- Publisher: SCi , Eidos Interactive
- Release Date: May 20, 2008
User Score
7.3
out of 10
Mixed or average reviews- based on 785 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 534 out of 785
-
Mixed: 65 out of 785
-
Negative: 186 out of 785
Review this game
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
SusanJul 13, 20083
-
-
PerMar 30, 20094
-
-
BobD.Jun 18, 20083
-
-
BenThereJun 23, 20083
-
-
RasterM.Sep 5, 20082Bugs, crashes, lacking content for the majority of the game, memory leaks, and is full of jerks due to the attraction that is blood, gore, and nudity. Don't let them fool you, they, and this game, are not mature. It is merely unfit for younger audiences.
-
-
NotaF.Jun 12, 20081
-
-
PaulF.Jun 2, 20084
-
-
JohnF.Jul 30, 20084
-
-
WilliamR.Jun 22, 20080I was not able to play the game after purchasing it because I was never sent an SMS verification code and got no support from Funcom. The game looks good, but be careful as Funcom will have no qualms about taking your money and not giving you anything in return.
-
-
MarkL.Jul 16, 20083
-
-
JamesP.May 20, 20084
-
-
EetuS.May 27, 20084Horrible game, no balance and spawn camping ruins ffa PvP.
-
-
AlanFMay 25, 20084
-
-
JohnSmithMay 29, 20081
-
-
BobDMay 31, 20084
-
-
UncaC.Jun 10, 20081A very unpolished, tedious game which doesn't do the name of Conan any justice. No motivation to drive the interest of players. The combat system is awful and the quests feel repetitve. "There goes 2 cartons I'll never get back."
-
-
RaJ.Jun 27, 20080Everything bugged in this game. The more patch it comes the more bug it shows.
-
-
CrommquitsJun 3, 20081To much stuff not in the game that was supposed to be there at launch.
-
-
AnonymousMCJul 14, 20082
-
-
DevonS.Jul 19, 20082
-
-
RenC.Jul 30, 20081This game, after reaching level 80, is terrible: big lack of content and massive class unbalance and 1 shots, I wonder if Blizzard took over this game it'd be completely different.
-
-
BillyW.Jul 30, 20083
-
-
Jerryl.Aug 4, 20080Horrible. The only reason this game got above a 60 rating is because half of those critics didn't play the game past level 20. Do not waste your money.
-
-
markbennettSep 6, 20083I played from launch, and the game ran smoother then, than it did when i stopped playing, but if anyone is sariosly interested in the game, get it grind to lvl 80, and wait for funcom to fix the entire game , that is when every one will be back, lets just hope they can do that before the tank. GL Funcom.
-
-
HalonDec 8, 20090
-
-
StevenHJan 4, 20100
-
-
JosephLMay 22, 20083
-
-
JakeS.May 22, 20080Buggy, Slow, and most importantly Boring. I'd rather go back to play EQ again than play this sadly =( Was hoping this game would be great too.
-
-
T.adrienMay 24, 20084Feeling of loneliness in a MMORPG what a strange paradox The interface is shamefull for a 2008 game quests haven't anything different from other MMORPG Nothing new except the graphism which are really good.
-
-
LinoCMay 26, 20084
-
-
MikeH.Jun 18, 20080This game is horrible. Just absolutely, plain, horrible. I canceled my subscription shortly after reaching level 35.
-
-
LouieA.Jun 21, 20083A half-baked game with little to add to the genre. The multi-player questing areas are small, overcrowded and mob spawns are slow. There's not nearly enough soloable instance content (or "night mode" as they call it) to justify going past lvl 20. Lazy development in an another squandered fantasy universe.
-
-
JimTJun 2, 20080So many bugs, limited leveling after 40. I am level 50 and have to grind all day. The crafting is completely messed up. Don't play this for 2 months when beta is over.
-
-
CraigM.Jun 2, 20083Over promised and under delivered. The world feels small and empty, like a single player game. The quests are dumbed down more than WOW, and the combat is only a half step above button mashing; it's just a lot more button mashing.
-
-
privateprivateJun 20, 20084Very buggy and unfinished. Unoriginal content. Too many instances and loading screens for every zone.
-
-
SebastianS.Jun 8, 20083
-
-
SteveAJul 27, 20083
-
-
NickJul 3, 20080Plain Terrible, agreed with all the other 0-2's out there. Waste of money and very old generation gameplay. Combat was ok, but it should be brought to a battlefield and not an instance maze.
-
-
JohnB.Jul 30, 20080Buggy technically. nerf after nerf for classes. lag spikes all the time. Reduced mature content. COULD have been a great game though.
-
-
MaxOJul 6, 20081Graphics are nice, but should be better for the type of system it requires. Buildings don't look that great. Gameplay new at first for non-spellcasters but gets boring. To much lack of content and bugs, even for a new mmorpg.
-
-
CarriganKJul 9, 20082Wow another great game from funcom... rather go and play a dead game like diablo 1 wasted 90$ on collectors edition not worth it plain and simple huge let down...was looking forward to time game since it was announced.... Don't buy it don't play it.
-
-
AoCcancelledsubscriptionAug 10, 20080
-
-
MattC.Aug 20, 20082LAG, and CRASHES, and BUGS, OH MY! The only things Age of Conan had going for it at launch was superior graphics. Everything else, including gameplay, stability, and class balancing was absolutely pathetic, pitiful. I quit after the first month.
-
-
NickyG.Aug 25, 20080
-
-
JakeGAug 30, 20083
-
-
WRAug 5, 20083New WOW clone now in Hyborian clothes. If you read REH (creator of Conan) books from Hyboria...you don't find that world from AOC. Really really shame. Game alone is full for bugs and poorly copies game mechanisms and classes from WOW. Nothing truly new.
-
-
EmilM.Sep 4, 20080Good Graphics and cool fatalities... Until your system Locks up! This game is fataly flawed and does not run for more then 10min to 2 hours before freezing your computer... And I own a Top Notch system. Buyer Beware.
-
-
DanReynoldsSep 7, 20081
-
-
PlanetSideJan 3, 20101heh all the positive reviews and comments about this game comes from the gamedeveloper staff at Funcom, or blind and dillusional kids who does not know better. Trust me, this game is SHIT
-
-
GHNov 18, 20080Garbage. No content, annoyingly imbalanced pvp, terrible social system.
-
-
DoomyHendricMay 17, 20083
-
-
ErrolbMay 22, 20083Combat cool having lag issues with it, the biggest problem i have is the whole game being instance based and not being able to see all players in areas.. to me thats guild wars and not a true mmo
-
-
AdamW.May 23, 20082Yet another boring WOW clone (with a more adult theme).
-
-
BjörnOMay 24, 20084A game with fantastic graphic and athmosphere. Sadly everything is destroyed by all loading time because they have divided the game world in different areas. Everytime you go to a new area you must talked to a npc and then travel. The feeling for a open world is lost.
-
-
KurtS.May 24, 20081Instances, worthless RP, boobs, 24/7 bugs and graphic issues, unskilled PvP, unbalanced PvP, very poor graphic style, very poor response on problems.
-
-
JohnL.May 26, 20084
-
-
JohnD.May 26, 20084This looks and feels very much like EQ2 which I hated. The graphics are not good. The sound effects are poor. It's also very buggy. Doesn't hold a candle to WoW even though I'm really tired of WoW.
-
-
TadMorbidMay 30, 20081European and American players unable to play on each others servers. Somewhat primitive interface.
-
-
KeiraP.Jun 12, 20081
-
-
RutgerH.Jun 12, 20082AoC is a short three phase process of excitement (hype & installation), fear (desperate tweaking to get any playability at low low settings), and disappointment (buy new grapics card to get high high settings and indeed see EQ2 with an extra helping of bugs, a very shallow combat system, and amazingly boring quests). Uninstall.
-
-
JamesnothanksJun 19, 20080Worst game ever, buggy, sexist bugs, poor combat system, no content, can't handle large scale PvP, is an alpha build game thats bad, just bad.
-
-
sfc19711971Jun 24, 20082
-
-
KevinR.Jun 28, 20084
-
-
JoeM.Jun 30, 20080
-
-
EccoJun 7, 20084IOnly the basics are implemented at the moment, very few quests after lvl 50, not so polished after lvl 20+, buggy laggy...a better beta at this point.
-
-
MGJun 7, 20080Epic amount of fail here. The game is nowhere near ready for release. Funcom is doing nothing to fix bugs or fix balance issues. In fact, every patch introduces more bugs than were present before the patch.
-
-
JerS.Jul 20, 20080You are paying to beta test a 50% complete game. Terrible customer service, really with all the things that make a MMO epic, this game is just boring after the first week. Look elsewhere this games a bust.
-
-
PeterB.Jul 22, 20081Very very poor game imo. Released way too early in it's development. I liked the idea of the direct combat system but in reality it's clunky and rather dull. Graphics are nice but that's just frill really when you consider that it's all about the gamplay - that's what really matters and that's a huge, huge letdown.
-
-
AlexM.Jul 22, 20081
-
-
DebraW.Jul 31, 20080Don't waste money on this one. Most of game is broken and bugs of every kind make game frustrating. Can't recommend.
-
-
ChristopherF.Jul 31, 20082As bugged and incomplete as any mmo at launch except that even the content is mostly missing. good style, bad implementation and the patches have actually progressively made the game less stable.
-
-
llJogJul 30, 20081Rated 7? Are these people actually playing his game? Of all the MMO's released this is by far the worst I have seen... There should be negative scores as well.
-
-
PMFJul 3, 20084
-
-
BenJul 31, 20081
-
-
DJul 5, 20080My relatively new PC can't get above 10fps, with every option turned down to nothing. There is no tech support. Only an auto-reply. I ebayed my cd key, and cut my losses.
-
-
JakeK.Jul 6, 20082
-
-
JackB.Aug 3, 20081You would be better off holding on to your money. This game is not ready for prime time and the flaws, bugs, poor content and class balance issues render the game almost unplayable. I suggest you wait at least a year before giving Conan a try.
-
-
RodericR.Sep 13, 20080A buggy, unbalanced game that was released a year too soon. It had substantial goodwill, interest, fanbase, and hype....and squandered ALL of it within 3 months. Once 3 and 6 month subscriptions finally run out, you're looking at a game that will struggle to keep 100k subscribers. Failcom will most likely go under due to epic failure here.
-
-
RasterM.Sep 14, 20081Bugs, crashes, lacking content for the majority of the game, memory leaks, and is full of jerks due to the attraction that is blood, gore, and nudity. Don't let them fool you, they, and this game, are not mature. It is merely unfit for younger audiences.
-
-
DönHSep 14, 20081
-
-
DarinnT.Sep 17, 20080The lack of content was a complete bore. After about Level 45 you struggle to find quests let alone any fun.
-
-
DönHSep 4, 20080
-
-
sbSep 9, 200844 of 10, because the character creation and starter island are good. Once you leave these initial areas the game goes downhill fast until, at level 80, there's nothing to do but stand around in stealth at zone entrances and wait for people to gank.
-
-
GarethW.Oct 16, 20080The lack of content, the bugs and the general failure of this game just makes me wanna wonder why I wasted the money on it in the first place. Dear oh dear, shame really, it was so promising.
-
-
StephenKMay 21, 20083It's an ok game. It doesn't feel fluid as say Oblivion or DDO does. They have tried to make dynamic animations and changing enemy weaknesses as a substitute, and it really doesn't work. For example, can I use terrain to my advantage? No.
-
-
ChadFMay 21, 20084
-
-
JessM.May 23, 20084The game has potential but it still feels like in beta; too choppy and laggy. Also, I've been spending most of my time on game updates that takes up some major time.
-
-
CDMay 24, 20083
-
-
AuronS.May 25, 20081
-
-
HarewV.Jun 15, 20084
-
-
ChaseB.Jun 16, 20084
-
-
MikeBJun 19, 20080
-
-
FedS.Jun 24, 20084The game is terrible past level 20. Poor class balance, weak pvp systems, no itemization in the end game, incredibly poorly designed tanking mechanics, technical issues...the list goes on and on. This game should not have been released, and Funcom manipulated the gaming community with its highly polished newbie area.
-
-
MichaelZJun 26, 20084
-
-
PolarisMJun 26, 20084
-
-
JGJun 28, 20082
-
-
GeorgioU.Jul 26, 20084This game is pretty broken.
-
-
KarlK.Jul 29, 20084The Good: Very beutiful environment, realistic characters, unique classes, unique combat, lvl 1-20 some of the best designed content in any MMO The Bad: Released too early, only 6 styles of armor, buggy patches, poor QA, not enough testing, sieging broken, tradeskills are a joke, Out of memory, grey maps, 4k-10k lag spikes are too frequent, no class balance
-
-
Bill.Jul 31, 20080It's absolutely the worse piece of software, game or otherwise, to come out in years.
-
-
UbieW.Jul 31, 20082Great graphics and beginning levels, but the bugs and memory leaks make the game unplayable at times even on the best machines. Most promised game aspects are missing or crippled by bugs. It might be a good MMO down the road, but alot of community feel mislead and I'm not sure it will overcome that.
-
-
94This game marks the next generation of MMOs in many ways. It looks good, is very entertaining and plays very well. This is a journey well worth taking.
-
92It won't put WoW out of business, but then again, nothing will for a long time, and that doesn't mean this isn't a great game with tons of appeal and a hopefully more mature audience
-
80Age of Conan going forward should become a delightfully savage second home for plenty of howling on-line barbarians.