GAMES: GameSpot | GameFAQs MUSIC: Last.fm | MP3.com MOVIES: Metacritic | Movietome TV: TV.com
Home | About Metacritic | About Metascores | What's New | Wireless Versions | Discussion Forums | Advertising Inquiries | Contact Us | RSS
Metacritic.com: We Deal With Criticism
     Help
> Switch to Advanced Search  
Film Video/DVD Music Games TV

Film

Upcoming Release Calendar
Weekend Box Office
Film Awards & Top 10s By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
How Metascores Are Calculated
Discuss Film In Our Forums

 

Wide Releases

sort by name sort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

 

Limited Releases

sort by name sort by score

67 $9.99
75 24 City
66 Adoration
74 Afghan Star
48 Alien Trespass
56 American Violet
82 Anvil! The Story of Anvil
57 Away We Go
81 Beaches of Agnes, The
62 Big Man Japan
28 Big Shot-Caller, The
78 Boys: The Sherman Brothers' Story, The
55 Brothers Bloom, The
82 Burma VJ: Reporting from a Closed Country
xx Call of the Wild
63 Cheri
62 Cherry Blossoms
63 Dead Snow
65 Departures
18 Downloading Nancy
58 Easy Virtue
70 End of the Line, The
77 Every Little Step
64 Examined Life
80 Food, Inc.
38 Gigantic
56 Girl from Monaco, The
67 Girlfriend Experience, The
87 Gomorrah
89 Goodbye Solo
63 Great Buck Howard, The
79 Harvard Beats Yale 29-29
xx Home
82 Hunger
91 Hurt Locker, The
16 I Hate Valentine's Day
81 Il Divo
54 Is Anybody There?
71 Jerichow
58 Julia
74 Lemon Tree
36 Life is Hot in Cracktown
40 Limits of Control, The
42 Little Ashes
64 Lymelife
50 Management
57 Merry Gentleman, The
66 Moon
35 New York
62 Not Forgotten
xx Offshore
78 O'Horten
64 Outrage
40 Paris 36
54 Pontypool
71 Pressure Cooker
52 Quiet Chaos
83 Revanche
67 Rudo y Cursi
86 Seraphine
65 Sex Positive
70 Shall We Kiss?
77 Sin Nombre
59 Sleep Dealer
74 Song of Sparrows, The
54 Stoning of Soraya M., The
82 Sugar
84 Summer Hours
61 Sunshine Cleaning
28 Surveillance
42 Tennessee
63 Tetro
64 Throw Down Your Heart
80 Tokyo Sonata
63 Tokyo!
70 Tony Manero
74 Treeless Mountain
88 Tulpan
74 Two Lovers
83 Tyson
83 U2 3D
60 Under Our Skin
69 Unmistaken Child
69 Valentino: The Last Emperor
22 What Goes Up
45 Whatever Works
57 Youssou Ndour: I Bring What I Love

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

 



Printer-Friendly Version Email This Page Discuss In Our Forums

Four Feathers, The
Paramount Pictures

Four Feathers, The reviews
Critic Score
Metascore: 49 Metascore out of 100
User Score  
7.6 out of 10
based on 32 reviews
Read critic reviews
How did we calculate this?
based on 13 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie

MPAA RATING: PG-13 for intense battle sequences, disturbing images, violence and some sensuality

Starring Heath Ledger, Wes Bentley, Kate Hudson, Djimon Hounsou, Michael Sheen, Laila Rouass, Rupert Penry-Jones, and Alex Jennings

A gripping adventure of epic proportions, this is a story of heroic redemption, undying loyalty and rivalry in love. A sweeping saga that captures a friend's bond and a hero's destiny, The Four Feathers is a look at man's indomitable spirit to survive. (Miramax)


GENRE(S): War  
WRITTEN BY: Michael Schiffer
Hossein Amini
A.E.W. Mason (novel)
 
DIRECTED BY: Shekhar Kapur  
RELEASE DATE: DVD: February 18, 2003 
Video: February 18, 2003 
Theatrical: September 20, 2002 
RUNNING TIME: 127 minutes, Color 
ORIGIN: USA 

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

88
New York Post Lou Lumenick
Splendidly spectacular, intelligent and very well-acted.
Read Full Review
80
New Times (L.A.) Gregory Weinkauf
Has a lot to offer as grand entertainment, from surprising battle sequences (plenty of terror, virtually no gore, brief and tasteful digital enhancement) to fine performances.
80
The Onion (A.V. Club) Nathan Rabin
Ledger is a charismatic, conflicted hero who internalizes his character's shame and anguish to powerful effect. Wes Bentley is similarly strong as Ledger's best friend turned romantic rival, and Kapur makes the most of Africa's breathtaking desert, crafting a gorgeous spectacle that's at once stately and hyper-real.
Read Full Review
75
Christian Science Monitor David Sterritt
The Four Feathers ends on the same dubious note as "Black Hawk Down" and other recent war movies, suggesting that loyalty in the trenches -- not the reason for fighting in the first place -- is all that matters. Many will disagree.
Read Full Review
75
Chicago Tribune Michael Wilmington
At its best, this new film does mix grandeur with skepticism, excitement with reflection. In the end, like Harry, it redeems itself.
Read Full Review
67
Seattle Post-Intelligencer William Arnold
When a filmmaker heavy-handedly imposes his contemporary values on a classic of popular art, it's devilishly hard not to destroy or invalidate the very thing that made it a classic.
Read Full Review
63
New York Daily News Jack Mathews
Ultimately, The Four Feathers is strong where its predecessors were weak (in the authenticity of combat) and weak where they were strong (in the larger-than-life quality of the characters). It's not a good exchange.
Read Full Review
63
Miami Herald Rene Rodriguez
What The Four Feathers lacks is genuine sweep or feeling or even a character worth caring about.
Read Full Review
63
Charlotte Observer Lawrence Toppman
Kapur’s contradictory feelings about his material result in a movie that works against itself. As righteous and consistent as his anger may be -- it’s displayed from the opening title cards to the final shot -- it doesn’t blend successfully with the story.
Read Full Review
63
ReelViews James Berardinelli
A tighter version of the same story might have captured and held my interest, but this one had the proceedings wandering like the riderless camels in the desert.
Read Full Review
60
Washington Post Michael O'Sullivan
It's a pretty compelling yarn, not to mention full of pretty pictures, and yet it could be so much more than that.
Read Full Review
60
Chicago Reader J.R. Jones
The film's opening and closing moments are weirdly reminiscent of "Black Hawk Down," another tale of Western soldiers in over their heads on the dark continent -- clearly no one these days understands manifest destiny.
Read Full Review
58
Entertainment Weekly Owen Gleiberman
It may be an accidental historical parallel that, at times, we seem to be watching a 19th-century version of ''The John Walker Lindh Story,'' but the fluke is only enhanced by the weird anonymity of Ledger's performance.
Read Full Review
50
USA Today Mike Clark
Kapur's stodgy style halts the momentum of young actors who have impressed in other movies.
Read Full Review
50
San Francisco Chronicle Mick LaSalle
Its virtues can't outweigh the disappointment of a movie that might have been a rousing old-fashioned epic, or better yet a provocative reworking of an old epic, and instead became a muddle.
Read Full Review
50
TV Guide Steve Simels
The film's center will not hold. Either crucial scenes were cut (perhaps for length) or Kapur has a problematic sense of narrative structure; sometimes it's unclear who's doing what to whom.
Read Full Review
50
Boston Globe Ty Burr
Still as moth-eaten as a Bengal tiger rug on the floor of a London men's club.
Read Full Review
50
Los Angeles Times Kenneth Turan
All these intriguing good intentions, however, have largely gone for naught because of a variety of missteps, starting with an increasing implausible plot as well as the fact that Ledger's Harry looks about as likely to pass for an Arab as the Mahdi is to pass for Queen Victoria.
Read Full Review
50
The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Rick Groen
What a featherweight epic this is, the kind of uniformed period piece where the watchword is pretty. Pretty costumes, pretty soldiers, pretty battles; pretty silly.
Read Full Review
50
Rolling Stone Peter Travers
It should have been an old-fashioned rouser, and sometimes it is. The great cinematographer Robert Richardson (JFK) lights the battle scenes like action paintings. But Kapur weighs down the tale with bogus profundities.
Read Full Review
50
Austin Chronicle Marc Savlov
Offers too small a dose of the blood-and-sand adventure you expect from this sort of big-budget Hollywood remake. As it is, it borders on The English Patient's on again-off again heroics, minus Anthony Minghella's patient skill in eliciting romantic suspense.
Read Full Review
50
Village Voice J. Hoberman
Feels both tiresomely old-fashioned and disturbingly topical.
Read Full Review
50
Washington Post Stephen Hunter
The movie's deeper problem and its primary disappointment: its unwillingness to deal directly with the issue of colonialism.
Read Full Review
50
Portland Oregonian Kim Morgan
Works as pure escapist entertainment, but it's on the cusp of being smarter -- making it all the more frustrating.
50
Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert
It looks good, it moves quickly and it is often a jolly good time. As mindless swashbuckling in a well-designed production, it can't be faulted. The less you know about the British Empire and human nature, the more you will like it, but then that can be said of so many movies.
Read Full Review
50
Philadelphia Inquirer Carrie Rickey
The good news is that it sees what a jihad looks like from both sides. The bad news is that it's not a very good movie, with three fine performances and two great sequences.
Read Full Review
40
The New Yorker Anthony Lane
Illogical and glum. [30 Sept 2002, p. 145]
38
Baltimore Sun Michael Sragow
Because this Four Feathers is an utter botch, it might make savvy viewers feel that the subject matter is hopeless.
Read Full Review
30
Variety Todd McCarthy
There is no one to become attached to in The Four Feathers, no interest or sympathies appealed to or engaged.
Read Full Review
30
LA Weekly Chuck Wilson
A mindless muddle.
Read Full Review
30
The New York Times A.O. Scott
Such few assets aren't enough to alleviate the film's shallowness.
Read Full Review
30
Salon.com Charles Taylor
Hoary epic of British Empire valor and cowardice, remade for seventh time, remains rot, old boy.
Read Full Review

What Our Users Said

Vote Now!The average user rating for this movie is 7.6 (out of 10) based on 13 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

chiwawa K. gave it a10:
A beautifull movie.

Mike A. gave it a 1:
Condescending at best. Terrible acting. It's almost too much to expect for Hollywood to produce a serious movie on a serious subject.

Distortedpetals gave it an 8:
Overall, renters liked this movie very much. This movie had a lot of layers and was not made for those with A.D.H.D. It is a real sit down-pay attention feature. However, It is well worth the watch.

Jugster Jam gave it a 9:
Movie is worth your time, money, and your brain. This a classic like lawrence of arabia. There are no parts in the movie where you can point out weak acting. The movie is shot beautifully and looks very sharp on DVD. The story offers everything and leaves out nothing.

Rose D. gave it a 9:
Good movie. The acting was good. Very exciting.

Eric S. gave it a 4:
I was looking forward to "The Four Feathers" for months, but was very disappointed at the final result. I'll admit the film looks great, and that the battle scene in the middle was spectacular. What a movie this could have been had the rest of it been like that one scene. Kate Hudson is sinfully underused.

Read more user comments...

Discuss this movie in our forums

Return to top of page
Home | FILM | DVD/VIDEO | MUSIC | GAMES | TV | Forums | About Metacritic metacritic.com

Popular on CBS sites: iPhone 3G | Fantasy Football | Moneywatch | Antivirus Software | Recipes | E3 2009

About CBS Interactive | Jobs | Advertise

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use