Movies
Weekend Box Office
Film Awards & Top 10s By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
Wide Releases
Now In Theaters
76
(500) Days of Summer
49
2012
60
9
17
All About Steve
37
Amelia
53
Astro Boy
70
Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans
52
Blind Side
47
Box, The
61
Capitalism: A Love Story
55
Christmas Carol, A
43
Cirque du Freak: The Vampire's Assistant
66
Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs
23
Couples Retreat
39
Fame
30
Final Destination, The
34
Fourth Kind, The
41
G-Force
46
Halloween II
73
Hangover, The
78
Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince
66
Informant!, The
69
Inglourious Basterds
58
Invention of Lying, The
47
Jennifer's Body
66
Julie & Julia
34
Law Abiding Citizen
54
Men Who Stare At Goats, The
67
Michael Jackson's This Is It
28
Pandorum
58
Pirate Radio
39
Planet 51
30
Saw VI
53
Shorts
33
Stepfather, The
45
Surrogates
46
Twilight Saga: New Moon, The
71
Where the Wild Things Are
67
Whip It
28
Whiteout
73
Zombieland
Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.
Limited Releases
Now In Theaters
58
(Untitled)
96
35 Shots of Rum![]()
56
Adam
39
Adventures of Power
66
Afterschool
73
Amreeka
49
Antichrist
76
Baader Meinhof Complex, The
86
Beaches of Agnes, The![]()
71
Big Fan
65
Black Dynamite
76
Bliss
26
Boondock Saints II: All Saints Day, The
44
Brief Interviews with Hideous Men
81
Bright Star![]()
76
Broken Embraces
70
Bronson
62
Cloud 9
65
Coco Before Chanel
69
Cold Souls
60
Collapse
82
Cove, The![]()
75
Crude
82
Damned United, The![]()
53
Dare
50
Defamation
67
Departures
70
Earth Days
85
Education, An![]()
55
Endgame
88
Fantastic Mr. Fox![]()
31
Fix
49
Food Beware: The French Organic Revolution
80
Food, Inc.
xx
From Mexico with Love
28
Gentlemen Broncos
72
Good Hair
89
Goodbye Solo![]()
63
Horse Boy, The
74
House of the Devil, The
xx
How to Seduce Difficult Women
26
I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell
70
It Might Get Loud
46
Killing Kasztner
43
Little Traitor, The
34
Looking for Palladin
80
Lorna's Silence
46
Love Hurts
84
Maid, The![]()
45
Mammoth
75
Messenger, The
55
Missing Person, The
59
More Than a Game
34
Motherhood
62
My One and Only
48
New York, I Love You
66
No Impact Man
26
Oh My God
68
Paranormal Activity
68
Paris
79
Precious: Based on the Novel by Sapphire
73
Red Cliff
69
September Issue, The
79
Serious Man, A
65
Skin
41
Splinterheads
42
Staten Island
50
Stoning of Soraya M., The
58
Storm
82
Sun, The![]()
49
Ten9Eight: Shoot for the Moon
73
That Evening Sun
61
Trucker
49
Turning Green
83
U2 3D![]()
45
Uncertainty
67
Visual Acoustics
32
War on Kids
67
Way We Get By, The
65
Wedding Song, The
xx
White on Rice
59
William Kunstler: Disturbing the Universe
74
Woman in Berlin, A
43
Women in Trouble
69
Yoo-Hoo, Mrs. Goldberg
Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.
Full Frontal

Mixed or average reviews
Based on 37 critic reviews
How did we calculate this?
Based on 7 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie >
Movie Info
Genre(s): Romance
Written by: Coleman Hough
Directed by: Steven Soderbergh
Release Date:
Theatrical: August 2, 2002
DVD: February 11, 2003
Running Time: 101 minutes, Color
Origin: USA
Summary
RATING: R for language and some sexual content
Starring Blair Underwood, Julia Roberts, David Hyde Pierce, Catherine Keener, Mary McCormack, Erika Alexander, Rainn Wilson, and David Duchovny
A movie about movies for people who love movies. (Miramax)
Also On Metacritic
FILM: Bubble Erin Brockovich Eros Ocean's Eleven Ocean's Twelve Out of Sight Schizopolis sex, lies, and videotape Solaris The Good German The Limey Traffic
Also On The Web: Internet Movie Database
What The Critics Said
All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...
New Times (L.A.) Robert Wilonsky
That's all Full Frontal is: a brilliant gag at the expense of those who paid for it and those who pay to see it.
Time Richard Corliss
The result is Soderberghs liveliest experiment since the strenuously weird "Schizopolis" six years ago -- except that this one works.
Read Full Review >Chicago Reader Bill Stamets
Catherine Keener is wonderfully weird as a vicious vice president of human relations, and Nicky Katt is brilliant as an actor playing Hitler in a stage play.
Read Full Review >San Francisco Chronicle Mick LaSalle
Viewers need only a willingness to have fun and not mind when they realize the movie was never intended to be profound. Full Frontal is merely human, funny and unusual -- and that's enough.
Read Full Review >USA Today Claudia Puig
These characters are interesting for their flaws and wounds, but the movie doesn't delve deeply into the sources of their pain. See this movie for its humor and talented cast and you won't be disappointed.
Read Full Review >The Onion (A.V. Club) Keith Phipps
The fact that Full Frontal comes together so well removes any doubt that anyone other than a master filmmaker is pulling the strings.
Read Full Review >Rolling Stone Peter Travers
It's all part of the joke. Soderbergh may have created a bit of a mess with Full Frontal, but it's a playful and scrappy mess.
Read Full Review >LA Weekly Ella Taylor
The movie remains fragmented, elliptical and overplotted to the point of being hard to track. Still, it's worth hanging in for the finish, a birthday party for Gus (David Duchovny), the producer of the film and the one person they're all linked to. Then Soderbergh pulls off a delicious trick, a gesture of pure, tender, unabashed movie love that makes up for everything.
Read Full Review >Portland Oregonian Shawn Levy
Feels like a tonic for its makers, a means of clearing the palate after a series of rich meals. For viewers who appreciate risks, it should be just as refreshing.
Entertainment Weekly Lisa Schwarzbaum
Even by Soderbergh's standards of serious playfulness/playful seriousness, Full Frontal is a tricky novelty item: The director himself has variously described it as an ''experiment,'' an ''exercise,'' and a ''sketch.''
Read Full Review >Miami Herald Rene Rodriguez
It's the summer's most avant-garde experiment, and those who hate it (and there will be plenty) will complain the movie doesn't have a point. Then again, neither did Seinfeld, and look how that turned out.
Read Full Review >Chicago Tribune Michael Wilmington
It's a weird little movie that's amusing enough while you watch it, offering fine acting moments and pungent insights into modern L.A.'s show-biz and media subcultures. But it doesn't leave you with much.
Read Full Review >Philadelphia Inquirer Carrie Rickey
Keener makes this sometimes inert but always intimate tale of love and ambition burst with dynamic energy. Keener doesn't just have attitude, she has maditude.
Read Full Review >The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Rick Groen
Despite (or maybe because of) its showy cleverness, Full Frontal merely seems full of itself -- it's a small film made by a big ego pretending to a modesty he no longer feels.
Read Full Review >ReelViews James Berardinelli
Quality-wise, however, there's a big drop off from sex, lies and videotape to Full Frontal.
Read Full Review >Film Threat Chris Gore
It's disappointing that he (Soderbergh) couldn't make something more cohesive out of his admirable experiment.
Read Full Review >Washington Post Ann Hornaday
No matter how much fun it is to watch -- and for hard-core movie fans, it is often enormous fun -- there's a certain relief when it stops and we're popped back out to our banal, one-track lives.
Read Full Review >Wall Street Journal Nancy deWolf Smith
The medium really is the message here, and it steals what there is of the show.
Seattle Post-Intelligencer Sean Axmaker
For an ostensibly personal film, this plodding portrait of the self-involved flailing for meaning in a mercenary world has little of Soderbergh's insight, empathy or generous personality.
Read Full Review >Boston Globe Wesley Morris
Studding your movie with friends, admirers, and sycophants is having a ball; it does not bring us to question the illusory power of cinema or the politics of entertainment.
Read Full Review >New York Daily News Jami Bernard
When improv is done well, it sheds a unique light on the human condition. When it is done adequately, as it is in Full Frontal, it simply makes you long for a good script and pricey production values.
Read Full Review >Christian Science Monitor David Sterritt
Far from a great film, but it certainly stretches the envelope.
Read Full Review >New York Post Lou Lumenick
You can't get much more perverse than asking Julia Roberts to wear fright wigs, do her own frumpy makeup and costumes -- and then shoot her scenes in eyeball-gougingly ugly digital video.
Read Full Review >TV Guide Maitland McDonagh
Though some individual scenes crackle, overall the film feels unfocussed and flabby, like a series of acting improv exercises strung together.
Read Full Review >Slate David Edelstein
Full Frontal could not be more opaque. I honestly don't have a clue what it's about; it went completely over my head.
Read Full Review >New York Magazine Peter Rainer
Has its fun moments, and the dialogue, some of which was surely improvised, has a natural flow. But Soderbergh suffocates everything with stylistics. Soderbergh is exploring his navel.
Read Full Review >Salon.com Stephanie Zacharek
Aside from a few well-shaped moments from some of the actors, the editing is about the only thing that keeps your mind occupied in Full Frontal -- and any good editor will tell you that's a problem.
Read Full Review >Los Angeles Times Kenneth Turan
When a set of pre-shooting guidelines a director came up with for his actors turns out to be cleverer, better written and of considerable more interest than the finished film, that's a bad sign. A very bad sign.
Read Full Review >Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert
A film so amateurish that only the professionalism of some of the actors makes it watchable.
Read Full Review >Charlotte Observer Lawrence Toppman
You could dismiss it, as I do, as an impenetrable and insufferable ball of pseudo-philosophic twaddle.
Read Full Review >Austin Chronicle Kimberley Jones
Fails because it takes itself so seriously, and because it is itself so seriously dull. Soderbergh's straining to give us a wink -- come on, guys, this is fun -- but really it just feels like some awful eye twitch -- a spasm of yawning self-indulgence in a mostly captivating career.
Read Full Review >Baltimore Sun Michael Sragow
In this film, Soderbergh appears to judge the actors by how well they spew or swallow bile.
The New Yorker David Denby
Full Frontal is the sort of arbitrary mess that gives experimentation a bad name. The news that the movie was shot on digital video and film in eighteen days, and that the actors drove themselves to the set and applied their own makeup, would have made a nice Sunday Times story if the movie were any good. But it isn't. [5 August 2002, p. 80]
The New York Times Dana Stevens
The aesthetic of Full Frontal is as rough and grainy as the off-the-rack digital video in which much of it was shot.
Read Full Review >Village Voice J. Hoberman
"Every work of art is an uncommitted crime," Theodor Adorno once wrote. This one is more of a botched misdemeanor.
Read Full Review >Washington Post Desson Thomson
The only way a self-absorbed treatise like this can get any kind of audience (not to mention distribution) is to cast famous people in it.
Read Full Review >What Our Users Said
The average user rating for this movie is 5.4 (out of 10) based on 7 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.
Ian Watkinson gave it a 1:
Boring, pretentious twaddle. The only redeeming feature of this film, is that you wonder how the hell they duped Julia Roberts into doing it.
Gilbert gave it a 7:
....Yeah. Well, I see where he's coming from...but he only partially succeeds. Still, partially is enough to make it watchable.
Chad S. gave it a 7:
"Full Frontal" reminds me of a SNL sketch that featured Jon Lovitz as a meglomaniacal Pablo Picasso who would scribble haphazardly on a notepad and assume it had artistic worth because of his celebrity. He was right. A collector of Picasso's artwork would want to see the artist's doodles just like how the Soderbergh faithful are going to put up with this curiousity; which looks awful but the performances aren't, in particular, David Hyde-Pierce like you've never seen him before, and Hitler(Nicky Katt) like you've never seen him before. And there's a considerable kick in watching the most famous woman on the planet so poorly lit and photographed. Perhaps Soderbergh is trying to outdo Tim Burton and actually be Ed Wood. But there's something admirable about an A-list director who'll make a film just for the hell of it. See "Full Frontal" with that same sense of adventure, for the hell of it.
David M. gave it a 3:
Its bad, pretty bad. Wonder if this movie would make half as much without the "big" names associated with it. Skip it, and move on.
Michael F. gave it a 9:
This is one COMPLETELY different movie. So original and interesting. I can unerstand one walking out of this movie and shrugging then saying "Who Cares?" I thought that it was interesting and REALLY well done (I like grainy). Great performances, hysterical cameos. Interesting twists and characters. This movie is in NO WAY, a "sequel" to "Sex, Lies and Videotape." They deal with COMPLETELY different issues, well, the style in which it is written is a little similar to that "interview dialouge" of "Sex, Lies..." but, I think, that this was a slightly better and more interesting film. It's funny and fascinating and well done, well acted, well written, well everything. Yeah, it's a bit slow at times but it's really good.
Jkasound gave it a 5:
Sometimes forgets where it's going until it gets kicked back on track by any member of the talented cast. Maybe not consistent but funny and introspective.
