me Search

Movies

Weekend Box Office
Film Awards & Top 10s By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
Best / Worst of the Decade

Wide Releases
Now In Theaters

sort by namesort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

Limited Releases
Now In Theaters

sort by namesort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

Code 46

EMAILPRINTUnited Artists / Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Distributing Corporation

Code 46 reviews
57
6.3 User Score:

Mixed or average reviews

Based on 33 critic reviews
How did we calculate this?

Based on 18 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie >

Movie Info

Genre(s): Romance  |  Sci-fi

Written by: Frank Cottrell Boyce

Directed by: Michael Winterbottom

Release Date:
Theatrical: August 6, 2004
DVD: December 28, 2004

Running Time: 92 minutes, Color

Origin: UK

Summary

RATING: R for a scene of sexuality, including brief graphic nudity

Starring Tim Robbins, Samantha Morton, Om Puri, Jeanne Balibar, Essie Davis, Nina Fog, Togo Igawa, and Emil Marwa

A love story set in an eerily possible near-future where cities are heavily controlled and only accessible through checkpoints. (United Artists)

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

100

Premiere Glenn Kenny

Provocative, quietly erotic, deeply romantic, and slyly witty (a cameo by a giant of punk rock is funny at first sight, and funnier still when you figure out the joke it's making), Code 46 is a very effective antidote to summer blockbuster bloat.

Read Full Review >
89

Austin Chronicle Marc Savlov

Cyberpunk meets renegade romance, à la Orwell.

Read Full Review >
83

Entertainment Weekly Owen Gleiberman

Code 46 has a noirish fatalism that renders it a close cousin to ''Blade Runner,'' but Winterbottom's film, shot mostly in the light, uses the theme of memory erasure to peer into the eternal sunshine of tragically altered minds.

Read Full Review >
80

Dallas Observer Gregory Weinkauf

Astonishing, haunting and lyrical on its own terms.

Read Full Review >
75

Portland Oregonian M. E. Russell

What is deeply stirring is Code 46's sound, light and texture. It's probably bad critical form to recommend a movie based largely on abstractions like "vibe," but Winterbottom does such a glorious job building his world that a certain breed of filmgoer can get punch-drunk lost in the pure cinema of it all.

Read Full Review >
75

San Francisco Chronicle Carla Meyer

Updates a classic premise -- the struggle for personal freedom -- by pairing it with ethical and moral quandaries.

Read Full Review >
75

Christian Science Monitor David Sterritt

Not always compellingly made, but intelligent and perhaps prophetic.

Read Full Review >
70

LA Weekly Scott Foundas

If the movie is finally something of a failure as a romance, it's rarely less than a triumph of soulful imagination.

Read Full Review >
70

Washington Post Desson Thomson

You may soon forget the specifics of the plot, but you'll always remember the world it came from.

Read Full Review >
70

Wall Street Journal Jim Fusilli

At times somber, and now and then dangerously close to self-important, Code 46 is nonetheless a smart, mature film that examines who and what we can be to each other, in a world full of invention and change.

63

The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Jason Anderson

It all contributes to a vision of the future that is as haunting as it is dispiriting.

Read Full Review >
63

Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert

The problem with Code 46 is that the movie, filled with ideas and imagination, is murky in its rules and intentions. I cannot say I understand the hows and whys of this future world, nor do I much care, since it's mostly a clever backdrop to a love affair that would easily teleport to many other genres.

Read Full Review >
63

New York Daily News Jack Mathews

But for what is at heart a thriller, Code 46 lacks both energy and tension.

Read Full Review >
63

USA Today Claudia Puig

For at least half the movie, you need a code book a few inches thick to decipher Code 46.

Read Full Review >
60

TV Guide Maitland McDonagh

Ultimately the sci-fi fillips — human cloning, memory wipes, empathy viruses — are subordinate to screenwriter Frank Cottrell Boyce's doomed romance.

Read Full Review >
60

The Hollywood Reporter Jean Oppenheimer

Code 46 lacks the visceral power of "28 Days Later," as well as what might be termed its "gross-out" appeal.

Read Full Review >
60

Variety David Stratton

An intriguing but only partly successful co-mingling of film noir and sci-fi.

Read Full Review >
60

Village Voice J. Hoberman

Late in the day, Code 46 bursts its chemical chains to become a convincingly irrational love story.

Read Full Review >
60

Empire Genevieve Harrison

Cinematography, production design and music are all top-notch, but the film largely succeeds because of the leads -- two fine actors at the top of their game.

Read Full Review >
50

Boston Globe Ty Burr

What this dystopia doesn't do is shock. In truth, Code 46 traffics in notions of speculative social fiction that are so familiar by now as to feel disconcertingly normal.

Read Full Review >
50

Slate David Edelstein

It's about unruly passion, but it's icy and cerebral, and Robbins has become a disappointingly tentative actor, playing emotionally straitjacketed men in a self-imposed straitjacket.

Read Full Review >
50

Chicago Reader Jonathan Rosenbaum

This film sounds better than it plays; there are too many echoes of "Alphaville" and of the dreamy drift of "Blade Runner." But the style of the opening and closing credits is pretty spiffy.

Read Full Review >
50

New York Magazine Peter Rainer

Their doomy romance is supposed to be fated, but it just seems sloggy, certainly not the stuff of myth. A good comedy could be made from this same premise.

Read Full Review >
50

Rolling Stone Peter Travers

What doesn't spark is the love story. Morton still seems soggy from her "Minority Report" role as a drenched pre-cog. Who wants romance in a future where glum is the word?

Read Full Review >
50

The New York Times Dana Stevens

The movie's atmosphere is, in many ways, more interesting than its story. Mr. Robbins and Ms. Morton are not the warmest actors. He can be mannered and smug, and she often seems to beam her performances from a strange, private mental universe.

Read Full Review >
50

Film Threat Pete Vonder Haar

I won't spoil the ending, but if Code 46 is to be believed, women will have it even worse in the years to come.

Read Full Review >
50

Los Angeles Times Kenneth Turan

Winterbottom, who's never been a director with a gift for warmth, can't make this romance come alive. Morton and Robbins are gifted actors, but they seem straitjacketed here, and the film finds it difficult to avoid tedium as their lugubrious relationship unfolds.

Read Full Review >
50

The Onion (A.V. Club) Noel Murray

Though Robbins acts a little stiff, Morton remains stunning throughout, playing a mixture of her wide-eyed, deeply sensitive characters from "Morvern Callar" and "Minority Report." She suggests worlds within worlds.

Read Full Review >
50

Chicago Tribune Allison Benedikt

Too ambiguous, too meandering to envelop us. It's ambitious work but ultimately cold, distant and difficult to piece together.

Read Full Review >
50

New York Post Lou Lumenick

An intriguing, if seriously flawed, film noir.

Read Full Review >
42

Seattle Post-Intelligencer Paula Nechak

This sci-fi film noir craves a passionate center, an intoxicating core or some pulse that makes us want to keep taking that first step into dark waters, but it leaves us drowning in its quiet tedium instead.

Read Full Review >
38

ReelViews James Berardinelli

Code 46 is like "Solaris" without the psychological depth and strong acting. The movie is flat, boring, pointless, and nonsensical.

Read Full Review >
30

Washington Post Stephen Hunter

Michael Winterbottom's Code 46 commits a Code 1 violation: It's boring.

Read Full Review >

What Our Users Said

The average user rating for this movie is 6.3 (out of 10) based on 18 User Votes

Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

Ilona C. gave it an8:
The main charaters of the film where well portrayed. They where not ultra sexy or blindingly physically attractive and that's the appeal. They are normal people set in an oppressive world where the over use of cloning and ivf leads to the need for a law called code 46. I won't spoil the movies end but will say it's beautifully shot, subtle elegant story-telling takes the viewer on a ride to a disturbingly realistic vision of the future with its center being the hopless ill fated love story .

Paul C. gave it an8:
A fascinating blend of music, photography and action create a film in many ways redolent of Wenders' Until the End of the World.

Ground F. gave it a7:
I'll never forget the world of Code 46. Unfortunately, the film is ruined by two dull characters and the dullest love affair imaginable. The characters are atypically boring. Incredibly boring. There's no real spontaneity in the relationship. The conversation that passes between the characters is almost mindless in its banality. Other than that, they make love. That is the relationship. I don't want to post spoilers, [***SPOILERS***] but the tragedy of their relationship is that there isn't much for them to lose. There was so much potential for this film. In my opinion, the world of Code 46 is as good as any that has been created in cinema. Unfortunately, the two main characters are impossibly dull; their affair is almost perversely dull. Code 46 has moments of real beauty that, in my opinion, eclipses all the things that make this film quite frustrating. It left a lasting impression on me and in a few months I will watch it again.

Ivan J. gave it a1:
Honestly, one of the worst films I've seen in the last five years. Utterly fails to redeem its promise. It's beautifully shot - I mean, gorgeously - but the problems are legion and sink it before it's half over. The central issue is (as others here have noted) that the couple at the film's heart makes absolutely no sense. There's zero chemistry between Tim Robbins and Samantha Morton, so there's also zero logic to their ostensibly rapid descent into obsession. Morton is just awful, here, and the sex scenes in particular were hard to take. (Tim Robbins is likeable, but the character is underwritten, giving him little to work with but a single bit of shtick that is old the second time you see it.) The worst thing is that Code 46 insists, every thirty seconds or so, on reminding you of all the vastly superior films it's derived from and to the position of which it so clearly wishes to aspire - Alphaville, Gattaca, and (Tarkovsky's) Solaris in particular. Awful, simply awful.

Richard S. gave it a4:
As others have posted, this is a mix of Blade Runner, Gattaca, Cypher, Eternal Sunshine, Solaris etc - but it's nothing like as good as any of those films. The sci-fi elements are poorly developed and go nowhere. Everything is subsumed within the central "romance". I use inverted commas as the relationship between Morton and Robbins is hideous. There is zero chemistry, which is hardly surprising since both actors specialise in flatlining performances (I really like Morton - I have been a fan since she was a kid in an episode of Cracker in the early 90s, but really, these shaven-headed, sleepy-eyed, dozy performances are getting annoying now...). The sex scenes between Morton and Robbins made me gag - since there is no chemstry or spark between the couple, and absolutely no sex appeal, it's hard to see them "get passionate" on a regular basis - it was all wrong. Don't get me wrong, this film could have worked, with a better cast, or more particularly, a different leading man. The sci-fi elements should also have been more clearly addressed. I should add I liked the soundtrack - very similar to Solaris tho not as good. The direction was also very good (though Greengrass' obsession with hand-held cameras is tiring), shame he couldn't tell a better story.

Kevin H. gave it a7:
I think the director did an incredible job. I loved the way it was shot. The scifi world they created was also awesome. But I think the story was way too subtle and wasn't clear enough.

Matt K gave it a10:
I loved this movie. Thoughtful and dense, and full of quiet passion about loving near strangers. It's steady and gorgeous.

Read more user comments >

Popular on CBS sites: College Signing Day | Olympics | Lost | iPhone | Cell Phones | Video Game Reviews | Free Music

About CBS Interactive | Jobs | Advertise

© 2010 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy (UPDATED) | Terms of Use