GAMES: GameSpot | GameFAQs MUSIC: Last.fm | MP3.com MOVIES: Metacritic | Movietome TV: TV.com
Home | About Metacritic | About Metascores | What's New | Wireless Versions | Discussion Forums | Advertising Inquiries | Contact Us | RSS
Metacritic.com: We Deal With Criticism
     Help
> Switch to Advanced Search  
Film Video/DVD Music Games TV

Film

Upcoming Release Calendar
Weekend Box Office
Film Awards & Top 10s By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
How Metascores Are Calculated
Discuss Film In Our Forums

 

Wide Releases

sort by name sort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

 

Limited Releases

sort by name sort by score

67 $9.99
75 24 City
66 Adoration
74 Afghan Star
48 Alien Trespass
56 American Violet
82 Anvil! The Story of Anvil
57 Away We Go
81 Beaches of Agnes, The
62 Big Man Japan
28 Big Shot-Caller, The
78 Boys: The Sherman Brothers' Story, The
55 Brothers Bloom, The
82 Burma VJ: Reporting from a Closed Country
xx Call of the Wild
63 Cheri
62 Cherry Blossoms
63 Dead Snow
65 Departures
18 Downloading Nancy
58 Easy Virtue
70 End of the Line, The
77 Every Little Step
64 Examined Life
80 Food, Inc.
38 Gigantic
56 Girl from Monaco, The
67 Girlfriend Experience, The
87 Gomorrah
89 Goodbye Solo
63 Great Buck Howard, The
79 Harvard Beats Yale 29-29
xx Home
82 Hunger
91 Hurt Locker, The
16 I Hate Valentine's Day
81 Il Divo
54 Is Anybody There?
71 Jerichow
58 Julia
74 Lemon Tree
36 Life is Hot in Cracktown
40 Limits of Control, The
42 Little Ashes
64 Lymelife
50 Management
57 Merry Gentleman, The
66 Moon
35 New York
62 Not Forgotten
xx Offshore
78 O'Horten
64 Outrage
40 Paris 36
54 Pontypool
71 Pressure Cooker
52 Quiet Chaos
83 Revanche
67 Rudo y Cursi
86 Seraphine
65 Sex Positive
70 Shall We Kiss?
77 Sin Nombre
59 Sleep Dealer
74 Song of Sparrows, The
54 Stoning of Soraya M., The
82 Sugar
84 Summer Hours
61 Sunshine Cleaning
28 Surveillance
42 Tennessee
63 Tetro
64 Throw Down Your Heart
80 Tokyo Sonata
63 Tokyo!
70 Tony Manero
74 Treeless Mountain
88 Tulpan
74 Two Lovers
83 Tyson
83 U2 3D
60 Under Our Skin
69 Unmistaken Child
69 Valentino: The Last Emperor
22 What Goes Up
45 Whatever Works
57 Youssou Ndour: I Bring What I Love

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

 



Printer-Friendly Version Email This Page Discuss In Our Forums

Murder by Numbers
Warner Bros.

Murder by Numbers reviews
Critic Score
Metascore: 50 Metascore out of 100
User Score  
6.3 out of 10
based on 35 reviews
Read critic reviews
How did we calculate this?
based on 10 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie

MPAA RATING: R for violence, language, a sex scene and brief drug use

Starring Sandra Bullock, Ryan Gosling, Michael Pitt, Agnes Bruckner, Chris Penn, R.D. Call, Ben Chaplin, and Tom Verica

Faced with the challenge of solving a "perfect murder," homicide detective Cassie Mayweather (Bullock) is forced to face and free herself from the tormented past she buried long ago. (Warner Bros.)


GENRE(S): Suspense/Thriller  
WRITTEN BY: Tony Gayton  
DIRECTED BY: Barbet Schroeder  
RELEASE DATE: DVD: September 24, 2002 
Video: September 24, 2002 
Theatrical: April 19, 2002 
RUNNING TIME: 118 minutes, Color 
ORIGIN: USA 

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

80
Washington Post Desson Thomson
Turns potentially forgettable formula into something strangely diverting.
Read Full Review
75
Seattle Post-Intelligencer Ellen A. Kim
Schroeder's misstep is trying hard to please his star, whether it be her character's empathetic past or one very fake-looking action climax. His greatest service is keeping her toe-to-toe with her talented co-stars -- and both are the better for it.
Read Full Review
75
Chicago Tribune Mark Caro
The outline of Murder by Numbers may be familiar, but the filmmakers and Bullock do an expert job of filling in the colors.
Read Full Review
75
Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert
Bullock does a good job here of working against her natural likability, creating a character you'd like to like, and could like, if she weren't so sad, strange and turned in upon herself.
Read Full Review
75
USA Today Mike Clark
The result is two or three cuts above genre standard.
Read Full Review
75
Baltimore Sun Michael Sragow
The story may be about cold-blooded murder, but Bullock's pulsating performance is about the getting of wisdom.
Read Full Review
70
Los Angeles Times Kenneth Turan
Though Schroeder makes you squirm more than you want to at the inevitable scenes of the trussed-up female murder victim, he also has the proclivity and the skill to make at least the B-picture half of Murder by Numbers of more than passing interest.
Read Full Review
70
The New Yorker David Denby
Bullock shades what she normally does into something more interesting -- the angriest and sexiest work she's done. [6 May 2002, p. 138]
70
LA Weekly F. X. Feeney
Even as the psychological interdependencies of the two boys take the foreground, the movie gets more and more crowded with fun-house surprises and cliffhanging set pieces.
Read Full Review
63
The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Liam Lacey
This is the kind of film where the audience has to sort through the sequences, like visiting the green grocer's: liked that bit, can do without those.
Read Full Review
63
Philadelphia Inquirer Carrie Rickey
When Bullock is on screen, Murder by Numbers is as far away as a sleepwalker's gaze. But when Schroeder focuses on the teenagers, the film is wide awake, eye-to-eye with adolescent angst and anomie.
Read Full Review
63
ReelViews James Berardinelli
Towards the end, Murder By Numbers reverts to form with cheesy clichés, plot twists, and a fair amount of unnecessary action, but that's easily the film's low point.
Read Full Review
63
Boston Globe Chris Fujiwara
For much of its length, the film is plausible, if predictable and ponderous. Its strongest assets are its actors.
Read Full Review
63
New York Post Lou Lumenick
In effect gives you two movies for the price of one. The better one doesn't star Sandra Bullock.
Read Full Review
60
Washington Post Ann Hornaday
Isn't a great movie, but it's a perfectly acceptable widget.
Read Full Review
60
Variety Todd McCarthy
Engrossing but psychologically shallow tale.
Read Full Review
58
Entertainment Weekly Lisa Schwarzbaum
Even though Bullock engages in a climactic scene of blue-screen peril, she essentially cedes the match to the kids. In this mediocre murder case, their presence is the only thing that's really killer.
Read Full Review
50
Chicago Reader Jonathan Rosenbaum
Neither the crime nor its detection is especially interesting, and screenwriter Tony Gayton doesn't appear to be aiming for psychological insights.
Read Full Review
50
Village Voice Dennis Lim
But owing no doubt to the requirements of Sandra Bullock, the movie's above-the-line star, executive producer, and worst enemy, this potboiling procedural never stands a chance of disproving its title.
Read Full Review
50
San Francisco Chronicle Mick LaSalle
A near miss, a respectable but uninspired thriller that's intelligent and considered in its details, but ultimately weak in its impact.
Read Full Review
50
Slate David Edelstein
Not even the actress' soulfulness can save the generic climax, in which she tussles with the badder bad guy on a collapsing terrace above a crashing surf. As a colleague muttered, "Murder by numbers is right."
Read Full Review
50
Charlotte Observer Lawrence Toppman
There is indeed a murder - two of them, in fact - and the movie proceeds strictly by the numbers laid down long ago in some by-the-book Hollywood writing class.
Read Full Review
50
Film Threat Michael Dequina
Doesn't necessarily make Murder by Numbers an awful film; it's certainly watchable, but it never escapes its paint-by-numbers design.
Read Full Review
50
The New York Times Dana Stevens
The real surprise, given the secondhand material, is that not everything proceeds by rote in Murder by Numbers.
Read Full Review
50
New York Daily News Jack Mathews
Ultimately, Murder by Numbers has been reduced to a tease, giving us a hint -- mostly through the fine performances of Gosling, who creates a charismatic sociopath, and Pitt, who's character seems genuinely troubled -- of the kind of relevant social drama it might have been.
50
Miami Herald Rene Rodriguez
In Murder by Numbers, though, even Schroeder can't keep his own boredom from showing.
Read Full Review
42
Portland Oregonian Kim Morgan
Starts out dark, thrilling and inventive, then, regrettably, becomes sappy, mainstream and mundane.
Read Full Review
40
Wall Street Journal Joe Morgenstern
The shallow-seated problem with Murder by Numbers is that it's serious and doggedly intricate but not much fun.
40
New York Magazine Peter Rainer
Director Barbet Schroeder is too elegant an artist for this material, which veers between routine cop-movie conventions and high-toned malarkey that seems a lot closer to Dungeons & Dragons than to "Thus Spoke Zarathustra."
Read Full Review
40
Rolling Stone Peter Travers
A sappy big-screen version of TV's "CSI."
Read Full Review
40
TV Guide Maitland McDonagh
There's nothing blatantly wrong with it (except perhaps the red-assed baboon ex machina), but it's 100% shock-free and coasts to a formulaic conclusion.
Read Full Review
40
The Onion (A.V. Club) Keith Phipps
A moralizing thriller so listless that it plays out like a game of mouse and mouse.
Read Full Review
30
Austin Chronicle Russell Smith
In context, it's utterly, dismayingly typical.
Read Full Review
30
New Times (L.A.) Bill Gallo
Most obvious crime is first-degree dullness, giving us a thriller without thrills and a mystery devoid of urgent questions.
Read Full Review
20
Salon.com Andrew O'Hehir
This premise could, just maybe, make for a decent thriller, but everything about Murder by Numbers is so flavorless and rote, so devoid of real suspense and human interest, that you never suspect for a moment that the answers are likely to be engaging.
Read Full Review

What Our Users Said

Vote Now!The average user rating for this movie is 6.3 (out of 10) based on 10 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

Gabor A. gave it a2:
Let me start by saying that no script ever written could be made into an enjoyable movie done with the terrible, straight to TV directing of this film. It was laughable. On top of that the script was aweful. This is the worst type of thriller, boring and dry and then still inconceivable and stupid. This film really ends up with no redeeming qualities because what would have been good acting is dissolved by the stupidity of the scenes in which they try to act.

Catrin J. gave it a 10:
I thought that the movie was fantastic and Sandra Bullock proves once again that she is a great actress. She was brilliant in miss congeniality aswell, fantastically funny n very entertaining to watch.

raVen gave it a 7:
Okay, as a whole it's pretty much a house of cards. But the two baddies--Gosling and Pitt--are REAL creeps! I guess coming in I figured Sandra's star power would make them seem foolish and unbelievable. But they do a good job shoving her around, which was what the roles needed. And Bullock, who I love, does a good job of looking shoved-around. I wouldn't touch either of these guys with a 39-foot pole.

Jack D. gave it a 3:
The first half is very good, but then it all falls apart, and the end is both stupid and sadistic... too bad because Bullock is excellent.

Thiago G. gave it a 10:
It's a great film and Bullock is the very best actress in the world!!!!

Sonja MaggĂ˝ M. gave it a 10:
I really like Ryan Gosling!!!:)

Read more user comments...

Discuss this movie in our forums

Return to top of page
Home | FILM | DVD/VIDEO | MUSIC | GAMES | TV | Forums | About Metacritic metacritic.com

Popular on CBS sites: iPhone 3G | Fantasy Football | Moneywatch | Antivirus Software | Recipes | E3 2009

About CBS Interactive | Jobs | Advertise

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use