Movies
Weekend Box Office
Film Awards & Top 10s By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
Best / Worst of the Decade
Wide Releases
Now In Theaters
49
2012
41
Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel
84
Avatar![]()
69
Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans
53
Blind Side
53
Book of Eli, The
55
Christmas Carol, A
57
Daybreakers
43
Dear John
27
Did You Hear About the Morgans?
55
Edge of Darkness
45
Extraordinary Measures
83
Fantastic Mr. Fox![]()
42
From Paris with Love
65
Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus, The
74
Invictus
57
It's Complicated
34
Law Abiding Citizen
33
Leap Year
33
Legion
42
Lovely Bones, The
54
Men Who Stare At Goats, The
34
Ninja Assassin
19
Old Dogs
xx
Percy Jackson & The Olympians: The Lightning Thief
39
Planet 51
79
Precious: Based on the Novel by Sapphire
73
Princess & the Frog, The
64
Road, The
57
Sherlock Holmes
27
Spy Next Door, The
36
Tooth Fairy
44
Twilight Saga: New Moon, The
83
Up in the Air![]()
43
Valentine's Day
25
When in Rome
71
Where the Wild Things Are
xx
WolfMan, The
63
Youth in Revolt
Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.
Limited Releases
Now In Theaters
46
44 Inch Chest
83
Ajami![]()
73
Amreeka
xx
Barefoot to Timbuktu
19
Bitch Slap
24
Boondock Saints II: All Saints Day, The
76
Broken Embraces
64
Cloud 9
65
Coco Before Chanel
84
Cove, The![]()
84
Crazy Heart![]()
21
Crazy on the Outside
48
Creation
xx
Daddy Long Legs
81
Damned United, The![]()
68
Departures
62
District 13: Ultimatum
85
Education, An![]()
71
Eyes Wide Open
24
Falling Awake
81
Fish Tank![]()
56
For My Father
xx
From Mexico with Love
43
Frozen
68
Girl on the Train, The
52
Killing Kasztner
74
Last Station, The
43
Little Traitor, The
51
Loss of a Teardrop Diamond, The
73
Me and Orson Welles
76
Messenger, The
57
Missing Person, The
67
Most Dangerous Man in America: Daniel Ellsberg and the Pentagon Papers, The
xx
My Name is Khan
49
Nine
63
North Face
59
October Country
67
Off and Running
52
Paranoids, The
49
Pop Star on Ice
49
Private Lives of Pippa Lee, The
xx
Promised Lands (Re-release)
69
Red Riding Trilogy, The
29
Saint John of Las Vegas
69
September Issue, The
36
Serious Moonlight
63
Shinjuku Incident, The
77
Single Man, A
xx
Still Bill
76
Terribly Happy
74
That Evening Sun
19
To Save a Life
68
Town Called Panic, A
59
Until the Light Takes Us
57
Videocracy
65
Waiting for Armageddon
82
White Ribbon![]()
43
Women in Trouble
xx
Word is Out
64
Young Victoria, The
Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.
Exorcist: The Version You've Never Seen, The

Universal acclaim
Based on 24 critic reviews
How did we calculate this?
Based on 33 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie >
Movie Info
Genre(s): Horror
Written by: William Peter Blatty (also novel)
Directed by: William Friedkin
Release Date:
Theatrical: September 22, 2000
DVD: December 26, 2000
Running Time: 131 minutes, Color
Origin: USA
Summary
RATING: R for strong language and disturbing images
Starring Ellen Burstyn, Max von Sydow, Lee J. Cobb, Kitty Winn, Jack MacGowran, Jason Miller, and Linda Blair
In this re-release of the horror classic, a 12 year old girl (Blair) becomes possessed by a malevolent spirit, and her only hope is an exorcism. Two priests are summoned to exorcise the demon.
Also On Metacritic
FILM: Exorcist: The Beginning
Also On The Web: Internet Movie Database View The Trailer Official Studio Site
What The Critics Said
All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...
Portland Oregonian Kim Morgan
Isn't just a horror film, but an American classic. Watch again and reflect for days after -- at your own risk.
Charlotte Observer Lawrence Toppman
Classically scary.
San Francisco Chronicle Peter Stack
Friedkin has said the new, expanded version of his film has a more spiritual tone. But it's still a shocker.
Read Full Review >Chicago Tribune Michael Wilmington
Re-released now in a digitally enhanced, sonically improved and slightly longer version, the movie is even better than it was in 1973.
Entertainment Weekly Owen Gleiberman
Here, in paranoid, bad acid trip form, is the real birth of girl power.
Read Full Review >Film.com John Hartl
The best thing about the new Exorcist is the spiffed-up soundtrack.
Read Full Review >Variety Robert Koehler
This edition of the seminal example of genre sensationalism refined by the cream of Hollywood craftsmanship is more complicated than a standard director's cut.
Read Full Review >Dallas Observer Robert Wilonsky
That's what directors do when they have nothing new to say: They go back and rewrite the past, if only to avoid facing the future
Read Full Review >Mr. Showbiz Larry Terenzi
It's shlock, yes, but at least it's highbrow shlock.
Boston Globe Jay Carr
An upsetting landmark. Don't take the children.
Philadelphia Inquirer Desmond Ryan
Suffice it to say I prefer the original conclusion, and I think most Exorcist fans will agree
New York Post Lou Lumenick
His (Friedkin) very lack of subtlety is both the strength and weakness of The Exorcist in the 21st century.
San Francisco Examiner Wesley Morris
The amazing thing about the film, for anyone who hasn't had an intentional Hollywood scare lately, is that it still delivers on the most visceral level
Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert
Was and is a brilliant horror film, one with an archetypal ability to reach and disturb us. If I were showing The Exorcist to a friend, I would show the 1973 version without the slightest hesitation.
Read Full Review >Miami Herald Rene Rodriguez
The Exorcist has lost none of its ability to invade your nightmares.
Washington Post Desson Thomson
A museum piece, something to be enjoyed for its historical value.
Read Full Review >Rolling Stone Peter Travers
There's something elemental about The Exorcist, even with the new hopeful ending that betrays the bleak original.
Chicago Reader Don Druker
You're scared witless much of the time, even if you conclude afterward that this 1973 movie was really pretty amateurish and simpleminded.
Read Full Review >New York Daily News Jack Mathews
The movie that launched a new era in horror films, and which, for one generation, remains one of the scariest experiences of their lives.
Read Full Review >TV Guide Frank Lovece
This truly terrifying film version of the best-selling Blatty novel is far superior to the book.
Read Full Review >TNT RoughCut Susannah Breslin
Still packs a wallop of terror for those with the strength of stomach for it.
Christian Science Monitor David Sterritt
This hugely popular horror yarn is less a cleverly spun story than a disjointed collection of shockeroos, surrounding a few ghoulishly effective moments with overcooked plot twists and in-your-face vulgarity.
Read Full Review >Washington Post Stephen Hunter
11 minutes longer than the original, and 11 minutes worse.
Read Full Review >What Our Users Said
The average user rating for this movie is 8.2 (out of 10) based on 33 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.
Vanessa L. gave it a10:
This movie is sooooooooooo scarey that I had to sleep with my parents for a whole week. Just the thought of being in a bedroom creeps me out due to the fact that most of the film is shot in Ragen's room. The effects are brilliant, and the film itself does its job as a horror flick; it lets our imaginations run wild without our control. If you like extreme horror movies, you should definetly consider watching this. Otherwise, KEEP AWAY UNTIL YOU CAN TAKE IT!!!
Marc D. gave it an8:
The original film never frightened me. What it did went much deeper. Friedkin's original film adaptation of the Blatty novel was a landmark in cinematic horror because it was constrained by the limitations of its medium. Instead, it used them to provide the most while showing you as little as possible. Emotions like horror, and its close cousins suspense and tension, don't need to be created within the audience. They need to be brought to the surface. This is why 'The Exorcist' remains compelling viewing after 33 years. The concepts and themes within the film isn't anything we haven't seen before. It's always been there. The fear works because the fear is real on a primal level which we can't truly explain. We fear what we know. Subjecting the audience, the false sense of safety within that dark theatre is now revealed to be a silly misguided illusion. Friedkin knew this. As does fear. This version simply shows the same thing. And it's scary. Not as much though. We see a little more than we should. Ultimately, the best horror told is the one which leaves more to the imagination of the audience. Give us more credit Hollywood. Highbrow horror works.
[Anonymous] gave it a0:
Nothing but terrible.
M D gave it a10:
Miles ahead of its time and fully deserves the title of 'classic'.
Tony B. gave it a10:
For non-believers, a brilliantly conceived and executed horror classic. For the rest of us, it's all that and more, a tale awesome in its implications.
raphaella p. gave it a10:
This is a great film, this excelent!!!!
Rick T gave it a10:
This horror movie will always stand the test of time because it is simple horror with good vs. evil. This movie gets into your mind and you always remember it. I first saw the movie in 1973 and I could not watch in the theatre. I kept my head down the entire time. The gutteral sounds were frightening enough to send me to the lobby. I can now look at the film but it still remains to be very disturbing and thought provoking. I believe the re-release version is better. The spider walk scene scared the .... out of me and was totally unexpected. Most horror films end up becomming slasher movies. You cannot watch this film and not be effected by the disturbing turn of events.
