Advanced Search >
Help Me Search

Movies

Weekend Box Office
Film Awards & Top 10s By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
Best / Worst of the Decade

Wide Releases
Now In Theaters

sort by namesort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

Limited Releases
Now In Theaters

sort by namesort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

Reader, The

EMAILPRINTThe Weinstein Company

Reader, The reviews
58
7.1 User Score:

Mixed or average reviews

Based on 38 critic reviews
How did we calculate this?

Based on 70 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie >

Movie Info

Genre(s): Drama  |  Romance

Written by: David Hare

Directed by: Stephen Daldry

Release Date:
Theatrical: December 10, 2008
DVD: April 14, 2009

Running Time: 123 minutes, Color

Origin: USA | Germany

Summary

RATING: R for some scenes of sexuality and nudity

Starring Ralph Fiennes, Kate Winslet, David Kross, Lena Olin, Bruno Gan, and Alexandra Maria Lara

The Reader opens in post-WWII Germany when teenager Michael Berg becomes ill and is helped home by Hanna, a stranger twice his age. Michael recovers from scarlet fever and seeks out Hanna to thank her. The two are quickly drawn into a passionate but secretive affair. (The Weinstein Company)

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

100

Premiere Jenni Miller

Winslet deserves an Oscar for her amazing performance.

Read Full Review >
91

The Onion (A.V. Club) Tasha Robinson

Kross and Winslet's intense performances and Daldry's deliberately placid control of tone make the material work as a love (and hate) story as well as a metaphor.

Read Full Review >
91

Seattle Post-Intelligencer William Arnold

The Reader is significant because -- like another film opening today, "Valkyrie" -- it asks us to see not just the Jews but the whole German people as victims of the Holocaust, and to view Nazism as more a product of explicable ignorance than inexplicable evil.

Read Full Review >
88

Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert

The crucial decision in The Reader is made by a 24-year-old youth, who has information that might help a woman about to be sentenced to life in prison, but withholds it. He is ashamed to reveal his affair with this woman. By making this decision, he shifts the film's focus from the subject of German guilt about the Holocaust and turns it on the human race in general.

Read Full Review >
78

Austin Chronicle Marc Savlov

There is a sense of ambiguity at the core of The Reader that makes it all the more brutal, all the more honest in its deflowering of love and what one imagines love ought to be instead of what it too often is.

Read Full Review >
75

Philadelphia Inquirer Carrie Rickey

With this film Daldry, previously the director of "Billy Elliot" and "The Hours," proves himself the screen's reigning master at showing passion thwarted or repressed.

Read Full Review >
75

Portland Oregonian Marc Mohan

An immaculately crafted, splendidly acted drama with a message at its core of forgiveness and humanity. It's also blatantly manipulative, and, upon reflection, rather banal. In other words, it's the epitome of Oscar bait and almost serves as a step-by-step guide to creating such a beast.

Read Full Review >
75

Charlotte Observer Lawrence Toppman

This coming-of-age portion is the less interesting half, though it has the more interesting Michael. We have seen Fiennes play an emotionally detached introvert so often that he brings nothing new to the role, apt though he is.

Read Full Review >
75

Christian Science Monitor Peter Rainer

Fiennes brings to the role a shimmering subtlety.

Read Full Review >
75

ReelViews James Berardinelli

The Reader is closer to a near miss than a rousing success but, on balance, this is still worth seeing for those who enjoy complexity and moral ambiguity within the context of a melodrama.

Read Full Review >
75

Rolling Stone Peter Travers

Winslet's fierce, unerring portrayal goes beyond acting, becoming a provocation that will keep you up nights.

Read Full Review >
75

USA Today Claudia Puig

Though the effort is uneven, it's a well-acted romance that becomes a less compelling courtroom drama.

Read Full Review >
70

The Hollywood Reporter Kirk Honeycutt

An engaging period drama. But German postwar guilt is not the most winning subject matter for the holiday season.

Read Full Review >
70

Los Angeles Times Kenneth Turan

It is only, frankly, the strength of Winslet's performance that rises above conventional surroundings and makes The Reader the experience it should be.

Read Full Review >
70

Chicago Reader J.R. Jones

The revelation that Winslet’s character is a war criminal is the centerpiece of The Reader, but surrounding the Holocaust morality play is another story that’s more modestly scaled and, in this age of unashamed romance between older women and younger men, more contemporary.

Read Full Review >
70

Washington Post Ann Hornaday

Bernhard Schlink's highly regarded novel "The Reader" receives a graceful, absorbing screen adaptation by director Stephen Daldry.

Read Full Review >
67

Entertainment Weekly Lisa Schwarzbaum

The film is notable for its nice performances, its handsome photography, and its very active music. If the preceding praise sounds generic, so is the movie.

Read Full Review >
63

New York Post Kyle Smith

Although the script works in a couple of pages of collegiate-level ethical debate about "the question of German guilt," what the movie is really interested in is the question of German sex. So think of it as "Schindler's Lust."

Read Full Review >
63

Miami Herald Connie Ogle

The Reader doesn't do enough to explore the guilt and betrayal the adult Michael feels over the acts of his elders.

Read Full Review >
60

Empire Kim Newman

The epitome of middle-brow 'quality' drama -- admirable within its limitations, but Bernard Schlink's Oprah Winfrey Book Club-approved book wasn't exactly literature, as this isn't exactly cinema.

Read Full Review >
60

New York Daily News Elizabeth Weitzman

Provocatively intentioned, The Reader is a movie worth seeing - the kind of film you'll think about for days afterward. But when all is said and done, you're likely to wonder why the impact wasn't greater still.

Read Full Review >
60

The New York Times Manohla Dargis

The film is neither about the Holocaust nor about those Germans who grappled with its legacy: it's about making the audience feel good about a historical catastrophe that grows fainter with each new tasteful interpolation.

Read Full Review >
60

Wall Street Journal Joe Morgenstern

The cast is superb: especially Kate Winslet, who transcends, by far, the limits of her character's narrow soul. Yet The Reader remains schematic, and ultimately reductive.

Read Full Review >
60

Newsweek David Ansen

The Reader can feel stilted and abstract: the film's only flesh-and-blood characters spend half the movie separated. But its emotional impact sneaks up on you. The Reader asks tough questions, and, to its credit, provides no easy answers.

Read Full Review >
50

Time Richard Schickel

Faithful both to the novel's plot and to its higher aspirations. This is not an entirely good thing. On the other hand -- and somewhat surprisingly -- it is not an entirely bad thing.

Read Full Review >
50

The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Rick Groen

So why, despite everyone's best efforts, does all this bigness seem so small and unfocused and simply not up to the task?

Read Full Review >
50

San Francisco Chronicle Mick LaSalle

A film made with high aspirations and more than the usual commitment but one that, after an arresting beginning, changes into a passive rumination.

Read Full Review >
50

Village Voice Ella Taylor

Like many narrative filmmakers who walk on their tippy-toes when dealing with the Holocaust, neither Daldry nor Hare seems eager to make the material his own.

Read Full Review >
50

Salon.com Stephanie Zacharek

The Reader feels weighty, all right; but it's an unsatisfying kind of weight, and Fiennes' presence, as the grown-up Michael, doesn't help much.

Read Full Review >
50

Variety Todd McCarthy

Stephen Daldry's film is sensitively realized and dramatically absorbing, but comes across as an essentially cerebral experience without gut impact.

Read Full Review >
50

TV Guide Jason Buchanan

Whether the source material or Hare's tinkering is to blame for the fact that the story keeps the viewer at arm's length, the end result is still the same: A film that's technically superb, yet still falls short of true greatness.

Read Full Review >
50

Chicago Tribune Michael Phillips

Can a formidable actress redeem a pile of solemn erotic kitsch? Kate Winslet answers that one as honestly as she can in the film version of Bernhard Schlink's 1995 novel "The Reader."

Read Full Review >
50

Boston Globe Wesley Morris

After a sensuous introductory act, The Reader descends into a series of dismaying contradictions regarding the moral toxins of the Holocaust - which still pollute postwar Germany.

Read Full Review >
50

Baltimore Sun Chris Kaltenbach

The Reader is ponderously self-important and smugly Socratic, brimming with unfinished sentences and pregnant pauses; if a single character would only say what he thinks, the movie would be over in 30 minutes

Read Full Review >
40

The New Yorker Anthony Lane

For those who think of cinema as dramatic roughage, The Reader should prove sufficiently indigestible.

Read Full Review >
40

New York Magazine David Edelstein

It appears that the filmmakers have taken Hannah Arendt's notion of the "banality of evil" way too literally.

Read Full Review >
20

Slate Dana Stevens

Slow-acting poison. For the first third of the movie, you'll experience a not-unpleasant tingling in the extremities, giving way to an encroaching torpor. An hour in, your pupils will have shrunk to pinholes, and by the time the closing credits roll, you'll be capable only of a dim longing for the defibrillation paddles. Who would have thought a movie about a beautiful, frequently naked female Nazi could be so dull?

Read Full Review >
10

Film Threat Matthew Sorrento

The shallowest "serious" film to be reeling this year.

Read Full Review >

What Our Users Said

The average user rating for this movie is 7.1 (out of 10) based on 70 User Votes

Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

Simone R gave it a7:
Bit late to review this particular movie, but was inspired to search the internet directly afterwards to see what others has drawn from it, to help me sort out my own concerns and was compelled to comment on the review in this forum by Thomas S. Your take on the deabilitating affliction of shame that shapes the course of human lives as it festers away under the calm construction of secrets and lies truly affected me........I guess the truth sets us all free.

Chelsea J gave it a9:
This movie is a great depiction of the victimization of women the world over. This single woman is jailed for the heinous crimes of Nazi men, and her single supporter who could have helped her kept silent...Ah, men, how dispicably you are portrayed in this film. She is held responsible for men's wars and is punished for them...Ugh, it is truly reprehensible.

Fred K gave it a10:
Most reviewers who panned the movie missed the point (and they would benefit from viewing the Director's feature included on the DVD). If you're expecting a classic Holocaust film, this isn't it. But neither is it 'soft on the Nazis', as some claim. Watch it and draw your own conclusions -- they may not come easily, but that's what separates great films from good ones.

Holly C gave it an8:
Winslet definitely deserved her Oscar (though I haven't seen Revolutionary Road yet)--her portrayal was fascinating from start to finish. There is nothing black and white about this film for me (other than that Winslet is great and I loved Kross as well). No easy judgement of the characters or what they did, mercy regarding personal shame and punishment--all totally shown in their complexity-- and I'm pretty sure that was the idea. As soon as you want to condemn someone, you must face your own moral relativity. This film gives you many chances to judge or sympathize and leaves it to you to figure it out. Bravo.

thomas s gave it a10:
The Reader Professional reviewers had a hard time with this one. A majority were favorable, but like the minority, seemed unable to formulate what it was that they liked or disliked. I think this kind of review is a result of taboo on shame in our society. Like sex in Victorian society, doing it is one thing, but talking about it is another. Perhaps the film is mostly about the power of shame, both for the characters and for the audience. It repeatedly makes the point that the guilty are also innocent, and the innocent arealso guilty, because of shame and guilt. During the trial, Hanna is so ashamed of being illiterate that she accepts a life sentence. And Michael is so ashamed of his relationship with her that he doesn’t inform the court that she is illiterate, that she couldn’t have written the document she is charged with. Because of his inaction, he then is overcome with guilt for not having helped Hanna. In modern societies, most people find it difficult to credit shame as an enormously powerful motive. But in traditional societies, shame is understood to be the most insistent of all human motives. The Japanese dread of shaming the family comes to mind. In this passage several hundred years ago in pre-modern France, Rousseau described the feeling that led him falsely to accuse a maid-servant of a theft which he had himself committed. When she appeared my heart was agonized, but the presence of so many people was more powerful than my compunction. I did not fear punishment, but I dreaded shame: I dreaded it more than death, more than the crime, more than all the world. I would have buried, hid myself in the center of the earth: invincible shame bore down every other sentiment; shame alone caused all my impudence, and in proportion as I became criminal the fear of discovery rendered me intrepid. I felt no dread but that of being detected, of being publicly and to my face declared a thief, liar, and calumniator (Confessions). Hanna’s motives in facing the court, and less directly, Michael’s, could be seen as similar to Rousseau’s, since they both seem controlled by “invincible” shame. When Michael visits Hannah in prison, he is virtually paralyzed by his emotions. He is still ashamed of associating with a criminal, and intensely ashamed of his shame. He is frozen by the conflict between these two feelings. For much of the film, the filmmaker seems to want the audience to identify first of all with Michael, an innocent who is also guilty. The novel puts more emphasis than the film on Hannah’s growth as a person while in prison. Both book and film show that she learns to read by obtaining the books that match the cassettes that Michael sends her. In the book, however, she goes on to read about the Holocaust, the crime that she participated in. Both book and film suggest that in court and in prison she is both a perpetrator and a victim. Mainly because Michael didn’t provide evidence that would have shortened her prison term, and didn’t give her the support that might have avoided her suicide. She was also victimized by the other defendants in the trial. Michael tries to do right by her by flying to New York to visit the surviving daughter of one of Hannah’s victims, played by Lena Ohlin. He asks her to take Hannah’s money, or at least give advice about how to use it, but the daughter refuses. She harshly rejects the least involvement in Hannah’s affairs, much less allowing even a shred of forgiveness. A somewhat puzzling aspect of this last scene is the obvious splendor of the daughter’s current life. She has a huge apartment, awash with art and style. There is no hint of this in the book. Why did the filmmaker want her to be so rich? Another puzzle is the difference between the dialogue in the book and in the film. The film version makes the daughter more haughty and rejecting than in the book. What is going on? One guess is that the filmmaker is trying to stir guilt in the audiences. Relative to the poverty of Hannah’s entire life, the members of the audience are rich. Perhaps the filmmaker was trying to turn the sympathy of audience from the daughter, to encourage them to be more forgiving of Hanna than the daughter was. The ideas in this story may be relevant to our own lives. People are always asking how we put up with the Bush administration for 8 years. Perhaps the people slept because they were both innocent and guilty. We were innocent in the sense that we ourselves weren’t corrupt, commit fraud and cause the death of innocents. Yet we were guilty in the sense that we didn’t do anything about bringing down the perpetrators, or at least anything effective. As with Michael, perhaps we were paralyzed by shame. And again, like Michael, one way toward ending our paralysis would be to learn to forgive others, so that we can begin to forgive ourselves.

Jay H. gave it an8:
Winslet's powerful and remarkable performance makes this well worth watching. Very well written, fine period detail. The story is always interesting. The art direction and cinematography are exceptional.

Kee D. gave it a9:
I completely agree with Maciej C. in one respect: Kate Winslet deserved her Oscar, but it should not have been for this movie. So nice to find a kindred spirit! Winslet's performance in "Revolutionary Road" was SHOCKINGLY good - awesome in the truest sense of the word. As for The Reader, I can understand the critics' opinions that parts of the 2nd half did not live up to the beginning. What I hate, though, is their seeming dislike of ambiguity. Hello! Ambiguity and a sense of the characters suffocating their emotions doesn't make for a bad, or even average, film. I found it heartbreaking in so many ways, and that's ok. Also, when critics are moralizing about their individual interpretations of The Holocaust, they are not reviewing a film. They're just trying to promote their opinions. This film doesn't FORCE you to have sympathy for a Nazi. It asks you, "DO YOU THINK you could have sympathy for a Nazi?" It draws no conclusions, just puts out plot points to make people think, and question their long-held opinions. I gave this film a 9 because it's not perfect. But in the world of current film-making, it is one of the best.

Read more user comments >

Popular on CBS sites: College Signing Day | Olympics | Lost | iPhone | Cell Phones | Video Game Reviews | Free Music

About CBS Interactive | Jobs | Advertise

© 2010 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy (UPDATED) | Terms of Use