GAMES: GameSpot | GameFAQs MUSIC: Last.fm | MP3.com MOVIES: Metacritic | Movietome TV: TV.com
Home | About Metacritic | About Metascores | What's New | Wireless Versions | Discussion Forums | Advertising Inquiries | Contact Us | RSS
Metacritic.com: We Deal With Criticism
     Help
> Switch to Advanced Search  
Film Video/DVD Music Games TV

Film

Upcoming Release Calendar
Weekend Box Office
Film Awards & Top 10s By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
How Metascores Are Calculated
Discuss Film In Our Forums

 

Wide Releases

sort by name sort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

 

Limited Releases

sort by name sort by score

67 $9.99
75 24 City
66 Adoration
74 Afghan Star
48 Alien Trespass
56 American Violet
82 Anvil! The Story of Anvil
57 Away We Go
81 Beaches of Agnes, The
62 Big Man Japan
28 Big Shot-Caller, The
78 Boys: The Sherman Brothers' Story, The
55 Brothers Bloom, The
82 Burma VJ: Reporting from a Closed Country
xx Call of the Wild
63 Cheri
62 Cherry Blossoms
63 Dead Snow
65 Departures
18 Downloading Nancy
58 Easy Virtue
70 End of the Line, The
77 Every Little Step
64 Examined Life
80 Food, Inc.
38 Gigantic
56 Girl from Monaco, The
67 Girlfriend Experience, The
87 Gomorrah
89 Goodbye Solo
63 Great Buck Howard, The
79 Harvard Beats Yale 29-29
xx Home
82 Hunger
91 Hurt Locker, The
16 I Hate Valentine's Day
81 Il Divo
54 Is Anybody There?
71 Jerichow
58 Julia
74 Lemon Tree
36 Life is Hot in Cracktown
40 Limits of Control, The
42 Little Ashes
64 Lymelife
50 Management
57 Merry Gentleman, The
66 Moon
35 New York
62 Not Forgotten
xx Offshore
78 O'Horten
64 Outrage
40 Paris 36
54 Pontypool
71 Pressure Cooker
52 Quiet Chaos
83 Revanche
67 Rudo y Cursi
86 Seraphine
65 Sex Positive
70 Shall We Kiss?
77 Sin Nombre
59 Sleep Dealer
74 Song of Sparrows, The
54 Stoning of Soraya M., The
82 Sugar
84 Summer Hours
61 Sunshine Cleaning
28 Surveillance
42 Tennessee
63 Tetro
64 Throw Down Your Heart
80 Tokyo Sonata
63 Tokyo!
70 Tony Manero
74 Treeless Mountain
88 Tulpan
74 Two Lovers
83 Tyson
83 U2 3D
60 Under Our Skin
69 Unmistaken Child
69 Valentino: The Last Emperor
22 What Goes Up
45 Whatever Works
57 Youssou Ndour: I Bring What I Love

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

 



Printer-Friendly Version Email This Page Discuss In Our Forums

Star Wars: Episode II - Attack of the Clones
20th Century Fox Film Corporation

Star Wars: Episode II - Attack of the Clones reviews
Critic Score
Metascore: 53 Metascore out of 100
User Score  
6.1 out of 10
based on 39 reviews
Read critic reviews
How did we calculate this?
based on 220 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie

MPAA RATING: PG for sustained sequences of sci-fi action/violence

Starring Ewan McGregor, Natalie Portman, Hayden Christensen, Ian McDiarmid, Samuel L. Jackson, Pernilla August, Jack Thompson, and Christopher Lee

Ten years after the events in "The Phantom Menace," Jedi Obi-Wan Kenobi (McGregor) and Anakin Sywalker (Christensen) are summoned to protect Padme Amidala (Portman) after an assassination attempt is made on her life. Anakin's love of Amidala grows when the pair returns to Naboo, and Obi-Wan's investigation of the death plot reveals sinister designs that threaten to bring the Galactic Republic to the brink of war.


GENRE(S): Sci-fi  
WRITTEN BY: George Lucas
Jonathan Hales
 
DIRECTED BY: George Lucas  
RELEASE DATE: DVD: November 12, 2002 
Video: November 12, 2002 
Theatrical: May 16, 2002 
RUNNING TIME: 132 minutes, Color 
ORIGIN: USA 

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

100
Chicago Tribune Michael Wilmington
Attack of the Clones celebrates a certain youthful spirit in both moviemaking and movie watching; because it's as much phenomenon as movie, audiences will either ride with or reject it. I was happy to take the ride.
Read Full Review
91
Portland Oregonian Shawn Levy
Don't go if "Star Wars" isn't your bag: You'll only resist and resent it. But if you're a fan, it's hard to see how you'd be disappointed. Me? I can't wait for May 2005. "Episode III": Hot diggity!
Read Full Review
90
Variety Todd McCarthy
George Lucas has reached deep into the trove of his self-generated mythological world to produce a grand entertainment that offers a satisfying balance among the series' epic, narrative, technological and emotional qualities.
Read Full Review
90
Time Richard Corliss
An exhilarating two hours of serious fun.
88
USA Today Mike Clark
As for the breathless 45-minute climax, no screen fantasy adventure in memory can match the showmanship.
88
Charlotte Observer Lawrence Toppman
The saga regains its grandeur with a complicated but easy-to-follow story. The characters are as satisfying as the effects.
Read Full Review
88
ReelViews James Berardinelli
In a time when, more often than not, sequels disappoint, it's refreshing to uncover something this high-profile that fulfils the promise of its name and adds another title to a storied legacy.
Read Full Review
88
Baltimore Sun Michael Sragow
As the sequence builds, it accretes so many heroic and nightmarish associations it plays like a prelude to apocalypse, which of course will come in Episode III. Attack of the Clones is part soda pop, part witches' brew - and all visual ambrosia.
Read Full Review
88
New York Post Lou Lumenick
A technological landmark that couldn't look or sound better.
Read Full Review
83
Seattle Post-Intelligencer William Arnold
Mostly very good. It's exactly the big fix of Saturday-matinee adventure, blazing special effects, inside humor and sly self-references for which its fans have been lusting.
Read Full Review
80
Film Threat Chris Gore
Clones is not a good movie -- but it is an incredibly awesome Star Wars movie! This is far from a perfect film, but the problems are almost dismissable based on the final result.
Read Full Review
80
New York Magazine Peter Rainer
Still, in its own Saturday-morning-serial kind of way, Attack of the Clones is a commendable example of the sort of movie we once loved and then outgrew. Of course, if it was even better, we wouldn't feel as if we'd outgrown it.
Read Full Review
75
Miami Herald Rene Rodriguez
A triumph of technology over humanity, and if it falls short of a completely fulfilling experience, it also achieves the kind of primal emotion movies were invented for: wonder.
Read Full Review
70
Rolling Stone Peter Travers
The dark fantasist in Lucas makes a comeback after years of once-over-lightly.
Read Full Review
63
Philadelphia Inquirer Steven Rea
Clones makes the Frodo-speak of "Lord of the Rings" sound like Noel Coward.
Read Full Review
63
Boston Globe Renee Graham
One roots for Lucas to get the next film sorted out, and to resurrect the humanity and soul that first made so many fall in love a long time ago with that galaxy far, far away.
Read Full Review
60
The New Yorker David Denby
Lucas shifts back and forth between this kind of original invention and a dependence on pompous dead-level dreck, a grade-B cheapness that he's obviously addicted to. [20 May 2002, p. 114]
60
Film Threat Ron Wells
You know, each and every person reading this right now will shell out their six bucks ($9-$14 in L.A./New York) to see this film no matter what I say. Hell, I feel ambivalent about it and I'm still going to pay to see it again.
Read Full Review
60
New Times (L.A.) Luke Y. Thompson
Sometimes it bounces along, other times it feels forced. Kids and hardcore fans will love it regardless, and those who don't will nonetheless be talking about it for the next three years.
58
Entertainment Weekly Lisa Schwarzbaum
Here we are again: not entertained, not nearly enough, by an installment of the ''Star Wars'' epic that, for the first time, exhibits symptoms of...nerves. And a chill, conservative grimness of purpose, rather than an excited thrill at the possibilities of cinematic storytelling.
Read Full Review
50
Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert
It is not what's there on the screen that disappoints me, but what's not there.
Read Full Review
50
Newsweek David Ansen
A decidedly mixed bag.
50
TV Guide Maitland McDonagh
And while it was always clear that Lucas cared more about special effects than acting, here his lack of interest has produced phenomenally wooden performances from newcomers and veterans alike: Only the imperious Christopher Lee, as baleful Count Dooku, emerges unscathed.
Read Full Review
50
Christian Science Monitor David Sterritt
The movie has a broader range of emotions and visual effects than any "Star Wars" installment since "The Empire Strikes Back," but the writing and acting are as stiff as R2-D2's metal torso.
Read Full Review
50
San Francisco Chronicle Mick LaSalle
Lucas knows his fans are un-boreable, un-annoyable and inexhaustible. For an artist, that's more a curse than a blessing.
Read Full Review
50
LA Weekly Hazel-Dawn Dumpert
Attack of the Clones' high-definition surfaces are certainly impressive, but they offer no lifelight, nothing to put your arms around.
Read Full Review
50
Slate David Edelstein
The scale of the enterprise is thrilling; it's too bad the movie is so muddled on so many different levels.
Read Full Review
50
New York Daily News Jack Mathews
The overall effect of Lucas' digital mania has been detrimental to the saga. Where the first trilogy was mythological fantasy, the second is pure cartoon. The sad truth is, the more three-dimensional they look, the more two-dimensional they are.
50
Los Angeles Times Kenneth Turan
Only a teenage boy could find this kind of stuff continually diverting, and only a teenage boy would not notice flimsy emotions and underdeveloped acting. It seems George Lucas, like Peter Pan, has never really grown up.
Read Full Review
40
The Onion (A.V. Club) Scott Tobias
Without the mythical power or giddy adventurousness of the first two Star Wars movies, the impact is strangely numbing, like watching a two-and-a-half-hour ILM show reel in search of moneyed investors.
Read Full Review
40
The New York Times Dana Stevens
It is not really much of a movie at all, if by movie you mean a work of visual storytelling about the dramatic actions of a group of interesting characters.
Read Full Review
40
Chicago Reader Jonathan Rosenbaum
Though the look aspires as usual to be both otherworldly and familiar, there's nothing that doesn't reek of southern California (as opposed to Hollywood) plastic, and this is as true of the characters as the decor.
Read Full Review
40
Austin Chronicle Marc Savlov
Attack of the Clones' final 35 minutes very nearly makes up for the preceding 105, featuring as it does the jaw-dropping spectacle of the entire Jedi Council battling it out with not only clones, but also lumbering monsters, space ships of all sorts, and each other.
Read Full Review
40
Washington Post Desson Thomson
There's nothing to stir us, no scene to savor for life -- such as the father-son battle between Luke Skywalker and Darth Vader in "The Empire Strikes Back." Back then, we were watching a classic, still the best film in the series. This time, we're watching just another "Star Wars" flick.
Read Full Review
38
The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Rick Groen
Watching Attack of the Clones is like getting rapped on the head with a rubber mallet -- no lasting damage (I pray and hope), but bad enough to bring on an acute bout of dizziness and disorientation. Definitely do not operate heavy machinery after viewing -- this behemoth is brutal.
Read Full Review
30
Village Voice Michael Atkinson
There is an odd cognitive dissonance at work between the obvious ingenuity dedicated to the film's visual details -- alien anatomies, industrial machinery, technological minutiae -- and the retarded intelligence quotient evident in its content.
Read Full Review
30
Wall Street Journal Joe Morgenstern
For all its video-game bedazzlements, Attack of the Clones suffers from severe digital glut, periodically relieved, if you can call it that, by amateur theatrics.
20
Salon.com Stephanie Zacharek
I can't remember ever feeling so glad that a movie was finally over. Lucas may have held my imagination hostage for two hours, but reclaiming it afterward wasn't hard at all.
Read Full Review
20
Washington Post Stephen Hunter
It's too long, it's too dull, it's too lame.
Read Full Review

What Our Users Said

Vote Now!The average user rating for this movie is 6.1 (out of 10) based on 220 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

Eddie D. gave it a2:
This is definitely one of the worst movies I have ever seen.The first 30 minutes is completely unnecessary, and boring. And they wasted another useless 40 minutes fooling around with Anakin and Pad Me. The plotline- FAIL! The action- FAIL! The romance- three thumbs down. I want my money, and my time back.

[Anonymous] gave it a7:
This is one of those movies where you think, "What the heck was George Lucas thinking?" But I gotta tell ya, I have weaknesses for these films. Sure the acting is off. Sure the only real good actors are Ewan McGregor, Christopher Lee, and even Hayden Christensen. Sure you have to wait a while for some of the Best on screen action/ battle. I had fun with this movie. Yes it's a love story. Yes, it does remind you of Pearl Harbor and Spider-Man 3. But it is fun.

R. Smith gave it a3:
What was George Lucas thinking? Has he completely lost his mind? As a long time Star Wars fan, this movie was so disappointing. The acting is awful, downright awful, and the plot has nothing going for it. The only good things about it were the light-saber fight at the end with Yoda, and that Jar Jar Binks wasn't in it. What a waste of talent, and expectation.

Stephen C gave it a9:
Woohoo! Awsome1 I wanted to stay in the movie theater and watch it again when I saw it!

Bob B. gave it an8:
The best out of the first 3 episodes of Star Wars. The acting wasn't nearly as bad as in Episode 3, and the story was never too flashy or action packed at the same time, which was not the case for episode 3. Lucas showed lots of Coruscant, from the car chase, to the Jedi Temple, the diner, etc. That is missing from Episode 3. In Ep. 3, you hardly even realize that the Republic is in bad shape. All you see are speeders flying around like they always are with nothing happening outside Palpatines office and Padmes apartment. Clones has just the right balance of mystery, action, special effects, and average acting. For anyone who says this is worse than Revenge of the Sith, you must be out of your mind.

Charlie W. gave it a0:
The only good thing I can say about this movie is that Jar-Jar is not in it... thank god...

Adam L. gave it a1:
This movie straight up sucked! A 1 is giving it a little, but only for the one scene in the Naboo Plains where they're talking about Padme's old boyfriend, but right afterword they have they'rs flirting sesion and it starts sucking again. Except for Star Wars Collectors like me, don't buy it, it is just a waste of money.

Read more user comments...

Discuss this movie in our forums

Return to top of page
Home | FILM | DVD/VIDEO | MUSIC | GAMES | TV | Forums | About Metacritic metacritic.com

Popular on CBS sites: iPhone 3G | Fantasy Football | Moneywatch | Antivirus Software | Recipes | E3 2009

About CBS Interactive | Jobs | Advertise

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use