CNET Networks Entertainment GameSpot | GameFAQs | SportsGamer | Metacritic | MP3.com | TV.com
Home | About Metacritic | About Metascores | What's New | Wireless Versions | Discussion Forums | Advertising Inquiries | Contact Us | RSS
Metacritic.com: We Deal With Criticism
     Help
> Switch to Advanced Search  
Film Video/DVD Music Games TV

Film

Upcoming Release Calendar
Weekend Box Office
Film Awards & Top 10s By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
How Metascores Are Calculated
Discuss Film In Our Forums

 

Wide Releases

sort by name sort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

 

Limited Releases

sort by name sort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

 



Printer-Friendly Version Email This Page Discuss In Our Forums

Melinda and Melinda
Fox Searchlight Pictures

Melinda and Melinda reviews
Critic Score
Metascore: 54 Metascore out of 100
User Score  
5.9 out of 10
based on 40 reviews
Read critic reviews
How did we calculate this?
based on 30 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie

MPAA RATING: PG-13 for adult situations involving sexuality, and some substance material

Starring Chiwetel Ejiofor, Will Ferrell, Jonny Lee Miller, Radha Mitchell, Amanda Peet, Chloë Sevigny, and Wallace Shawn

This film combines romantic comedy and drama in a way that Woody Allen, unique among filmmakers, likes to contrast. (Fox Searchlight)


GENRE(S): Comedy  
WRITTEN BY: Woody Allen  
DIRECTED BY: Woody Allen  
RELEASE DATE: DVD: October 25, 2005 
Theatrical: March 18, 2005 
RUNNING TIME: 100 minutes, Color 
ORIGIN: USA 

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

88
USA Today Mike Clark
Smart, satisfying and compact but so modest in scale that only true-blue fans will sense - immediately - that it's Woody Allen's best outing in many years.
Read Full Review
88
Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert
In its complexity and wit, this is one of his (Allen's) best recent films.
Read Full Review
88
Chicago Tribune Michael Wilmington
Allen gives us at least half a classic comedy - more than we usually get at the movies these days - while having some elegant fun with an idea that has intrigued poets and smart alecks through the ages: the interchangeability of comedy and tragedy.
Read Full Review
80
Empire Emma Cochrane
It has great performances, snappy one-liners and a likeably tricksy structure, all wrapped up in an affirmative antidote to life’s daunting complexities. Welcome back, Woody.
Read Full Review
80
Wall Street Journal Joe Morgenstern
Full of entertaining vignettes that eventually make a happy mockery, as they're meant to do, of the tragedy vs. comedy dialectic.
80
The Hollywood Reporter Sheri Linden
Woody's back on solid ground with his first memorable pic of the new millennium.
Read Full Review
80
Variety Deborah Young
Radha Mitchell stirs memories of complex Allen heroines from Annie Hall on down, even if the action is dispersed via a larger ensemble cast which he currently favors.
Read Full Review
75
Rolling Stone Peter Travers
With Melinda and Melinda he's (Allen) not just going through the motions. He's saying the game isn't over before you laugh till it hurts.
Read Full Review
75
Christian Science Monitor David Sterritt
This is closer to an Allen comeback than anything else he's made recently. Maybe he'll achieve it with his next movie, "Match Point," due this year.
Read Full Review
75
Premiere Glenn Kenny
Though Melinda is no masterpiece, it’s also an Allen film that requires almost zero special pleading.
Read Full Review
75
San Francisco Chronicle Mick LaSalle
More accomplished, adventurous and original. Instead of Allen's usual investigation into the nature of existence, this new film looks at the way stories are created, particularly comedies.
Read Full Review
70
The New York Times Dana Stevens
As he (Allen) interweaves two versions of the Melinda story, one meant to be bathed in pathos, the other sprinkled with whimsy, it becomes apparent that his notions of comedy and tragedy do not quite correspond either to scholarly dogma or to everyday usage.
Read Full Review
70
The New Yorker David Denby
It's emotionally more alive than anything Allen has done since "Sweet and Lowdown," in 1999. I was absorbed in it, and I liked parts of it. And I wish to God it were better.
Read Full Review
67
Entertainment Weekly Owen Gleiberman
The best reason to see Melinda and Melinda is Radha Mitchell, who has her grabbiest role (or two of them) since she broke through with "High Art."
Read Full Review
67
Seattle Post-Intelligencer Paula Nechak
tTere are two things going for Melinda and Melinda: Woody's not in it and Radha Mitchell is.
Read Full Review
67
Portland Oregonian Shawn Levy
It's breezy enough, though, as a romantic comedy. And the stakes at risk in it are more grown-up and weighty than those in most Hollywood fare. Like Allen himself, you could do worse.
Read Full Review
63
Charlotte Observer Lawrence Toppman
Whatever you think of Melinda and Melinda, you have to admire Woody Allen for this: After years of criticism that he didn't use people of color in films, he's written two interracial romances.
Read Full Review
63
Philadelphia Inquirer Steven Rea
The dialogue rings tinny in the ear, as if enunciated in the phony arc of a stage light.
Read Full Review
63
ReelViews James Berardinelli
Has a fascinating premise; it's the execution that's sloppy.
Read Full Review
63
The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Liam Lacey
Allen's best effort since 1999's "Sweet and Lowdown," but that's not saying a lot.
Read Full Review
63
New York Daily News Jack Mathews
But Allen can still write a good joke and there are some here. Not enough to say he has returned to form, but enough to remind you of what that form was.
Read Full Review
60
Time Richard Corliss
Allen has assembled an attractive cast and given most of them clichés to inhabit. He has also stinted on inventiveness.
Read Full Review
60
Village Voice J. Hoberman
Neither comedy nor tragedy, the movie is closest to genteel soap opera.
Read Full Review
60
Washington Post Desson Thomson
A medium-boil good time, mostly for its humor.
Read Full Review
50
Dallas Observer Melissa Levine
It's merely all right--very high-concept and on its way to interesting, but never there.
Read Full Review
50
Miami Herald Rene Rodriguez
Beautifully shot by the great Vilmos Zsigmond, the movie is watchable, sporadically amusing and ultimately frustrating, because Allen is capable of so much more, but doesn't appear interested -- or willing -- to push himself any longer.
Read Full Review
50
LA Weekly Brendan Bernhard
From its austere opening credits to its screechy women, this 35th film by Woody Allen looks and sounds like a dozen other Allen movies.
Read Full Review
50
New York Magazine Ken Tucker
When are we going to get a generation of actors who will finally decline to succumb to The Woody Mystique, and refuse to accept a proffered role without first deciding whether the entire damn project is worthwhile?
Read Full Review
50
Boston Globe Wesley Morris
Doesn't entirely work.
Read Full Review
50
New York Post Kyle Smith
Not since Edward Norton kicked his own butt in Fight Club has the screen witnessed such a brutal self-drubbing.
Read Full Review
50
TV Guide Maitland McDonagh
It's all very well to say that laughter and tears are just a heartbeat apart, but both variations on Melinda's story bear the unmistakable mark of Allen's morose sensibilities.
Read Full Review
40
Slate David Edelstein
The Australian actress Radha Mitchell is the only reason to see the movie: She has an extraordinary open face and a way of mixing dreaminess with sudden bursts of lacerating emotion that recalls Jessica Lange.
Read Full Review
40
Salon.com Stephanie Zacharek
Even these actors -- who, in other pictures, are often wonderful in distinctive ways -- don't seem like themselves: It's as if they've been pulverized and pressed into convenient actor shapes.
Read Full Review
40
Los Angeles Times Carina Chocano
Allen's view of what's "deeply real" feels ever more deeply bogus as the movie progresses, his trademark wit having calcified into pastiche and unintended self-parody.
Read Full Review
40
The New Republic Stanley Kauffmann
The grave story is leaden, the comic story isn't funny, and the comparison--the rivalry--between the two modes is never crystallized.
Read Full Review
38
Baltimore Sun Michael Sragow
It's disconcerting to see Ferrell, a master of macho psychosis, adopt the stop-and-go dithering of Woody Allen-style neurosis.
Read Full Review
30
Chicago Reader Jonathan Rosenbaum
This is mainly a narrative brain-teaser like "Memento" or "The Jacket"; merely keeping up with the game requires so much energy that the thinness of the material becomes fully apparent only toward the end.
Read Full Review
30
Washington Post Stephen Hunter
Give Woody Allen credit for ambition. Failing at one movie wasn't enough. Nearly anyone can do that; it happens all the time. He's chosen to fail at two simultaneously.
Read Full Review
30
The Onion (A.V. Club) Nathan Rabin
A second-rate comedy and a third-rate drama, Melinda And Melinda gives viewers two unsatisfying movies in one. The only genuine tragedy here involves a once-brilliant comedy writer plunging further into a seemingly permanent artistic freefall.
Read Full Review
20
Austin Chronicle Kimberley Jones
These days, Allen's pictures are more like snuff films, in which the viewer must suffer both gifted actors committing screen hara-kiri and a once-brilliant filmmaker soldiering on with his long, bullheaded decline.
Read Full Review

What Our Users Said

Vote Now!The average user rating for this movie is 5.9 (out of 10) based on 30 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

Craig A. gave it a1:
Just rubbish. Stilted, unnatural dialogue, wooden performances, pretensious and bourgious. Its concept is supposedly the same story told two different ways. Its not. Its two different stories told the same way - badly.

Tony B. gave it a4:
Although it has an interesting premise, there is really only one reason to see this film, and that is Radha Mitchell's performance, one of the best of the year.

Susan M gave it a1:
I rented this pitiful "film." I am appalled that anybody was willing to fund this. It reminded me of a beginning acting class where people pair up and do scenes in front of the class and "act" with all the realism of a piece of wood. Moreover, the archaic dialoge just sounded ridiculous. Does Mr. Allen ever listen to contemporary conversations? Oh, and everyone is an accomplished musician and they only like Cole Porter! "I was walking along a sidewalk and there was a piano. I used to play in high school. Actually, I gave concerts." Puh-lease. The only cast member I didn't pity was Amanda Peet, who emerged from this mess without losing any dignity. Can't say the same for everyone else. Hey, what did you guys think?

Wally S. gave it an8:
Woody Allen is in good shape, he creates a wonderfull plot full of autentic characters that are performed with majesty. Definetly, a cult film to see over and over again, just to capture the delightfull essence of the story, that is great.

Greg T. gave it a0:
Rhonda asks how anyone can hate a Woody Allen movie...easy, just watch this one.

Larry R. gave it an8:
Delightful. Woddy Allen shows again the promise of his earlier work. The interiors were over done and unbelievable, distracting from the flow. Maybe we will once again see the glories of yesteryear.

Doyle P. gave it a10:
Couldn't take my eyes and mind off this movie. My only criticisim is that the characters might have been five or ten years older and therefore their problems would have been more pressing. Thanks, Woody.

Read more user comments...

Discuss this movie in our forums

Return to top of page
Home | FILM | DVD/VIDEO | MUSIC | GAMES | TV | Forums | About Metacritic metacritic.com

Popular on CBS sites: World News | Fantasy Football | Amy Winehouse | Baseball | E3 | Batman | Firefox 3 | iPhone 3G

About CNET Networks | Jobs | Advertise

© 2008 CNET Networks, Inc., a CBS Company. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use