Advanced Search >
Help Me Search

Movies

Weekend Box Office
Film Awards & Top 10s By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores

Wide Releases
Now In Theaters

sort by namesort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

Limited Releases
Now In Theaters

sort by namesort by score

58 (Untitled)
96 35 Shots of Rum
56 Adam
39 Adventures of Power
66 Afterschool
73 Amreeka
49 Antichrist
76 Baader Meinhof Complex, The
86 Beaches of Agnes, The
71 Big Fan
65 Black Dynamite
76 Bliss
26 Boondock Saints II: All Saints Day, The
44 Brief Interviews with Hideous Men
81 Bright Star
76 Broken Embraces
70 Bronson
62 Cloud 9
65 Coco Before Chanel
69 Cold Souls
60 Collapse
82 Cove, The
75 Crude
82 Damned United, The
53 Dare
50 Defamation
67 Departures
70 Earth Days
85 Education, An
55 Endgame
88 Fantastic Mr. Fox
31 Fix
49 Food Beware: The French Organic Revolution
80 Food, Inc.
xx From Mexico with Love
28 Gentlemen Broncos
72 Good Hair
89 Goodbye Solo
63 Horse Boy, The
74 House of the Devil, The
xx How to Seduce Difficult Women
26 I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell
70 It Might Get Loud
46 Killing Kasztner
43 Little Traitor, The
34 Looking for Palladin
80 Lorna's Silence
46 Love Hurts
84 Maid, The
45 Mammoth
75 Messenger, The
55 Missing Person, The
59 More Than a Game
34 Motherhood
62 My One and Only
48 New York, I Love You
66 No Impact Man
26 Oh My God
68 Paranormal Activity
68 Paris
79 Precious: Based on the Novel by Sapphire
73 Red Cliff
69 September Issue, The
79 Serious Man, A
65 Skin
41 Splinterheads
42 Staten Island
50 Stoning of Soraya M., The
58 Storm
82 Sun, The
49 Ten9Eight: Shoot for the Moon
73 That Evening Sun
61 Trucker
49 Turning Green
83 U2 3D
45 Uncertainty
67 Visual Acoustics
32 War on Kids
67 Way We Get By, The
65 Wedding Song, The
xx White on Rice
59 William Kunstler: Disturbing the Universe
74 Woman in Berlin, A
43 Women in Trouble
69 Yoo-Hoo, Mrs. Goldberg

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian

EMAILPRINT20th Century Fox

Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian reviews
42
5.9 User Score:

Mixed or average reviews

Based on 31 critic reviews
How did we calculate this?

Based on 32 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie >

Movie Info

Genre(s): Action  |  Comedy

Written by: Robert Ben Garant
Thomas Lennon

Directed by: Shawn Levy

Release Date:
Theatrical: May 22, 2009
DVD: December 1, 2009

Running Time: 105 minutes, Color

Origin: USA | Canada

Summary

RATING: PG for mild action and brief language

Starring Ben Stiller, Amy Adams, Owen Wilson, Hank Azaria, Christopher Guest, Alain Chabat, Robin Williams, and Jonah Hill

Night has fallen upon the Smithsonian Institution in Washington, DC. The guides have gone home, the lights are out, the school kids are tucked in their beds...yet something incredible is stirring as former night guard Larry Daley finds himself lured into his biggest, most imagination-boggling adventure yet in which history truly comes alive. In this second installment of the Night at the Museum saga, Larry faces a battle so epic it could only unfold in the corridors of the world’s largest museum. Now, Larry must try to save his formerly inanimate friends from what could be their last stand amid the wonders of the Smithsonian, all of which, from the famous paintings on the walls to the rocket ships in the halls, suddenly have a mind of their own. (20th Century Fox)

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

83

Entertainment Weekly Owen Gleiberman

Battle of the Smithsonian has plenty of life. But it's Adams who gives it zing.

Read Full Review >
75

Chicago Tribune Michael Phillips

Nothing elegant about Adams here, but she's terrific -- a sparkling screen presence. Her Earhart hoists this big-budget sequel above the routine.

Read Full Review >
75

Baltimore Sun Chris Kaltenbach

Takes a great idea -- what if the inhabitants of a museum came to life at night? -- and milks it for every drop of fun it's worth.

Read Full Review >
70

Village Voice Michelle Orange

Though it's a little slow to start and some of the humor clunks, the film features a wholesome charm, some truly dazzling effects (the Lincoln Memorial alone is worth it), and enough mild, parent-nip in-jokes to keep all but the stone-hearted happy.

Read Full Review >
60

Empire Helen O'Hara

It’s funnier this time, but still veers noticeably from kid-friendly slapstick to adult-friendly banter.

Read Full Review >
60

The Hollywood Reporter Michael Rechtshaffen

Some of that frenetic running around has been replaced by inspired effects sequences and amusing riffs by the talented cast, especially new arrivals Hank Azaria and Amy Adams.

Read Full Review >
60

New York Daily News Elizabeth Weitzman

Far surpasses original.

Read Full Review >
60

The New Yorker David Denby

Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian is what my mother would have called a kakabarly--a large, foaming broth into which she emptied the forlorn and highly miscellaneous contents of her icebox.

Read Full Review >
58

Portland Oregonian M. E. Russell

Your 12-and-unders will dig it, and it might even serve as a sort of movie-Bookmobile and get them to read a little history, or at least a little Wikipedia. But otherwise it's utterly dispensable.

Read Full Review >
50

The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Kate Taylor

Unfortunately, once these creatures do come to life for a second outing, the promise soon evaporates and the clever comedy, built largely on crisscrossing anachronisms and various sly cultural references, is not enough to sustain a romp that is all rather predictable.

Read Full Review >
50

The New York Times A.O. Scott

Shallow and harmlessly diverting picture.

Read Full Review >
50

San Francisco Chronicle Amy Binacolli

Some of the results are delightfully loopy. Some are cornball.

Read Full Review >
50

Philadelphia Inquirer Steven Rea

The problem with NATM:BOTS is that Stiller, Adams, and company seem to be pretending that they're having fun, too.

Read Full Review >
50

Variety Lael Loewenstein

Where the original had a vaguely tenable narrative hook (deadbeat dad finds redemption through nocturnal heroics), the new pic seems purely a vehicle for lavish visuals and cheap gags.

Read Full Review >
50

ReelViews James Berardinelli

It's harmless. And pointless. And dumb. This is a perfect example of a motion picture that exists exclusively because its predecessor made a lot of money.

Read Full Review >
50

USA Today Claudia Puig

Resembles an enthusiastic but undisciplined child running amok through an exhibit.

Read Full Review >
50

Wall Street Journal Joe Morgenstern

Beware of idiocy's charms.

Read Full Review >
50

TV Guide Perry Seibert

Without Azaria's comedic gifts, the movie would be close to unendurable.

Read Full Review >
42

Christian Science Monitor Peter Rainer

Being touted as the first film ever shot in the Smithsonian complex. With any luck, it will also be the last. This is not the best use of our landmarks.

Read Full Review >
40

Washington Post Dan Kois

The museum sparkles, but the movie is awfully dull.

Read Full Review >
40

Los Angeles Times Betsy Sharkey

It's not so much a movie as a series of running antiquity gags, good for a comedy club, not so much for the multiplex.

Read Full Review >
40

Chicago Reader Andrea Gronvall

Bloated with visual effects, this sequel to the 2006 hit starts off slowly, reintroducing the original characters.

Read Full Review >
38

Rolling Stone Peter Travers

The money shots of the living tableau are padded with jokes that feel embalmed before the actors get them out of their mouths.

Read Full Review >
38

Boston Globe Ty Burr

It's bigger, noisier, shinier, and dumber, and it has no earthly reason to exist.

Read Full Review >
38

Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert

Oh, did I dislike this film. It made me squirm. Its premise is lame, its plot relentlessly predictable, its characters with personalities that would distinguish picture books.

Read Full Review >
25

Miami Herald Rene Rodriguez

Even Ben Stiller looks bored out of his mind in Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian, and he got paid several million dollars to star in it.

Read Full Review >
25

The Onion (A.V. Club) Scott Tobias

It’s a busier and less coherent film, too, with a baffling master plot and a crowded pileup of special effects in search of something to do.

Read Full Review >
25

New York Post Lou Lumenick

Seems to go on for several days and nights, though in fact it lasts just 105 minutes. I checked my watch. A lot.

Read Full Review >
25

Premiere Staff (Not credited)

Feels like a re-hash.

Read Full Review >
20

Austin Chronicle Marc Savlov

Shamlessly dumb movie.

Read Full Review >
20

Film Threat Rick Kisonak

Even by Hollywood sequel standards, this is lazily conceived, cynically recycled stuff.

Read Full Review >

What Our Users Said

The average user rating for this movie is 5.9 (out of 10) based on 32 User Votes

Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

Manuel R. gave it a5:
Disappointing, at the very start you can notice it doesn't has anything to do with the first one, You have at the end of de 1st a Stiller that loves his work and realizes that he has found what he was meant to do in life, and also he seems very happy about it. At the star of this one you realize the whole message of the 1st movie was a lie, Larry left his beloved wax friends for what he was supposed to had forgotten and not over.valued at the end of 1st... Very crappy film. Anyways it entertains, has awesome effects and jokes, hilarious at some pint. But then they abused of the Psy-Theraphy he had with Atila at the 1st, but in this one, he does it again n again n again, with every character he founds.

[Anonymous] gave it an8:
I really liked the first movie, but I felt this one had a serious lack of central plot. The Earhart character was brilliant, as were several of the new comers, but I didn't feel the same connection I felt with the first movie(dead beat dad trying to redeem himself in his son's eyes) If you've seen the first movie, you owe it to yourself to watch this one, as one definite saving grace is there's what I felt was a better closure for the museum characters than in the first film. Go see this film, but don't expect it to be better than the first.

Jonny 99 gave it a5:
NatM: BotS is sort of a hodge-podge of CGI, historical references and comic vignettes stewed together and set to a screaming soundtrack and overwhelming Foley editing. Basically the result is exactly what you expect if you had a massive budget budget and no overriding storytelling goal. There are a few good bits and everything that's been said about Amy Adams is true. Wait for it on cable.

mark p gave it a2:
my children and i really enjoyed the first "museum" movie but this one is not worth the price of a ticket. It does have a few funny parts in it but the story is stupid and the movie is a sleeper. I would not even recommend renting this. Just a big waste of a nice Saturday.

Shabalaba D gave it a10:
I loved the special effects and the comedy was very funny. I am 15 and i enjoyed it very much.

Kirk C gave it a3:
The movie was no way nearly as good as the first one, this seems to generally be the case for sequels. Special effects where really good. The movie had some funny scenes. The movies special effects carry it all the way to the end. I wouldn't see it again.

Paul M gave it a7:
Did nobody notice the editing problem? Custer started off out in the warehouse. Then, he was locked inside the crate with the money and the tablet BEFORE the sun went down. Then, he was rescuing Larry Daley with the motor cycle and side car. Then, he was locked inside the crate again.

Read more user comments >

Popular on CBS sites: SEC Football | NFL | Video Game Cheats | iPhone | Video Game Reviews | Notebooks | Antivirus Software

About CBS Interactive | Jobs | Advertise

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy (UPDATED) | Terms of Use