GAMES: GameSpot | GameFAQs | SportsGamer MUSIC: Last.fm | MP3.com MOVIES: Metacritic | Movietome TV: TV.com
Home | About Metacritic | About Metascores | What's New | Wireless Versions | Discussion Forums | Advertising Inquiries | Contact Us | RSS
Metacritic.com: We Deal With Criticism
     Help
> Switch to Advanced Search  
Film Video/DVD Music Games TV

Film

Upcoming Release Calendar
Weekend Box Office
Film Awards & Top 10s By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
How Metascores Are Calculated
Discuss Film In Our Forums

 

Wide Releases

sort by name sort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

 

Limited Releases

sort by name sort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

 



Printer-Friendly Version Email This Page Discuss In Our Forums

House of Wax
Warner Bros.

House of Wax reviews
Critic Score
Metascore: 41 Metascore out of 100
User Score  
5.0 out of 10
based on 36 reviews
Read critic reviews
How did we calculate this?
based on 58 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie

MPAA RATING: R for horror violence, some sexual content and language

Starring Elisha Cuthbert, Chad Michael Murray, Brian Van Holt, Paris Hilton, Jared Padalecki, Jon Abrahams, Robert Ri'chard, and Dragicia Debert

What begins as a weekend getaway for six friends becomes a terrifying fight for their lives in House of Wax, an exciting re-imagining of the 1953 horror classic. (Warner Bros.)


GENRE(S): Horror  |  Suspense/Thriller  
WRITTEN BY: Chad Hayes
Carey Hayes
Charles Belden (story)
 
DIRECTED BY: Jaume Serra  
RELEASE DATE: DVD: October 25, 2005 
Theatrical: May 6, 2005 
RUNNING TIME: 105 minutes, Color 
ORIGIN: Australia / USA 

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

80
Washington Post Stephen Hunter
This movie gives it to you, as no movie has in some years. Okay, if that's not your part of the swamp, don't go into it.
Read Full Review
75
San Francisco Chronicle Mick LaSalle
After a month, no one will talk about this movie, ever again. Still, with a picture like this, there's really only one question: Is it any fun? Yes. Lots. Definitely.
Read Full Review
75
Christian Science Monitor David Sterritt
As a frightfest it's better than today's average.
Read Full Review
63
Miami Herald Connie Ogle
House of Wax won't give you nightmares, but it upholds teen horror traditions with flair and energy.
Read Full Review
63
Philadelphia Inquirer David Hiltbrand
A sturdy and cohesive representative of what tends to be a flimsy and tawdry B-movie genre. It even has a moral: People who live in wax houses shouldn't start fires.
Read Full Review
60
Chicago Reader Jonathan Rosenbaum
Formulaic but fairly well-done.
Read Full Review
58
Portland Oregonian M. E. Russell
Sadly, director Jaume Serra has taken the Gothic premise of a madman casting his living victims in wax and, no doubt at the behest of copycat-hungry producers, turned House of Wax into yet another teens-versus-hillbillies slasher flick
Read Full Review
50
The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Rick Groen
The original was shot in 3-D; this, by contrast, is 1-D all the way.
Read Full Review
50
The Onion (A.V. Club) Nathan Rabin
Like too many horror movies these days, House of Wax goes for scares, but settles for being gory and deeply unpleasant.
Read Full Review
50
Film Threat Pete Vonder Haar
Works best when it sticks to some of the tenets of successful horror; namely, gore and surprise.
Read Full Review
50
Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert
House of Wax is not a good movie but it is an efficient one, and will deliver most of what anyone attending House of Wax could reasonably expect, assuming it would be unreasonable to expect very much.
Read Full Review
50
New York Daily News Jack Mathews
It's a good thing Jaume Serra's House of Wax wasn't shot in 3-D like the original 1953 horror classic - Paris Hilton is in it and she doesn't have a third dimension.
Read Full Review
50
New York Post Kyle Smith
Treats us to some feverish decapitating, juicy stabbing and non-anesthetized fingertip removal.
Read Full Review
50
The New York Times Dana Stevens
The set design is fairly elaborate by the standards of the genre, and the victims don't die in precisely the order you might expect, but everything else goes pretty much according to formula, including a last-minute plot twist that opens the creaky door to a sequel.
Read Full Review
50
ReelViews James Berardinelli
The problem is that the writing is too weak for me to come close to recommending it.
Read Full Review
50
The Hollywood Reporter Kirk Honeycutt
Acting is similarly routine with the glorious exception of Hilton, who is so bad she steals the show.
Read Full Review
50
Village Voice Benjamin Strong
Only a nominal remake...Nevertheless, for gore aficionados (and probably no one else) the murders are worth the wait.
Read Full Review
50
Entertainment Weekly Gregory Kirschling
Except for when Paris is on screen giving us the winking sex eye, Wax is just a museum of gory, joyless, easy shocks.
Read Full Review
50
Chicago Tribune Robert K. Elder
Gratuitous gore and young, nubile flesh bind together a cardboard plot.
Read Full Review
40
LA Weekly Chuck Wilson
Boring.
Read Full Review
40
Dallas Observer Jean Oppenheimer
Manages to be gruesome and grisly, but not particularly creepy or frightening.
Read Full Review
40
Austin Chronicle Marrit Ingman
Expect lots of Slasher Movie 101.
Read Full Review
40
Wall Street Journal Joanne Kaufmann
This is slash and burn strictly by the numbers. There's never an ounce of doubt where the movie's going; the only suspense is how long it's going to take to get there and how high the body count is going to get.
40
TV Guide Maitland McDonagh
It delivers some bracingly nasty gore scenes, but there's no spark left in the run-scream-repeat formula, and a movie whose biggest draw is profoundly untalented hotel-fortune heiress Paris Hilton is in desperate need of some juice.
Read Full Review
40
Salon.com Stephanie Zacharek
Paris Hilton is the big draw in Jaume Collet-Serra's not-really-a-remake horror-slasher thriller House of Wax, and she'd have to be: There's so little else going on in it that you find yourself waiting for her few brief scenes.
Read Full Review
40
Slate David Edelstein
Isn't bad as these things go, although these things go nowhere a healthy individual should want to. Having never claimed to be a healthy individual, I found it tolerable.
Read Full Review
38
Boston Globe Wesley Morris
For Hilton haters, the stupid and grotesque remake of House of Wax will only stoke their schadenfreude.
Read Full Review
30
Washington Post Desson Thomson
You'll be rooting for these people to get slaughtered out of sheer boredom.
Read Full Review
30
Los Angeles Times Kevin Crust
Related to the 1953 Vincent Price film in name, embalming technique and Warner Bros. pedigree only, the new House of Wax is a dreary, predictable tale.
Read Full Review
25
Seattle Post-Intelligencer Sean Axmaker
Overlong, unscary, poorly paced and banally written.
Read Full Review
25
USA Today Mike Clark
When the cast starts wondering where the roadkill is, someone says, "Follow the smell." Good tip: That's how you'll know where Wax is playing.
Read Full Review
25
Charlotte Observer Lawrence Toppman
Weak, obligatory stabs at humor make it more generic than it might've been.
Read Full Review
25
Rolling Stone Peter Travers
Purists, be warned: This scare-flick quickie has as much relation to the 1953 Vincent Price classic with the same title as Paris Hilton does to acting.
Read Full Review
25
Premiere Aaron Hillis
A sadistically bland entertainment that oversells its reveals and lets its suspense drip so long that it would be nice if something (anything!) happened.
Read Full Review
25
Baltimore Sun Michael Sragow
Barf-bag baroque.
Read Full Review
20
Variety Scott Foundas
Direly predictable, with candle-drip pacing and a pervasive unpleasantness.
Read Full Review

What Our Users Said

Vote Now!The average user rating for this movie is 5.0 (out of 10) based on 58 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

Steve S. gave it a3:
Not scary and dull. I kept pausing it and walking away.

Andrew B. gave it a1:
HORRIBLE MOVIE! I never seen the original but this movie is bad, just the main point in travel, they left to go to the super bowl which they didn't even have tickets to and if they scalpt tickets they would be REALLY expensive. but they make it far enough to a town they never heard of before(well two of them do) and the others go on even farther to the super bowl and then deside to turn around and go back after being stuck in trafic on a highway which there is no turn around while people in the back seat are sayin "TURN AROUND, LETS GO BACK!" STUPID!!! so they do turn back, retarded. and the other part i remember is when those 2 first go into the wax house and then she see's something outside in the window looking in and gets freaked out, and he goes outside to see what/who it was, it's a free country, people can be outside, and besides that whoever it was, they were just looking in the window, no actually walking into the place and touchin and metting a little wax. and she stays INSIDE the wax house while he goes outside to see what it was outside, f-ing stupid.

Jim S. gave it a3:
I expected this movie to follow in the footsteps of the orignal classic House Of Wax. Totally disappointed with screenplay and artwork.

Wally S. gave it a6:
The remakes just keep getting worst, and here it achieves the unnatural gift of beeing stupid and dreadfull, the teens have no skill, and even though the art direction is excellent, everything else is trash.

Andy W. gave it a10:
[***SPOILERS***] This is probably one of the best movies of 05. just because....a)elisha cuthbert lives, she's a babe b)paris hilton gets absolutely owned in the middle of the movie c)tons of guts and gore and d)the plot was very effective because it practically had me on the edge of my seat, wondering what was going to happen. if any of those reasons were not sufficient in this movie, i would've pulled out my hair at it. this for once, was actually a pretty scary movie.

Denis C gave it an8:
Very efficient, scary at some parts, love the special effects of certain shots. I recommend this movie for those who love to be seated on the edge of their seats. Don't drink and watch, you will spill your drink in a matter of time!!

tracy i. gave it a9:
Great film.

Read more user comments...

Discuss this movie in our forums

Return to top of page
Home | FILM | DVD/VIDEO | MUSIC | GAMES | TV | Forums | About Metacritic metacritic.com

Popular on CBS sites: MLB | Spore | iPhone 3G | Paris Hilton | Antivirus Software | GPS | Recipes | Shwayze | NFL

About CBS Interactive | Jobs | Advertise

© 2008 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use