CNET Networks Entertainment GameSpot | GameFAQs | SportsGamer | Metacritic | MP3.com | TV.com
Home | About Metacritic | About Metascores | What's New | Wireless Versions | Discussion Forums | Advertising Inquiries | Contact Us | RSS
Metacritic.com: We Deal With Criticism
     Help
> Switch to Advanced Search  
Film Video/DVD Music Games TV

Film

Upcoming Release Calendar
Weekend Box Office
Film Awards & Top 10s By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
How Metascores Are Calculated
Discuss Film In Our Forums

 

Wide Releases

sort by name sort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

 

Limited Releases

sort by name sort by score

83 Alexandra
80 Band's Visit, The
76 Beauty in Trouble
47 Bella
80 Bigger, Stronger, Faster*
59 Blind Mountain
55 Bra Boys
60 Brick Lane
70 Caramel
49 Children of Huang Shi, The
83 Chop Shop
83 Chris & Don. A Love Story
78 Counterfeiters, The
52 Diminished Capacity
64 Dreams with Sharp Teeth
73 Duchess of Langeais, The
84 Edge of Heaven, The
52 Elsa & Fred
79 Encounters at the End of the World
62 Expired
64 Fall, The
51 Finding Amanda
57 Flawless
86 Flight of the Red Balloon, The
63 Foot Fist Way, The
60 Fugitive Pieces
45 Full Grown Men
55 Glass: A Portrait of Philip in Twelve Parts
69 Go-Getter, The
74 Gonzo: The Life and Work of Dr. Hunter S. Thompson
63 Gunnin for that #1 Spot
68 Heartbeat Detector
34 Holding Trevor
68 Honeydripper
55 Irina Palm
69 Jellyfish
60 Jihad for Love, A
68 Kabluey
62 Kiss the Bride
63 Kit Kittredge: An American Girl
82 Last Mistress, The
38 Life Before Her Eyes, The
70 Love Songs
64 Married Life
30 Meet Bill
33 Miss Conception
53 Mister Lonely
74 Mongol
52 Mother of Tears, The
52 My Blueberry Nights
71 My Brother Is an Only Child
84 My Winnipeg
61 On the Rumba River
69 Operation Filmmaker
61 OSS 117: Cairo - Nest of Spies
83 Paranoid Park
72 Priceless
51 Promotion, The
55 Quid Pro Quo
29 Red Roses and Petrol
79 Reprise
71 Roman de gare
56 Sangre de mi sangre
51 Savage Grace
76 Shotgun Stories
66 Son of Rambow
70 Standard Operating Procedure
62 Stuck
72 Surfwise
81 Tell No One
56 Then She Found Me
xx Thoda Pyaar Thoda Magic
71 To the Limit
54 Tracey Fragments, The
70 Trumbo
72 Tuya's Marriage
83 U2 3D
56 Unknown Woman
86 Up the Yangtze
79 Visitor, The
62 Wackness, The
37 War, Inc.
64 Water Lilies
66 When Did You Last See Your Father?
55 Without the King
72 Woman on the Beach
64 XXY
67 Year My Parents Went on Vacation, The
75 Young@Heart

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

 



Printer-Friendly Version Email This Page Discuss In Our Forums

Underworld
Screen Gems Inc.

Underworld reviews
Critic Score
Metascore: 42 Metascore out of 100
User Score  
7.0 out of 10
based on 34 reviews
Read critic reviews
How did we calculate this?
based on 73 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie

MPAA RATING: R for strong violence/gore and some language

Starring Kate Beckinsale, Scott Speedman, Shane Brolly, Michael Sheen, Bill Nighy, Erwin Leder, and Sophia Myles

Underworld reimagines Vampires as a secretive clan of modern aristocratic sophisticates whose mortal enemies are the Lycans (werewolves), a shrewd gang of street thugs who prowl the city's underbelly. (Screen Gems)


GENRE(S): Action  |  Fantasy  |  Horror  
WRITTEN BY: Danny McBride (also story)
Kevin Grevioux (story)
Len Wiseman (story)
 
DIRECTED BY: Len Wiseman  
RELEASE DATE: DVD: January 6, 2004 
Video: January 6, 2004 
Theatrical: September 19, 2003 
RUNNING TIME: 121 minutes, Color 
ORIGIN: USA / Germany / Hungary / UK 

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

75
Christian Science Monitor David Sterritt
At heart, this is an old-fashioned monster flick decked out with Hollywood's full battery of high-tech visual effects. It's as goofy as it is gory -- stay away if you don't like in-your-face mayhem.
Read Full Review
75
Seattle Post-Intelligencer William Arnold
It's Shakespearean in its political machinations and closer to "Saving Private Ryan" and "Starship Troopers" than to "Dracula" or "The Howling."
Read Full Review
75
Charlotte Observer Lawrence Toppman
However much Underworld recycles elements from other films, it carries us into a well-constructed, convincingly scary world worth visiting.
Read Full Review
75
New York Daily News Jami Bernard
The filmmakers' decision to go with prosthetic enhancements rather than CGI gives the snouts, fangs and snapping jaws a refreshingly tactile look.
Read Full Review
67
Austin Chronicle Marc Savlov
It is the perfectly cast Beckinsale who lifts Underworld out and away from the film’s many moments of silly gravitas and steers it into a truly interesting take on the whole vampires 'n' werewolves genre.
Read Full Review
63
Premiere Peter Debruge
Riddled with ammunition for what Alfred Hitchcock called the "Plausibles"--those poor-sport moviegoers who insist on pointing out a movie's inconsistencies instead of simply enjoying the ride
Read Full Review
63
ReelViews James Berardinelli
An example of a vampire movie for the new century -- stylish, gothic, gory, and loud.
Read Full Review
63
Boston Globe Wesley Morris
As murky and derivative-looking as the film is, it moves with an authority that pummels you into submission.
Read Full Review
63
Chicago Tribune Robert K. Elder
Has one other thing in common with "The Matrix Reloaded" -- too much story, too many angles.
Read Full Review
60
Dallas Observer Gregory Weinkauf
Visually it's wild fun, since fledgling feature director Len Wiseman started off in production design, and creature designer Patrick Tatopoulos's diverse credits span from "Godzilla" to "Stuart Little." Yet with Underworld's guilty pleasures come copious clinkers, from its nuts-and-bolts narrative foundation to Wiseman's inability to direct actors beyond cartoonish interaction.
Read Full Review
60
Salon.com Andrew O'Hehir
The funny thing about all this is that a half-hour into Underworld I couldn't wait for it to be over. When it really was over, I couldn't wait for the next installment. Go figure.
Read Full Review
50
Miami Herald Charles Savage
A loud and relentlessly overstated B-movie, and yet not entirely stupid.
Read Full Review
50
Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert
It's so impossible to care about the characters in the movie that I didn't care if the vampires or werewolves won. I might not have cared in a better movie, either, but I might have been willing to pretend.
Read Full Review
50
New York Post Jonathan Foreman
Though it sometimes feels as if it's four hours long, Underworld has going for it an intriguing fantasy premise, an eventful plot and a look that is diverting, if finally a bit monotonous.
Read Full Review
50
Variety Todd McCarthy
Takes itself so seriously that it never has fun with its shopworn genre elements.
Read Full Review
50
Los Angeles Times Manohla Dargis
Alas, as is often the case with lower-end genre movies, the story cooked up by Wiseman and his friends, actor Kevin Grevioux and the film's screenwriter, Danny McBride, is decidedly less important than the look of the film and its influences.
Read Full Review
50
Portland Oregonian Kim Morgan
A slick disappointment -- though there's much unintentional humor to be enjoyed.
Read Full Review
50
Entertainment Weekly Owen Gleiberman
By the end, I was starting to ponder questions like, If a vampire mates with a lycan-vamp hybrid, which parent will have to convert?
Read Full Review
50
The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Liam Lacey
All of this is accomplished with buckets of blood, but almost no sense of flesh: It's hard to recall a more sexless vampire flick.
Read Full Review
40
TV Guide Maitland McDonagh
So clotted with back story that the Romeo and Juliet-style romance between a warrior vampire and a reluctant werewolf never has a chance to breath, Len Wiseman's revisionist horror tale is all look and no bite.
Read Full Review
40
LA Weekly Chuck Wilson
Beautiful in its dark, contrasting blues and blacks, Underworld is nonetheless a remarkably humorless movie, and not even the adroitly hammy Bill Nighy, as the vampire king, can leaven the overwrought seriousness of it all.
Read Full Review
40
Chicago Reader Jonathan Rosenbaum
This is the silliest horror movie I've seen in years, though some of the special effects are pretty good.
Read Full Review
40
The New York Times Anita Gates
Achieves only loudness, aggressive confusion and one of the silliest head-splittings in film history.
Read Full Review
40
The Hollywood Reporter Michael Rechtshaffen
Beckinsale delivers even if Underworld doesn't quite manage to follow through on its initial promise.
Read Full Review
38
Baltimore Sun Chris Kaltenbach
A hollow, relentless mess.
Read Full Review
30
Slate David Edelstein
125 minutes is a long time to stare at a movie that's basically in bleached blue-and-white with occasional splotches of brick red. The palette reinforces the monotony of the storyline.
Read Full Review
30
The Onion (A.V. Club) Nathan Rabin
Not since "Battlefield Earth" pitted overacting, nine-foot-tall Psychlos against puny man-animals has there been an interspecies match-up this perversely uninteresting.
Read Full Review
30
Film Threat Kevin Carr
There's too much pretension in this film. Lots of intense stares into the camera. Lots of uncomfortably hip clothes. Lots of pompous names for themselves.
Read Full Review
30
Washington Post Ann Hornaday
Plays less like a novel re-imagining of a classic if campy narrative than a drearily self-conscious exercise in Know Your Film References.
Read Full Review
25
USA Today Claudia Puig
Neither side is worth rooting for in this ridiculous blood feud, which features some of the year's most laughable dialogue.
Read Full Review
25
Rolling Stone Peter Travers
"Your incompetence is most taxing," says the chief vampire (Bill Nighy). A line that pretty much nails this rusty Blade.
Read Full Review
25
San Francisco Chronicle Peter Hartlaub
Could use script transfusion, or at least a few quarts of levity.
Read Full Review
20
Washington Post Desson Thomson
It needs a wooden stake AND a silver bullet through its script.
Read Full Review
20
Village Voice Alex Pappademas
Speedman's such a nonentity here I worried that the theater air-conditioning would blow him off the screen.
Read Full Review

What Our Users Said

Vote Now!The average user rating for this movie is 7.0 (out of 10) based on 73 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

Riren gave it a1:
Atrocious, even for a popcorn flick. The action sequences and "plot twists" feel like the fat they cut off the Blade movies. Coincidentally, almost everyone in this world of eternal rainy nighttime dresses like they were expecting a walk-on on Blade II. You can't expect too much creativity from a movie that basically steals vampires, werewolves and leather - but this is still insultingly bad, especially with its generic soundtrack and poor acting.

Abrianna M. gave it a9:
This was a Spectacular movie I liked the action packed scenes and the forever rising climax. I also liked the special effects.

Tonia R. gave it a9:
I thought the movie was great! All the costumes and everything. I just wasn't into how the warewolves looked. I kind of have a different perspective on how they look. But all in all they looked pretty good.

Chris M. gave it an8:
Exellent story that builds throughtout, and leaves you hanging wanting more. There were some corny line in it, however the story and the effects made up for this.

Steve P. gave it a9:
The story isn't much, but what i was really impressed with was the creativity put into the charitures and concept. in the history of movies many directors have pited 2 horror monsters against each other, like gonzilla vs king kong. most times it turns out HORRIBLE, but underworld is the frist to really pull if off. Vampires fighting Warewolves, Hot Vampires fighting Warewolves, that's cool. it's like the Matrix except all the agients suck people's blood and the rebles turn into flesh eating super wolves. If you want some artsy film well then, go see some euopean film about why pot should be legalized. if you want to see a good film see underworld.

Mitch M. gave it a3:
Vampires vs. Werewolves. Abbott & Costello? No. Not even. But hey, they're all armed with arsenals of automatic weapons! I thought the point of being a monster was you didn't need any of that crap. But I guess it's cheaper to have cool looking, sexy model types firing off blank rounds harmlessly at each other than doing a complete CGI movie? The only drama here was whether I might throw my vote with the vampires ... or the werewolves. Tough choice. And no apparent reason to back either. Now, if Lon Chaney or Bela Lugosi had been in this ...

John C gave it a9:
Enticing and absorbing popcorn enterment with a sexy leading lady who puts out a good performance, or at least as good as you can get in the genre.

Read more user comments...

Discuss this movie in our forums

Return to top of page
Home | FILM | DVD/VIDEO | MUSIC | GAMES | TV | Forums | About Metacritic metacritic.com

Popular on CBS sites: World News | Fantasy Football | Amy Winehouse | Baseball | E3 | Batman | Firefox 3 | iPhone 3G

About CNET Networks | Jobs | Advertise

© 2008 CNET Networks, Inc., a CBS Company. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use