Advanced Search >
Help Me Search

Movies

Weekend Box Office
Film Awards & Top 10s By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
Best / Worst of the Decade

Wide Releases
Now In Theaters

sort by namesort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

Limited Releases
Now In Theaters

sort by namesort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

What the #$*! Do We Know?!

EMAILPRINTCaptured Light Industries

What the #$*! Do We Know?! reviews
38
4.7 User Score:

Generally unfavorable reviews

Based on 26 critic reviews
How did we calculate this?

Based on 63 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie >

Movie Info

Genre(s): Comedy  |  Documentary  |  Drama

Written by: William Arntz
Betsy Chasse

Directed by: William Arntz
Betsy Chasse
Mark Vicente

Release Date:
Theatrical: June 18, 2004
DVD: March 15, 2005

Running Time: 108 minutes, Color

Origin: USA

Summary

RATING: Not Rated

Starring Marlee Matlin, Elaine Hendrix, Barry Newman, Robert Bailey Jr., John Ross Bowie, Armin Shimerman, and Robert Blanche

What the #$*! Do We Know is part documentary, part story, and part elaborate and inspiring visual effects and animations. The protagonist, Amanda (Matlin), finds herself in a fantastic Alice in Wonderland experience when her daily, uninspired life literally begins to unravel, revealing the uncertain world of the quantum field hidden behind what we consider to be our normal, waking reality. (Lord of the Wind Films, LLC)

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

91

Seattle Post-Intelligencer William Arnold

Tells a light-hearted fictional story and creates a maze of imaginative animation and special effects to illustrate how the heavier thoughts of the science apply to the everyday world.

Read Full Review >
75

Philadelphia Inquirer Steven Rea

As a piece of filmmaking, What the Bleep isn't exactly transcendent stuff. But as an entryway into new ways of thinking about the self, the universe, and the vast infinite whatnot of whatever (you know what we mean, oh wise one), this little movie is big.

Read Full Review >
75

The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Rick Groen

Apparently, the faith that can move mountains is detectable in the microscopes that can track electrons. If so, the metaphoric is real and, to me, that thought is as scary as it is thrilling -- but what the bleep do I know?

Read Full Review >
70

The Hollywood Reporter Michael Rechtshaffen

Think of it as "The Matrix" for the quantum physics set.

Read Full Review >
63

Chicago Tribune Sid Smith

What the Bleep Do We Know? is both modern science for dummies and a feisty extension of our ongoing religious debate.

Read Full Review >
63

Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert

Not a conventional documentary about quantum physics. It's more like a collision in the editing room between talking heads, an impenetrable human parable and a hallucinogenic animated cartoon.

Read Full Review >
60

Dallas Observer Bill Gallo

The film is amateurish in places, but fascinating: Bring your eager hypothalamus and your tuned-up frontal lobes with you. They'll get a workout.

Read Full Review >
50

Baltimore Sun Chris Kaltenbach

The movie annoyingly waits until the end to reveal the names of those experts who have been doing all the talking; it would have been nice to know these folks' qualifications first.

Read Full Review >
50

The New York Times Dave Kehr

Once upon a time this was known as "the power of positive thinking," and it didn't involve nearly so much math.

Read Full Review >
50

Christian Science Monitor David Sterritt

There are many tantalizing bits, but the overall result is a simplistic story wrapped in barely explained quantum physics and new-age sound bites. Fascinating and frustrating in about equal measure.

Read Full Review >
50

Chicago Reader Jonathan Rosenbaum

It's fun, instructive, and stimulating, but never beautiful. Ultimately it's limited by its compulsion to knock our socks off at every turn and to compare itself with "Alice in Wonderland."

Read Full Review >
50

Los Angeles Times Kevin Crust

As entertainment, the movie is a mixed bag. Some of the talking heads become just that after a while.

Read Full Review >
50

Variety Robert Koehler

Pic's not-so-hidden agenda is to promote the fusion of science and New Age religion, making it a close cousin to ventures as Bernt and Fritjof Capra's "Mindwalk."

Read Full Review >
50

Village Voice Benjamin Strong

Matlin's haphephobic character dry-swallows anti-anxiety pills only in instances of extreme duress, but the actress herself looks pained throughout the movie, wincing reflexively at inappropriate moments.

Read Full Review >
40

LA Weekly Margaret Wertheim

In the age of creationism, a sympathetic mix of science and religion sounds like a promising premise. But in this genre-blending cocktail of drama, documentary and computer-graphic animation, quantum physics is so subordinated to the service of an anything-goes mysticism that little remains of the science except the terminology.

Read Full Review >
40

Austin Chronicle Marc Savlov

Part metaphysical treatise, part educational primer, and part dangerously goofy self-help manual for the New Age set, this bizarre and not unentertaining documentary strives mightily to teach the lay audience everything there is to know about quantum physics in 108 minutes.

Read Full Review >
40

Empire Anna Smith

Touches on some interesting philosophical ideas, but it's poorly-produced and unclear in tone.

Read Full Review >
38

New York Daily News Jack Mathews

"Quantum Bull-Bleep" would be a more apt title for the conclusions that the movie draws, but one concept was a revelation to me. One of the scientists said it's a fact that a single object can be in two places at the same time. I guess that explains O.J.'s alibi.

Read Full Review >
30

TV Guide Maitland McDonagh

Why would anyone who wanted his or her film to be taken seriously saddle it with a cutesy title like this?

Read Full Review >
30

The Onion (A.V. Club) Nathan Rabin

Darts around maniacally before congealing around a touchy-feely message of personal empowerment whose secular humanism and moral relativism is bound to strike fundamentalists of all stripes as downright Satanic.

Read Full Review >
30

Washington Post Michael O'Sullivan

On the whole, it feels like a cross between a PBS special hosted by a series of low-rent Deepak Chopras and an infomercial for self-help audio tapes.

Read Full Review >
25

San Francisco Chronicle Ruthe Stein

The biggest puzzlement about "What'' is what it's doing in major movie theaters around the country when it so clearly belongs on one of those small cable channels given to peculiar programming.

Read Full Review >
25

Boston Globe Wesley Morris

A terribly self-satisfied lecture about the ubiquity of quantum physics in spiritual life, is dishonest enough to suggest that even its cavalcade of scientists and mystics might not know anything about such topics as reality and the sub-atomic world.

Read Full Review >
25

Miami Herald Rene Rodriguez

Emits a fishy odor, like a recruitment film for an obscure cult you'd rather stay away from.

Read Full Review >
0

Entertainment Weekly Owen Gleiberman

The film treats its audience like fidgety junior-high schoolers, piling on the sub-Koyaanisqatsi cityscapes and cheesy episodes with Marlee Matlin as a lonely photographer, plus bouncy cartoons of human cells who look as if they'd be happier chasing stains in bathroom-cleanser commercials.

Read Full Review >
0

New York Post Lou Lumenick

Nearly two hours of New Age hooey.

Read Full Review >

What Our Users Said

The average user rating for this movie is 4.7 (out of 10) based on 63 User Votes

Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

Marianne B. gave it a0:
Aimed at people who were confused by middle school. Looks like short clips from all sorts of NOVA programs put into a paper bag and shaken (no context!) up spliced with clips of psychic babbling. It's like being stuck at a bus stop having to endure the conversation among stupid people wanting to shout "You stupid #@%*'s!" but too polite to do so.

Robert H. gave it a0:
One of the most laughable films ever made. It represents ridiculous claims as scientific fact without any sort of credibility. When JZ Knight "channeled" an alien warrior to help explain quantum physics, I knew that this movie was full of BS. Avoid at all costs.

Shaun M. gave it a9:
People are so bleeping dumb. It makes me wonder how many of the "red-numbered" reviews down below are from close-minded religious fanatics or dull witted white-trash.

[Anonymous] gave it a0:
Simply awful, whatever your point of view.

Blerim gave it an8:
It's more than interesting how some people react on this "documentary". Why this documentary is taken so seriously by the biggest skeptics in the world? Why it matters so much? Maybe we just feel jealous because somebody else did this documentary and not us, maybe our experience is telling us that there is more than meet the eyes. (Sorry for my English writing, foreigner)

[Anonymous] gave it a0:
The stupidest movie ever...wow...what bulls***.

[Anonymous] gave it a0:
Dang. It is too bad that this is exactly the type of nonsense that people buy into.

Read more user comments >

Popular on CBS sites: College Signing Day | Olympics | Lost | iPhone | Cell Phones | Video Game Reviews | Free Music

About CBS Interactive | Jobs | Advertise

© 2010 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy (UPDATED) | Terms of Use