CNET Networks Entertainment GameSpot | GameFAQs | SportsGamer | Metacritic | MP3.com | TV.com
Home | About Metacritic | About Metascores | What's New | Wireless Versions | Discussion Forums | Advertising Inquiries | Contact Us | RSS
Metacritic.com: We Deal With Criticism
     Help
> Switch to Advanced Search  
Film Video/DVD Music Games TV

Film

Upcoming Release Calendar
Weekend Box Office
Film Awards & Top 10s By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
How Metascores Are Calculated
Discuss Film In Our Forums

 

Wide Releases

sort by name sort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

 

Limited Releases

sort by name sort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

 



Printer-Friendly Version Email This Page Discuss In Our Forums

Interview
Sony Pictures

Interview reviews
Critic Score
Metascore: 64 Metascore out of 100
User Score  
7.0 out of 10
based on 29 reviews
Read critic reviews
How did we calculate this?
based on 10 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie

MPAA RATING: R for language including sexual references, and some drug use

Starring Steve Buscemi, Sienna Miller, Tara Elders, Molly Griffith, Robert Hines, and Jackson Loo

Self-destructive journalist Pierre Peders is no stranger to violence and inhumanity. Having made his name as a war reporter, he has traveled the world seeing some of the most horrifying sights imaginable. So he feels that his current puff-piece assignment, an interview with pop diva, TV and movie start Katya, is beneath his dignity. The two meet in a restaurant and instantly it's a collision of two worlds--Pierre's serious political focus and Katya's superficial world of celebrity. But perhaps all is not as it appears. Their confrontation evolves into a passionate verbal chess game spiked with wit, intrigue and sexual tension, capped with a riveting twist ending. (Sony Pictures)


GENRE(S): Drama  
WRITTEN BY: Theodor Holman (original screenplay)
Steve Buscemi
David Schechter
 
DIRECTED BY: Steve Buscemi  
RELEASE DATE: Theatrical: July 13, 2007 
RUNNING TIME: 83 minutes, Color 
ORIGIN: USA 

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

91
Entertainment Weekly Owen Gleiberman
Any doubts as to whether Sienna Miller is a gifted actress should be laid to rest by Interview.
Read Full Review
90
New York Magazine David Edelstein
I’ve sat through so many claustrophobic examples of the genre I forgot how exhilarating, how pure a great one could be. Interview is a great one--electric as theater and cinema.
Read Full Review
83
Christian Science Monitor Peter Rainer
The back-and-forth between the performers is tensely choreographed, and Buscemi does a good job opening up the action, which mostly takes place in a Manhattan loft.
Read Full Review
75
The Onion (A.V. Club) Nathan Rabin
The Interview is mannered, implausible, and stagy, but queasily compelling all the same.
Read Full Review
75
Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert
I found Interview kind of fascinating, especially in the ways that Buscemi and Miller make their performances into commentaries on the types of characters they play.
Read Full Review
75
San Francisco Chronicle Mick LaSalle
Despite the fact that both protagonists are equally appalling, the screenplay seems to have a soft spot for the woman. However, this doesn't take away from the fun of watching the two characters tear each other to pieces.
Read Full Review
75
New York Daily News Jack Mathews
The first of three planned remakes of Dutch films by the late Theo van Gogh, Steve Buscemi's Interview takes the most unnatural act in human intercourse - the celebrity interview - and makes an explosively funny two-character psychodrama out of it.
Read Full Review
75
New York Post Kyle Smith
Some bits are too stagy, but for the most part this long night feels like an interview that could have actually happened. Miller is so good - dumb, smart, wounded, wounding, a lollipop of sweet poison that you'd buy every day until it killed you - that you feel you not only understand her but all actresses.
Read Full Review
75
Chicago Tribune Michael Phillips
The film's emotional claustrophobia may not be for everyone.
Read Full Review
75
Portland Oregonian Marc Mohan
While the subject matter is certainly American enough, it seems possible the original had a bit more depth.
Read Full Review
75
Rolling Stone Peter Travers
Stick with it for Miller’s gutsy tour de force and the kick of watching Buscemi, as actor and filmmaker, turn an experiment into a mesmerizing battle of wills.
Read Full Review
75
Philadelphia Inquirer Carrie Rickey
The film is enjoyable as a performance piece, an eminently watchable contest between two actors at the top of their games.
Read Full Review
70
The New York Times Manohla Dargis
Vaporous and chilled to freezing, Interview lacks a single honest moment, but it does have plenty of diverting ones.
Read Full Review
70
Variety Dennis Harvey
Afforded a comparatively rare chance to stretch out in a complex lead role, Buscemi is excellent.
Read Full Review
70
Los Angeles Times Carina Chocano
For a film that unfolds mostly in a single location, Interview manages not to feel like a stage piece. But the premise, which may have worked in Holland, gets a little lost in the American translation.
Read Full Review
63
TV Guide Maitland McDonagh
In the end, sharp writing and terrific performances can't compensate for the fact that the back-and-forth between a sour scribe and a manipulative celebrity doesn't amount to a hill of beans in this crazy world.
Read Full Review
63
Boston Globe Ty Burr
One comes away from Interview exhausted and a little unclean, entertained by the acting equivalent of a pit bull fight but needing a hose-down. The movie confirms that in every relationship "there are winners and losers." True enough, but for the audience this one's a draw.
Read Full Review
63
ReelViews James Berardinelli
Interview has its moments but they can't prevent it from feeling a little long winded and unsatisfying.
Read Full Review
60
Film Threat Jamie Tipps
To their credit, Miller and Buscemi engage the audience’s interest in what is essentially an extended conversation for an extraordinarily long time.
Read Full Review
60
Empire William Thomas
Stagey filming aside, this is a sharp and controlled study of celebrity obsession.
Read Full Review
60
Village Voice Jim Ridley
The result, though anchored mostly to a single set cleverly sectioned by hammocks, curtains, and a kitchen bar, is the least concrete and most artificial of Buscemi's films.
Read Full Review
60
Salon.com Andrew O'Hehir
Whatever we may make of van Gogh's life and death, Buscemi's talky, stagey Interview -- the first of three van Gogh adaptations planned by American actor-directors -- doesn't make much of a case for him as an important or original artist.
Read Full Review
58
Seattle Post-Intelligencer Sean Axmaker
Buscemi gets a fine performance from Miller and plays his part with a murky mix of self-pity, opportunism and arrogance. A few scenes crackle with their intensity. The rest of it wallows in glib acrimony and cynicism.
Read Full Review
50
Washington Post Desson Thomson
Unfortunately, Buscemi's film conveys the spirit of its source material but doesn't make a satisfying transmogrification out of its homage.
Read Full Review
50
Wall Street Journal Joanne Kaufman
Both in its content and production values, Interview has the feel of an undergraduate project -- all intensity, no never mind. Pierre is such a weasel, Katya is such a narcissist and the outcome seems so pre-determined, it's hard to care whose belt gets the notch. The adroit performances of Buscemi and Miller almost make it matter.
Read Full Review
50
The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Kamal AL-Solaylee
The end result of this showcase for Buscemi's writing, acting and directing chops is so uneven and mixed in small details and overall tone that it's anybody's guess if it's one for the Oscars or the Razzies next year.
Read Full Review
50
Chicago Reader Jonathan Rosenbaum
The good direction and performances seem wasted on limited material; despite a few interesting twists and ambiguities, the main revelation--that the reporter is an insufferable snob--doesn't seem worth the 84 minutes devoted to spelling it out.
Read Full Review
38
USA Today Claudia Puig
Director Steve Buscemi is not to be faulted for his filmmaking or acting skills, but as co-writer he could have done better than the false-sounding dialogue.
Read Full Review
30
Austin Chronicle Josh Rosenblatt
Buscemi and Miller do their best with what they have, finding at least some small redemption in two dislikable characters written into an improbable situation, but emotional honesty in the service of nonsense is still nonsense, no matter how many scabs it manages to pick at.
Read Full Review

What Our Users Said

Vote Now!The average user rating for this movie is 7.0 (out of 10) based on 10 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

[Anonymous] gave it a10:
Actually, the film is pretty sexy. This is probably Sienna's best role. And I also enjoyed watching Steve Buscemi play a character you don't often see him play on screen.

[Anonymous] gave it a10:
Wonderfully acted and very captivating...kept me interested the whole way through. I bet Sienna Miller will also get a nod at the Golden Globes or Oscars for this performance. Well worth seeing!

Max L gave it a4:
An ugly movie overall. The shots, the dialogue, and the story. The acting almost made it worth seeing.

[Anonymous] gave it a4:
Disappointing and ugly.

Discuss this movie in our forums

Return to top of page
Home | FILM | DVD/VIDEO | MUSIC | GAMES | TV | Forums | About Metacritic metacritic.com

Popular on CBS sites: Fantasy Football | Miley Cyrus | MLB | iPhone 3G | GPS | Recipes | Shwayze | NFL

About CNET Networks | Jobs | Advertise

© 2008 CNET Networks, Inc., a CBS Company. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use