Metascore
tbd

No score yet - based on 3 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 0 out of 3
  2. Negative: 2 out of 3
Buy On
  1. There's nothing that makes you gasp with pleasure, but neither is there anything seriously wrong.
  2. Computer Games Magazine
    40
    No part of the game is distinctive enough to be particularly terrible either, and there's a blessed lack of extremely shiny surfaces. [Sept 2002, p.75]
  3. Previous budget-priced shooters didn't set our expectations for Navy SEALs very high, but the game undercuts even those standards.
User Score
5.8

Mixed or average reviews- based on 4 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 2 out of 4
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 4
  3. Negative: 2 out of 4
  1. Oct 18, 2014
    2
    I've played better 90's games. There's no reason for me to make that statement regardless if this is a 2002 budget shooter. There are only 5I've played better 90's games. There's no reason for me to make that statement regardless if this is a 2002 budget shooter. There are only 5 weapons: a knife, a pistol, MP5, M4 and AK47. And the AI is dumber than a post. And you don't work with a team, yet in reality, Navy SEALs certainly don't work alone. This game isn't worth the time and effort to look for. It's that bad. Play Conflict: Desert Storm instead, or even SOCOM, where you actually play as a Navy SEAL team. Full Review »
  2. Wonphi
    Nov 5, 2004
    10
    Theres is nothing really wrong about tjis game. it looks nice, it is realistic,like head shots take down enemies in 1 shjot and the guns are Theres is nothing really wrong about tjis game. it looks nice, it is realistic,like head shots take down enemies in 1 shjot and the guns are realistic with real sounds9Heard sounds of guns in documentary before. very nice, only low is dumb ai otherwise a good outdoor exploring like shooter. Full Review »