Generally favorable reviews - based on 9 Critics What's this?

User Score

No user score yet- Be the first to review!

Your Score
0 out of 10
Rate this:
  • 10
  • 9
  • 8
  • 7
  • 6
  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1
  • 0
  • 0
  • Summary: Hyper Breaker Turbo is not just some ordinary breaker game based on a well known classic from the old days, but it's actually a completely new action puzzle game like you've never seen before. Imagine a breaker game with actual multiple screen level design, 'free' paddle control which gives very precise control over the ball, realistic physics and more! Collapse
Score distribution:
  1. Positive: 4 out of 9
  2. Negative: 0 out of 9
  1. Jun 9, 2013
    Hyper Breaker Turbo finds simple ways to improve on a time-tested game. I got a lot of replay going back through levels, trying to get four stars. The physics, free-floating paddle and awesome level designs make this one game worth checking out. Just be wary of those drunken balls.
  2. May 28, 2013
    With a variety of beautiful level designs, challenging stage layouts, awesome power-ups and intense gameplay, Hyper Breaker Turbo is one of the best brick breaking games we've seen in a long time. Simple to play, but mastering it will take a very long time!
  3. May 31, 2013
    Featuring multiple graphic styles, generous paddle control, and lengthy vertically-scrolling levels, Hyper Breaker Turbo breathes life into a weary genre.
  4. May 28, 2013
    Hyper Breaker Turbo ($1.99, Universal) ascends the brick breaker genre to new heights thanks to a neat twist on the genre delivered in a well crafted app making it worth the price of admission.
  5. Jun 13, 2013
    The old game mechanic of Breakout and Arkanoid is still fun, thanks to some successful additions. Hyper Breaker Turbo just doesn’t dare to be as hyper or turbo as its title might have you think.
  6. May 30, 2013
    An entertaining riff on the classic Arkanoid template with extended levels - though their sprawling nature also leads to a couple of dull patches.
  7. May 29, 2013
    Decent at what it does; not bad, not great.

See all 9 Critic Reviews