- Critic Score
- Most active
- Publication
- Most clicked
-
94The gaming public has wanted a good team based game for a long time, now it has one.
-
90Pure, unadulterated fun, especially when you’re playing the game with other people.
-
If you are patient, willing to work on developing an online gaming community, and looking to play a well-designed, team-based first person shooter Global Operations is the perfect fit.
-
84It's a damn good game with a lot going for it if those with the machines to run it will give it a chance.
-
81If you manage to go through all of the connection demands and find a fully functional server, the game can offer you a thrilling multiplayer experience.
-
81Kind of like having to eat a banana split with your hands--just because it's a little sloppy doesn't mean it isn't still good...One of the deepest and most satisfying multiplayer tactical shooters currently available.
-
I had a really difficult time adapting to the inconsistent accuracy of the weapons. [May 2002, p.92]
-
80With versatile server options allowing operators with a dedicated machine to run a variety of servers, the potential is there for massive success over the net. We're more than happy to recommend it to you heartily.
-
It’s not the counter-strike killer we are all hanging out for but it definitely adds some fresh new options to the style of game.
-
74I have a rock-solid DSL connection and a high-end Athlon rig and still suffered atrocious lag. [June 2002, p.74]
-
The major problem holding it back is its poor network performance.
-
66It feels like a game that was rushed out the door, failing to offer all the core features an online game should have.
-
The AI, for both team and enemy, is absolutely atrocious. [July 2002, p.64]
prev
next
Page:
- 1
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 2 out of 2
-
Mixed: 0 out of 2
-
Negative: 0 out of 2
-
CiaranGallagher9
-
CiaranG.10This is a good game.