GAMES: GameSpot | GameFAQs | SportsGamer MUSIC: Last.fm | MP3.com MOVIES: Metacritic | Movietome TV: TV.com
Home | About Metacritic | About Metascores | What's New | Wireless Versions | Discussion Forums | Advertising Inquiries | Contact Us | RSS
Metacritic.com: We Deal With Criticism
     Help
> Switch to Advanced Search  
Film Video/DVD Music Games TV

Film

Upcoming Release Calendar
Weekend Box Office
Film Awards & Top 10s By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
How Metascores Are Calculated
Discuss Film In Our Forums

 

Wide Releases

sort by name sort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

 

Limited Releases

sort by name sort by score

xx All of Us
53 Allah Made Me Funny: Live in Concert
57 Amazing Truth About Queen Raquela, The
64 Appaloosa
69 Ashes of Time Redux
68 August Evening
xx B.O.H.I.C.A.
62 Baghead
84 Ballast
54 Battle in Seattle
xx Beer for My Horses
75 Betrayal - Nerakhoon, The
xx Billy: The Early Years
66 Boogie Man: The Lee Atwater Story
56 Bottle Shock
55 Boy in the Striped Pajamas, The
50 Breakfast with Scot
61 Brick Lane
43 Call and Response
62 Changeling
49 Children of Huang Shi, The
47 Choke
46 Choose Connor
84 Christmas Tale, A
41 Cthulhu
81 Dear Zachary: A Letter to a Son About His Father
xx Dostana
62 Duchess, The
46 Dukes, The
63 Eden
xx Eden Lake
66 Elegy
46 Elephant King, The
80 Encounters at the End of the World
26 Everybody Wants to Be Italian
64 Fall, The
69 Fear(s) of the Dark
26 Filth and Wisdom
28 Fireproof
52 First Basket, The
67 Flow: For Love of Water
37 Forever Strong
69 Frontrunners
82 Frozen River
43 Gardens of the Night
73 Girl Cut in Two, A
73 Gonzo: The Life and Work of Dr. Hunter S. Thompson
54 Good Dick
30 Guitar, The
84 Happy-Go-Lucky
44 Henry Poole is Here
31 Hounddog
27 House of the Sleeping Beauties
47 How About You
54 Humboldt County
72 I Served the King of England
70 I.O.U.S. A
40 Igor
64 In Search of a Midnight Kiss
78 I've Loved You So Long
63 JCVD
41 Johnny Got His Gun
xx Just Buried
62 Kabluey
63 Kit Kittredge: An American Girl
25 Lake City
78 Last Mistress, The
81 Let the Right One In
xx Lower Learning
63 Man Named Pearl, A
89 Man on Wire
xx Mary
xx Matador, The
62 Mister Foe
84 Momma's Man
51 Morning Light
79 Moving Midway
33 My Name Is Bruce
59 Nights and Weekends
73 Obscene
40 Other End of the Line, The
34 Otto; or Up with Dead People
40 Passengers
xx Phoebe in Wonderland
55 Ping Pong Playa
75 Pool, The
77 Pray the Devil Back to Hell
82 Rachel Getting Married
56 Religulous
32 Repo! The Genetic Opera
xx Roadside Romeo
53 RocknRolla
56 Save Me
74 Secret, A
45 Shoot on Sight
57 Sixty Six
85 Slumdog Millionaire
56 Special
58 Splinter
79 Stranded: I Have Come from a Plane That Crashed on the Mountains
67 Synecdoche, New York
82 Tell No One
64 Thousand Years of Good Prayers, A
57 Towelhead
72 Transsiberian
83 Trouble the Water
43 Tru Loved
83 U2 3D
61 Universe of Keith Haring
84 Up the Yangtze
52 Virtual JFK: Vietnam If Kennedy Had Lived
79 Visitor, The
61 Wackness, The
59 We Are Wizards
55 What Just Happened?
66 When Did You Last See Your Father?

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

 



Printer-Friendly Version Email This Page Discuss In Our Forums

Why We Fight
Sony Pictures Classics

Why We Fight reviews
Critic Score
Metascore: 68 Metascore out of 100
User Score  
7.5 out of 10
based on 32 reviews
Read critic reviews
How did we calculate this?
based on 19 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie

MPAA RATING: Not Rated

Starring William Solomon, Karen Kwiatkowski, Anh Duong, John McCain, William Kristol, Richard Perle, Gore Vidal, and John S.D. Eisenhower

This documentary is an unflinching look at the anatomy of the American war machine, weaving unforgettable personal stories with commentary by a "who's who" of military and beltway insiders. (Sony Pictures Classics)


GENRE(S): Documentary  
WRITTEN BY: Eugene Jarecki  
DIRECTED BY: Eugene Jarecki  
RELEASE DATE: DVD: June 27, 2006 
Theatrical: January 20, 2006 
RUNNING TIME: 98 minutes, B/W / Color 
ORIGIN: USA 
LANGUAGE(S): English / Arabic 

Grand Jury Prize (Documentary), 2005 Sundance Film Festival

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

100
Philadelphia Inquirer Steven Rea
It's impossible to imagine anyone, right-leaning or left, coming away from this hugely important documentary unshaken by its representation of the United States and its military establishment.
Read Full Review
100
Baltimore Sun Michael Sragow
It's a topical, iconoclastic documentary with the warmth and pace of a first-rate personal essay.
Read Full Review
91
Entertainment Weekly Owen Gleiberman
Jarecki is no glib ideologue thumbing his nose at power.
Read Full Review
90
Variety Robert Koehler
Picture sets the gold standard for political documentaries.
Read Full Review
88
Rolling Stone Peter Travers
Why We Fight deserves high praise for making it that much tougher to wear blinders.
Read Full Review
88
Boston Globe Ty Burr
An agit-doc of unusual depth. It has a point -- that the primary business of America over the past half-century has been waging war -- and it supports that point with nuance, research, and a willingness to hear the other side of the argument.
Read Full Review
83
Seattle Post-Intelligencer Sean Axmaker
There's plenty of ammunition here for liberal conspiracy theorists, which surely will limit the audience to those already in Jarecki's political camp. Which is too bad, for it is a sobering history lesson as well as a political polemic on foreign policy and the growth of war into America's biggest business.
Read Full Review
80
Salon.com Andrew O'Hehir
A film that stands out for its passion, ambition and clarion-call sincerity, even amid the contemporary onslaught of political documentaries.
Read Full Review
80
Washington Post Stephen Hunter
Memo to left-wing anti-Bushies: Stories like this work. Don't lecture. Tell stories! Much better!
Read Full Review
78
Austin Chronicle Marc Savlov
Canny and somewhat overwhelming documentary.
Read Full Review
75
Miami Herald Rene Rodriguez
There's no denying the particular political slant of Why We Fight, but Jarecki's thoughtful, nonconfrontational approach makes it absorbing viewing, regardless of whether or not you buy his arguments.
Read Full Review
75
The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Rick Groen
The strength of this documentary lies in its balance, or at least the careful appearance of balance.
Read Full Review
75
San Francisco Chronicle Neva Chonin
A somber polemic that presents a convincing case against using war as an economic booster -- although, Jarecki argues, that is precisely what the United States has been doing under every president since Truman.
Read Full Review
75
Portland Oregonian Shawn Levy
Why We Fight attempts, somewhat sketchily, to connect the dots between Ike's Cassandra-like warnings and current events.
Read Full Review
75
USA Today Mike Clark
The result isn't quite a Michael Moore movie without the hubris, but it's reasonably close. It's thoughtful, and you have to take it seriously and with respect.
Read Full Review
75
TV Guide Maitland McDonagh
It's a deeply provocative piece of filmmaking.
Read Full Review
75
New York Daily News Jack Mathews
Whether we've reached the critical mass of "misplaced power" is the gist of the current national debate, and Why We Fight is a useful tool in that argument.
Read Full Review
75
The Onion (A.V. Club) Keith Phipps
Ultimately, Why We Fight reveals itself as yet another leftie doc with an anti-war agenda. But the mere fact that it takes time to ask questions and listen to opposing viewpoints sets it apart from the pack.
Read Full Review
75
Christian Science Monitor Peter Rainer
In addition to the usual pontificators like Gore Vidal, whose world weariness has assumed Olympian proportions, the director provides interviews with such right-wing counterparts as Richard Perle and William Kristol. Nobody is allowed much time to develop an argument.
Read Full Review
70
Los Angeles Times Kevin Crust
The long line of recent muckraking documentaries that has preceded Why We Fight does nothing to diminish its force.
Read Full Review
70
The New Republic Stanley Kauffmann
Jarecki says that his film doesn't precisely answer the question in his title. He is mistaken.
Read Full Review
70
Dallas Observer Jean Oppenheimer
Adding to the film's underlying sense of urgency and unease is composer Robert Miller's haunting score, so reminiscent of Philip Glass' music for "The Fog of War."
Read Full Review
70
Village Voice J. Hoberman
Jarecki's film forcefully argues that the much abused word FREEDOM cannot paper over the conflicts between capitalism and democracy.
Read Full Review
70
Chicago Reader J.R. Jones
Despite Jarecki's varied success in bringing these six people's stories to life, their stories personalize our current geopolitical predicament and remind us that in a democracy no one can shrug off responsibility for the war.
Read Full Review
60
Newsweek David Ansen
This scary, eye-opening documentary looks back from a post-9/11 vantage point to see how Ike’s prophecy has come horribly true.
Read Full Review
50
The New Yorker David Denby
Unconvincing and ineffective; the many patches of ideological montage, growing like kudzu throughout the film, weaken the impact of its best moments.
Read Full Review
50
The New York Times Manohla Dargis
Mr. Jarecki forcefully, if not with wholesale persuasiveness, argues that our business is specifically war.
Read Full Review
50
Chicago Tribune Allison Benedikt
A pretty entertaining case against our current war and question the integrity of our president, but more than that, these docs manipulate imagery, music and sound bites to work their audiences into a frenzy.
Read Full Review
50
Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert
The movie tells us nothing we haven't heard before.
Read Full Review
40
LA Weekly Scott Foundas
There may not be two equal sides to every argument, but in giving such little credence to those who might oppose him, Jarecki makes us wonder what exactly it is he’s so afraid of.
Read Full Review
38
New York Post Kyle Smith
This rehash of familiar pacifist arguments offers neither heat nor light. It's "Fahrenheit: Room Temperature."
Read Full Review
30
Wall Street Journal Joe Morgenstern
Mr. Jarecki undercuts his own case -- not just undercuts but carpet-bombs it -- by using the same propaganda techniques he professes to abhor.

What Our Users Said

Vote Now!The average user rating for this movie is 7.5 (out of 10) based on 19 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

Riren gave it a5:
This documentary is unfortunately highly biased and tries to coerce rather than inform, a trend in modern documentary. It does not even come close to answering the sociological question of violence in America, or even the U.S.'s reasons for going to war throughout so much of its history. However, it is very informative about the military industrial complex - indeed, if 45 minutes were cut off the film, it could be repackaged as a documentary about just that, though then the film wouldn't be as sensational. It employs the tired, old propoganda tricks, like quotes taken out of context, a few anonymous quotes used to indicate the minds of millions, and musical montages that don't technically state an opinion but still beat you over the head with it. The film's real answer to why we fight is that there is a vast organization of businesses that profit off of war, and that they have infected politics to make sure they keep raking in the billions. This is a disturbing part of the answer, but unfortunately it is only a part - and the rest isn't that U.S. citizens are all dumb and none of the politicians care. Don't get me wrong, it's a great question. Hopefully a better documentary will try to answer it someday.

Floyd B. gave it a2:
If people are to be awakened to what is going on about why we create wars of aggression, this documentary is not very good. What was the producer afraid of? I bought the DVD waste of money.

Jose S. gave it a2:
This was more a two hour editorial than a documentary. It was filled with opinions only, no facts. I agree with the general motivation behind it, but it was unfocused. The central theme revolves around an impossible to prove theory about the "military industrial complex," implying some collusion between political, military, and industrial leaders. This film has all of the bad aspects of a Michael Moore film, but none of the good. What is most disappointing is that facts exist to support some theories similar to what was attempted; however, the film lacks the sophistication to really do any of these theories justice. Ultimately, it was nothing more than a juvenile, unsubstantiated conspiracy theory.

Albert R. gave it a5:
I went expecting to learn something but I didn't learn anything new, so I'd say this documentary is best for those who need to catch up on US military industrial complex inluences and history, especially in relation to the current war in Iraq. Even so, the approach is too scattershot. I found the film understimulating, a bit tedious. There are some good elements--some of the interviews are surprising, especially a retired female colonel who worked in the Pentagon. I agree that the retired cop is another effective bit. What this film brough home to me is that writing and directing both effective and entertaining documentaries are extremely difficult to pull off. Michael Moore does it but he makes no pretense at evenhanded treatment, which Jarecki seems to want to do. So, see this if you need education on these themes; if you don;t, you can do without it. Unfortunately, I think that the audience for a film like this is more likely to be the latter.

Mark B. gave it a7:
Who would ever have foreseen the day in which President Dwight D. Eisenhower would become not only a hero but an avatar to Democrats everywhere? Not that he was perfect, mind you, or didn't have a lot to answer for: Ike pretty much stood back and allowed Joe McCarthy almost total free rein for a couple of years, and was so wimpy on civil rights that if presidential term limits hadn't be put into effect after FDR, we might STILL be eating at segregated lunch counters. Eisenhower's finest day in office might well have been his last: in his farewell address, he warned the American people to beware of the burgeoning military-industrial complex. As both a military man and a politician, he should know; as the much-loved general he was during World War 2 he--like all good soldiers--really hated war. But the American corporate machine has to keep rolling and increasing in speed and power...and with it, so do the tanks and bombers. [***SPOILERS***] That's the thesis of Why We Fight, Eugene Jarecki's comprehensive examination of the US's inevitably expansive military presence worldwide from WW2 on, inevitably culminating in and focusing on the current, apparently endless Iraq debacle. This movie is the perfect documentary expansion of the old T-shirt and bumper-sticker slogan "War is good business--invest your son", but viewers looking for another Bush-bash-a-thon will find that the blame is spread pretty evenly; in fact, of all the US Presidents of the past 60 years, the only two who AREN'T catalogued or blamed as partial contributors to the problem are Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter. Why We Fight is decidedly straightforward in pursuing its point; maybe the fact that Jarecki almost never leavens his message with humor, puckishness or sarcasm the way that Michael Moore, Robert Greenwald or the folks who brought you Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room do explains in part why Roger Ebert wasn't too thrilled with this film. What Why We Fight DOES give you, however, are three absolutely unforgettable, no-screenwriter-could-do-them-justice individuals: there's retired cop Wilton Selczer (who bears a remarkable resemblance to actor Bruce McGill), this film's rough equivalent to Fahrenheit 9/11's Lila Lipscomb: he's a grieving dad who spends years trying to exorcise his pain over his son's 9/11 death by having the boy's name painted on an Iraq-bound bomb. There's former career Air Force officer Karen Kwiatkowski (who bears a remarkable resemblance to actress Emily Watson), an incredibly decent, admirable woman who clearly loved her work but couldn't reconcile her sworn duty with what the administration is asking her to do, and so she resigned...and then there's William Solomon (who bears a remarkable resemblance to the kid down the street), a sweet, likable young man who sees military service, which of course almost inevitably involves going to the Middle East, as his only ticket out of economic oblivion. For a real one-two gut puch, watch this film, absorb its conclusions, and follow it up by reading the provocative best-selling book Is The American Dream Killing You? by Paul Stiles, (a former military man and Wall Street power player, and a social conservative who walks his talk). It's a sprawling but thoroughly credible expansion of Stiles' thesis that the all-encompassing (and ethically barren) American business market will not be denied, dominates every aspect of American life, and whose unchecked reign has led to everything from high divorce rates to road rage to gang violence to Super Bowl wardrobe malfunctions...and, yes, to the war in Iraq too. Digesting both these works will certainly cause you, when hearing politicians and pundits claim that we're fighting for freedom (whether providing it around the world or protecting our own), to filter most of their rationalizations through the slightly rephrased words of Mae West : "Freedom has nothing to do with it!"

Dale M. gave it a7:
This could have been a great documentary if it stuck more to "why we fight" rather than the more narrow theme of "why are we fighting in Iraq." The people in the theatre where I saw it applauded at various anti-current government statements. I feel many missed the broader point that it makes no difference which party has been in power the past 50 years. I applaud this film for reaching toward some broader political statement than Michael Moore's unabashedly anti-Bush film. I disagree with some reviewers that the film was really anti-war. The director seems to have no qualms about WWII or about the NY Policeman's feeling that we ought to get whoever was responsible for 911. However, the director is clearly against the way the military-industrial- congressional complex manipulates things. Unfortunately the director succumbs to pandering to the ready-made anti-Bush crowd by over-focussing on only one of the wars of the past 50 years. One further note: The director spoke after the film at the showing I attended. He said he recently screened the film at West Point and says he has been asked to screen it again there. It's not really surprising that soldiers are interested to learn how they might be being manipulated. I think this points out that the film is not really so much anti-war in general as it is against the collusion between the two major political parties, the defense industry, and the leaders of the military.

Navid gave it a10:
We are at the point in history that our collective action has far more horrendous effect than we can enviosn. "Why We Fight" tells us, in a subtle way, what future will be awaiting us. In 1906, no one could predict the coming of WWI and its massive killing of human beings...I think, we are all blind, and the only thing that will sober us all (humanity on earth) is a massive catastrophic war, graver than any war we have seen...

Read more user comments...

Discuss this movie in our forums

Return to top of page
Home | FILM | DVD/VIDEO | MUSIC | GAMES | TV | Forums | About Metacritic metacritic.com

Popular on CBS sites: MLB | Spore | iPhone 3G | Paris Hilton | Antivirus Software | GPS | Recipes | Shwayze | NFL

About CBS Interactive | Jobs | Advertise

© 2008 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use