CNET Networks Entertainment GameSpot | GameFAQs | SportsGamer | Metacritic | MP3.com | TV.com
Home | About Metacritic | About Metascores | What's New | Wireless Versions | Discussion Forums | Advertising Inquiries | Contact Us | RSS
Metacritic.com: We Deal With Criticism
     Help
> Switch to Advanced Search  
Film Video/DVD Music Games Books TV
Printer-Friendly Version Email This Page Discuss In Our Forums

Film

Upcoming Release Calendar
Weekend Box Office
Film Awards & Top 10s By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
How Metascores Are Calculated
Discuss Film In Our Forums

 

Wide Releases

sort by name sort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

 

Limited Releases

sort by name sort by score

97 4 Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days
83 Alexandra
43 Anamorph
35 Babysitters, The
32 Backseat
80 Band's Visit, The
62 Battle for Haditha
47 Bella
63 Blind Mountain
71 Blindsight
47 Boarding Gate
63 Body of War
58 Bra Boys
70 Caramel
54 Cashback
44 Chaos Theory
32 Chapter 27
69 Chicago 10
82 Chop Shop
46 CJ7
78 Counterfeiters, The
30 Cover
48 Dark Matter
35 Deal
61 Dhamma Brothers, The
92 Diving Bell and the Butterfly, The
73 Duchess of Langeais, The
20 Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed
58 Fall, The
43 Favor, The
58 First Saturday in May, The
57 Flawless
87 Flight of the Red Balloon, The
xx From Within
44 Frontier(s)
59 Fugitive Pieces
41 Funny Games
66 George A. Romero's Diary of the Dead
61 Girls Rock!
55 Glass: A Portrait of Philip in Twelve Parts
57 Grand, The
58 Hats Off
68 Honeydripper
xx Jack and Jill vs. the World
67 Jellyfish
xx Kiss the Bride
37 Life Before Her Eyes, The
72 Life of Reilly, The
50 Look
65 Married Life
35 Meet Bill
63 Miss Pettigrew Lives for a Day
54 Mister Lonely
52 My Blueberry Nights
71 My Brother Is an Only Child
52 Noise
61 OSS 117: Cairo - Nest of Spies
83 Paranoid Park
55 Pathology
48 Penelope
90 Persepolis
62 Planet B-Boy
xx Plumm Summer, A
67 Praying with Lior
46 Previous Engagement, A
72 Priceless
17 Prom Night
69 Redbelt
72 Roman de gare
48 Run, Fat Boy, Run
85 Savages, The
24 Sex and Death 101
66 Shelter
75 Shotgun Stories
40 Sleepwalking
67 Snow Angels
64 Son of Rambow
71 Standard Operating Procedure
76 Stuff and Dough
64 Surfwise
xx Tashan
82 Taxi to the Dark Side
57 Teeth
56 Then She Found Me
55 Tracey Fragments, The
56 Turn the River
72 Tuya's Marriage
83 U2 3D
59 Under the Same Moon
76 Unforeseen, The
xx Unsettled
91 Up the Yangtze
55 Vice
79 Visitor, The
64 Water Lilies
45 Where in the World Is Osama Bin Laden?
57 Without the King
74 Witnesses, The
63 XXY
67 Year My Parents Went on Vacation, The
75 Young@Heart
45 Zombie Strippers

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.



Funny Games
Warner Independent Pictures

Funny Games reviews
Critic Score
Metascore: 41 Metascore out of 100
User Score  
4.7 out of 10
based on 33 reviews
Read critic reviews
How did we calculate this?
based on 51 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie

MPAA RATING: R for terror, violence and some langauge

Starring Naomi Watts, Tim Roth, Michael Pitt, Brady Corbet, Boyd Gaines, Siobhan Fallon, Devon Gearhart, Tim Roth, Michael Pitt, Brady Corbet, Boyd Gaines, Siobhan Fallon, and Devon Gearhart

In this provocative and brutal thriller, a vacationing family gets an unexpected visit from two deeply disturbed young men. Their idyllic holiday turns nightmarish as they are subjected to unimaginable terrors and struggle to stay alive. (Warner Independent Pictures)


GENRE(S): Horror  |  Suspense/Thriller  
WRITTEN BY: Michael Haneke  
DIRECTED BY: Michael Haneke  
RELEASE DATE: Theatrical: March 14, 2008 
RUNNING TIME: minutes, Color 
ORIGIN: UK / USA / France 

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

100
The Onion (A.V. Club) Scott Tobias
A chilly and extraordinarily controlled treatise on film violence, Funny Games punishes the audience for its casual bloodlust by giving it all the sickening torture and mayhem it could possibly desire. Neat trick, that.
Read Full Review
89
Austin Chronicle Marc Savlov
You can take a page from Wes Craven before he went flat and keep repeating, "It's only a movie; it's only a movie; it's only a movie." But is it?
Read Full Review
88
Miami Herald Rene Rodriguez
The experience of watching Funny Games, be it the original or this version, is never forgotten, whatever your ultimate impression of the film.
Read Full Review
88
ReelViews James Berardinelli
Funny Games is not entertainment but it is an experience.
Read Full Review
83
Entertainment Weekly Owen Gleiberman
Can a movie be gripping and repellent at the same time? In Funny Games, a mockingly sadistic and terrifying watch-the-middle-class-writhe-like-stuck-pigs thriller, the director Michael Haneke puts his characters in a vise, and the audience too.
Read Full Review
80
Film Threat Rick Kisonak
By and large, reviewers have conceded that the picture is exceptionally gripping and suspenseful while deriding its moral subtext as a crock. The only explanation possible for such fuming pettiness, in my opinion, is the fact that Michael Haneke isn’t one of us.
Read Full Review
80
Empire Damon Wise
A stylish, darkly satirical horror-thriller, raising serious questions about Hollywood’s sanitisation of violence.
Read Full Review
75
Portland Oregonian Stan Hall
One might reasonably despise Funny Games and consider Haneke an exploitative hypocrite. Still, whether it's the original or the replica, this is a film that is impossible to enjoy and difficult to forget.
Read Full Review
75
The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Rick Groen
Is Funny Games an unqualified success? No, and for this reason: In order to analyze the devolution of violence into entertainment, the premise obliges the film to superimpose a complicated game atop the genre's simple one – in other words, it makes a game out of the game it condemns.
Read Full Review
75
Philadelphia Inquirer Steven Rea
Watts, who is one of the film's executive producers, brings a taut intelligence to the proceedings, but her character, like Roth's, is more archetype than actual person.
Read Full Review
70
Dallas Observer Jim Ridley
Haneke rigs the movie into a weapon against its audience. Like the infected porn that destroys perverts in Cronenberg's "Videodrome," Funny Games means to kill our pleasure in the very thing we theoretically paid to see: zipless, guilt-free, morally untroubled mayhem.
Read Full Review
70
Washington Post John Anderson
While the movie's star -- and ruler, and ship's captain, and grand poobah -- is Haneke himself, his actors are sublime.
Read Full Review
70
The Hollywood Reporter Stephen Farber
Perhaps the best way to appreciate the picture, its few intellectual pretensions notwithstanding, is as a classy horror film with a particularly nasty edge. It's not exactly entertainment, but it casts a poisonous spell.
Read Full Review
50
Boston Globe Ty Burr
If this is daring in theory, it's a failure in practice. Exactingly well-made, the movie is grueling and unpleasant in the extreme - that's the point - but it's also working from a specious premise, that film-school Brechtian devices can bring on mass enlightenment.
Read Full Review
50
TV Guide Ken Fox
The film is merciless in its depiction of death and suffering, Pitt and Corbet are perfectly cast, and Watts, who also served as executive producer, gives a disturbingly raw performance.
Read Full Review
50
Chicago Tribune Michael Phillips
Funny Games is fundamentally a bourgeois exercise in authorial sadism. As the methodical games grind on, the suffocatingly beige and white surroundings start to look like a mausoleum.
Read Full Review
50
Slate Dana Stevens
Many American viewers may take Haneke at his word and walk out midway through this grueling ethics exam of a movie. But much as I may resent the facile polemics of Haneke's shame-the-viewer project, I have to respect the way that he nailed me, trembling, to my seat.
Read Full Review
50
Chicago Reader J.R. Jones
It’s one thing to make a movie filled with mayhem and then implicate the audience for watching it; it’s another thing entirely to come back ten years later with the same movie, hype it with a marketing campaign, and try to implicate the viewer again. One nice thing about America is that you can’t be tried twice for the same crime.
Read Full Review
40
Salon.com Andrew O'Hehir
Haneke's new Funny Games has a current of bleak humor that comes through more clearly when you're not reading subtitles. It remains a horrifying, implacable mind-fuck, liable to be widely misunderstood and widely despised.
Read Full Review
38
Premiere Glenn Kenny
The picture, remade by the maestro Haneke himself, is every bit as gripping, suspenseful and upsetting as the original. And it's even more of a crock.
Read Full Review
38
USA Today Claudia Puig
So sadistic and disturbing, Games is easily the toughest movie to sit through since 1994's "Natural Born Killers."
Read Full Review
38
New York Daily News Elizabeth Weitzman
A patronizing, self-satisfied piece of work, Funny Games is Michael Haneke's way of chastising us for blindly following the traditional rules of entertainment.
Read Full Review
30
The New Yorker Anthony Lane
The new movie wears an air of old hat. I would absolutely defend Haneke’s right to relaunch his broadside on our voyeuristic vices, but he’s not keeping up with the times; he’s behind them.
Read Full Review
30
Variety Derek Elley
As shocking and deliberately manipulative as the original movie and -- some may reckon -- even more pointless.
Read Full Review
25
Baltimore Sun Michael Sragow
Funny Games is an art house "Hostel" -- it mistakes self-consciousness for intelligence.
Read Full Review
25
New York Post Lou Lumenick
The joke is on arthouse audiences who show up for Funny Games, which is basically torture porn every bit as manipulative and reprehensible as "Hostel," even if it's tricked out with intellectual pretension.
Read Full Review
25
San Francisco Chronicle Mick LaSalle
Just because it's a conscious commentary on other vile, useless, pointless cinematic exercises doesn't make it any less vile, useless and pointless.
Read Full Review
20
Newsweek David Ansen
That this relentless barrage of psychological and physical torture is extremely well made and powerfully performed--Watts hurls herself into her physically demanding role with heroic conviction--somehow makes it worse.
Read Full Review
20
Village Voice J. Hoberman
Professional obligations required that I endure it, but there's no reason why you should.
Read Full Review
16
Seattle Post-Intelligencer William Arnold
One thing you can say about Michael Haneke's unbelievably brutal thriller, Funny Games, is that it's an experience: an unpleasant, unsettling, cruelly manipulative and finally hateful experience, but an experience nonetheless. You'll likely lose some sleep over this one.
Read Full Review
0
The New York Times A.O. Scott
The film calls attention to its own artificial status. It actually knows it’s a movie! What a clever, tricky game! What fun! What a fraud.
Read Full Review
0
Wall Street Journal Joe Morgenstern
In addition to being borderline unendurable, Funny Games is inexplicable, and I don't mean in any philosophical sense.
Read Full Review
0
New York Magazine David Edelstein
Haneke’s assault on our fantasy lives is shallow, unimaginative, and glacially unengaged--a sucker punch without the redeeming passion of punk.
Read Full Review

What Our Users Said

Vote Now!The average user rating for this movie is 4.7 (out of 10) based on 51 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

Barry B. gave it a10:
Never have I felt so tense while watching a movie (except maybe Bram Stoker's Dracula, but I was kid then). Haneke made a movie that most action, thriller, and horror movie lovers won't love, because it calls them out on exactly what they crave and why they crave it. In real life, the bad guys usually win. But the Mission Impossibles, the 8MMs, and the Hostels have tried to teach us that good guys prevail. They don't. Naomi Watts deserves an Oscar nomination.

James K. gave it a0:
Never wanted to leave a movie theatre so badly before. This has got to be the WORST movie ever.

Anna W gave it a0:
For intelligent audiences only?? I fully understand the point that it was trying to make and the purpose behind it. But that was the most pointless 111 minutes of my life. The film was awful, truly TRULY awful. I actually cannot understand how anybody could walk out of a cinema and say that was a good film. I'm sure this is going to get many 'oh but its so clever and making a statement' but that is all it is. It is not worthy of the cinema and my £4.50 AND my 111 minutes.

Ram B. gave it a0:
Crude pointless violence, with some intellectual intent. If you want to reason out how others should feel guilty about violence in society try these two: (1) don't be violent with your thoughts, i.e., whenever someone does not agree with what you think is good for everyone DON'T make them watch Funny Games and (2) Go and experience real-world violence happening. This is not a Funny Game... This movie is just plain boring and a failure.

Sean V. gave it a5:
While I love Thrillers, I almost couldn't watch all of this. I mean it starts good keeping things tense, but then it gets so brutal I didn't know what to do with myself. And I have watch almost every horror movie out their, its just I don't know how to describe it.

Ben N. gave it a1:
Didn't really like this film. Didn't really have a story line and didn't make sense.

George S. gave it a0:
For God's shake it's an awful movie. It's just a waste of time. The makers believe we are stupids. I could make a better movie just for fun.

Read more user comments...

Discuss this movie in our forums

Return to top of page
Home | FILM | DVD/VIDEO | MUSIC | GAMES | BOOKS | TV | Forums | About Metacritic metacritic.com

About CNET Networks | Jobs | Advertise | Partnerships                                Visit other CNET Networks sites:

Copyright ©2007 CNET Networks, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use