Advanced Search >
Help Me Search

Movies

Weekend Box Office
Film Awards & Top 10s By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
Best / Worst of the Decade

Wide Releases
Now In Theaters

sort by namesort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

Limited Releases
Now In Theaters

sort by namesort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

Signs

EMAILPRINTTouchstone Pictures

Signs reviews
59
5.8 User Score:

Mixed or average reviews

Based on 36 critic reviews
How did we calculate this?

Based on 150 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie >

Movie Info

Genre(s): Suspense/Thriller

Written by: M. Night Shyamalan

Directed by: M. Night Shyamalan

Release Date:
Theatrical: August 2, 2002
DVD: January 7, 2003

Running Time: 120 minutes, Color

Origin: USA

Summary

RATING: PG-13 for some frightening moments

Starring Mel Gibson, Joaquin Phoenix, Rory Culkin, Abigail Breslin, Cherry Jones, Patricia Kalember, and Jose L. Rodriguez

Everything that farmer Graham Hess (Gibson) assumed about the world is changed when he discovers a message - an intricate pattern of circles and lines - carved into his crops. (Touchstone Pictures)

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

100

Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert

The work of a born filmmaker, able to summon apprehension out of thin air.

Read Full Review >
88

Miami Herald Rene Rodriguez

If "The Sixth Sense" was Shyamalan's take on ghost stories and "Unbreakable" his ode to comic books, then Signs is the evil cousin to Steven Spielberg's "Close Encounters of the Third Kind."

Read Full Review >
80

Newsweek David Ansen

One of the things that makes Signs such a refreshing summer movie is that it goes against almost all the grains of contemporary Hollywood razzle-dazzle filmmaking -- as did “The Sixth Sense.”

80

New Times (L.A.) Robert Wilonsky

Signs blessedly displays a sense of giddy dark humor absent from Shyamalan's previous outings. It appears for much of the film he's merely having fun with the genre, goofing on its paranoid roots.

80

Film Threat Clint Morris

Shyamalan’s film blends together elements of humanity, faith, drama, tears, tension, terror, humour and the supernatural and succeeds in being one of the sharpest and most exciting films of the year.

Read Full Review >
80

Chicago Reader Hank Sartin

Borrowing heavily from "Close Encounters of the Third Kind," Shyamalan tries to lighten his trademark gloomy tone -- and almost kills the suspense he's working so hard to achieve.

Read Full Review >
80

Wall Street Journal Nancy deWolf Smith

Mr. Shyamalan is a new national treasure, as attuned to our sensibilities and everyday life as Steven Spielberg.

80

Washington Post Ann Hornaday

For filmgoers whose idea of a good time is getting the stuffing scared out of them (who are you guys, anyway?), Signs should prove to be time well spent.

Read Full Review >
80

Rolling Stone Peter Travers

Follow Shyamalan's Signs. It will take a piece out of you.

Read Full Review >
75

Chicago Tribune Michael Wilmington

Signs -- though Shyamalan's most visually beautiful work -- seems thinner, barely more than a sketch for a movie, with characters trapped in formulas. Beautifully trapped perhaps -- but paralyzed nonetheless.

Read Full Review >
75

Boston Globe Ty Burr

Its quirks are exactly what make Signs interesting, entertaining, and good.

Read Full Review >
75

ReelViews James Berardinelli

By limiting the number of special effects shots and treating the film more like a horror movie than a science fiction spectacle, Shyamalan creates a claustrophobic atmosphere and keeps the tension level high. There were times during this film when I was strongly reminded of "Panic Room."

Read Full Review >
75

New York Post Lou Lumenick

A beautifully crafted, white-knuckle, roller-coaster ride of old-school filmmaking -- the kind that believes that the less you show, the better.

Read Full Review >
75

Philadelphia Inquirer Steven Rea

Signs is about God and family, too, but it's also about scaring the bejesus out of you -- and on that level it works like a miracle.

Read Full Review >
70

The New Yorker Anthony Lane

Shyamalan often tries too hard, but nobody else can conjure such a sudden flood of worry, or summon so unmistakable a stink of evil, and you come out of Signs, as you did from "The Sixth Sense," in severe need of loud music, bad jokes, and drinks with cherries and umbrellas in them -- anything to waft away the fug of unease. [12 August 2002, p. 82]

70

The Onion (A.V. Club) Scott Tobias

For a big-budget Hollywood feature, the film places an unusually high amount of stock in the audience's imagination; not since "The Others" or "The Blair Witch Project" have so many shocks been indirect or kept teasingly out of view.

Read Full Review >
70

LA Weekly Hazel-Dawn Dumpert

Even if Signs suffers a little from uneven pacing and mismatched tones of reverent homage (to "The Birds" and "War of the Worlds"), soul-searching and silly comedy, the jokes are clever, the tension continual and expertly calibrated, and the performances -- are both deep and moving.

Read Full Review >
67

Entertainment Weekly Owen Gleiberman

It's a high-octane doomsday vision built almost entirely around our sense of anticipation, and that's both its strength and its weakness.

Read Full Review >
67

Austin Chronicle Marc Savlov

Parcels out information like a triage medic doling out morphine; every tiny bit is carefully considered and then rationed out as though he were terrified he might exhaust his supply before the closing credits.

Read Full Review >
63

The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Liam Lacey

The problem with Signs is not that the movie is pretentious -- or ambitious -- enough to try to combine "The Book of Job" and "Invasion of the Body Snatchers." The problem is that Signs manages to be both so terribly serious and so unimportant at the same time.

Read Full Review >
63

USA Today Mike Clark

The movie keeps you watching and, at times, even gripped for more than an hour. But, at the end, it leaves us feeling detached and underwhelmed.

Read Full Review >
60

Los Angeles Times Kenneth Turan

Shyamalan's great gift is the creation of atmosphere, the conjuring of spooky, unseen menace. When he gets around to doing this in Signs, all is well, but it's a tossup as to whether the film offers enough of a payoff considering how long it takes to get where it's going.

Read Full Review >
60

Variety Todd McCarthy

All smoke and mirrors. With his third straight excursion into the supernatural, M. Night Shyamalan has begun revealing the hand that works his spooky tricks so much that the lack of substance is plainly seen.

Read Full Review >
60

New York Magazine Peter Rainer

Shyamalan wants to be the metaphysical poet of movies, but he's dangerously close to becoming its O. Henry. The best surprise ending he could give us in his next movie would be no surprise ending at all.

Read Full Review >
58

Portland Oregonian Shawn Levy

A deeply weird film, accomplished, gripping, disorienting, icily adept and barking mad at once. It makes for invigorating viewing.

Read Full Review >
50

Salon.com Andrew O'Hehir

Once again, the filmmaker gets incredibly wobbly at the end of his story, and his resolution of both the alien incursion and of Graham's crisis of faith feels more like a cheap trick than the product of a genuine belief in anything at all.

Read Full Review >
50

New York Daily News Jack Mathews

Shyamalan has learned from his idol (Spielberg) how to manipulate audience emotion through the intimacy of an ordinary family that is "contacted." But he is even more shameless about it.

Read Full Review >
50

Seattle Post-Intelligencer Sean Axmaker

Shyamalan has learned the lessons that so many horror directors ignore: Suggestion is scarier than revelation.

Read Full Review >
50

Washington Post Desson Thomson

Even though he shows some master touches throughout the movie, Shyamalan flits a little too lightly across the surface, like a pond skater.

Read Full Review >
50

Slate David Edelstein

As a scare picture, Signs is good enough. As a religious parable, it's scarier -- and I don't mean that as a compliment.

Read Full Review >
50

The New York Times Dana Stevens

Mr. Shyamalan never gives us anything to believe in, other than his own power to solve problems of his own posing, and his command of a narrative logic is as circular -- and as empty -- as those bare patches out in the cornfield.

Read Full Review >
40

TV Guide Maitland McDonagh

The film's underlying themes dovetail efficiently with the action but don't generate the emotional gut punch the movie needs; overall it feels padded and logy.

Read Full Review >
38

Baltimore Sun Michael Sragow

Shyamalan plows the same old ground of juiced-up surprise endings.

Read Full Review >
25

Christian Science Monitor David Sterritt

It's encouraging to see Hollywood tackle themes of faith and religion, but here, too, Shyamalan is timid, reducing them to fuzzy New Age clichés. Add wooden acting, stilted dialogue, and a faux-arty style, and you have a thudding disappointment.

Read Full Review >
25

San Francisco Chronicle Mick LaSalle

Promised to be the season's thoughtful action picture, turns out to have few thoughts and no thrills.

Read Full Review >
10

Village Voice Jessica Winter

Sitting through the last reel is significantly less charming than listening to a four-year-old with a taste for exaggeration recount his Halloween trip to the Haunted House.

Read Full Review >

What Our Users Said

The average user rating for this movie is 5.8 (out of 10) based on 150 User Votes

Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

Alex Z. gave it a10:
This is a movie about hope. It's tagline for me is "Can it be there are no coincidents?". Some people think that it advocates religion and faith. I think the return of Graham at the end to religion is a plot device and a necessary parabol for everyone else, as we all have hopes and faith, each at different grounds. I felt deeply emotional by the end of this film. A miracle is the final ring of a chain which start from us. Among the most humanist film I've seen.

Ryan M gave it a0:
Horrible Movie. Cheesy and unrealistic. It advertised that it is going to follow the mythology of Earth's encounters with extra-terrestrials. Instead you get a completely shallow suspense film with an unoriginal story. If you want good science fiction you will be terribly disappointed.

Mack gave it an8:
Yes the statement that the director is trying to make is silly and heavy handed. However, his ability to make the events seem like they could really happen and the reactions of the characters play out very realistically before they collapse at the end. The build up is definitely worth putting up with some dissapointment at the end.

[Anonymous] gave it a3:
Brilliant imagery and good directing. However, the plot is so damn atrocious it is hard to believe. Even if you like religious films, it would be hard not to find the ending preposterous. Shayamaylan created a very clever ending to the Sixth Sense and thought he could achieve it again in Signs and The Villiage. He was wrong... 'Swing it!'

David S gave it a10:
A thoroughly under-rated masterpiece. After watching the trailers for this movie, I can see why some people were disapointed. The trailers seemed to have been geared to attract the 'War of the Worlds' fans. However, a lot of peop-le seemed to have missed the raw craft and style with which 'Signs' is executed. To begin with, M.Night Shalamyn's movies scare me the most out of any other movies I have seen. His use of manipulative camera angles, building music, and slow development create some truly memorable moments. On top of this, the back-story is extremely believable, the acting is unique and top-notch, and the musical score is brilliant. It is a very subtle movie, however, so only people who actually like HORROR should watch it, and watch it alone. All you guys who just want to see blood and boobs should watch Hostel or some other piece of garbage with your friends.

Dana C gave it a3:
A tacky morality play packaged in a lackluster retelling of War of the Worlds, delivered with the subtlety of a sledgehammer.

Damian A gave it a10:
These reviews are indeed surprising. This film is a work of genius from the mind of M. Night Shamylan, but it still dissapoints me that his newer works don't have the same gripping, terrifying and awe-inspiring feel.

Read more user comments >

Popular on CBS sites: College Signing Day | Olympics | Lost | iPhone | Cell Phones | Video Game Reviews | Free Music

About CBS Interactive | Jobs | Advertise

© 2010 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy (UPDATED) | Terms of Use