Metascore
67

Mixed or average reviews - based on 4 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1 out of 4
  2. Negative: 0 out of 4
  1. 82
    A game that won't inspire novices or attract causal gamers. This is one for the hardcore only.
  2. It may not be as accessible as Sid Meier's Gettysburg, but it's different enough from the traditional turn-based, hexagonal wargame that wargamers should sit up and take notice.
  3. PC Gamer
    54
    I had to grit my teeth to put in enough play time for a quality review. [June 2002, p.77]
  4. 50
    [It's] like my relationship with broccoli. Playing it was definitely not love at first fight, but after a while, you warm up to it...an in-depth wargaming experience.
User Score
5.3

Mixed or average reviews- based on 4 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 2 out of 4
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 4
  3. Negative: 2 out of 4
  1. BillyJimboBob
    Feb 27, 2004
    1
    Pure garbage-- the 3-D view is useless. The AI is ridiculous-- when you zoom in to look at units, sometimes they just spin around in circles. Pure garbage-- the 3-D view is useless. The AI is ridiculous-- when you zoom in to look at units, sometimes they just spin around in circles. The company that published this abandoned support for it. I find no redeeming qualities in this game. Full Review »