Movies
Weekend Box Office
Film Awards & Top 10s By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
Best / Worst of the Decade
Wide Releases
Now In Theaters
49
2012
41
Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel
84
Avatar![]()
69
Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans
53
Blind Side
53
Book of Eli, The
55
Christmas Carol, A
57
Daybreakers
43
Dear John
27
Did You Hear About the Morgans?
55
Edge of Darkness
45
Extraordinary Measures
83
Fantastic Mr. Fox![]()
42
From Paris with Love
65
Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus, The
74
Invictus
57
It's Complicated
34
Law Abiding Citizen
33
Leap Year
33
Legion
42
Lovely Bones, The
54
Men Who Stare At Goats, The
34
Ninja Assassin
19
Old Dogs
xx
Percy Jackson & The Olympians: The Lightning Thief
39
Planet 51
79
Precious: Based on the Novel by Sapphire
73
Princess & the Frog, The
64
Road, The
57
Sherlock Holmes
27
Spy Next Door, The
36
Tooth Fairy
44
Twilight Saga: New Moon, The
83
Up in the Air![]()
xx
Valentine's Day
25
When in Rome
71
Where the Wild Things Are
xx
WolfMan, The
63
Youth in Revolt
Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.
Limited Releases
Now In Theaters
46
44 Inch Chest
83
Ajami![]()
73
Amreeka
xx
Barefoot to Timbuktu
19
Bitch Slap
24
Boondock Saints II: All Saints Day, The
76
Broken Embraces
64
Cloud 9
65
Coco Before Chanel
84
Cove, The![]()
84
Crazy Heart![]()
21
Crazy on the Outside
48
Creation
xx
Daddy Long Legs
81
Damned United, The![]()
68
Departures
62
District 13: Ultimatum
85
Education, An![]()
71
Eyes Wide Open
24
Falling Awake
81
Fish Tank![]()
56
For My Father
xx
From Mexico with Love
43
Frozen
68
Girl on the Train, The
52
Killing Kasztner
74
Last Station, The
43
Little Traitor, The
51
Loss of a Teardrop Diamond, The
73
Me and Orson Welles
76
Messenger, The
57
Missing Person, The
67
Most Dangerous Man in America: Daniel Ellsberg and the Pentagon Papers, The
xx
My Name is Khan
49
Nine
63
North Face
xx
October Country
67
Off and Running
52
Paranoids, The
49
Pop Star on Ice
49
Private Lives of Pippa Lee, The
xx
Promised Lands (Re-release)
69
Red Riding Trilogy, The
29
Saint John of Las Vegas
69
September Issue, The
36
Serious Moonlight
63
Shinjuku Incident, The
77
Single Man, A
xx
Still Bill
76
Terribly Happy
74
That Evening Sun
19
To Save a Life
68
Town Called Panic, A
59
Until the Light Takes Us
xx
Videocracy
65
Waiting for Armageddon
82
White Ribbon![]()
43
Women in Trouble
xx
Word is Out
64
Young Victoria, The
Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.
Hills Have Eyes, The
EMAILPRINTFox Searchlight Pictures

Mixed or average reviews
Based on 28 critic reviews
How did we calculate this?
Based on 96 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie >
Movie Info
Genre(s): Drama | Horror | Suspense/Thriller
Written by:
Alexandre Aja
Grégory Levasseur
Wes Craven (1977 screenplay)
Directed by: Alexandre Aja
Release Date:
Theatrical: March 10, 2006
DVD: June 20, 2006
Running Time: 108 minutes, Color
Origin: USA
Summary
RATING: R for strong gruesome violence and terror throughout, and for language
Starring Aaron Stanford, Kathleen Quinlan, Vinessa Shaw, Emilie de Ravin, Dan Byrd, Robert Joy, and Ted Levine
A new take on Wes Craven's 1977 film of the same name, The Hills Have Eyes is the story of a family road trip that goes terrifyingly awry when the travelers become stranded in a government atomic zone. Miles from nowhere, the Carters soon realize the seemingly uninhabited wasteland is actually the breeding ground of a blood-thirst mutant family -- and they are the prey. (Fox Searchlight)
Also On Metacritic
FILM: High Tension The Hills Have Eyes II
Also On The Web: Internet Movie Database View The Trailer Official Studio Site
What The Critics Said
All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...
Film Threat Heidi Martinuzzi
When Aja really starts in on the brutal slayings, he spares no one any comfort at all.
Read Full Review >Washington Post Stephen Hunter
Even as he reinvents, Aja invents. He's clearly working on a big budget for his first American film and has been told he can do anything he can think of. Visually, the movie is wildly alive, full of sure touches.
Read Full Review >The New York Times Nathan Lee
Snobs may balk, purists will be appalled, but this new and exceedingly nasty version of Wes Craven's 1977 cult shocker is awfully good at what it does. And mostly what it does is make you feel awful.
Read Full Review >San Francisco Chronicle Peter Hartlaub
If studios insist on remaking classic horror films, this is definitely the way to do it.
Read Full Review >Boston Globe Erin Meister
Hills is a far cry from its cheesy and predictable predecessor. "Gruesome" doesn't begin to describe the horrors that are revealed on-screen here.
Read Full Review >Seattle Post-Intelligencer Sean Axmaker
Almost 30 years later, it's just as primal.
Read Full Review >TV Guide Maitland McDonagh
French up-and-comer Alexandre Aja's full-bore do-over is a shockingly successful update of a seminal 1970s shocker.
Read Full Review >The Hollywood Reporter Michael Rechtshaffen
This remake of the 1977 Wes Craven cult classic is brutally horrific. And that's a compliment.
Read Full Review >Variety Robert Koehler
Besides proving to be a faithful mimic of Craven's filmmaking, Aja pours on the gore. But where Aja's version really leaps beyond Craven's both atmospherically and on the violence scale is in the second hour.
Read Full Review >Austin Chronicle Marc Savlov
Aja's version, while a killer ride in its own right, never manages the nagging subtexts Craven so handily injected into the proceedings. It's a topnotch nightmare, but this time you wake up.
Read Full Review >Premiere Glenn Kenny
Though this new Hills is both scarier and smarter than 95 percent of the other horror product out there, it's also indicative of everything that's wrong with horror movies today.
Read Full Review >ReelViews James Berardinelli
The Hills Have Eyes gets points for gore and general creepiness, and for occasional periods of tension, but it's not scary enough to linger long in the subconscious.
Read Full Review >Empire Chris Hewitt
Fans of the original won't be disappointed, but ultimately it's just another decent, arguably unnecessary, '70s horror remake.
Read Full Review >Entertainment Weekly Owen Gleiberman
Where Craven and his director, Alexandre Aja, may have miscalculated is in making the genetically damaged demons, with their flesh-potato foreheads and minimal verbal skills, into monster action figures who take vengeance on the world that created them. They're not scary because they're victims themselves.
Read Full Review >Rolling Stone Peter Travers
What good is a wallow in sicko sadism if you take all the fun out of it?
Read Full Review >Christian Science Monitor Peter Rainer
Alexandre Aja directs in full glop mode and the cast includes a few performers, including Ted Levine (from "Monk"), Robert Joy, and Kathleen Quinlan, who probably wish they were elsewhere.
Read Full Review >Chicago Reader J.R. Jones
Some may condemn this gruesome, heartless exercise, but I prefer to savor the irony: three years after the Francophobia that accompanied Operation Iraqi Freedom, every bonehead in America will be lining up to see a Frenchman's movie about subhuman hillbillies.
Read Full Review >New York Daily News Jack Mathews
As with all ensemble horror movies, your first challenge is to guess which of the Carter kin will survive to destroy the creatures killing them, and in what order the family members (and their pets) will fall.
Read Full Review >The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Liam Lacey
There are scenes that may make your stomach feel uncomfortable for a moment but rarely stories that will upset your equilibrium.
Read Full Review >Miami Herald Rene Rodriguez
This slick, sick remake of the 1977 Wes Craven cult shocker is more of a glum bummer than a horror show.
Read Full Review >The Onion (A.V. Club) Nathan Rabin
Thanks to assured direction and a fine cast, Hills isn't terrible, only terribly unnecessary.
Read Full Review >Village Voice Michael Atkinson
The net effect would be doze-inducing if in fact the Dolby didn't attempt to wake the dead.
Read Full Review >Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert
It is not faulty logic that derails The Hills have Eyes, however, but faulty drama. The movie is a one-trick pony.
Read Full Review >Chicago Tribune Michael Phillips
The ratings board gets all twisted up about sex and skin, yet it cannot give you or your kids enough ax blades to the cranium. This week's evidence: the remake of the old Wes Craven horror item, The Hills Have Eyes, which should not be rated R. It should be rated NC-17, or ITTS-OW, which stands for Is This Thing Sadistic, Or What?
Read Full Review >USA Today Claudia Puig
Nothing is right about this ridiculous horror schlockfest.
Read Full Review >LA Weekly Scott Foundas
An orgy of bloodletting and dismemberment that's more monotonous than shocking. Aja and Levasseur are to splatter what Liberace was to rhinestones: practitioners of gaud.
Read Full Review >New York Post Kyle Smith
These man-eaters are deadly, mainly in their ability to bore you to death.
Read Full Review >Philadelphia Inquirer Carrie Rickey
Aja's stomach-churning remake (produced by Craven) follows the original with frightening fidelity, amping up the barbarity from a nine (on the 1-10 scale) to a 12.
Read Full Review >What Our Users Said
The average user rating for this movie is 5.9 (out of 10) based on 96 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.
T F gave it a9:
I dont know wats with all the bull from you ppl it was a good movie and it made we wana see the original there have been worse movies (dawn of the dead remake) so dont rate it as the worse.
Cory C. gave it a10:
I wish I could give this a higher vote than 10. My favorite movie ever. Rape scene not needed? What the hell? The Carter family didn't need to be attacked by the mutants, but they were. That's what Lizard wanted to do, and though emotional, it was awesomely done. You really feel like you know the characters before they kill them. It wasn't TRYING to do anything, I don't think. It wasn't shying away from the horror of what it would really be like to be attacked unawares by such vicious creatures. This was the most intelligently, well done movie I know of, and I loved it with a passion! Aja, I wish you would direct THe Hills Have Eyes 3 and continue the plot with Bobby, Doug, Brenda, Katheryne, and Beast.
Angel Heart gave it a0:
Theres only so much a film lover can take before saying enough is enough! Yet another remake and yet another complete waste of space. No tension, a useless cast of cardboard cut outs, characters that never connect with the viewer, I could go on and on. This film would get vertigo in a sewer! Garbage with a capital G.
Trish S. gave it a1:
This movie was trying to hard to get a reaction out of viewers. I love horror movies, but this was a joke. Rape scene was not necessary and the movie was just boring. Lame, lame, lame!!
Steven R. gave it a9:
This film was really good. The atmosphiere and visual style were effective. The story benefits from its reworking from the original as viewers cannot be certain what to expect.
[Anonymous] gave it a10:
I cannot wait for #2. I have seen the original 3 as well as this one and have loved every minute of this top-of-its-class horror. For a horror film, this movie got excellent reviews. I loved it much more than the reviewers did and I recommend it to any horror fan out there. A
Jordan A. gave it a10:
I absolutely loved this movie. Probably one of the best horror movies I have ever seen. Great plot, and the gore and intensity level is just over the top. The ending was kind of confusing, but it was still good, knowing there are more out there. The number 2 doesn't look as good though.
