User Score
8.0
out of 10
Generally favorable reviews- based on 157 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 125 out of 157
-
Mixed: 10 out of 157
-
Negative: 22 out of 157
Review this game
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
SimonGApr 19, 20094No single player mode, no tutorial, steep learning curve, connectivity issues, and only a half dozen maps. This isn't a good game. It's like the disappointing multiplayer mode of a good game.
-
-
MikeOApr 22, 20094
-
-
EmilMMay 8, 20090This game is complete utter crap, it has no strategical depth and is deliberately made to either steal money from DotA players or get people who have never played DotA to play this game without realising how bad it is, if you compare.
-
-
ACMay 20, 20093
-
-
JonWApr 18, 20094
-
-
JohnBMay 21, 20093
-
-
MaxwellJun 28, 20092The game is great, the company that coded it and published it? A joke. No QA. Whining CEO's. Very sad. This could've had a lot of potential. Please GPG, sell this off to a good company.
-
-
Jan 8, 20120Update for 2012: The game crashes on start, crashes randomly ingame and support is currently non-existent. There is no reason whatsoever to buy it or play it.
-
The multiplayer focus and a lack of a more traditional, story-driven solo campaign may not sit as well with all players, but the streamlined action-RPG gameplay proves to be seriously addictive in short bursts. The development team managed to inject a surprising level of gameplay depth into such a pared-down RTS design, and it works out.
-
65Online connection issues and a dearth of content keep this fun hybrid game from reigning supreme.
-
50If you're interested in throwing down cash for a beta and maybe getting in some practice before things get smoothed out, go ahead and bump that score up a letter grade. Anybody else should find something else to do until then.