Advanced Search >
Help Me Search

Movies

Weekend Box Office
Film Awards & Top 10s By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores

Wide Releases
Now In Theaters

sort by namesort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

Limited Releases
Now In Theaters

sort by namesort by score

58 (Untitled)
96 35 Shots of Rum
56 Adam
39 Adventures of Power
66 Afterschool
73 Amreeka
49 Antichrist
76 Baader Meinhof Complex, The
86 Beaches of Agnes, The
71 Big Fan
65 Black Dynamite
76 Bliss
26 Boondock Saints II: All Saints Day, The
44 Brief Interviews with Hideous Men
81 Bright Star
76 Broken Embraces
70 Bronson
62 Cloud 9
65 Coco Before Chanel
69 Cold Souls
60 Collapse
82 Cove, The
75 Crude
82 Damned United, The
53 Dare
50 Defamation
67 Departures
70 Earth Days
85 Education, An
55 Endgame
88 Fantastic Mr. Fox
31 Fix
49 Food Beware: The French Organic Revolution
80 Food, Inc.
xx From Mexico with Love
28 Gentlemen Broncos
72 Good Hair
89 Goodbye Solo
63 Horse Boy, The
74 House of the Devil, The
xx How to Seduce Difficult Women
26 I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell
70 It Might Get Loud
46 Killing Kasztner
43 Little Traitor, The
34 Looking for Palladin
80 Lorna's Silence
46 Love Hurts
84 Maid, The
45 Mammoth
75 Messenger, The
55 Missing Person, The
59 More Than a Game
34 Motherhood
62 My One and Only
48 New York, I Love You
66 No Impact Man
26 Oh My God
68 Paranormal Activity
68 Paris
79 Precious: Based on the Novel by Sapphire
73 Red Cliff
69 September Issue, The
79 Serious Man, A
65 Skin
41 Splinterheads
42 Staten Island
50 Stoning of Soraya M., The
58 Storm
82 Sun, The
49 Ten9Eight: Shoot for the Moon
73 That Evening Sun
61 Trucker
49 Turning Green
83 U2 3D
45 Uncertainty
67 Visual Acoustics
32 War on Kids
67 Way We Get By, The
65 Wedding Song, The
xx White on Rice
59 William Kunstler: Disturbing the Universe
74 Woman in Berlin, A
43 Women in Trouble
69 Yoo-Hoo, Mrs. Goldberg

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

Producers, The

EMAILPRINTUniversal Pictures

Producers, The reviews
52
7.9 User Score:

Mixed or average reviews

Based on 37 critic reviews
How did we calculate this?

Based on 138 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie >

Movie Info

Genre(s): Comedy  |  Musical

Written by: Mel Brooks (also 1968 screenplay, 2001 stage play book & lyrics)
Thomas Meehan (also 2001 stage play music)

Directed by: Susan Stroman

Release Date:
Theatrical: December 16, 2005
DVD: May 16, 2006

Running Time: 134 minutes, Color

Origin: USA

Summary

RATING: PG-13 for sexual humor and references

Starring Nathan Lane, Matthew Broderick, Uma Thurman, Will Ferrell, Roger Bart, Gary Beach, Andrea Martin, and Debra Monk

The movie classic that became a Broadway sensation now becomes a movie musical event.

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

83

Christian Science Monitor Peter Rainer

It's a classic example of how a movie can be great without, strictly speaking, being good. But when something is this funny, who wants to speak strictly?

Read Full Review >
75

Boston Globe Ty Burr

Susan Stroman directed the show on Broadway and what she has done here is photograph that show -- no more, no less. This is good news for anyone who couldn't afford a trip to New York and $100 tickets, but it's a fairly odd approach to cinema.

Read Full Review >
75

Premiere Staff (not credited)

Once you drink The Producers' Kool-Aid, it's a thoroughly enjoyable descent into madness.

Read Full Review >
75

Baltimore Sun Michael Sragow

Producers hits few wrong notes on the big screen.

Read Full Review >
75

Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert

It was fun, it was funny, it was alive.

Read Full Review >
70

Washington Post Stephen Hunter

It's too long to be great and it's too square to be great and it's too loud to be great and it finds homosexual effeminacy too funny to ever be called great, but I can't imagine anyone coming out sadder than they went in.

Read Full Review >
70

Chicago Reader Jonathan Rosenbaum

Brooks's sweetness, innocence, and boundless love of the infantile inform everything from the brassy production numbers (capped by an homage to Jailhouse Rock) to the final credits.

Read Full Review >
70

Dallas Observer Melissa Levine

In the end, The Producers is an enjoyable romp, and at times--as when Hitler sings "Heil Myself"--it's hilarious. But it's not transcendent.

Read Full Review >
70

Time Richard Schickel

There's no attempt to address the show's endemic weak spots--a slow start and a contrived end. Mostly Stroman just lets it rip. But in some respects the movie is an improvement on the show.

Read Full Review >
70

Village Voice J. Hoberman

Broderick is a genuine trouper, hoofing his way through his big numbers, while Lane's antics are difficult to resist.

Read Full Review >
70

The Onion (A.V. Club) Nathan Rabin

The result is largely a giddy, goofy delight.

Read Full Review >
67

Austin Chronicle Steve Davis

In the world of Mel Brooks, everything is fair game and anything is good for a laugh. God bless Mel Brooks.

Read Full Review >
67

Portland Oregonian Shawn Levy

The new film is a nauseatingly unsteady medley of brilliance and foolish nonsense.

Read Full Review >
63

USA Today Claudia Puig

Enough is enough. Somebody should just stop remaking The Producers.

Read Full Review >
60

Variety Todd McCarthy

So determinedly old-fashioned it makes a strong claim to being the best film musical of 1959.

Read Full Review >
60

Empire Olly Richards

As a chance to see the celebrated Broadway show with the original cast, this is a treat. As a re-interpretation of a classic, though, it's a disappointment.

Read Full Review >
50

Charlotte Observer Lawrence Toppman

Brooks gives himself the last word, appearing onscreen for the first time amid chorus girls oozing PG-13 pulchritude. "Go home!" he says. "It's over!" Could he be referring to his career?

Read Full Review >
50

Miami Herald Christine Dolan

The chemistry is intact, but performances that were reaching-for-the-balcony big on Broadway haven't been scaled back a bit for a more intimate, up-close medium.

Read Full Review >
50

Seattle Post-Intelligencer Paula Nechak

Can't find its rhythm and stride. It plays it far too safe and slick.

Read Full Review >
50

New York Daily News Jack Mathews

If you have seen the play, especially if you've seen it with the original cast, treasure the memory and protect it. The movie will attack it like a virus.

Read Full Review >
50

Film Threat Rory L. Aronsky

It's the curse of overacting and overdone shtick that does them in.

Read Full Review >
50

Newsweek David Ansen

The theatricality is off the charts. Lane aims for the balconies; Broderick tones it down for the camera a bit.

Read Full Review >
50

The Hollywood Reporter Kirk Honeycutt

The best two performances belong to Uma Thurman and Will Ferrell. For the film to work, though, the two best roles should belong to Tony-winning Nathan Lane and Matthew Broderick in the title roles.

Read Full Review >
50

Entertainment Weekly Lisa Schwarzbaum

The accountant in Bloom would probably approve of the new Producers: It's an efficient extension of a popular brand. In theory, what's not to like? In reality, the whole schmear.

Read Full Review >
50

LA Weekly Scott Foundas

The musical film version of The Producers is, for better or worse, a faithful record of the stage production, adhering to the same if-it-ain't-broke-don't-fix-it philosophy that informed the recent "Rent."

Read Full Review >
50

ReelViews James Berardinelli

The Producers is a movie based on a play based on a movie about a play. And that's probably the funniest thing about it.

Read Full Review >
50

TV Guide Maitland McDonagh

The film falls short even as a record of Broderick and Lane's crowd-pleasing rapport: Both have done the show so many times that every scrap of life is gone.

Read Full Review >
50

Rolling Stone Peter Travers

Stroman should have studied the original Producers that Brooks directed in 1968, with Zero Mostel and Gene Wilder. It answers the question "Where did they go right?"

Read Full Review >
50

San Francisco Chronicle Mick LaSalle

Most of the bits and performances have a hard time making the transition from stage to screen.

Read Full Review >
50

The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Liam Lacey

This is the stage experience documented on film, from the perspective of someone sitting front row centre watching actors pitching for the back rows of the balcony.

Read Full Review >
40

Salon.com Stephanie Zacharek

Watching The Producers is simply exhausting.

Read Full Review >
40

Los Angeles Times Kevin Crust

Whereas the original film is gleefully crass and energetically paced, the movie musical, weighing in at a robust two-plus hours, is bloated and self-satisfied. Whatever spectacle the stage musical possessed to make it such a box-office behemoth fails to transfer to the screen.

Read Full Review >
40

The New York Times Dana Stevens

Ms. Thurman is the one bit of genuine radiance in this aggressively and pointlessly shiny, noisy spectacle.

Read Full Review >
38

Chicago Tribune Michael Phillips

The Producers on screen, as a musical, does not work. It is not very funny. It doesn't look right. It's depressing.

Read Full Review >
25

New York Post Kyle Smith

From bad to worse - Even in verse - The Producers moves like a hearse -Mildness and blandness -Mugging like madness - Who knew that "Rent" would win this fight? - Murdering a genre's just not all right!

Read Full Review >
20

Wall Street Journal Joe Morgenstern

The Producers is nightmarish, in its febrile way, a head-bangingly primitive version of an overrated Broadway show that grew out of a clumsy 1968 movie with an inflated reputation.

20

Slate David Edelstein

There are no real people in The Producers --only actors laboring to dispel whatever magic they once were thought to possess. The director, Susan Stroman, has brought the Broadway smash to the screen (where it began, almost 40 years ago) with cataclysmic results.

Read Full Review >

What Our Users Said

The average user rating for this movie is 7.9 (out of 10) based on 138 User Votes

Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

Ken gave it a6:
Though some of the humor falls flat and it suffers from an unbearably long ending, The Producers is quite a fun and exuberant movie.

Roy R. gave it a0:
I'm someone who has a fairly strong stomach for bad films, it takes a nasty ride for me to stop appreciating something even as wallpaper, That said I turned this off. It was making me sick so I turned it off.

John H. gave it an8:
I never saw the Broadway production. I am too young (15) to know the original version. But this movie seemed like a good performance of a good musical. It does not stand out for its musical virtues, but nothing on Broadway (besides Soundheim) is of musical caliber anywhere near the average classical CD I can pick up at the library. Musicals are never created to showcase music alone, anyway. Two complaints seem to be: that the movie does not convey the full brilliance of the Broadway version, and that it does not take advantage of the movie-medium. As to the second, I would be sorely upset if any more of the music was cut out; I rented the DVD to see a full musical for a fortieth the price, not a destroyed and non-musical movie based on a musical which was originally based on a non-musical movie that was (apparently) great to begin with. And, if the Broadway rendition was much better than this one, it must truly have been magnificent; this one is quite good.

Melissa M. gave it a2:
I was truely disappointed. This is the first Mel Brooks production I've ever seen that I didn't like. I don't think I laughed a single time. Just Mel cracking jokes at Jews and Gays and Nazi's because he can -- after all, he is Mel... Miss this one, hopefully he will bounce back.

J Liddy gave it a3:
This movie disapoints. I wonder if those reviewers who rated this movie highly ever saw the original whick was truely a scream and should be seen so as to put this remake in context. The role of "LSD" as played by Dick Shawn was incredibly funny but was written out of the remake. Will Ferrel could have been a great "LSD". Yet the originally small role of the swedish secretary was expanded, unecesary, and boring. Nathan Lane is Talented but Zero Mostel was a genius who's portrayal of Max reached into the audience's head whith madcap angst. I never fully apeciated his talent until now. Rent this movie, but buy the original and enjoy it for years to come.

A Movie Critic gave it a5:
Too long. The problem is the songs, which serve to interrupt the comedy and story, and end up dragging on and on. I'm sure they were entertaining on Broadway, but on a screen, it's just not. It's boring, and the songs drag on and on. On a Broadway stage, songs can go on and on because there's something exciting, (I guess) about seeing big musical numbers performed right in front of you. But in a movie, on a screen, they've got to be short and quick, because they do nothing but interrupt the plot. The movie, (when there's no singing going on,) is funny, and the idea was always a creative one, and there are some very funny performanes here. But you can't enjoy the movie when it keeps interrupting itself for yet another pointless musical number. Clocking in at over 2 hours, it's a long movie, and one that would have been much better with at least 30 minutes cut. And there's no question about where the cuts should have taken place; the SONGS. Some could have easily been eliminated (or at the very least shortened) and it would have greatly benefitted the movie.

Jeff F. gave it a7:
Pretty good film,but why did they leave out the best parts of the original? L.S.D. The bar scene and blowing up the theater.

Read more user comments >

Popular on CBS sites: SEC Football | NFL | Video Game Cheats | iPhone | Video Game Reviews | Notebooks | Antivirus Software

About CBS Interactive | Jobs | Advertise

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy (UPDATED) | Terms of Use