• Publisher: VU Games
  • Release Date: Apr 26, 2005
User Score
6.8 out of 10

Mixed or average reviews- based on 44 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 29 out of 44
  2. Negative: 13 out of 44

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    10 out of 10
    Rate this:
    out of 10
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  3. Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000

  1. JamesK.
    May 4, 2008
    10
    Best Game Ever
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  2. MatiasK.
    Jan 4, 2005
    10
    The Best Epich Strategy Game Ever!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  3. ScottS
    May 19, 2005
    3
    While playing it I often thought to myself "this is a great feature" but never "this is a great game". There are a couple new features which should be incorporated into future RTS games (war planner, citizen manager, PIP) but many aspects of the game are horrendously amatuer. It sorely lacks the polish and easy-to-learn interface of its competitors: Warcraft III, Rise of Nations, and Age of Mythology are all better games. It's like they invented some new features, but otherwise failed to build on the past ten years of RTS features. Pathfinding is completely broken and by all accounts on fan forums in-game performance is universally mediocre given the quality of graphics, but these things could be improved in patches. I guess Magazine reviewers are easily swayed by a couple of 'spiffy' features, it's sad to see the harsh disconnect between reviewers and actual gamers. Empire Earth II has a lot of exciting crap stitched together but doesn't come through with a coherant game. Try it if you're a die-hard fan of the original, otherwise give this one a miss. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  4. Goobers
    Sep 1, 2005
    9
    Awesome Strategy game. As good as Civ or AOE. Great detail and depth.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  5. Bonedoc
    Sep 27, 2005
    7
    I'd give it a higher rateing if it didn't freeze while loading saves so often on my Falcon Mach V. Honestly, you would think it would run without a problem on a puter that runs Doom and Half-life on the highest possible settings.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  6. StephenP.
    Oct 2, 2005
    3
    This game is much easier than its predecessor. Its game play is only but a fraction of the time as EE was. Despite all of the new buildings and epochs, there seems to be less to choose from once you make your initial choice of a race. Furthermore, awesome graphics do not insure an awesome game, when will designers realize this.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  7. OriaB.
    Jun 7, 2005
    4
    This game is worse by far than the first game.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  8. TroyM.
    Jul 30, 2005
    10
    Best game ever!!! u cant miss it.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  9. TJWendle
    Jul 30, 2005
    10
    The best game ever!!! you have to buy this game.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  10. mriguy
    May 9, 2006
    7
    I loved the original EE and keep hoping that Sierra finds a better developer or Mad Dog improves. EE could be the ultimate stategy platform. By bigest complaint is the sound. EE1's charactors evolved. It was cool to hear the cavemen grunt. Germans should speak German, Italy, Italian etc.. There are a lot of nice features but I HATE the oversized leaders. Stainless Steels EE1 was cleaner but Mad Dog could still make this the best RTS if theye just cleaned up some items and listen to all the community feedback, maybe EE3. There are a lot of good ideas in the forums. It's the commuunity that makes the RTS. If the customer's support and feedback dies so does the product. I like the addition of spies and the elimination of magical charactors. I could write a 5 page report about all the features that could be improved. I rate it an "Almost, but you need to fix this this and this.." Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  11. BJ
    Nov 9, 2005
    2
    Major step down from the original Empire Earth. Big disappointment.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  12. AlphaO.
    Apr 22, 2005
    7
    I've had the game 24 hours. So far it's a bit disappointing. The only graphical improvements I can see are minor: The water uses pixel shaders to gain a slight "sheen" and the people models are slightly better ... frankly it's hard to tell it isn't Empire earth 1. A lot of the "new" features (IE borders, trade caravans etc) are just the "old" features of other games (civ3, rise of nations etc.) so it just feels like a mishmash of a rehash. It's not BAD.. just not great. I've finished the four tutorials. .. and haven't yet mustered up enough interest to play the campaigns. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  13. EdoardoDellaV.
    May 1, 2005
    7
    Very similar to "Rise of Nations", it's a pity that the previous "Empire Earth" was much better than "Rise of Nations"!!! In this game there isn't the possibility of custom civilations, and the presence of useless and complicated "special powers" only make the game more complicated and not user-friendly. Good graphic and audio, but small maps and the game is too fast leaving little time to devise strategies. Civilizations unique units are somewhat useless since they don't advance through ages. Nukes do very little damage. The civilian managment screen is a excellent idea and a very powerful tool! Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  14. Kuro
    May 3, 2005
    3
    Lacks the flair and design of the original, very disappointing. I find the UI and engine quite disgusting, mad-doc have made it feel far more amatuer. A definite step backwards.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  15. BBD.
    May 9, 2005
    1
    Terrible stuff really. Back to rise of nations and age of mythology.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  16. BradC.
    Jun 24, 2005
    8
    While not outstanding a good edition to the Empire Earth Series.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  17. DanD.
    Jun 4, 2005
    10
    I liked it.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  18. KateR.
    Jul 13, 2005
    9
    Great Game. Still addicted.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  19. LuisV.
    Jul 21, 2005
    7
    Cool game.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  20. GeorgeH.
    Jul 27, 2005
    1
    It is one of the worst games i have ever played, however the first game is one of hte best games ive played.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  21. ScottL.
    Jul 31, 2005
    2
    Could be a great game. But, the citizen manager needs work, unit movement is terrible, slow unit response, lots and lots of bugs. I could live with the bugs for now if there was any word of progress from the developers. Huge patch two months ago and not a peep from them since. Have to say I am really disappointed with every review I've seen about this game. Not a one of them was thorough AND honest. My first time on this site.....just checked the reviews here, Computer Games Magazines is the only one I recognize that handed out the rating the game deserves. The others must be using advertising $$ as their guide for rating the game. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  22. WilliamG.
    Aug 1, 2005
    3
    I agree fully with Scott L. There are much much better RTS games (like Empires: Dawn of the Modern World -- which is 2 years older and a lot better).
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  23. DanielM.
    May 25, 2006
    10
    I thought this was a brialliant and very stratigical game.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  24. Maslab
    May 21, 2008
    7
    I do especially like dropping nukes and other various bombs on fledgling civilizations, but there isn't that much strategy required. Build a bunch of units and charge. That's about it. However, it is very fun if you just want to blow up stuff on a massive scale.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  25. RicH.
    Jan 27, 2009
    10
    This game is a masterpiece. The unit response times are beautiful, there's a huge range of epochs - each home to different units and building types - even in the year 2009 the graphics are still sturdy and quite impressive. This game is simply great. No flaws what-so-ever. The online mode makes this game so great.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  26. HughBetcha
    Feb 28, 2005
    4
    An ugly dull clone of Warcraft/Starcraft whose reach exceeds its grasp.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  27. [Anonymous]
    Apr 22, 2005
    3
    Disapointing to say the least. the engine is buggy, and combat is mushy. back to rise of nations
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  28. Chimp
    Apr 23, 2005
    7
    Empire Earth II is not a bad game. Just like the first one, it has way too much stuff. There are so many ages and civilizations, but each age("epoch") has about 7-16 military units total, with a couple special units for each civ. The game itself copies Rise of Nations so much its insane, but thats not necessarily a bad thing, i think its good. Now there are cities and the civilzations are more distinct. My biggest problem with this game has to be its graphics-just so you know, if you've seen screenshots in ads for the game, the game does not look like that. AT ALL. i put it on max resolution, all settings maxed including shadows, and it looked nowhere near as good as the picture, especially for the units. the pictures they show have to be in at least 2048 resolution, something few people can have. So unless you can get it to look like the screens, the graphics arent too great, especially the water, which comparing to what we have been seeing lately, sucks. the gameplay has tons of things to do like war plans, but i can already tell no one is actually going to use them in multiplayer games. although ive only played the demo, i know from experience with the first one that the game is simply a technology race, without time to use any of the nice features that come with it. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  29. AnonymousMC
    May 11, 2005
    6
    disapointing the could patch it up to 8 of 10 for me if they improve the field of view, you see just too little to fight with your big units on the small screen, even medium formation of 8 tanks doesnt even fit on screen so all the nic ideas of war plans and so on are useless if yount make the big picture in the main screen.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  30. Samaritan
    Sep 22, 2005
    9
    I am the Age of Empires series expert and this game is cool.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  31. FredB.
    Dec 11, 2006
    8
    Much shiner than its predecessor with a better interface and some awesome new features like territories and capturing buidlings. I must say, however, that I preferred EE1's complex array of specialized counter-units to EE2's simple rock-paper-scissors system. Also, the campaigns are bland, incorporating few cinematics and no dialogue. Still, a fun and challenging game with visible crews for unenclosed vehicles and artillery. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  32. aa
    Oct 22, 2007
    10
    One of the best RTS's of all time
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  33. Feb 5, 2012
    9
    One of the bets game I have ever played. Played 6 hours a day for a long time...I got my life back. It lagged a lot..old machines couldn't handle the unit masses. Multiplayer was sooo good. Learned about history from this game....loved the expansion of it Art of Supremacy.
Metascore

Generally favorable reviews - based on 39 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 32 out of 39
  2. Negative: 2 out of 39
  1. Given both its de-emphasis on low-level tactical decisions and its ambitious scope, EEII resides in a bizarre no-man's-land between "Civilization III" and "Kohan II." [May 2005, p.124]
  2. 80
    I can think of very few games that I could play for the next 10 years (or until I get eaten by that monster in the woods) and never run out different ways to play and different strategies to explore. Empire Earth II is one of those games.
  3. 89
    A deep and satisfying real-time strategy game. The campaigns are great, the multiplayer is super fun, and skirmish allows for tons of single player satisfaction thanks to some terrific AI that'll give you fits.