GAMES: GameSpot | GameFAQs | SportsGamer MUSIC: Last.fm | MP3.com MOVIES: Metacritic | Movietome TV: TV.com
Home | About Metacritic | About Metascores | What's New | Wireless Versions | Discussion Forums | Advertising Inquiries | Contact Us | RSS
Metacritic.com: We Deal With Criticism
     Help
> Switch to Advanced Search  
Film Video/DVD Music Games TV

Film

Upcoming Release Calendar
Weekend Box Office
Film Awards & Top 10s By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
How Metascores Are Calculated
Discuss Film In Our Forums

 

Wide Releases

sort by name sort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

 

Limited Releases

sort by name sort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

 



Printer-Friendly Version Email This Page Discuss In Our Forums

Lady Chatterley
Kino International Corp.

Lady Chatterley reviews
Critic Score
Metascore: 80 Metascore out of 100
User Score  
7.0 out of 10
based on 26 reviews
Read critic reviews
How did we calculate this?
based on 26 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie

MPAA RATING: Not Rated

Starring Marina Hands, Jean-Louis Coullo'ch, Hippolyte Girardot, Hélène Alexandridis, Hélène Fillières, Bernard Verley, Sava Lolov, and Jean-Baptiste Montagut

Based on D.H. Lawrence's "Lady Chatterley's Lover," this film tells the story of a passion that is both innocent and subversive - one that transcends, without ever ignoring, class and social conventions. (Kino International)


GENRE(S): Drama  |  Foreign  
WRITTEN BY: Roger Bohbot
Pascale Ferran
D.H. Lawrence (novel)
Pierre Trividic (dialogue)
 
DIRECTED BY: Pascale Ferran  
RELEASE DATE: DVD: December 4, 2007 
Theatrical: June 22, 2007 
RUNNING TIME: 168 minutes, Color 
ORIGIN: Belgium / France / UK 
LANGUAGE(S): French (with English subtitles) 

Best Actress (Hands), Best Cinematography, Best Costume Design, Best Film and Best Writing - Adaptation, 2007 César Awards

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

100
Entertainment Weekly Lisa Schwarzbaum
There's an adult life force in every frame of this luxuriously paced work, even in the sight of rain and a lady's stocking.
Read Full Review
100
Chicago Reader Jonathan Rosenbaum
A masterful 168-minute piece of storytelling that never ceases to be gripping in spite of its measured pace.
Read Full Review
90
Los Angeles Times Kenneth Turan
The most frankly sensual movie in memory. Winner of five Cesars, the French Oscar, including best picture and best actress for its luminous star, Marina Hands, it has found the soul of the celebrated D.H. Lawrence novel.
Read Full Review
90
The New York Times A.O. Scott
This Lady Chatterley, winner of five César awards in France, feels bracingly fresh, vital and modern.
Read Full Review
90
LA Weekly Ella Taylor
The supreme achievement of this lovely film — all three rhythmic, leisurely hours of it -- is that what borders on faintly fascistic body worship in the novel instead feels as perfectly natural to us as it does to the lovers. Lawrence would kvell.
Read Full Review
88
Rolling Stone Peter Travers
It's a movie as timely as it is thrilling to watch.
Read Full Review
88
Boston Globe Ty Burr
Pascale Ferran's Lady Chatterley is sensual in escalating degrees of heat, but the film's eroticism, which is substantial, is laid on with a caress. The movie's a slow-motion swoon back into Eden -- a nature documentary about humans -- and it's hypnotic.
Read Full Review
88
Philadelphia Inquirer Steven Rea
A heartbreaking story of true love.
Read Full Review
88
Chicago Tribune Sid Smith
The result is not a movie of peekaboo titillation, but a studied, original portrait of sexuality and its role in human relationships.
Read Full Review
88
New York Post V.A. Musetto
Intelligent and tasteful, even while being sexually frank.
Read Full Review
83
Seattle Post-Intelligencer Sean Axmaker
These are mortal souls and unglamorous bodies and Ferran explores their affair in its earthy, physical and fleshy reality.
Read Full Review
80
Washington Post Desson Thomson
Director Pascale Ferran makes this a sort of opera of two bodies, as the characters discover not only each other but themselves. And the French filmmaker cannily turns their corporeal discoveries into a moral mission, two desperately lonely souls crying for spiritual freedom in a world of moral constriction.
Read Full Review
80
Empire David Parkinson
Pascale Ferran as the first female director to adapt this notorious novel absorbs her successful vision with a uniquely romantic vibe.
Read Full Review
80
The New Republic Stanley Kauffmann
In this film the lovers are seeking the impossible through the possible. The knowledge of that impossibility makes the scenes all the more powerful. This is the core of Lawrence's novel, and Ferran has understood it.
Read Full Review
80
Village Voice J. Hoberman
This is not so much a love story (and even less a story about love) than it is a movie of passionate loveliness.
Read Full Review
80
New York Magazine David Edelstein
I found the first half-hour a snooze, but once I adjusted to the movie's rhythms, I was completely enraptured. Ferran weaves the love affair into nature, but not in the mystical, sanctified manner of Ang Lee's "Brokeback Mountain."
Read Full Review
75
TV Guide Ken Fox
Wragby is a stately manor straight out of English House & Garden, rather than a sprawling, suffocating warren teetering on the edge of a coal pit, and sex is portrayed as a means of personal deliverance rather than a universal salvation, leaving Lawrence's admirers still waiting for the film that will finally do the novel justice.
Read Full Review
75
New York Daily News Jack Mathews
It captures the animal attraction we call lust and carefully tracks its evolution to true love. For all its faults, this beautifully shot, sexually graphic film is a gem.
Read Full Review
75
San Francisco Chronicle Ruthe Stein
As the title character in Lady Chatterley, Marina Hands does the most persuasive job of feigning sexual pleasure since Jane Fonda in "Coming Home."
Read Full Review
75
Portland Oregonian Marc Mohan
Being a fairly faithful adaptation, this version also has a lot of that other stuff about the hypocrisy of civilized life, the truthfulness of natural splendor and so forth.
Read Full Review
75
Baltimore Sun Michael Sragow
Few films even try to render the full range of emotions and sensations in female sexuality as the aptly titled Lady Chatterley, directed and co-written by a Frenchwoman, Pascale Ferran.
Read Full Review
70
Salon.com Andrew O'Hehir
If a film can be both lush and cold, both erotic and cautious, that film is Lady Chatterley. It's a picture to honor and appreciate, not necessarily to love.
Read Full Review
67
Austin Chronicle Marjorie Baumgarten
Lady Chatterley is the recipient of six César Awards, France's equivalent of the Oscar. Although the film is capable of sustaining our interest throughout, the viewer may find it lacking in some of the transcendence Lady Chatterley's lust is supposed to inspire.
Read Full Review
63
Miami Herald Marta Barber
Its candid conversations about sexuality are what places Lawrence's protagonist in a class by herself.
Read Full Review
50
The Onion (A.V. Club) Tasha Robinson
This might be pleasant to watch, in a floaty '70s-movie kind of way, if not for the film's groaning 168-minute length and abrupt thudder of an ending.
Read Full Review
50
Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert
Watching this film I reflected that there are only so many Cracker Jacks you can eat before you decide to hell with the toy.
Read Full Review

What Our Users Said

Vote Now!The average user rating for this movie is 7.0 (out of 10) based on 26 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

kevin b. gave it a10:
I've given a 10 as a default as - boo - I haven't actually watched the movie yet - it's on release in the UK on 24 August. I may downrate the film after the screening but am willing to suspend disbelief for the mo': I'm really looking forward to seeing it. Moving onto the ad hominem arguments in this thread, why can't contributors accept that their subjective judgements are, of course, legitimate but also carry little weight with others who have differing opinions? There's too much 'I just think', 'overrated', 'elitist', 'imbecilic' etc. And who do I think I am , yadayadaya. Enjoy! And if you didn't, chacun a son gout. (Elitist!)

Michael gave it a5:
Andy Scala, there is only one s in asinine. Your typographical errors subvert the inherent elitism of your argument. I suggest you return to glorifying shallow postmodern art in the humanities departments or some other intellectual cul-de-sac produced by the Ivy League, while dismissing all other culture as inconsequential kitsch.

Liz gave it a2:
Pretty nature scenes and a few good scenes (eg, Lady Chatterly's husband insisting that no one help him up the hill even though his motorized wheelchair os failing him) but about an hour too long. The sex scenes are painful to watch. After their third encounter, Lady Chatterly's lover says, "We came at the same time." ???? I hadn't notice that she got much pleasure out of the first two. And why should she have? He had all the technique of a 16 year old boy and it took about 30 seconds. In contract the end of the movie is a conversation between Lady Chatterly and her lover. It takes place in real time and it was agonizing to watch and listen to.

[Anonymous] gave it an8:
A great surprise. A patience and beautiful film - but with that said - it is not quite the film that it could have been.

Jay D gave it a7:
The problem with Alexandra's comments is not that she didn't like it, that is her prerogative, but that she felt she should warn other people not to see it. Make your comments about the film and appreciate that others are intelligent enough to make up their own mind as to whether to go to see it or not.

Alexandra gave it a0:
To Jerry J and Ken G Thank you both for backing me up. I'm tired of condescending and pretentious people that think that anyone that doesn't agree with them is wrong. Just because I did not like this film does not make me an idiot, in fact, I am far from it. I just thought this movie was dull. Simple as that.

Ken G gave it a4:
To Andy Scala, you are not an idiot if you dislike a certain movie. An idiot is someone who looks down on someone else who doesn't agree with him/her about a movie. An idiot is someone who has no respect for a difference of opinion about a movie. That makes you the idiot. As for this movie, as beautifully filmed as it was, the story is flat, lifeless, and feels tame and dated by today's standards. Of all the great novels, this story is probably not one of the better choices to make a movie about today. The story was daring and scandalous in it's day. But no longer. Take those elements out of it, and what you have left is a rather tame, bland story, that takes too much time to tell a story with so little going on. It seems the mindset of the filmmakers here was that we have to pay proper homage to this legendary story, by making a movie that is almost 3 hours long. The problem is, that there is not 3 hours worth of material in this story. The whole thing is stretched so thin, that even the sex and nudity starts to feel dull.

Read more user comments...

Discuss this movie in our forums

Return to top of page
Home | FILM | DVD/VIDEO | MUSIC | GAMES | TV | Forums | About Metacritic metacritic.com

Popular on CBS sites: MLB | Spore | iPhone 3G | Paris Hilton | Antivirus Software | GPS | Recipes | Shwayze | NFL

About CBS Interactive | Jobs | Advertise

© 2008 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use