- Critic Score
- Most active
- Publication
- Most clicked
-
90The game lacks a battery to save high-scores, but that's a small complaint as each of these arcade machines wiped clean when the power turned off.
-
90An addictive and fun collection of Pac-Man games that looks a whole lot better than you’d expect.
-
It's one of those games that can give you a quick gaming fix when you need it, and even though the premise is similiar among all of the titles (Pac-Attack being the exception), the action is different and worthy of gameplay!
-
80The lack of a save feature for high scores is a disappointment, but it's still a nice addition to an arcade-lover's library.
-
80The simple, undemanding diversions found in Pac-Man Collection are perfect for today's portable systems.
-
80The collection feels incomplete without Ms. Pac Man, the only Pac sequel truly worth playing.
-
80Safe and insatiable, Pac-Man Collection delivers high comfort but low thrills.
-
80The lack of a two player option and any sort of battery save really hurt this game. Otherwise, the whole of Pac-Man Collection is much more than the sum of its parts.
-
No matter which game you prefer, this is a great collection. Except for the forgivable absence of the lesser known "Super Pac-Man," this game has everything a fan could ask for.
-
75Even considering the mediocrity of Pac-Attack, the other three games included in Pac-Man Collection prove that stellar gameplay can (and does) transcend all issues of graphics, sound, and time. [Winter 2001, p.44]
-
Each game can be played for a few minutes at a time or a few hours at a time if you're addicted.
-
It's an uneven collection where high scores disappear when the power goes off, just like they did in the '80s. [Oct 2001, p.158]
-
There is some refreshing additions to gameplay, but the replay value is diminishing as this game gets older... It's old yet somewhat refreshing.
prev
next
Page:
- 1
User Score
tbd
No user score yet- Awaiting 3 more ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 1 out of 1
-
Mixed: 0 out of 1
-
Negative: 0 out of 1
-
WojtekS.9Very, very GOOD.