Movies
Weekend Box Office
Film Awards & Top 10s By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
Best / Worst of the Decade
Wide Releases
Now In Theaters
49
2012
41
Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel
84
Avatar![]()
69
Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans
53
Blind Side
53
Book of Eli, The
55
Christmas Carol, A
57
Daybreakers
43
Dear John
27
Did You Hear About the Morgans?
55
Edge of Darkness
45
Extraordinary Measures
83
Fantastic Mr. Fox![]()
42
From Paris with Love
65
Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus, The
74
Invictus
57
It's Complicated
34
Law Abiding Citizen
33
Leap Year
33
Legion
42
Lovely Bones, The
54
Men Who Stare At Goats, The
34
Ninja Assassin
19
Old Dogs
xx
Percy Jackson & The Olympians: The Lightning Thief
39
Planet 51
79
Precious: Based on the Novel by Sapphire
73
Princess & the Frog, The
64
Road, The
57
Sherlock Holmes
27
Spy Next Door, The
36
Tooth Fairy
44
Twilight Saga: New Moon, The
83
Up in the Air![]()
43
Valentine's Day
25
When in Rome
71
Where the Wild Things Are
xx
WolfMan, The
63
Youth in Revolt
Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.
Limited Releases
Now In Theaters
46
44 Inch Chest
83
Ajami![]()
73
Amreeka
xx
Barefoot to Timbuktu
19
Bitch Slap
24
Boondock Saints II: All Saints Day, The
76
Broken Embraces
64
Cloud 9
65
Coco Before Chanel
84
Cove, The![]()
84
Crazy Heart![]()
21
Crazy on the Outside
48
Creation
xx
Daddy Long Legs
81
Damned United, The![]()
68
Departures
62
District 13: Ultimatum
85
Education, An![]()
71
Eyes Wide Open
24
Falling Awake
81
Fish Tank![]()
56
For My Father
xx
From Mexico with Love
43
Frozen
68
Girl on the Train, The
52
Killing Kasztner
74
Last Station, The
43
Little Traitor, The
51
Loss of a Teardrop Diamond, The
73
Me and Orson Welles
76
Messenger, The
57
Missing Person, The
67
Most Dangerous Man in America: Daniel Ellsberg and the Pentagon Papers, The
xx
My Name is Khan
49
Nine
63
North Face
59
October Country
67
Off and Running
52
Paranoids, The
49
Pop Star on Ice
49
Private Lives of Pippa Lee, The
xx
Promised Lands (Re-release)
69
Red Riding Trilogy, The
29
Saint John of Las Vegas
69
September Issue, The
36
Serious Moonlight
63
Shinjuku Incident, The
77
Single Man, A
xx
Still Bill
76
Terribly Happy
74
That Evening Sun
19
To Save a Life
68
Town Called Panic, A
59
Until the Light Takes Us
57
Videocracy
65
Waiting for Armageddon
82
White Ribbon![]()
43
Women in Trouble
xx
Word is Out
64
Young Victoria, The
Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.
V for Vendetta

Generally favorable reviews
Based on 39 critic reviews
How did we calculate this?
Based on 390 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie >
Movie Info
Genre(s): Action | Drama | Sci-fi | Suspense/Thriller
Written by:
Andy Wachowski
Larry Wachowski
Alan Moore (characters)
David Lloyd (characters)
Directed by: James McTeigue
Release Date:
Theatrical: March 17, 2006
DVD: August 1, 2006
Running Time: 132 minutes, Color
Origin: USA / Germany
Summary
RATING: R for strong violence and some language
Starring Natalie Portman, Hugo Weaving, Stephen Rea, Stephen Fry, John Hurt, Tim Pigott-Smith, Rupert Graves, and Roger Allam
Set against the futuristic landscape of totalitarian Britain, V for Vendetta tells the story of a mild-mannered young woman named Evey (Portman) who is rescued from a life-and-death situation by a masked man (Weaving) known only as "V." Incomparably charismatic and ferociously skilled in the art of combat and deception, V ignites a revolution when he urges his fellow citizens to rise up against tyranny and oppression. As Evey uncovers the truth about V's mysterious background, she also discovers the truth about herself -- and emerges as his unlikely ally in the culmination of his plan to bring freedom and justice back to a society fraught with cruelty and corruption. (Warner Bros.)
Also On The Web: Internet Movie Database View The Trailer Official Studio Site
What The Critics Said
All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...
Premiere Glenn Kenny
A compelling, rousing and at times strangely moving entertainment.
Read Full Review >San Francisco Chronicle Ruthe Stein
Richly satisfying entertainment the way movies are at their best, when they prod you to think.
Read Full Review >Portland Oregonian Shawn Levy
V for Vendetta puts its ideological intent first, and happens to provide smashing entertainment only as a vehicle for delivering its message.
Read Full Review >Time Richard Corliss
It's a terrific movie. I love the look and the verve of the thing, the confidence of its epic design, its smart use of half a dozen noted British thesps, lending weight and wit to the supporting roles.
Read Full Review >Rolling Stone Peter Travers
The explosive V for Vendetta is powered by ideas that are not computer-generated. It's something rare in Teflon Hollywood: a movie that sticks with you.
Read Full Review >ReelViews James Berardinelli
V for Vendetta represents 2006's first memorable motion picture - a visually sumptuous concoction that combines political allegory, bloody action, and a few stunning cinematic moments into a solid piece of entertainment.
Read Full Review >Charlotte Observer Lawrence Toppman
Portman doesn't catch fire until the second half, then heaves herself into emotional action; this suits her initially passive, mostly unthinking character. Weaving, who acts entirely with his voice, is V's ideal embodiment: witty, rueful, pitiless, visionary and mad.
Read Full Review >Baltimore Sun Michael Sragow
The Wachowski Brothers once again they prove themselves our reigning masters of murk.
Read Full Review >Empire Dan Jolin
Setting out more to challenge us with its ideas than make us whoop at the action, Vendetta can be clumsy, but there are enough impressive flourishes to make up for its stumblings.
Read Full Review >New York Magazine David Edelstein
It's the perfect moment for the ridiculous but riotously enjoyable revolutionary comic-book thriller V for Vendetta-which will doubtless outrage conservatives and unnerve fuddy-duddys but liberate the rest of us with its magisterial irresponsibility.
Read Full Review >Austin Chronicle Marc Savlov
One of the most eloquent tales in ages of dysfunctional love – between a man and his ideals, between a country and its government, and, in the end, between Evey and V.
Read Full Review >Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert
With most action thrillers based on graphic novels, we simply watch the sound and light show. V for Vendetta, directed by James McTeigue, almost always has something going on that is actually interesting, inviting us to decode the character and plot and apply the message where we will.
Read Full Review >Miami Herald Rene Rodriguez
Even if V for Vendetta isn't nearly as incendiary as it's been made out to be by some alarmist critics, there's still something enjoyably subversive about it, beginning with the way it tramples over the conventions of the contemporary action film.
Read Full Review >New York Daily News Jami Bernard
Hugo Weaving, weaving deftly beneath a fixed plastic grin and Prince Valiant wig as the mysterious avenger in V for Vendetta, both chills and amuses throughout this enjoyable - if occasionally irresponsible - comic-book thriller.
Read Full Review >Christian Science Monitor Peter Rainer
First-time director James McTeigue's big, bold imagery, with slashing reds and blacks, is a close approximation of the novel's look and feel.
Read Full Review >The Onion (A.V. Club) Keith Phipps
Mostly, it's content to remain a compelling, visually striking political mystery with some big ideas woven into it--subversive notions about integrity, liberty, and political change.
Read Full Review >Entertainment Weekly Owen Gleiberman
As a fix of pop iconography, V for Vendetta is eyeball grabbing, even if it lacks the relentless videogame bravura that sold the Matrix films. As a movie, however, it's merely okay, with a pivotal dramatic weakness: Evey, for all the attentions of her revolutionary Svengali, remains, in essence, a bystander, and Portman, her head shaved, plays her like Joan of Arc as a tremulous Girl Scout.
Read Full Review >TV Guide Maitland McDonagh
Brutally gorgeous and seething with incendiary images.
Read Full Review >Dallas Observer Luke Y. Thompson
From a fan's perspective, though, one might wish for a smaller budget and a truly uncompromising vision.
Read Full Review >The Hollywood Reporter John DeFore
Viewers expecting a thrill ride might be disappointed. V engages in a couple of satisfying crime-fighting set pieces, but the story is more occupied with mystery and intrigue. Happily, it almost is entirely free of the hollow pomposity that marred the Wachowskis' last two "Matrix" films.
Read Full Review >Chicago Reader J.R. Jones
The swashbuckling first hour is superior to the second, which bursts at the seams with backstory, but a rousing climax makes this the most potent piece of agitpop in years.
Read Full Review >Film Threat Pete Vonder Haar
With its emphasis on dialogue and political machinations over explosions and kung fu fighting, it remains to be see whether or not V for Vendetta will actually find one (a wider audience).
Read Full Review >Seattle Post-Intelligencer William Arnold
It's the strangest comic-book superhero movie you're likely to see this year. For anyone looking for something totally different in this most overworked of Hollywood genres, this is it.
Read Full Review >Boston Globe Ty Burr
The real villain is a cowed and lazy citizenry. Meaning all of us. Disappointingly, V for Vendetta makes this point early and moves on, at some point turning as shallow as what it protests against.
Read Full Review >Chicago Tribune Michael Phillips
Finally, a film to unite movie-mad members of Al Qaeda with your neighbor's kid, the one with the crush on Natalie Portman.
Read Full Review >Los Angeles Times Carina Chocano
By the time you've gotten through it, you feel spent, loaded down and more than a little disoriented. Part of the problem is that the movie's big concepts - violence begets violence, absolute power corrupts absolutely, everything is connected, my terrorist is your freedom fighter, etc. - are pithy, brief and irrefutable enough to embroider on throw pillows.
Read Full Review >Variety Leslie Felperin
Suffers from many of same problems as last two installments of producers Andy and Larry Wachowski's "Matrix" franchise: indigestible dialogue, pacing difficulties and too much pseudo-philosophical info.
Read Full Review >Village Voice J. Hoberman
Absorbing even in its incoherence,V for Vendetta manages to make an old popular mythology new. Impossible not to break into a grin: It's the thought that counts.
Read Full Review >Newsweek Jeff Giles
The movie plays like a clumsy assault on post-9/11 paranoia. It references "America's war," uses imagery direct from Abu Ghraib and contains dialogue likely to offend anyone who's not, say, a suicide bomber.
Read Full Review >The New York Times Manohla Dargis
The more valid question is how anyone who isn't 14 or under could possibly mistake a corporate bread-and-circus entertainment like this for something subversive. You want radical? Wait for the next Claire Denis film.
Read Full Review >Salon.com Stephanie Zacharek
Both oversimplifies and overcomplicates Moore's and Lloyd's vision, but it never cuts to the bone. It's a movie drawn with big, bold strokes and very little feeling -- a tracing-paper exercise masquerading as a masterpiece.
Read Full Review >Wall Street Journal Joe Morgenstern
The film is beset by incoherence and implausibilities that are perplexing, given the close relationship between the Wachowskis and the director, Mr. McTeigue.
The New Yorker David Denby
The quarter-century-old disgruntled fantasies of two English comic-book artists, amplified by a powerful movie company, and ambushed by history, wind up yielding a disastrous muddle.
Read Full Review >LA Weekly Scott Foundas
V for Vendetta is a dud - far too long at nearly two and a half hours, with flat, grungy visuals, choppy editing and no sense of urgency. But as a political work, it's something else - heavy-handed, reactionary and flat-out stupid. (For the record, Moore has publicly distanced himself from the film, saying it bears precious little resemblance to his original creation.)
Read Full Review >Washington Post Stephen Hunter
A piece of pulp claptrap; it has no insights whatsoever into totalitarian psychology and always settles for the cheesiest kinds of demagoguery and harangue as its emblems of evil. They say they want a revolution? Then give us a revolution, one that's believable, frightening, heroic, coherent and not a teenagers' freaky power trip.
Read Full Review >What Our Users Said
The average user rating for this movie is 7.7 (out of 10) based on 390 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.
Iain W gave it a9:
This is the one film i have ever seen, that has taken a comic, altered it and come out with a good result at the end, the changes are subtle to make the film better, judging by the low reviews from "professional" American critics it is obvious they don't appreciate the subtle intelligence that Alan Moore wove into the original story, "people should not be afraid of their government, governments should be afraid of their people".
james m gave it a9:
Great movie, great action, and many philosophical ideas and concepts have been used to show us what a future world will look like. LOVE the ending, it can be translated and taken many different ways.
Brandon M gave it a10:
Excellent Movie, Best message and a peak of what may be a visible future for America. Watch it twice.
Kristina S gave it a0:
The film won’t work for the same reason that Watchmen won’t work. Even Alan Moore who wrote Watchmen has said it won’t work as a film. Both V and Watchmen depend on one giant thing that no longer exists: fear of a nuclear war between the US and the Soviets. Based on the fear of the extermination of the human race, even an extreme figure like Watchman’s Oz or Vendetta’s V can appear justifiable. Outside that end of the Cold War fear however the source material won’t work. What makes this film junk as a film and as storytelling is that it’s explicit pro-Terrorist and anti-American, anti-Bush politics fly in the face of the reality: terrorists really DO want to kill us all; they’ve tried very hard; and have succeeded in Beslan, Bali, Tunisia, London, Madrid, Jakarta, Istanbul, Sharm El Sheik, Amman, New Delhi and more. Not to mention NYC and Arlington VA and Shank’s Field PA. The authorities don’t look like fascists but people barely able to cope with the onslaught of evil that leads to Islamic nutcases beheading 16 year old Catholic Schoolgirls. Hard to make those guys sympathetic. Hard to make the authorities fighting these guys the enemy. At a time when people risk their lives to vote against bin Laden’s terrorists intent on blowing them up, the film is going to flop. Big time. Why? Because what people see on the news every day tells them the movie’s politics and story is full of garbage. What’s bigger is the agency problem of Hollywood. At a time when more and more of Hollywood’s core audience (male 12-24) is bailing out for video games that give them heroes to be and villains to defeat, Hollywood is intent on driving them away. Guys want to be John McClain defeating the terrorists in Die Hard, not being one of them. If I were Icann I’d be pushing this film as WHY Time-Warners should be broken up; a big terrorist attack killing say thousands of Americans (we can’t be lucky forever) contemporanous with release and not only is the film toast but so will Portman and Weaving as stars due to collateral damage. It’s pretty telling that the best Hollywood can come up with is a big slap in the face to “Jesusland” and the idea that terrorists are bad guys, instead of making a movie based on Flight 93, the guys in Afghanistan, or counter-terrorist guys. Being explicitly opposed to what most of your paying customers hold dear is a good way to lose their business.
Kerry L. gave it an8:
After reading the posts on the site, I felt inclined to put in my two cents. V was a fine movie, but as with any movie, it had flaws. The biggest flaw was Natalie Portman. She was poorly cast; the role seemed too big for her. The rest of the actors did an amazing job, especially Hugo Weaving even though you never see his face. The British actors did an excellent job, as they almost always do. The film has a fine plot, but it took entirely too much depth out of the novel. The film could have been about half an hour longer and been much better. What is very interesting about the story is that despite being written more than twenty years ago, it remains relevant today. Although not as good as it could have been, it is definitely worth watching. A mature audience which is not letting its political biases cloud its judgments will enjoy the film for what it is: a good action film, with a quality story.
Chris S. gave it a10:
The voting tells you more about people than the film. The story is a powerful one showing a future in which right wing extremism goes well, to extremes. The rankings seem less about the movie more about the readers reaction to the consequences of extremism in the state. I did not find the plot that unbelieveable, rather a bit too close to reality for comfort. Plagues like that are conceivable. Medi manipulation like that is conceivble. And the masses well we were led after September 11th weren't we? The way it critises those who hate for race or religious reasons...I can well understand their reactions to this movie. Better a backlash against the movie rather than one at ourselves. 10. Its novel. Its clever. No other movie like it. ...but its definatly not Superman saves the world.
Sylvok A gave it a9:
Was an alright movie, not the best ever made but one I still dont mind watching. Also side note, but did anyone else notice a large amount of the negative reviews seem to be copy-pasted. I think this got freepered at one point.
