Metascore
75

Generally favorable reviews - based on 36 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 20 out of 36
  2. Negative: 1 out of 36
  1. 100
    There's a ton of content in "Rebel Strike," and the multiplayer gives it replayability far beyond that of the previous "Rogue Squadron" games.
  2. Choked full of quality gameplay, authentic Star Wars goodness, and loads of bonus content, this is the best Rogue Squadron game since the last one.
  3. 87
    One of the best Star Wars games out there and also, in the process, proves to be one of the best GameCube games out there.
  4. Sure this game lacks a bit when it comes to the foot levels but the other single player levels and multiplayer modes will make you overlook the issue.
  5. This is the game they should have made last time. Gorgeous, sizey and ambitious. The new modes just need a little more tweaking. [GamesMaster]
  6. The improvements to the graphics, the larger mission scope, and solid implementation of new vehicles all help to create a complete experience.
  7. Don't get me wrong, I love this game, but every now and then I get annoyed because someone is lighting my butt up and I can’t seem to find out where the hell it is coming from. I just wish that Factor 5 threw in a camera angle button so you can see what is going on.
  8. The flying missions are fantastic, but the on-foot portions need some work. The camera doesn't work very well and you don't have any control over it. [Dec 2003, p.140]
  9. The other big talking point of this game is the inclusion of ground missions, and again, I turn a slightly blind eye to the sloppy control and sometimes frustrating camera because these missions look good and are fun, if only because you are running around blasting Stormtroopers like you pretended to as a kid. [Nov 2003, p.68]
User Score
7.5

Generally favorable reviews- based on 42 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 10 out of 18
  2. Negative: 4 out of 18
  1. Feb 4, 2014
    7
    This game has good graphics and dogfights but they failed on foot combat. that was one of the reasons i bought this game too. it had goodThis game has good graphics and dogfights but they failed on foot combat. that was one of the reasons i bought this game too. it had good fighting elements in the dogfights. Full Review »
  2. May 28, 2012
    6
    Good graphics, like the previous game, interesting stories, and enjoyable air combat. Only problem is the ground missions felt quite bulky,Good graphics, like the previous game, interesting stories, and enjoyable air combat. Only problem is the ground missions felt quite bulky, and some of the other levels as well seemed slow. Other than that, a decent game. Full Review »
  3. LisaB.
    Jul 19, 2006
    8
    i thought this game was fairly good the ground missions SUCKED but the flying missions ROCKED my [***SPOILERS***] favorite part of the game i thought this game was fairly good the ground missions SUCKED but the flying missions ROCKED my [***SPOILERS***] favorite part of the game is the multi player because inthe battle of hoth in story mode you get shot down and have to play on foot i liked when you get to take out the AT-ATs using the grappling hook and when you pull your self up you have to use your light saber to open the door and then throw your thermal bomb to destroy it thats the only part ilike about that mission but in the multi player battle of hoth your in a snow speeder and you get to use toe cable to take down the AT-ATs its a fun game but i think multi player is better for all you cheaters enter iouaoye and after that enter wimpiam! to get inf lives. Full Review »