Now Playing
Critics & Publications
Archives: A-Z Index
Advanced Search

Upcoming Release Calendar
Weekend Box Office
Film Awards & Top 10s By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
How Metascores Are Calculated
Discuss Film In Our Forums

sort by name

sort by score

38 12 Rounds
48 17 Again
76 Adventureland
48 Angels & Demons
54 Battle for Terra
xx Bruno
80 Coraline
40 Dance Flick
83 Drag Me to Hell
72 Earth
45 Fast & Furious
61 Fighting
34 Ghosts of Girlfriends Past
72 Gran Torino
73 Hangover, The
47 Hannah Montana: The Movie
51 Ice Age: Dawn of the Dinosaurs
54 Imagine That
41 Knowing
32 Land of the Lost
56 Monsters vs. Aliens
34 My Life in Ruins
51 My Sister's Keeper
46 Next Day Air
42 Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian
54 Observe and Report
25 Obsessed
48 Proposal, The
70 Public Enemies
61 Soloist, The
83 Star Trek
64 State of Play
55 Taking of Pelham 1 2 3, The
52 Terminator Salvation
35 Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen
77 Under the Sea 3D
88 Up
43 X-Men Origins: Wolverine
34 Year One

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

sort by name

sort by score

67 $9.99
75 24 City
66 Adoration
74 Afghan Star
48 Alien Trespass
56 American Violet
82 Anvil! The Story of Anvil
57 Away We Go
81 Beaches of Agnes, The
62 Big Man Japan
28 Big Shot-Caller, The
78 Boys: The Sherman Brothers' Story, The
55 Brothers Bloom, The
82 Burma VJ: Reporting from a Closed Country
xx Call of the Wild
63 Cheri
62 Cherry Blossoms
63 Dead Snow
65 Departures
18 Downloading Nancy
58 Easy Virtue
70 End of the Line, The
77 Every Little Step
64 Examined Life
80 Food, Inc.
38 Gigantic
56 Girl from Monaco, The
67 Girlfriend Experience, The
87 Gomorrah
89 Goodbye Solo
63 Great Buck Howard, The
79 Harvard Beats Yale 29-29
xx Home
82 Hunger
91 Hurt Locker, The
16 I Hate Valentine's Day
81 Il Divo
54 Is Anybody There?
71 Jerichow
58 Julia
74 Lemon Tree
36 Life is Hot in Cracktown
40 Limits of Control, The
42 Little Ashes
64 Lymelife
50 Management
57 Merry Gentleman, The
66 Moon
35 New York
62 Not Forgotten
xx Offshore
78 O'Horten
64 Outrage
40 Paris 36
54 Pontypool
71 Pressure Cooker
52 Quiet Chaos
83 Revanche
67 Rudo y Cursi
86 Seraphine
65 Sex Positive
70 Shall We Kiss?
77 Sin Nombre
59 Sleep Dealer
74 Song of Sparrows, The
54 Stoning of Soraya M., The
82 Sugar
84 Summer Hours
61 Sunshine Cleaning
28 Surveillance
42 Tennessee
63 Tetro
64 Throw Down Your Heart
80 Tokyo Sonata
63 Tokyo!
70 Tony Manero
74 Treeless Mountain
88 Tulpan
74 Two Lovers
83 Tyson
83 U2 3D
60 Under Our Skin
69 Unmistaken Child
69 Valentino: The Last Emperor
22 What Goes Up
45 Whatever Works
57 Youssou Ndour: I Bring What I Love

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

Murder by Numbers
Warner Bros.


6.3

based on 35 reviews
Read critic reviews
How did we calculate this?

based on 10 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie

FILM:

Terror's Advocate

MPAA RATING: R for violence, language, a sex scene and brief drug use

Starring Sandra Bullock, Ryan Gosling, Michael Pitt, Agnes Bruckner, Chris Penn, R.D. Call, Ben Chaplin, and Tom Verica

Faced with the challenge of solving a "perfect murder," homicide detective Cassie Mayweather (Bullock) is forced to face and free herself from the tormented past she buried long ago. (Warner Bros.)

GENRE(S):	Suspense/Thriller
WRITTEN BY:	Tony Gayton
DIRECTED BY:	Barbet Schroeder
RELEASE DATE:	DVD: September 24, 2002 Video: September 24, 2002 Theatrical: April 19, 2002
RUNNING TIME:	118 minutes, Color
ORIGIN:	USA

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

Washington Post Desson Thomson

Turns potentially forgettable formula into something strangely diverting.

Seattle Post-Intelligencer Ellen A. Kim

Schroeder's misstep is trying hard to please his star, whether it be her character's empathetic past or one very fake-looking action climax. His greatest service is keeping her toe-to-toe with her talented co-stars -- and both are the better for it.

Chicago Tribune Mark Caro

The outline of Murder by Numbers may be familiar, but the filmmakers and Bullock do an expert job of filling in the colors.

Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert

Bullock does a good job here of working against her natural likability, creating a character you'd like to like, and could like, if she weren't so sad, strange and turned in upon herself.

USA Today Mike Clark

The result is two or three cuts above genre standard.

Baltimore Sun Michael Sragow

The story may be about cold-blooded murder, but Bullock's pulsating performance is about the getting of wisdom.

Los Angeles Times Kenneth Turan

Though Schroeder makes you squirm more than you want to at the inevitable scenes of the trussed-up female murder victim, he also has the proclivity and the skill to make at least the B-picture half of Murder by Numbers of more than passing interest.

The New Yorker David Denby

Bullock shades what she normally does into something more interesting -- the angriest and sexiest work she's done. [6 May 2002, p. 138]

LA Weekly F. X. Feeney

Even as the psychological interdependencies of the two boys take the foreground, the movie gets more and more crowded with fun-house surprises and cliffhanging set pieces.

The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Liam Lacey

This is the kind of film where the audience has to sort through the sequences, like visiting the green grocer's: liked that bit, can do without those.

Philadelphia Inquirer Carrie Rickey

When Bullock is on screen, Murder by Numbers is as far away as a sleepwalker's gaze. But when Schroeder focuses on the teenagers, the film is wide awake, eye-to-eye with adolescent angst and anomie.

ReelViews James Berardinelli

Towards the end, Murder By Numbers reverts to form with cheesy clichés, plot twists, and a fair amount of unnecessary action, but that's easily the film's low point.

Boston Globe Chris Fujiwara

For much of its length, the film is plausible, if predictable and ponderous. Its strongest assets are its actors.

New York Post Lou Lumenick

In effect gives you two movies for the price of one. The better one doesn't star Sandra Bullock.

Washington Post Ann Hornaday

Isn't a great movie, but it's a perfectly acceptable widget.

Variety Todd McCarthy

Engrossing but psychologically shallow tale.

Entertainment Weekly Lisa Schwarzbaum

Even though Bullock engages in a climactic scene of blue-screen peril, she essentially cedes the match to the kids. In this mediocre murder case, their presence is the only thing that's really killer.

Chicago Reader Jonathan Rosenbaum

Neither the crime nor its detection is especially interesting, and screenwriter Tony Gayton doesn't appear to be aiming for psychological insights.

Village Voice Dennis Lim

But owing no doubt to the requirements of Sandra Bullock, the movie's above-the-line star, executive producer, and worst enemy, this potboiling procedural never stands a chance of disproving its title.

San Francisco Chronicle Mick LaSalle

A near miss, a respectable but uninspired thriller that's intelligent and considered in its details, but ultimately weak in its impact.

Slate David Edelstein

Not even the actress' soulfulness can save the generic climax, in which she tussles with the badder bad guy on a collapsing terrace above a crashing surf. As a colleague muttered, "Murder by numbers is right."

Charlotte Observer Lawrence Toppman

There is indeed a murder - two of them, in fact - and the movie proceeds strictly by the numbers laid down long ago in some by-the-book Hollywood writing class.

Film Threat Michael Dequina

Doesn't necessarily make Murder by Numbers an awful film; it's certainly watchable, but it never escapes its paint-by-numbers design.

The New York Times Dana Stevens

The real surprise, given the secondhand material, is that not everything proceeds by rote in Murder by Numbers.

New York Daily News Jack Mathews

Ultimately, Murder by Numbers has been reduced to a tease, giving us a hint -- mostly through the fine performances of Gosling, who creates a charismatic sociopath, and Pitt, who's character seems genuinely troubled -- of the kind of relevant social drama it might have been.

Miami Herald Rene Rodriguez

In Murder by Numbers, though, even Schroeder can't keep his own boredom from showing.

Portland Oregonian Kim Morgan

Starts out dark, thrilling and inventive, then, regrettably, becomes sappy, mainstream and mundane.

Wall Street Journal Joe Morgenstern

The shallow-seated problem with Murder by Numbers is that it's serious and doggedly intricate but not much fun.

New York Magazine Peter Rainer

Director Barbet Schroeder is too elegant an artist for this material, which veers between routine cop-movie conventions and high-toned malarkey that seems a lot closer to Dungeons & Dragons than to "Thus Spoke Zarathustra."

Rolling Stone Peter Travers

A sappy big-screen version of TV's "CSI."

TV Guide Maitland McDonagh

There's nothing blatantly wrong with it (except perhaps the red-assed baboon ex machina), but it's 100% shock-free and coasts to a formulaic conclusion.

The Onion (A.V. Club) Keith Phipps

A moralizing thriller so listless that it plays out like a game of mouse and mouse.

Austin Chronicle Russell Smith

In context, it's utterly, dismayingly typical.

New Times (L.A.) Bill Gallo

Most obvious crime is first-degree dullness, giving us a thriller without thrills and a mystery devoid of urgent questions.

Salon.com Andrew O'Hehir

This premise could, just maybe, make for a decent thriller, but everything about Murder by Numbers is so flavorless and rote, so devoid of real suspense and human interest, that you never suspect for a moment that the answers are likely to be engaging.

The average user rating for this movie is 6.3 (out of 10) based on 10 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

Gabor A. gave it a2:
Let me start by saying that no script ever written could be made into an enjoyable movie done with the terrible, straight to TV directing of this film. It was laughable. On top of that the script was aweful. This is the worst type of thriller, boring and dry and then still inconceivable and stupid. This film really ends up with no redeeming qualities because what would have been good acting is dissolved by the stupidity of the scenes in which they try to act.

Catrin J. gave it a 10:
I thought that the movie was fantastic and Sandra Bullock proves once again that she is a great actress. She was brilliant in miss congeniality aswell, fantastically funny n very entertaining to watch.

raVen gave it a 7:
Okay, as a whole it's pretty much a house of cards. But the two baddies--Gosling and Pitt--are REAL creeps! I guess coming in I figured Sandra's star power would make them seem foolish and unbelievable. But they do a good job shoving her around, which was what the roles needed. And Bullock, who I love, does a good job of looking shoved-around. I wouldn't touch either of these guys with a 39-foot pole.

Jack D. gave it a 3:
The first half is very good, but then it all falls apart, and the end is both stupid and sadistic... too bad because Bullock is excellent.

Thiago G. gave it a 10:
It's a great film and Bullock is the very best actress in the world!!!!

Sonja Maggý M. gave it a 10:
I really like Ryan Gosling!!!:)

Murder by Numbers Warner Bros.

Murder by Numbers
Warner Bros.