GAMES: GameSpot | GameFAQs MUSIC: Last.fm | MP3.com MOVIES: Metacritic | Movietome TV: TV.com
Home | About Metacritic | About Metascores | What's New | Wireless Versions | Discussion Forums | Advertising Inquiries | Contact Us | RSS
Metacritic.com: We Deal With Criticism
     Help
> Switch to Advanced Search  
Film Video/DVD Music Games TV

Film

Upcoming Release Calendar
Weekend Box Office
Film Awards & Top 10s By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
How Metascores Are Calculated
Discuss Film In Our Forums

 

Wide Releases

sort by name sort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

 

Limited Releases

sort by name sort by score

67 $9.99
75 24 City
66 Adoration
74 Afghan Star
48 Alien Trespass
56 American Violet
82 Anvil! The Story of Anvil
57 Away We Go
81 Beaches of Agnes, The
62 Big Man Japan
28 Big Shot-Caller, The
78 Boys: The Sherman Brothers' Story, The
55 Brothers Bloom, The
82 Burma VJ: Reporting from a Closed Country
xx Call of the Wild
63 Cheri
62 Cherry Blossoms
63 Dead Snow
65 Departures
18 Downloading Nancy
58 Easy Virtue
70 End of the Line, The
77 Every Little Step
64 Examined Life
80 Food, Inc.
38 Gigantic
56 Girl from Monaco, The
67 Girlfriend Experience, The
87 Gomorrah
89 Goodbye Solo
63 Great Buck Howard, The
79 Harvard Beats Yale 29-29
xx Home
82 Hunger
91 Hurt Locker, The
16 I Hate Valentine's Day
81 Il Divo
54 Is Anybody There?
71 Jerichow
58 Julia
74 Lemon Tree
36 Life is Hot in Cracktown
40 Limits of Control, The
42 Little Ashes
64 Lymelife
50 Management
57 Merry Gentleman, The
66 Moon
35 New York
62 Not Forgotten
xx Offshore
78 O'Horten
64 Outrage
40 Paris 36
54 Pontypool
71 Pressure Cooker
52 Quiet Chaos
83 Revanche
67 Rudo y Cursi
86 Seraphine
65 Sex Positive
70 Shall We Kiss?
77 Sin Nombre
59 Sleep Dealer
74 Song of Sparrows, The
54 Stoning of Soraya M., The
82 Sugar
84 Summer Hours
61 Sunshine Cleaning
28 Surveillance
42 Tennessee
63 Tetro
64 Throw Down Your Heart
80 Tokyo Sonata
63 Tokyo!
70 Tony Manero
74 Treeless Mountain
88 Tulpan
74 Two Lovers
83 Tyson
83 U2 3D
60 Under Our Skin
69 Unmistaken Child
69 Valentino: The Last Emperor
22 What Goes Up
45 Whatever Works
57 Youssou Ndour: I Bring What I Love

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

 



Printer-Friendly Version Email This Page Discuss In Our Forums

Full Frontal
Miramax Films

Full Frontal reviews
Critic Score
Metascore: 45 Metascore out of 100
User Score  
5.4 out of 10
based on 37 reviews
Read critic reviews
How did we calculate this?
based on 7 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie

MPAA RATING: R for language and some sexual content

Starring Blair Underwood, Julia Roberts, David Hyde Pierce, Catherine Keener, Mary McCormack, Erika Alexander, Rainn Wilson, and David Duchovny

A movie about movies for people who love movies. (Miramax)


GENRE(S): Romance  
WRITTEN BY: Coleman Hough  
DIRECTED BY: Steven Soderbergh  
RELEASE DATE: DVD: February 11, 2003 
Video: February 11, 2003 
Theatrical: August 2, 2002 
RUNNING TIME: 101 minutes, Color 
ORIGIN: USA 

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

90
New Times (L.A.) Robert Wilonsky
That's all Full Frontal is: a brilliant gag at the expense of those who paid for it and those who pay to see it.
90
Time Richard Corliss
The result is Soderberghs liveliest experiment since the strenuously weird "Schizopolis" six years ago -- except that this one works.
Read Full Review
80
Chicago Reader Bill Stamets
Catherine Keener is wonderfully weird as a vicious vice president of human relations, and Nicky Katt is brilliant as an actor playing Hitler in a stage play.
Read Full Review
75
San Francisco Chronicle Mick LaSalle
Viewers need only a willingness to have fun and not mind when they realize the movie was never intended to be profound. Full Frontal is merely human, funny and unusual -- and that's enough.
Read Full Review
75
USA Today Claudia Puig
These characters are interesting for their flaws and wounds, but the movie doesn't delve deeply into the sources of their pain. See this movie for its humor and talented cast and you won't be disappointed.
Read Full Review
70
The Onion (A.V. Club) Keith Phipps
The fact that Full Frontal comes together so well removes any doubt that anyone other than a master filmmaker is pulling the strings.
Read Full Review
70
Rolling Stone Peter Travers
It's all part of the joke. Soderbergh may have created a bit of a mess with Full Frontal, but it's a playful and scrappy mess.
Read Full Review
70
LA Weekly Ella Taylor
The movie remains fragmented, elliptical and overplotted to the point of being hard to track. Still, it's worth hanging in for the finish, a birthday party for Gus (David Duchovny), the producer of the film and the one person they're all linked to. Then Soderbergh pulls off a delicious trick, a gesture of pure, tender, unabashed movie love that makes up for everything.
Read Full Review
67
Portland Oregonian Shawn Levy
Feels like a tonic for its makers, a means of clearing the palate after a series of rich meals. For viewers who appreciate risks, it should be just as refreshing.
67
Entertainment Weekly Lisa Schwarzbaum
Even by Soderbergh's standards of serious playfulness/playful seriousness, Full Frontal is a tricky novelty item: The director himself has variously described it as an ''experiment,'' an ''exercise,'' and a ''sketch.''
Read Full Review
63
Miami Herald Rene Rodriguez
It's the summer's most avant-garde experiment, and those who hate it (and there will be plenty) will complain the movie doesn't have a point. Then again, neither did Seinfeld, and look how that turned out.
Read Full Review
63
Chicago Tribune Michael Wilmington
It's a weird little movie that's amusing enough while you watch it, offering fine acting moments and pungent insights into modern L.A.'s show-biz and media subcultures. But it doesn't leave you with much.
Read Full Review
63
Philadelphia Inquirer Carrie Rickey
Keener makes this sometimes inert but always intimate tale of love and ambition burst with dynamic energy. Keener doesn't just have attitude, she has maditude.
Read Full Review
63
The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Rick Groen
Despite (or maybe because of) its showy cleverness, Full Frontal merely seems full of itself -- it's a small film made by a big ego pretending to a modesty he no longer feels.
Read Full Review
63
ReelViews James Berardinelli
Quality-wise, however, there's a big drop off from sex, lies and videotape to Full Frontal.
Read Full Review
60
Film Threat Chris Gore
It's disappointing that he (Soderbergh) couldn't make something more cohesive out of his admirable experiment.
Read Full Review
60
Washington Post Ann Hornaday
No matter how much fun it is to watch -- and for hard-core movie fans, it is often enormous fun -- there's a certain relief when it stops and we're popped back out to our banal, one-track lives.
Read Full Review
50
Wall Street Journal Nancy deWolf Smith
The medium really is the message here, and it steals what there is of the show.
50
Seattle Post-Intelligencer Sean Axmaker
For an ostensibly personal film, this plodding portrait of the self-involved flailing for meaning in a mercenary world has little of Soderbergh's insight, empathy or generous personality.
Read Full Review
50
Boston Globe Wesley Morris
Studding your movie with friends, admirers, and sycophants is having a ball; it does not bring us to question the illusory power of cinema or the politics of entertainment.
Read Full Review
50
New York Daily News Jami Bernard
When improv is done well, it sheds a unique light on the human condition. When it is done adequately, as it is in Full Frontal, it simply makes you long for a good script and pricey production values.
Read Full Review
50
Christian Science Monitor David Sterritt
Far from a great film, but it certainly stretches the envelope.
Read Full Review
50
New York Post Lou Lumenick
You can't get much more perverse than asking Julia Roberts to wear fright wigs, do her own frumpy makeup and costumes -- and then shoot her scenes in eyeball-gougingly ugly digital video.
Read Full Review
40
TV Guide Maitland McDonagh
Though some individual scenes crackle, overall the film feels unfocussed and flabby, like a series of acting improv exercises strung together.
Read Full Review
40
Slate David Edelstein
Full Frontal could not be more opaque. I honestly don't have a clue what it's about; it went completely over my head.
Read Full Review
40
New York Magazine Peter Rainer
Has its fun moments, and the dialogue, some of which was surely improvised, has a natural flow. But Soderbergh suffocates everything with stylistics. Soderbergh is exploring his navel.
Read Full Review
40
Salon.com Stephanie Zacharek
Aside from a few well-shaped moments from some of the actors, the editing is about the only thing that keeps your mind occupied in Full Frontal -- and any good editor will tell you that's a problem.
Read Full Review
40
Los Angeles Times Kenneth Turan
When a set of pre-shooting guidelines a director came up with for his actors turns out to be cleverer, better written and of considerable more interest than the finished film, that's a bad sign. A very bad sign.
Read Full Review
38
Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert
A film so amateurish that only the professionalism of some of the actors makes it watchable.
Read Full Review
38
Charlotte Observer Lawrence Toppman
You could dismiss it, as I do, as an impenetrable and insufferable ball of pseudo-philosophic twaddle.
Read Full Review
30
Austin Chronicle Kimberley Jones
Fails because it takes itself so seriously, and because it is itself so seriously dull. Soderbergh's straining to give us a wink -- come on, guys, this is fun -- but really it just feels like some awful eye twitch -- a spasm of yawning self-indulgence in a mostly captivating career.
Read Full Review
30
Variety Todd McCarthy
Arid, self-consciously arty and emotionally uninvolving.
Read Full Review
25
Baltimore Sun Michael Sragow
In this film, Soderbergh appears to judge the actors by how well they spew or swallow bile.
20
The New Yorker David Denby
Full Frontal is the sort of arbitrary mess that gives experimentation a bad name. The news that the movie was shot on digital video and film in eighteen days, and that the actors drove themselves to the set and applied their own makeup, would have made a nice Sunday Times story if the movie were any good. But it isn't. [5 August 2002, p. 80]
20
The New York Times Dana Stevens
The aesthetic of Full Frontal is as rough and grainy as the off-the-rack digital video in which much of it was shot.
Read Full Review
20
Village Voice J. Hoberman
"Every work of art is an uncommitted crime," Theodor Adorno once wrote. This one is more of a botched misdemeanor.
Read Full Review
10
Washington Post Desson Thomson
The only way a self-absorbed treatise like this can get any kind of audience (not to mention distribution) is to cast famous people in it.
Read Full Review

What Our Users Said

Vote Now!The average user rating for this movie is 5.4 (out of 10) based on 7 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

Ian Watkinson gave it a 1:
Boring, pretentious twaddle. The only redeeming feature of this film, is that you wonder how the hell they duped Julia Roberts into doing it.

Gilbert gave it a 7:
....Yeah. Well, I see where he's coming from...but he only partially succeeds. Still, partially is enough to make it watchable.

Chad S. gave it a 7:
"Full Frontal" reminds me of a SNL sketch that featured Jon Lovitz as a meglomaniacal Pablo Picasso who would scribble haphazardly on a notepad and assume it had artistic worth because of his celebrity. He was right. A collector of Picasso's artwork would want to see the artist's doodles just like how the Soderbergh faithful are going to put up with this curiousity; which looks awful but the performances aren't, in particular, David Hyde-Pierce like you've never seen him before, and Hitler(Nicky Katt) like you've never seen him before. And there's a considerable kick in watching the most famous woman on the planet so poorly lit and photographed. Perhaps Soderbergh is trying to outdo Tim Burton and actually be Ed Wood. But there's something admirable about an A-list director who'll make a film just for the hell of it. See "Full Frontal" with that same sense of adventure, for the hell of it.

David M. gave it a 3:
Its bad, pretty bad. Wonder if this movie would make half as much without the "big" names associated with it. Skip it, and move on.

Michael F. gave it a 9:
This is one COMPLETELY different movie. So original and interesting. I can unerstand one walking out of this movie and shrugging then saying "Who Cares?" I thought that it was interesting and REALLY well done (I like grainy). Great performances, hysterical cameos. Interesting twists and characters. This movie is in NO WAY, a "sequel" to "Sex, Lies and Videotape." They deal with COMPLETELY different issues, well, the style in which it is written is a little similar to that "interview dialouge" of "Sex, Lies..." but, I think, that this was a slightly better and more interesting film. It's funny and fascinating and well done, well acted, well written, well everything. Yeah, it's a bit slow at times but it's really good.

Jkasound gave it a 5:
Sometimes forgets where it's going until it gets kicked back on track by any member of the talented cast. Maybe not consistent but funny and introspective.

Discuss this movie in our forums

Return to top of page
Home | FILM | DVD/VIDEO | MUSIC | GAMES | TV | Forums | About Metacritic metacritic.com

Popular on CBS sites: iPhone 3G | Fantasy Football | Moneywatch | Antivirus Software | Recipes | E3 2009

About CBS Interactive | Jobs | Advertise

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use