CNET Networks Entertainment GameSpot | GameFAQs | SportsGamer | Metacritic | MP3.com | TV.com
Home | About Metacritic | About Metascores | What's New | Wireless Versions | Discussion Forums | Advertising Inquiries | Contact Us | RSS
Metacritic.com: We Deal With Criticism
     Help
> Switch to Advanced Search  
Film Video/DVD Music Games TV

Film

Upcoming Release Calendar
Weekend Box Office
Film Awards & Top 10s By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
How Metascores Are Calculated
Discuss Film In Our Forums

 

Wide Releases

sort by name sort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

 

Limited Releases

sort by name sort by score

83 Alexandra
39 August
80 Band's Visit, The
76 Beauty in Trouble
79 Before I Forget
47 Bella
80 Bigger, Stronger, Faster*
60 Blind Mountain
55 Bra Boys
61 Brick Lane
70 Caramel
49 Children of Huang Shi, The
83 Chop Shop
82 Chris & Don. A Love Story
78 Counterfeiters, The
75 Days and Clouds
48 Death Defying Acts
54 Diminished Capacity
47 Doorman, The
64 Dreams with Sharp Teeth
73 Duchess of Langeais, The
85 Edge of Heaven, The
27 Eight Miles High
54 Elsa & Fred
81 Encounters at the End of the World
62 Expired
64 Fall, The
54 Felon
51 Finding Amanda
57 Flawless
86 Flight of the Red Balloon, The
63 Foot Fist Way, The
60 Fugitive Pieces
72 Full Battle Rattle
45 Full Grown Men
31 Garden Party
55 Glass: A Portrait of Philip in Twelve Parts
69 Go-Getter, The
73 Gonzo: The Life and Work of Dr. Hunter S. Thompson
59 Gunnin for that #1 Spot
10 Harold
68 Heartbeat Detector
36 Holding Trevor
68 Honeydripper
55 Irina Palm
66 Jellyfish
58 Jihad for Love, A
66 Kabluey
62 Kiss the Bride
63 Kit Kittredge: An American Girl
80 Last Mistress, The
38 Life Before Her Eyes, The
74 Lou Reed's Berlin
70 Love Songs
67 Mad Detective
xx Man Named Pearl, A
64 Married Life
30 Meet Bill
33 Miss Conception
53 Mister Lonely
74 Mongol
52 Mother of Tears, The
52 My Blueberry Nights
71 My Brother Is an Only Child
85 My Winnipeg
61 On the Rumba River
69 Operation Filmmaker
61 OSS 117: Cairo - Nest of Spies
70 Outsourced
83 Paranoid Park
72 Priceless
51 Promotion, The
55 Quid Pro Quo
29 Red Roses and Petrol
79 Reprise
71 Roman de gare
77 Roman Polanski: Wanted and Desired
56 Sangre de mi sangre
51 Savage Grace
76 Shotgun Stories
66 Son of Rambow
70 Standard Operating Procedure
57 Stone Angel, The
61 Stuck
72 Surfwise
25 Take
81 Tell No One
56 Then She Found Me
xx Thoda Pyaar Thoda Magic
71 To the Limit
54 Tracey Fragments, The
69 Transsiberian
71 Trumbo
71 Tuya's Marriage
83 U2 3D
56 Unknown Woman
86 Up the Yangtze
59 Very British Gangster, A
79 Visitor, The
61 Wackness, The
37 War, Inc.
65 Water Lilies
66 When Did You Last See Your Father?
55 Without the King
72 Woman on the Beach
64 XXY
67 Year My Parents Went on Vacation, The
75 Young@Heart

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

 



Printer-Friendly Version Email This Page Discuss In Our Forums

Spider-Man 3
Columbia Pictures / Sony Pictures Releasing

Spider-Man 3 reviews
Critic Score
Metascore: 59 Metascore out of 100
User Score  
6.0 out of 10
based on 40 reviews
Read critic reviews
How did we calculate this?
based on 550 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie

MPAA RATING: PG-13 for sequences of intense action violence

Starring Tobey Maguire, Kirsten Dunst, James Franco, Thomas Haden Church, Topher Grace, Bryce Dallas Howard, James Cromwell, and Rosemary Harris

Spider-Man 3 reunites the cast and filmmakers from the first two blockbuster adventures for a web of secrets, vengeance, love, and forgiveness. (Columbia Pictures)


GENRE(S): Action  |  Adventure  |  Sci-fi  |  Suspense/Thriller  
WRITTEN BY: Sam Raimi
Ivan Raimi (also screen story)
Alvin Sargent
Stan Lee and Steve Ditko (Marvel comic book)
 
DIRECTED BY: Sam Raimi  
RELEASE DATE: DVD: October 30, 2007 
Theatrical: May 4, 2007 
RUNNING TIME: 140 minutes, Color 
ORIGIN: USA 

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

88
New York Daily News Jack Mathews
With nifty new villains, a revived Green Goblin, plus $300 million worth of aerial special effects, Sam Raimi's Spider-Man 3 is definitely good to go.
Read Full Review
88
Miami Herald Rene Rodriguez
This is a wonderfully imagined, heartfelt piece of pop entertainment that soars not only for its spectacular eye candy, but also during the moments when its protagonists simply stand still and talk to each other. How many comic-book movies can you say that about?
Read Full Review
80
Time Richard Corliss
Where can mass-moviegoers find release for their tenderer feelings? Only at dozens of inspirational sports movies, where guys (on screen and in the audience) get to cry and cheer and win. And, this weekend, at Spider-Man 3.
Read Full Review
80
Salon.com Stephanie Zacharek
The good news about Spider-Man 3 is that it's more of the same -- except better.
Read Full Review
80
The Hollywood Reporter Michael Rechtshaffen
The wow factor works overtime with state-of-the-art effects sequences that often are as beautiful as they are astonishing.
Read Full Review
80
Newsweek David Ansen
The juiciest battle here is Spidey vs. Spidey, or, if you prefer, superego vs. id. When Peter starts to go seriously bad, the movie becomes seriously fun.
Read Full Review
75
New York Post Lou Lumenick
Overly long and complicated, it's packed with crowd-pleasing moments and satisfactorily wraps up the trilogy - without quite capturing the magic of the first two installments.
Read Full Review
75
USA Today Claudia Puig
Solidly entertaining and possesses dazzling special effects, but it falls short of the near-perfection of the Spidey sequel.
Read Full Review
75
Boston Globe Wesley Morris
Raimi, who shares script credit with his brother Ivan and Alvin Sargent, strikes an exquisite balance between pop and woe, drama and whooshing adventure.
Read Full Review
75
TV Guide Maitland McDonagh
Raimi and company deftly balance spectacle and character-based drama, occasionally tweaking the comic-book mythology but always respecting creator Stan Lee's idea that costumed crime-fighter Peter Parker's life as Spider-Man isn't all derring-do and public accolades.
Read Full Review
75
Rolling Stone Peter Travers
There are delicious bits aplenty in Spider-Man 3 for those who care to notice.
Read Full Review
75
Seattle Post-Intelligencer William Arnold
The experience is fun enough that it's sure to be the summer's first blockbuster.
Read Full Review
70
Slate Dana Stevens
There are plenty of pleasures here: The slow birth of the Sandman from a heap of supercharged sand crystals (or something) is a marvel of digital animation, and the chemistry between Dunst and Maguire feels like the dynamic of a real couple, full of subtle shifts and eloquent silences.
Read Full Review
70
Film Threat Clint Morris
What saves Spider-Man 3 from becoming well, "Superman III," is the fact that it's still a solid film that packs a punch when it comes to turn on the spectacle.
Read Full Review
67
The Onion (A.V. Club) Noel Murray
So Spider-Man 3's action is superb and its theme fairly weighty. Then why does it feel a letdown from its predecessor? Nearly all the blame rests with director Sam Raimi, who's taken the success of some light slapstick moments in Spider-Man 2 as a cue to get even sillier.
Read Full Review
67
Entertainment Weekly Owen Gleiberman
Spider-Man 3 has terrific moments, but after the danger and majesty and romantic brio of "Spider-Man 2," those adrenalized rooftop ballets feel, more than ever, like sequences.
Read Full Review
67
Austin Chronicle Marjorie Baumgarten
In short, there are way too many storylines here, especially for a movie that turns stiff whenever it's on the ground. When cascading through the cityscape, Spider-Man 3 still makes us gasp with delight, but on Earth those gasps come solely in reaction to the cynical dreariness of the script.
Read Full Review
67
Portland Oregonian Shawn Levy
Spider-Man 3 is a likeable film -- Maguire's personality, or Raimi's channeled through him, is genuinely charming. But the tenor of the film is too often too muted, melancholy and enervated for something of its size.
Read Full Review
67
Baltimore Sun Michael Sragow
The sprawling canvas ultimately dwarfs the plucky title figure and makes him seem too small in every way.
Read Full Review
67
Christian Science Monitor Peter Rainer
Far from a flop, and I'm sure the Spider-maniacs will eat it up. For me, it's a buffet without much aftertaste.
Read Full Review
63
Charlotte Observer Lawrence Toppman
If the longest and beefiest "Spider-Man" movie to date were a baseball player, it would be tested tomorrow for steroids. That won't stop "S-M 3" from hitting a home run at the box-office, where fans will roar.
Read Full Review
63
The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Rick Groen
The main flaw is an over-abundance of villains, a bout of narrative greediness that sees them marching out of their lairs like so many evil-doers-on-parade.
Read Full Review
63
Philadelphia Inquirer Steven Rea
It's not dull, exactly, but neither is it much fun.
Read Full Review
63
Chicago Tribune Michael Phillips
You want big wows with this sort of entertainment, and the wows here are medium.
Read Full Review
63
Premiere Glenn Kenny
This incarnation of Spider Man seems to forget that its source material was a comic book that wanted to transcend its genre. This is a movie that's content to be pretty good within its genre, with the main distinction of being much bigger than any of its competition.
Read Full Review
60
Empire Chris Hewitt
Still smart, still exciting and still action-packed. It's just a shame to note that, after promising greatness, all Spider-Man 3 delivers is satisfaction.
Read Full Review
60
New York Magazine David Edelstein
The movie isn't a dud: It has exuberant bits and breathtaking (money money money) effects. But it's supposed to be fun and inspirational, and it's too leaden for liftoff.
Read Full Review
60
Chicago Reader Jonathan Rosenbaum
Given how bogus the movie is whenever it departs from formula, it's not surprising that the funniest bit (in which Peter Parker becomes a disco smoothie) is stolen from Jerry Lewis's "The Nutty Professor" or that the best special effects, involving a gigantic Sandman, dimly echo "King Kong."
Read Full Review
60
Wall Street Journal Joe Morgenstern
Will the extremely extravagant special effects prove sufficient to sustain the picture? Surely they will, this time. Still, there's a sense of fatigue in the scenes that don't involve high-tensile webs and high-tension suspense.
Read Full Review
50
The New York Times Manohla Dargis
The bittersweet paradox of this franchise is that while the stories have grown progressively less interesting the special effects have improved tremendously, becoming at once more plausible -- when Spider-Man swings through the urban canyons he finally looks almost real -- and more spectacular.
Read Full Review
50
ReelViews James Berardinelli
Spider-Man and the first sequel were breezy adventures - easy and fun to sit through. Spider-Man 3 is a chore. The effective moments require a lot patience to uncover and some of what has to be shifted to get to them is not worth the effort. People love trilogies because it's said that good things come in threes, but this series would have looked better and felt more satisfying had the filmmakers stopped at two.
Read Full Review
50
Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert
Spider-Man 3 is, in short, a mess. Too many villains, too many pale plot strands, too many romantic misunderstandings, too many conversations, too many street crowds looking high into the air and shouting "oooh!" this way, then swiveling and shouting "aaah!" that way.
Read Full Review
50
Variety Todd McCarthy
A sense of strain envelops the proceedings this time around. One can feel the effort required to suit up one more time, come up with fresh variations on a winning formula and inject urgency into a format that basically needs to be repeated and, due to audience expectations, can't be toyed with or deepened very much.
Read Full Review
50
Los Angeles Times Kenneth Turan
Though aspects of it are entertaining, the presence of all these mismatched pieces give Spider-Man 3 an ungainly, cumbersome feeling, as if its plot elements were the product of competing contractors who never saw the need to cooperate on a coherent final product.
Read Full Review
50
Dallas Observer Robert Wilonsky
Overstuffed (three villains), overlong (at more than two hours and 20 minutes) and undercooked (plot points include amnesia and alien goo).
Read Full Review
40
The New Yorker Anthony Lane
That's the problem with this third installment of the franchise: not that it's running out of ideas, or lifting them too slavishly from the original comic, but that it lunges at them with an infantile lack of grace, throwing money at one special effect after another and praying--or calculating--that some of them will fly.
Read Full Review
40
Village Voice Nathan Lee
Given that Spider-Man 2 was twice as fun as the first, it's triply disappointing what an overwrought bore S3 turns out to be.
Read Full Review
40
LA Weekly Scott Foundas
The satirical jabs at celebrity culture smell like rotted leftovers from "The Fantastic Four." The token ruminations on the tension between a superhero's public and private lives seem flown in from Bryan Singer's "Superman Returns" (to say nothing of Raimi's own, superior "Darkman"). Most egregious, though, is the way Raimi and the writers reduce Spider-Man 3 to the very sort of abject distinctions between virtue and sin that the series has heretofore studiously avoided.
Read Full Review
30
Washington Post Ann Hornaday
An overlong, visually incoherent, mean-spirited and often just plain awful Spider-Man 3.
Read Full Review
25
San Francisco Chronicle Mick LaSalle
"Spider-Man 2" was a textbook example of how to make a sequel: Deepen it, make it funnier, give it more heart and come up with a strong villain and a good story. Spider Man 3, by contrast, shows how not to make a sequel.
Read Full Review

What Our Users Said

Vote Now!The average user rating for this movie is 6.0 (out of 10) based on 550 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

Jesse S. gave it a1:
Cramming over twenty years of comic history into a single hour of a movie won't help with storyline or plot, but it'll definitely help sales. One of the main problems of the movie is that the storyline rushes and moves too fast. Scenes skip around to the point where you have to be paying close attention to what's going on, or you'll miss important plot points. Having said that, I'll talk about individual processes. Topher Grace's performance of Venom is less-than-spectacular. Venom is a character who's the pure essence of evil. He originally had a distorted, screech-like voice, but now it's only slightly deepened by Grace's. The abundance of bad lines that Grace has don't help his performance, either. "I like being bad. It makes me happy." That was one of the lines that made the movie feel like a big, unimportant joke. I did like the special effects of the Sandman and Thomas Hayden Church's performance. The parts of Venom could've been cut out to save for another movie and this would've been great. Weak subplots and overly-fast pacing put the third film as bad as Fantastic 4 : Rise of the Silver Surfer.

Mark B. gave it a0:
Worst movie ever. Spiderman dancing around to jazz music playing piano? Such a waste of time.

John M. gave it a10:
So sue me, I loved it! Action-packed and full of fun. That's what I look for in a movie.

Keith J gave it a5:
Loaded with illogical and unlikely events, it feels like an excuse for special effects and to tie loose ends. That said, the special effects are good. So if you want to partly disengage your brain, this movie is satisfactory.

Uncle Doug Bigelow gave it a1:
Sandman killed this movie. The only reason it doesn't get a zero is because Parker smacked M.J.

Peter J. gave it a7:
Good solid movie and very entertaining. Not the best Spiderman film, but those giving this movie 1's and 2's are absolute morons.

[Anonymous] gave it an8:
Compared to predecessors, Spidey three is a little choppy, but that doesn't prevent it from being entertaining. the "bad" peter is an absolute blast to watch, from his more outspoken behavioral qualities to his ferocious spidey fighting. Sandman's an awesome villain, and the arc with the three friends was wrapped up nicely.

Read more user comments...

Discuss this movie in our forums

Return to top of page
Home | FILM | DVD/VIDEO | MUSIC | GAMES | TV | Forums | About Metacritic metacritic.com

Popular on CBS sites: World News | Fantasy Football | Amy Winehouse | Baseball | E3 | Batman | Firefox 3 | iPhone 3G

About CNET Networks | Jobs | Advertise

© 2008 CNET Networks, Inc., a CBS Company. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use