GAMES: GameSpot | GameFAQs MUSIC: Last.fm | MP3.com MOVIES: Metacritic | Movietome TV: TV.com
Home | About Metacritic | About Metascores | What's New | Wireless Versions | Discussion Forums | Advertising Inquiries | Contact Us | RSS
Metacritic.com: We Deal With Criticism
     Help
> Switch to Advanced Search  
Film Video/DVD Music Games TV

Film

Upcoming Release Calendar
Weekend Box Office
Film Awards & Top 10s By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
How Metascores Are Calculated
Discuss Film In Our Forums

 

Wide Releases

sort by name sort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

 

Limited Releases

sort by name sort by score

67 $9.99
75 24 City
66 Adoration
74 Afghan Star
48 Alien Trespass
56 American Violet
82 Anvil! The Story of Anvil
57 Away We Go
81 Beaches of Agnes, The
62 Big Man Japan
28 Big Shot-Caller, The
78 Boys: The Sherman Brothers' Story, The
55 Brothers Bloom, The
82 Burma VJ: Reporting from a Closed Country
xx Call of the Wild
63 Cheri
62 Cherry Blossoms
63 Dead Snow
65 Departures
18 Downloading Nancy
58 Easy Virtue
70 End of the Line, The
77 Every Little Step
64 Examined Life
80 Food, Inc.
38 Gigantic
56 Girl from Monaco, The
67 Girlfriend Experience, The
87 Gomorrah
89 Goodbye Solo
63 Great Buck Howard, The
79 Harvard Beats Yale 29-29
xx Home
82 Hunger
91 Hurt Locker, The
16 I Hate Valentine's Day
81 Il Divo
54 Is Anybody There?
71 Jerichow
58 Julia
74 Lemon Tree
36 Life is Hot in Cracktown
40 Limits of Control, The
42 Little Ashes
64 Lymelife
50 Management
57 Merry Gentleman, The
66 Moon
35 New York
62 Not Forgotten
xx Offshore
78 O'Horten
64 Outrage
40 Paris 36
54 Pontypool
71 Pressure Cooker
52 Quiet Chaos
83 Revanche
67 Rudo y Cursi
86 Seraphine
65 Sex Positive
70 Shall We Kiss?
77 Sin Nombre
59 Sleep Dealer
74 Song of Sparrows, The
54 Stoning of Soraya M., The
82 Sugar
84 Summer Hours
61 Sunshine Cleaning
28 Surveillance
42 Tennessee
63 Tetro
64 Throw Down Your Heart
80 Tokyo Sonata
63 Tokyo!
70 Tony Manero
74 Treeless Mountain
88 Tulpan
74 Two Lovers
83 Tyson
83 U2 3D
60 Under Our Skin
69 Unmistaken Child
69 Valentino: The Last Emperor
22 What Goes Up
45 Whatever Works
57 Youssou Ndour: I Bring What I Love

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

 



Printer-Friendly Version Email This Page Discuss In Our Forums

Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix
Warner Bros.

Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix reviews
Critic Score
Metascore: 71 Metascore out of 100
User Score  
6.8 out of 10
based on 37 reviews
Read critic reviews
How did we calculate this?
based on 375 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie

MPAA RATING: PG-13 for sequences of fantasy violence and frightening images

Starring Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, Emma Watson, Helena Bonham Carter, Imelda Staunton, Gary Oldman, Brendan Gleeson, and Ralph Fiennes

In Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, Harry returns for his fifth year of study at Hogwarts only to discover that much of the wizarding community has been led to believe that the story of the teenager's recent encounter with the evil Lord Voldemort is a lie, putting Harry's integrity in question. Worse, the Minister for Magic, Cornelius Fudge, has appointed a new Defense Against the Dark Arts teacher, the duplicitous Professor Dolores Umbridge. But Umbridge's "Ministry-approved" course of defensive magic leaves the young wizards woefully unprepared to defend themselves against the Dark forces threatening them, so at the prompting of his friends Hermione and Ron, Harry is convinced to take matters into his own hands. Meeting secretly with a small group of students who name themselves "Dumbledore's Army", Harry teaches them how to defend themselves against the Dark Arts, preparing the courageous young wizards for the extraordinary battle that lies ahead. (Warner Bros. Pictures)


GENRE(S): Adventure  |  Drama  |  Family/Kids  |  Fantasy  
WRITTEN BY: J.K. Rowling (novel)
Michael Goldenberg
 
DIRECTED BY: David Yates  
RELEASE DATE: DVD: December 11, 2007 
Theatrical: July 11, 2007 
RUNNING TIME: 138 minutes, Color 
ORIGIN: UK / USA 

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

100
New York Magazine David Edelstein
For all its portentousness, this is the best Harry Potter picture yet. In some ways, it improves on J.K. Rowling’s novel, which is punishingly protracted and builds to a climactic wand-off better seen than read.
Read Full Review
100
New York Daily News Colin Bertram
It's action-packed, darker, more epic and thankfully schmaltz-free. And it's the best "Harry Potter" film yet.
Read Full Review
100
Village Voice Scott Foundas
In narrative terms, not that much happens, but as for Harry's emotional journey--well, that's nearly epic.
Read Full Review
90
Time Richard Corliss
Not just a ripping yarn but a powerful, poignant coming-of-age story.
Read Full Review
88
USA Today Claudia Puig
The special effects continue to be masterful, but villains are given a new twist, and Order of the Phoenix is all the more fun because of it.
Read Full Review
88
Rolling Stone Peter Travers
It will hook you good and keep you riveted.
Read Full Review
88
ReelViews James Berardinelli
For those who have gotten their Harry Potter fix entirely through the cinematic incarnation, the script is lucid and fast-moving.
Read Full Review
83
Seattle Post-Intelligencer William Arnold
Yet, as good as it is in so many ways, there's no getting around the fact that this briefest Harry and first directed by an unknown filmmaker (David Yates) is the least substantial of the bunch.
Read Full Review
83
Baltimore Sun Michael Sragow
The whole film is about innocence and experience, and if it isn't a Blakean song, it is a sturdy and vibrant piece of prose.
Read Full Review
83
Entertainment Weekly Lisa Schwarzbaum
The flourishes don't answer the question most on Potterites' minds -- who lives, who dies? -- but they briefly stupefy.
Read Full Review
80
Washington Post Desson Thomson
Screenwriter Michael Goldenberg and director David Yates have transformed J.K. Rowling's garrulous storytelling into something leaner, moodier and more compelling, that ticks with metronomic purpose as the story flits between psychological darkness and cartoonish slapstick.
Read Full Review
80
Empire Helen O'Hara
It won't win new fans, but as Potter movies go, this is the most filmic of the lot, suspenseful and action-packed.
Read Full Review
78
Austin Chronicle Marc Savlov
Timely metaphors abound in The Order of the Phoenix, but the story (of which there is much) stands on its own magical merits, dark and darker still though they may be.
Read Full Review
75
The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Rick Groen
Is there an admired British thespian who hasn't toiled in Potter's field?
Read Full Review
75
Christian Science Monitor Peter Rainer
Harry comes through loud and clear as a conflicted, edgy, avid young man. He's turned into EveryTeen.
Read Full Review
75
Chicago Tribune Michael Phillips
Destined to be remembered as the one that handed the screen Harry his first kiss. Like much of the film, the smooch comes and goes briskly, without a lot of fuss.
Read Full Review
75
Premiere Glenn Kenny
Pheonix is smartly-constructed enough that non-acolytes interested in checking out Harry's world won't need too long to catch up.
Read Full Review
75
Boston Globe Ty Burr
Darker, leaner, less expansive , and meaner, Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix is all business, and it casts a spell utterly unlike the first four films.
Read Full Review
75
Charlotte Observer Lawrence Toppman
Given a choice between this and the navel-gazing of the novel, I'll take the short ride on a fast machine.
Read Full Review
75
Miami Herald Rene Rodriguez
The most amazing magic yet for the wildly popular franchise: It is genuinely engrossing.
Read Full Review
75
Portland Oregonian M. E. Russell
On balance, the filmmakers do a terrific job with one of the weaker stories. It's welcome news that Yates is coming back for one of the stronger ones; he's set to direct "Half-Blood Prince."
Read Full Review
70
Salon.com Stephanie Zacharek
This is a gangly, confusing sprawl, and yet there are enough patches of beauty scattered throughout that it's impossible to reject it wholesale.
Read Full Review
70
Variety Todd McCarthy
Considerably grimmer and grittier than the previous pictures.
Read Full Review
70
The New York Times A.O. Scott
A sleek, swift and exciting adaptation of J. K. Rowling’s longest novel to date.
Read Full Review
70
Slate Dana Stevens
The movie is brisk and lively, if not exactly action-packed.
Read Full Review
67
The Onion (A.V. Club) Scott Tobias
Save for the thrilling opening sequence, there's not much to remember about the film beyond Staunton (Vera Drake), who masks her bottomless malevolence behind a pasted-on patrician smile.
Read Full Review
63
TV Guide Maitland McDonagh
This fifth film should please fans who rate the films based on their fidelity to the canonical texts. But for the uninitiated, it's a dry and slightly dreary introduction to the world of Hogwarts and Azkaban.
Read Full Review
63
Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert
Whatever happened to the delight and, if you'll excuse the term, the magic in the "Harry Potter" series? As the characters grow up, the stories grow, too, leaving the innocence behind and confusing us with plots so labyrinthine that it takes a Ph.D from Hogwarts to figure them out.
Read Full Review
63
Philadelphia Inquirer Carrie Rickey
Standouts are Gary Oldman as Sirius Black, Harry's sly father-surrogate, and Imelda Staunton as Dolores Umbridge.
Read Full Review
60
Wall Street Journal Joanne Kaufman
Director David Yates, who is new to the Potter franchise, moves the story along briskly, at the expense of texture and nuance.
Read Full Review
60
The Hollywood Reporter Kirk Honeycutt
"Phoenix" might go down as the problematic film, full of plot but little fun.
Read Full Review
50
San Francisco Chronicle Mick LaSalle
Taken as a motion picture, the new "Harry" comes up short. But taken as a visual aid to the experience of reading a book, the new "Harry" does its job.
Read Full Review
50
Newsweek David Ansen
The storytelling seems occasionally disjointed, but more important, for all the special-effects wizardry, that touch of film magic never surfaces.
Read Full Review
50
New York Post Lou Lumenick
There are lots of special effects, but sadly, no real magic.
Read Full Review
50
Film Threat Pete Vonder Haar
Something of a letdown. Previous statements aside, I understand Warner Bros. has to set the table for "Half-Blood Prince" and "Deathly Hallows," but too much of Phoenix is filler. And with only two movies left, we better get to the main course in short order.
Read Full Review
50
Los Angeles Times Kenneth Turan
It finally can't transcend the limitations inherent in being no more than a way station in an epic journey, a journey whose cinematic conclusion is several years away.
Read Full Review
50
Chicago Reader Andrea Gronvall
Less magic also means less fun and discovery, as Harry battles depression and a hostile press; this is the bleakest Potter installment to date, and under David Yates's choppy direction, Maggie Smith, Emma Thompson, Brendan Gleeson, and David Thewlis have little more than walk-ons.
Read Full Review

What Our Users Said

Vote Now!The average user rating for this movie is 6.8 (out of 10) based on 375 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

[Anonymous] gave it a9:
A very enjoyable film with a stellar cast if a little under-used. Had this been 15-20 minutes longer I would have given it a 10!

Lauri R. gave it a7:
The problem with this movie is, and has been for the last few Potter films, that it's a compromise. It's not advisable to make a movie over three hours long, because after that it's a wee bit too much to watch on one sitting, but ironically three hours of movie isn't quite enough to sum up the plot of a book as long as The Order Of Phoenix. Despite it's length, in many parts it feels like the story is rushed to the next key point, and many aspects of the book (f.ex. quidditch) have been completely dropped off. Because the storytelling in the movie is processing with such fast pace, it may be hard for people who have not read the actual book to follow the quick advancing of the story. You should judge the movie by it's own merits, it is decent work as a visual captivation of the Harry Potter- universe, and a nice supporting view in parallel with the one you yourself have created in your mind while reading the book. As a stand-alone movie experience however, without reading the book, it is merely an average piece of work.

Fred F gave it a1:
What a mess - surely the most apalling of all the Potter films, and that's saying something because they are all pretty awful. I hated every minute of this crappola.

Ariel B. gave it a3:
The film was good but it wasn't great. I've seen better and I was quite disappointed when I fist saw the movie. I though it would look great after the goblet of fire, but still the forth is the best Harry Potter movie although a lot of stuff had been left out. It's a shame that they left out Quidditch and Ron and Hermione becoming a prefects. When you see it several times it clearly shows that it isn't great. Good,maybe even average, but not great. The best thing in the film is battle between Voldermort and Dumbldor, and the character of Dolores Umbridge. If the half blood prince turns out as his predecessor I very much doubt it that I'll buy that dvd.

[Anonymous] gave it a1:
This movie is terrible. Does anyone else think the dursleys are acting half retarded. No one in this movie acts like they are a person. they are all monotone zombies. Everything is all messed up and out of order and wrong and the acting still sucks horribly.. and what the hell is wrong with mrs figg??? is she slow... no one seems to care whats happening its like they are waiting to get off work or something. The lord of the rings had good acting this is absolute sh*t.

David C. gave it a9:
Reading some of the other comments about this movie I can only assume that some people just like to hear their own voice without giving much thought to what they are saying. This movie was clearly up there with the others despite the fact that so much had to be left out. This is not the fault of the director; more the incredible literary ability of JK Rowling who is able to fill every chapter with an exciting event.

R.A. L. gave it an8:
The best Harry Potter film so far. Precise balance between action, mystery and drama add up to a pretty wonderful and magical movie.

Read more user comments...

Discuss this movie in our forums

Return to top of page
Home | FILM | DVD/VIDEO | MUSIC | GAMES | TV | Forums | About Metacritic metacritic.com

Popular on CBS sites: iPhone 3G | Fantasy Football | Moneywatch | Antivirus Software | Recipes | E3 2009

About CBS Interactive | Jobs | Advertise

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use