- Publisher: Electronic Arts
- Release Date: Nov 1, 2000
User Score
7.5
out of 10
Generally favorable reviews- based on 21 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 14 out of 21
-
Mixed: 6 out of 21
-
Negative: 1 out of 21
Review this game
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
UterMay 31, 20037It's quite a good fps. But for some unknown reason you can't look up or down. I have no clue why they would take that out - it just makes aiming tough. I would say though, if you liked goldeneye, you probably enjoy this one too.
-
-
[Anomynous]Sep 20, 200110Doesn't beat "Goldeye" but it beats "Perfect Dark," and it has great graphics, gameplay, gadgets, and cool weapons, but not enough though.
-
-
StarfireOct 23, 20078Once it came out, this replaced playing Golden Eye for me, with it's varied guns and exciting multiplayer- with or without bots. The graphics are also nicely detailed- though it has to be said that FPS have come a long way since this one and that Goldeneye was overall a better game. Still very enjoyable, though.
-
-
Aug 14, 20127
-
MichaelD.Jan 11, 20029A very good bond game which could have been improved by having more weapons, levels and a bit more excitement.
-
-
JoseV.Aug 11, 20026This was decent, but not great. Never in this lifetime would I say it was better than goldeneye or perfect dark. Some levels are kinda cheesy and it was easy to get through many levels. Don't pay too much if you buy it.
-
-
YanniT.Jan 11, 200410Everybody loves goldeney, they dont like this. In my opinion this games is exactly the same as Goldeney except for better graphics, gameplay, plot, and the shooting is much more realistic!
-
-
dotDragonJun 1, 20055
-
-
ChrisJ.Jul 7, 20017Meltdown. Shouldn't be as hard... should have more guns.
-
-
BobF.Nov 7, 20012This game sucks! The gameplay and multiplayer are horrible. "GoldenEye" and "Perfect Dark" are so much better than this piece of trash.
-
-
ChadK.Dec 5, 20019Bob F. doesn't know what he's talkin about. The game was great, but not as great as "GoldenEye." What makes "GoldenEye" better is that it was the original, the first of it's kind.
-
-
[Anonymous]Aug 22, 20019This is still a good game. The only thing that is wrong it is that they have fewer guns.
-
-
[Anonymous]Jan 23, 20026The game is OK! I did not even have the game a month and I beat every level. The Meltdown level was kind of stupid b/c at first I could not figure out where to go! I tried to look on the internet for tips and there was nothing.
-
-
Nov 29, 20125"El Mundo no basta" fue un intento de colgarse del éxito que (merecidamente) consiguió GoldenEye. El juego en si no es malo, pero comparado con lo que intento ser es bastante flojo.
-
Aug 16, 20126007 suffers from GoldenEye envy and Rare definitely has EA beat on this one. However, 007: The World is Not Enough is still a decent first-person shooter, with a wide variety of weapons and entertaining game-play. The more magic experience would go to GoldenEye, but if you were remotely a fan of that game, The World is Not Enough still has a lot to offer you.
-
If "GoldenEye" was the Sean Connery of Bond games, and "Tomorrow Never Dies" was George Lazenby, then The World Is Not Enough is a likable Roger Moore--showing its age, in it for the money, and prone to bouts of slowdown, but still sporting that old Bond magic.
-
98(Da Gameplay is) genius' I tell you. 007 is pure magic.
-
89TWINE revels in fact that it poaches the concepts pioneered in GoldenEye, and N64 gamers should too, because we haven't had it this good since 1997.