|
Upcoming Release Calendar
38
12 Rounds Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.
67
$9.99 Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.
|
Fracture
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
||||||||||||
MPAA RATING: R for language and some violent content
Starring Anthony Hopkins, Ryan Gosling, David Strathairn, Rosamund Pike, Embeth Davidtz, Billy Burke, Cliff Curtis, and Fiona Shaw
When a meticulous structural engineer (Hokins) is found innocent of the attempted murder of his wife (Davidtz), the young district attorney (Gosling) who is prosecuting him becomes a crusader for justice. Fracture is packed with twists and turns that weave in and out of the courtroom as the pair try to outwit each other. (New Line Cinema)
| GENRE(S): | Suspense/Thriller |
| WRITTEN BY: |
Daniel Pyne (also story)
Glenn Gers |
| DIRECTED BY: | Gregory Hoblit |
| RELEASE DATE: |
DVD: August 14, 2007 Theatrical: April 20, 2007 |
| RUNNING TIME: | 112 minutes, Color |
| ORIGIN: | USA |
All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...
The average user rating for this movie is 6.5 (out of 10) based on 47 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.
Tony B. gave it a6:
Extremely well-acted legal thriller with some unfortunate plot holes. Ryan Gosling more than holds his own up against one of our finest actors, Anthony Hopkins.
Frank H. gave it a6:
Generally as an attorney I am able to appreciate literary license and understand that a film can not 100% reflect the realities of the law. But I do expect some basis in reality. The legal errors were so glaring that I was unable to enjoy the movie. Just because a defendant waives a preliminary hearing doesn't mean that the trial is going to start the next day. When a defendant files a motion the prosecution has an opportunity to respond, in writing. Judges don't make rulings in chambers, etc. My guess that a police investigator who saw this movie would have their own complaints about police procedure. That being said, Hopkins is still an interesting actor.
Tom J. gave it a9:
Great acting, very engaging.
Dean D. gave it a2:
Plot spoiler warning! As a lawyer, I can say there were two major flaws in the plot. First, the notion of double jeopardy is nonsense. Crawford was never tried and acquitted, the charges were dropped for lack of evidence. Hence, they could be refiled if new evidence came to light. That said, being guilty of murder didn't make sense if he couldn't be charged with attempted murder. His wife died because the hospital turned off her respirator, which they were presumably entitled to do under the law, with his permission. How can that be murder if under the double jeopardy concept, he couldn't be charged again with shooting his wife? Doesn't compute. Aesthetically, I thought Willy was obnoxious and his "conversion" was laughable. And the affair of a gorgeous senior partner with an incoming jr. associate.......in your dreams.
C L gave it a7:
Reasonably well directed and written, but: Personally, I felt no sympathy for any of the "good guy" characters in this movie. First of all, lets start with Crawford's Wife; she is cheating on her husband, who we are provided with no evidence to the contrary that he is anything else but a loving spouse. She is cold, untrustworthy and generally came across as a deceptive woman. The cop, who comes across less as a deranged lover than as a poorly disciplined, incompetent, also cheating cop was also difficult to muster any kind of sympathy for. The lawyer, again, annoys me and I'm guessing many other people, because he is a stuck up, cocky young lawyer who seems to think he is smarter than he really is. Then there is Crawford himself. [***SPOILER***] I wanted him to prevail, I wanted to see him outwit this cocky young lawyer in a case where he used his perfectly justifiable, though not condoned, human emotions and careful, meticulous intelligence to get away with murdering his cheating wife and her also cheating lover. He was the most complex character and had the most justifiable feelings out of any of the characters in the film. Other than this, I liked it.
Colin C gave it a7:
While a lot of the elements felt familiar, it had enough new twists I liked the style of film and enjoyed it, even if it did feel like I'd seen the ending played out more than once in different TV lawyer shows.
Elizabeth P. gave it a7:
Very entertaining, great story, I just wished they elaborated the ending a little more.

| Return to top of page |

Popular on CBS sites: iPhone 3G | Fantasy Football | Moneywatch | Antivirus Software | Recipes | E3 2009
About CBS Interactive | Jobs | Advertise
© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use