- Publisher: Jagex Games Studio
- Release Date: Dec 12, 2012
User Score
5.0
out of 10
Mixed or average reviews- based on 355 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 153 out of 355
-
Mixed: 37 out of 355
-
Negative: 165 out of 355
Review this game
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
May 20, 20133Fun Game-play, Laggy as Hell, Cheap Tactics, Clunky (Really annoying and hard to climb), No country separation (playing with people in Europe who don't speak English), Crappy Community, Not a whole lot to choose from, No server browse, only quick match which sucked at matching.
~Don't Look at the Critic Reviews They're Pointless~ -
May 20, 20131
-
May 17, 20138I don't understand why so much negative reviews... ok the game needs improvements... but the developer are working hard and the updates are always ready with new improvements.
I love this game, one original first person shooter in the sea of the clones, and the "minecraft" style land, offers new approaches to the strategy of the game and lots of fun. -
May 15, 20138AoS Minecraft TF2. But still missing some FPS spice.
bases before annihilating each other, the absence of this feature leaves this game feeling extremely lacking. -
May 14, 20130my friend got this is fore pack gave one to me I loved it now ITS TERI-BLE IF YOU DO-NT FIX THIS ME AND MY FRIEND WANTS A REF-UN HE GOT THIS FORE PACK OFF SALE SO IT COST MORE FIX OR PAY 30 DOL-ERS OH AND PLUS NO-CH THIS IS ALL ON YOU YOUR FAULT ANO-THERE -100,000,000,000 WILL BE TAKEN FROM YOUR POINTS
-
May 13, 20132
-
Apr 28, 20132This was not worth my time downloading it on the free weekend( (And it was like two minutes, Max). The game was disappointing and this is coming from a person who thought that it was a good game. (Minecraft and Team Fortress 2)
-
Apr 27, 20130The original was a good game... then Jagex ruined it with their shoddy coding, poor decisions, and bad advertising. Avoid at all costs and sign up for the Guncraft beta.
-
Apr 22, 20137
-
Apr 12, 20138
-
Apr 10, 20139
-
Apr 5, 201310The zombie mode itself, is worth the game, addicting and fun... Don't pay attention to all the bad reviews, they are voting down a game based off one little difference.
-
Apr 4, 20139
-
Apr 2, 20130
-
Mar 28, 20139
-
Mar 28, 20139In my opinion this game is really fun. You shouldn't compare it with other games, the description already says: A creative shooter. Ofcourse there are some points to work on, but whit the latest updates and fixes, I actually think this game is really cool!
-
Mar 25, 20132
-
Mar 20, 20133I dont know why you would buy this when you could buy guncraft which right now is free and is only five dollars more and guncraft has better graphics and you can import minecraft worlds
-
Mar 19, 201310
-
Mar 18, 20137
-
Mar 17, 201310
-
Mar 16, 201310
-
Mar 16, 201310i think this game is really good i like the worlds like Tokyo and London and the characters you get to be.
The only thing i don't like is when you click join blue team and when you get in the game you are a green team but other than that it is good game. so i'll give a ten out of ten -
Mar 16, 20137This game has some very good ideas, and it is fun playing. It is not as bad as they say, the music is great, controls are okay, graphics are good (since it fits to game's style). However, it should have been more creative.
-
Mar 15, 20133this game had a free weekend on steam this week, so i decided to give it a try. after about an hour, I have to say, this game feels almost broken. combat is boring, the building does not work half the time, and most objectives revolve around camping in an area and killing anybody who enters.
Only fun thing to do in this game is cutting down trees with your sniper. -
Mar 15, 20130I played this game during a 'free weekend' on Steam. Opened the game, hit 'quick match'. It immediately errors out and tells me I need to buy something. Some free weekend.
-
Mar 15, 20131This review contains spoilers, click expand to view.
-
Mar 15, 20131
-
Mar 15, 20134There is just nothing about this game that is particularly fun (besides being a marksman and playing around with him). Classes are unbalanced, and the game, while it being a cool idea, is terribly flawed.
-
Mar 11, 20133
-
Mar 7, 20132I think this game could be better, the game isn´t well executed, but the idea is good. Try to work more to get the public. This game could be better
-
Mar 4, 20130
-
Mar 4, 201310I think that most people played the game before all the updates came out, and so they gave a bad rating. the game is quite fun with a load of versatility and the mechanics are great. hey is a tonne of teamwork involved,and you can get better and better and its even more fun to play with friends.definitely a good game.
-
Mar 2, 20132I saw this game on a steam sale and saw some videos on it. It seemed legit and I bought it. Big mistake. The game itself seems decent, but it was unplayable on my computer for some reason, poorly optimized. I can run minecraft just fine, which has just about the same graphics as this game, if not better.
-
Mar 2, 20134
-
Mar 2, 20130game very awful, I bought it in having played some hours I understood that it is impossible to play it, despite that that game occupies about 500 mb it TERRIBLY with LAGS
-
Mar 1, 201310[FR] Je ne suis pas du tout dacore avec les avis Negatif Se jeux et merveilleux vous avez 4 classes ext Que demander de mieux nn? Je vous le conseille n'obeissez pas au Negatif Mais que au Positif
-
Mar 1, 201310
-
Feb 27, 20139
-
Feb 27, 20138
-
Feb 27, 20134
-
Feb 26, 201310It's a very interesting game Command shooter is very expressive and it can take you for hours! Now with practically all bugs fixed new locations and new Dlc it' s even better then before!
-
Feb 25, 20131
-
Feb 22, 20133Ace of Spades had a lot of potential and had incredibly cool ideas yet it fell short on almost every single aspect of a good FPS. Not only that but the scenery is hard on the eyes and easily makes the game less enjoyable. Long story short, do not buy this game, you will be wasting 10$.
-
Feb 21, 20138
-
Feb 17, 20139Ace of Spades IS NOT A BAD GAME. It dosen't deserve a 46 score on metacritic, ive seen worse games that have got better score! *Cough Cough* Aliens: Colonial Marines. It should get a better review than other things!
-
Feb 17, 20136With friends a lot of fun.
-
Feb 17, 201310Nice game. Fast paced, a good idea, lots of fun, amusing game modes, and would deserve more (especially more than its current average of 4.5 or 51). So what are the cons? Well, lack of self-hosting feature (so you cannot have your own private hosted game
-
Feb 16, 20132
-
Feb 16, 20136
-
Feb 15, 20132
-
Feb 14, 20139Good game has flaws but is still tons of fun worth the $10. This game is kind of a let down and there is a lot of missed potential yet I keep coming back to this game.
-
Feb 14, 201310I picked this up during one of the Steam sales and despite all the negative reviews I personally love this game. I didn't play the beta before JAGEX bought it up so maybe that's why I have no problem with it. AoS is the game I've been playing and with the new content coming will still be playing for a long time.
-
Feb 14, 20139
-
Feb 14, 20130Sad clone of the original free version with flaws like destroying the whole trench warfare part of the original and thus making the game nothing more than CoD with blocky graphics.
-
Feb 14, 20138
-
Feb 13, 20130
-
Feb 12, 20130this this game suck, if you want a real game play Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 or Black Ops 2, but this it's only bad graphics like the graphics of minecraft that game sucks and its full of bug and there are only servers on australia, that game, you readers and you jagex
-
Feb 11, 20133The original game was fresh, well designed, and fun. The reboot misses just about every point that made Ace of Spades fun. It could have been so much better.
-
Feb 11, 20133My friend told me about this game like a month before it came out, and at first I was really excited about it.
But after I bought the game, which is only about 5-6 dollars (because of the steam winter sale), I was very disappointing. It's just plain not fun. The only reason I'm not giving it a terrible score is because it's a pretty cheap game. -
Feb 9, 20138For most of these people who gave this game low scores, you should try waiting for the updates. as they came out with the classic mode, which in my opinion, is 80% similar to the original.
-
Feb 9, 20132Steam had lead me to believe this would be Minecraft with the elements of a FPS. It accomplished neither. I was particularly disappointed with the building aspects of the game. I appreciate the makers concepts, however the execution was with out many merits. Bottom line: not particularly fun to play
-
Feb 6, 20130
-
Feb 5, 20135On the bright side, some of the additions to the full version are fun, but:
1) Why the hell did Jagex get the rights to the game?!
2) Why the hell does it cost 10 frigging dollars to get the game? Why the hell is it not still Free-to-Play?
3) Why the hell is this not as fun and craps as much as the original was??
3 words:
Damn you, Jagex! -
Feb 3, 20139After the update the game is actually fun again with the new world war 1 inspired classic mode. In addition the jetpack was nerfed so building serves a point again.
-
Feb 3, 20133
-
Jan 31, 20137
-
Jan 31, 20138
-
Jan 30, 20130Game is barely playable. Tombstones that explode, jetpacks that go super fast which you can't hit, buggy hitboxes for snipers, lack of dedicated servers. I looked over at Steam Discussions for Ace of Spades and found Jagex dodges requests for dedicated servers Regret buying this game.
-
Jan 29, 201310
-
Jan 29, 20132
-
Jan 28, 20132Simply put, there is nothing this game has to offer that is worth your time, with poor balance, annoying controls and gun play. The original version seems better according to other people, so there is no reason to spend the money
-
Jan 28, 201310The game is getting better, initially, jagex ruined the game, it almost destroyed the original concept, but with the new update, they implemented a classical mode similar to the original one, and they improved the new "normal" mode. Jagex deserves a second chance, please, fell free to try it again, as a veteran player, I highly recommend it!!
-
Jan 26, 20139
-
Jan 26, 20131When I played the free version it worked and it was fun but the new class system ruins the whole game! The whole building idea is pointless due to the jet pack class just fly's over the whole map and the rocket class just blows it up faster than you can build. Do not buy this see if you can play the free version.
-
Jan 25, 20138
-
Jan 23, 20137Brazil:
Bom o Jogo ta Otimo! Mas ele Devia Ter Nivel! Tipo Pra evoluir quanto mais nois matamos mais xp Nois Obtemos pra Ter Nossos Niveis! Quem Concorda?
Ingles:
Ta good game Great! But he should have Level! Type To evolve as more Nois killed more xp Nois We get to Having Our Levels! Who did you? -
Jan 18, 20131
-
Jan 14, 20134The game can be fun but there hasn't been any major updates or such yet and doesn't compare to the original free version. The description for the new snow blowing grief weapon doesn't even have a valid description. This game is disappointing.
-
Jan 12, 20139Even if other say this game is bad, I think it is good overall. I had mixed feelings at first because Jagex remade it and RuneScape was a disaster. Although it turned out well. I do have negative thoughts about it, but it is lots of fun to play and I highly recommend it.
-
Jan 12, 201310You people really stop your **** your just giving it unfair rating because you must pay for it and the game isn't even done! So stop complaining and enjoy a good game!
-
Jan 12, 20130No! No! No! This game is bad, the accuracy is very bad, the duration of jetpack is very very low, the graphics are fun but not for a FPS , aiming down the sight make this game worse!!
-
Jan 11, 20138
-
Jan 11, 20139
-
Jan 10, 20132
-
Jan 9, 20136
-
Jan 9, 20130Ace of spades? More like space of aids, this game is absolutely **** which isn't a big suprise from Jagex. After all, these guys aren't about quality games, at least, not anymore. It's all about money money money, so what do they do to achieve that? Combine the favorite 3 things of every 13 year old: minecraft, guns and team fortress. And there you have it, the worst game out there.
0/10 -
Jan 9, 20138
-
Jan 8, 20138
-
Jan 8, 20136
-
Jan 8, 20130
-
Jan 8, 20131
-
Jan 8, 20133''Say hello to the creative shooter. Ace of Spades is the first-person shooter that lets you create your battleground, destroy it, then create it again''
It wasn't the first game that was made with minecraft blocks.... That was Brickwars. Plus the game sucks -
Jan 7, 20133This game is a mess and a showcase of lazy game design, the maps are pretty much unplayable at the moment with many maps being a bore to traverse if you don't have a jet pack. Lag plagues servers and the general feel of shooting and engaging in combat is a very flat one which leaves little impression.
-
Jan 7, 20139
-
Jan 5, 201310I feel like there are a lot of butthurt people giving this game a zero mainly because it apparently used to be f2p and now because it costs a little cash it now sucks? I went a bought the game just because of that and gave it a 10. You guys are pathetic. Seriously pathetic. Review the game based off of gameplay not because your mommy wont give you the 5 or 10 bucks it costs to buy it. **** sad.
-
Jan 4, 20133
-
Jan 4, 20130
-
Jan 2, 20130The original game was really good. Right now it's a Team Fortress 2 wanna be. Shame on the new game developers who ruined the essence of this great game.
-
Dec 31, 20127
-
Mar 15, 201363There might be some good ideas in there somewhere but Ace of Spades has no game in it. In the Minecraft it was the beauty of it, but concept doesn't work if you will try to make a FPS. [March 2013]
-
Feb 25, 201340On paper it sounds like it could be a winning combination, and perhaps this will improve as the game evolves, but in practice the play styles don't mesh well together, seemingly diametrically opposed at times.
-
Feb 18, 201362Quotation forthcoming.