Movies
Weekend Box Office
Film Awards & Top 10s By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
Best / Worst of the Decade
Wide Releases
Now In Theaters
49
2012
41
Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel
84
Avatar![]()
69
Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans
53
Blind Side
53
Book of Eli, The
55
Christmas Carol, A
57
Daybreakers
43
Dear John
27
Did You Hear About the Morgans?
55
Edge of Darkness
45
Extraordinary Measures
83
Fantastic Mr. Fox![]()
42
From Paris with Love
65
Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus, The
74
Invictus
57
It's Complicated
34
Law Abiding Citizen
33
Leap Year
33
Legion
42
Lovely Bones, The
54
Men Who Stare At Goats, The
34
Ninja Assassin
19
Old Dogs
xx
Percy Jackson & The Olympians: The Lightning Thief
39
Planet 51
79
Precious: Based on the Novel by Sapphire
73
Princess & the Frog, The
64
Road, The
57
Sherlock Holmes
27
Spy Next Door, The
36
Tooth Fairy
44
Twilight Saga: New Moon, The
83
Up in the Air![]()
43
Valentine's Day
25
When in Rome
71
Where the Wild Things Are
xx
WolfMan, The
63
Youth in Revolt
Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.
Limited Releases
Now In Theaters
46
44 Inch Chest
83
Ajami![]()
73
Amreeka
xx
Barefoot to Timbuktu
19
Bitch Slap
24
Boondock Saints II: All Saints Day, The
76
Broken Embraces
64
Cloud 9
65
Coco Before Chanel
84
Cove, The![]()
84
Crazy Heart![]()
21
Crazy on the Outside
48
Creation
xx
Daddy Long Legs
81
Damned United, The![]()
68
Departures
62
District 13: Ultimatum
85
Education, An![]()
71
Eyes Wide Open
24
Falling Awake
81
Fish Tank![]()
56
For My Father
xx
From Mexico with Love
43
Frozen
68
Girl on the Train, The
52
Killing Kasztner
74
Last Station, The
43
Little Traitor, The
51
Loss of a Teardrop Diamond, The
73
Me and Orson Welles
76
Messenger, The
57
Missing Person, The
67
Most Dangerous Man in America: Daniel Ellsberg and the Pentagon Papers, The
xx
My Name is Khan
49
Nine
63
North Face
59
October Country
67
Off and Running
52
Paranoids, The
49
Pop Star on Ice
49
Private Lives of Pippa Lee, The
xx
Promised Lands (Re-release)
69
Red Riding Trilogy, The
29
Saint John of Las Vegas
69
September Issue, The
36
Serious Moonlight
63
Shinjuku Incident, The
77
Single Man, A
xx
Still Bill
76
Terribly Happy
74
That Evening Sun
19
To Save a Life
68
Town Called Panic, A
59
Until the Light Takes Us
57
Videocracy
65
Waiting for Armageddon
82
White Ribbon![]()
43
Women in Trouble
xx
Word is Out
64
Young Victoria, The
Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.
Oliver Twist
EMAILPRINTSony Pictures Entertainment

Generally favorable reviews
Based on 36 critic reviews
How did we calculate this?
Based on 26 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie >
Movie Info
Genre(s): Drama | Family/Kids
Written by:
Ronald Harwood
Charles Dickens (novel)
Directed by: Roman Polanski
Release Date:
Theatrical: September 23, 2005
DVD: January 24, 2006
Running Time: 130 minutes, Color
Origin: UK / Czech Republic / France / Italy
Summary
RATING: PG-13 for disturbing images
Starring Ben Kingsley, Barney Clark, Jamie Foreman, Harry Eden, Leanne Rowe, Lewis Chase, Edward Hardwicke, and Jeremy Swift
Director Roman Polanski and writer Ronald Harwood re-imagine Charles Dickens' classic story of a young boy who gets involved with a gang of pickpockets in 19th Century London. (Sony Pictures Entertainment)
Also On Metacritic
FILM: Chinatown Death and the Maiden Repulsion The Ninth Gate The Pianist The Tenant
Also On The Web: Internet Movie Database View The Trailer Official Studio Site
What The Critics Said
All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...
Christian Science Monitor Peter Rainer
Altogether remarkable, a near-masterpiece.
Read Full Review >San Francisco Chronicle Mick LaSalle
A grounded and unusually matter-of-fact adaptation.
Read Full Review >Salon.com Stephanie Zacharek
This is that rare movie version of a great novel in which watching IS reading.
Read Full Review >Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert
Polanski's film is visually exact and detailed without being too picturesque. This is not Ye Olde London, but Ye Harrowing London, teeming with life and dispute.
Read Full Review >Baltimore Sun Michael Sragow
Despite the movie's several shortcomings, it leaves us sated. That's because, unlike Oliver's workhouse, it does give "some more" - more emotional breadth, more hardscrabble farce, and more haunting drama.
Read Full Review >Entertainment Weekly Lisa Schwarzbaum
Yet precisely because this is by Roman Polanski, it's irresistible to read his sorrowful and seemingly classical take, from a filmmaker known as much for the schisms in his personal history as for the lurches in his work, as something much more personal and poignant.
Read Full Review >The New York Times Dana Stevens
With tact and enthusiasm, Mr. Polanski grabs hold of a great book and rediscovers its true and enduring vitality.
Read Full Review >Premiere Ryan Devlin
It's worth noting that Oliver Twist will likely be no Harry Potter at the box office, due in no small part to a lack of bombastic special effects and supernatural subplots, yet it's nearly as entertaining, even without the wizardry.
Read Full Review >TV Guide Ken Fox
Dark, dank and violent, filled with terrifying scenes in which exploited children are beaten, shot or starving to death. In other words, it's just as Dickens wrote.
Read Full Review >Philadelphia Inquirer Carrie Rickey
The movie about literature's luckiest orphan may teem with children, but it is not for them.
Read Full Review >Seattle Post-Intelligencer William Arnold
The movie is 23 minutes longer than the Lean version, yet it somehow seems much less evocative of the novel's immense scope and texture. And its Cockney accents are such a strain to understand that as much as a third of the dialogue is indecipherable.
Read Full Review >Chicago Reader Jonathan Rosenbaum
Polanski honors the craft of classical storytelling and never flinches from the book's melodramatic extremes in portraying the horrors of poverty.
Read Full Review >The New Yorker Anthony Lane
Without Nancy and her demon lover, Polanski's Oliver Twist feels handsome, steady, and respectful; it has that touch of mummification which wins awards. But Dickens had murder in mind--women killed for their kindness, children for lack of food--and he wanted us to howl and hyperventilate. He asked for more.
Read Full Review >Slate David Edelstein
The most effective counterweight to Polanski's fatalism is young Barney Clark, whose Oliver--although given to few words--is unshakably alive and responsive, even as he's being buffeted violently by forces beyond his control.
Read Full Review >Los Angeles Times Carina Chocano
Polanski's version, though handsomely realized, is a fairly conventional rendering of the novel that probably won't be counted among his best films.
Read Full Review >Variety Todd McCarthy
A respectable literary adaptation but lacks dramatic urgency and intriguing undercurrents.
Read Full Review >Village Voice Jessica Winter
Accomplished if lacking in urgency, this Oliver Twist (scripted by Ronald Harwood, who also wrote "The Pianist") showcases Polanski's proven gift for Dickensian caricature.
Read Full Review >Portland Oregonian Shawn Levy
And that ultimately may be the problem with the Polanski version: by bringing Oliver forward, you push the drama backward.
Read Full Review >Austin Chronicle Steve Davis
As in "The Pianist," Polanski is content to allow the film's narrative to evoke the emotions he wishes his audience to experience.
Read Full Review >Boston Globe Ty Burr
The result is an expertly made, very watchable film that's curiously lacking in impact. By Polanski standards that has to be a disappointment.
Read Full Review >ReelViews James Berardinelli
As an introduction to the story for someone with no previous exposure to Oliver Twist, Polanski's movie is adequate.
Read Full Review >New York Post Kyle Smith
Dickens was a sentimentalist, but even his happy endings are more nuanced than Polanski's brutal anti-sentimentalism.
Read Full Review >The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Rick Groen
So what's surprising here isn't Polanski's choice of material but his utter failure to put any distinctive stamp on it.
Read Full Review >Chicago Tribune Michael Phillips
Filming on locations in Prague and in various Czech locations serving as London and the English countryside, the director delivers Dickens' tale with some style. The style, however, is that of a more cautious artist than Polanski is at his best.
Read Full Review >Miami Herald Rene Rodriguez
Turns out to be far more interesting for grown-ups (the movie is probably too long, and too much, for little kids anyway).
Read Full Review >USA Today Mike Clark
The big surprise in Polanski's Oliver is the lack of a discernible personal stamp, especially from such a directorial master of the macabre.
Read Full Review >The Hollywood Reporter Kirk Honeycutt
The biggest surprise in Roman Polanski's Oliver Twist is that there are no surprises.
Read Full Review >Rolling Stone Peter Travers
It's unlikely audiences will be echoing a starving Oliver's most famous line: "Please, sir, I want some more."
Read Full Review >Wall Street Journal Joe Morgenstern
Two dramatic problems beset Roman Polanski's darkly handsome new film of the Dickens novel. The boy is as passive as ever, and bleak in the bargain -- instead of glowing like the Oliver of the musical, he takes light in -- while Ben Kingsley's Fagin and Jamie Foreman's Bill Sikes manage to make villainy a bit of a bore.
New York Daily News Jami Bernard
Kingsley seems determined to rescue this old chestnut of a character from Jewish stereotypes, but to what end? Oliver's boyhood has become worse than Dickensian - it's bland.
Read Full Review >The Onion (A.V. Club) Tasha Robinson
Kingsley is one of very few lively things about Polanski's plodding, by-the-numbers Oliver Twist. And in this dreary setting, he comes across more as a desperate clown than a saving grace, which makes it all the more awkward that no one else is clowning along with him.
Read Full Review >LA Weekly Ella Taylor
Lacking energy and pace and enslaved by a ghastly score, this tepid movie left me longing alternately for David Lean's thrillingly grim 1948 masterpiece, and Carol Reed's chipper 1968 sing-along, with pretty tunes by Lionel Bart.
Read Full Review >Washington Post Ann Hornaday
The fact that there's nothing wrong with it -- that there's nary a scenic detail or scrap of dialogue or performance that isn't utterly on the nose -- is precisely what's wrong with it.
Read Full Review >What Our Users Said
The average user rating for this movie is 7.3 (out of 10) based on 26 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.
[Anonymous] gave it an8:
Reading the film critics, their main grip seems to be that "Oliver Twist" is not polenskian enough. How about Dickensian? Is anything wrong with a good narrative and lovely cinematography?
Manolis S. gave it a10:
A very personal take on Oliver Twist for Polanski, full of emotions, similar to the Pianist, where people look at life through windows, little Oliver on the road gathers all good and positive aspects of life through his adventures, near masterpiece, cinema at its best!!
Crysania gave it a4:
Lots of people who had reviewed this movie would compare it either with the book, adapted play or previous films. As I did not have any prior experience with any of those materials, I could do an unbias review. Boring was the verdict. Although the acting was good, the production lavish and good directing from Polanski, it failed to exhume any feelings I may have had for any of those characters except for a brief interlude at the end. Best to watch it with the sub-titles on.
Brian M. gave it a4:
I just couldn't get into it. None of the characters connected with me. I actually turned off the DVD about two-thirds of the way through, and never finished it, because I was bored.
Ilze S. gave it a2:
The movie is boring. The book is much better than this adaptation. I expected more, there are no pleasure in this film. It’s dark and slow. I don’t like Charles Dickens very much, but Great Expectations was good book and good movie. If the director was someone else, I think they could get much better result than this jam.
Emma C. gave it a6:
I think most of the viewers have seen this act out thing already.so when we saw this movie...we will like already know what will be going on in the next secne.so i may thought that to change some of the scene into better ones.
david b. gave it a9:
If you expect the singalong jollity that Oliver! delivered don't watch this version. This film offers the viewer a valid interpretation of life in those times. The sets are by no means polished stages, these come across as real muddy streets filled with violent drunkards and brutes. Not that there aren't any compassionate characters, for there are a few - but they are strikingly naive in their expectations of the behaviour of others. The actors in this film are not larger than the roles they are playing - and that adds to the realism. Kingsley's Fagin is not the lovable entertainer portrayed by Moody - but his is far more appropriate. I think Dickens would approve.
