- Publisher: Electronic Arts
- Release Date: Nov 17, 2009
- Also On: Xbox 360
User Score
8.4
out of 10
Generally favorable reviews- based on 1571 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 1,359 out of 1571
-
Mixed: 70 out of 1571
-
Negative: 142 out of 1571
Review this game
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
Apr 9, 20131
-
Feb 27, 20134Lo mejor del juego es cuando lo desinstalas.
Cuanto antes lo hagas más divertido.
Paso de hacer más comentarios de esta basura. -
Jan 24, 20133Terrible, identical to Left for Dead with some new weapons and characters. I got so board i couldn't even make it through the entire storyline, which is about 5 hours. There is really nothing good I can say about this game, do not buy this.
-
Nov 23, 20123i liked the game cuz its almost excactly the same as the first 1. THe thing that i am very disapointed is that they change the charecters because Zoey is my favorite. And i basically sank when i cant see my favorite charcter when i started playing.... :'(
-
Jun 2, 20120L4D is one of rare games where I really cried for money spend. Even if game is bad I never complain because people did a lot of effort to make a game. L4D is just too bad game. If you want 4 player MP COOP go for Payday: The Heist. Skip L4D is BIG CIRCLE!!!!
-
Jun 1, 20124You shoot zombies with other people. That's literally the entire game, and it's only multiplayer too. Would have been much more impressive with some interesting guns or mechanics, taking the semi-realism path for developing this game was a huge mistake. Even though the gameplay is garbage, the aesthetics are pretty good and I don't think I'll be forgetting the voice acting any time soon.
-
Mar 6, 20121
-
Jan 5, 20123It's the same Left 4 Dead! Why deceive people? Why create a CLONE? The creation of games - the art! The art does not make money! If, nevertheless, the game discuss, in the first place there begins to annoy (for some reason, can only me) music (Soundtrack: HL2 - best, L4D2 - fail).
-
Dec 26, 20114
-
Nov 2, 20111
-
Oct 27, 20110
-
Jul 7, 20114If it weren't for the 90% of players I've played with that were complete *******, I would've given this game a 8 or 9. Unfortunettely I can't enjoy a game where almost everyone game I've joined, there will be some elitist **** that'll complain about everything, rip through the map while leaving the rest of the team behind, and won't help their teammates for ****.
-
Jul 6, 20110All I can say, is that this game is a **** awesome sequel to Left 4 Dead, ticked all my boxes, nothing negative comes to mind. Awesome! The gameplay is awesome in multiplayer, had tones of fun, the new infected are fun to kill and are fun to play as! Very very verry good game :D
-
May 14, 20111After more than 300 hours in game, i must say, it was waste of time. This game has become garbage. Community is full of arrogant no-life emo kids. People are leaving over and over. Maps are buggy and every new update is worse than one before. It's really time for Valve to create new game engine, otherwise there will be no reason to buy expensive and old looking games.
-
Jan 15, 20111
-
Oct 31, 20104
-
Oct 29, 20101this game is absoloute......pathetic! theres nothing good about it.its the most depressing game of all time.......now then somebody open the guiness book of records to the most depressing games of all time
-
Sep 25, 20100
-
JayF.Apr 10, 20104As an online play game, it's just average in my book. I'd rather play other recent games with better graphics. Solo play is a joke. There's no campaign so to speak. Rather, it's like playing online with yourself. I played this game for maybe 3 hours and then looked for another.
-
-
ScottF.Apr 9, 20103
-
-
GazManApr 8, 20102
-
-
SallyV.Apr 4, 20100
-
-
ElliottFMar 27, 20101
-
-
MichaelR.Mar 20, 20103
-
-
FetzLFeb 19, 20101
-
-
F.DFeb 18, 20100
-
-
SPFeb 15, 20100
-
-
MikeS.Feb 9, 20100
-
-
J.MidnightJan 25, 20102
-
-
JakeCJan 21, 20102The game is unplayable most of the time, because of the worthless servers which either have: 1) horrible ping 2) annoying mods/custom content The game is also filled with bugs of all sort. Why did they have to rush out with this piece of shit anyways? Fix the useless servers and bugs and I would give the game an 7, the game costs too much for what it delivers compared to the first game.
-
-
MichaelNJan 9, 20104
-
-
RomanOJan 8, 20101
-
-
JeremyCJan 7, 20101
-
-
DavidNJan 6, 20100
-
-
RichardSJan 6, 20100
-
-
GuessWhoJan 6, 20102All you morons complaining about the game think twice. In Australia we got the dumbed dumbed down version of the game. Zombies hit the ground BOOM gone off screen. Can't rate it any higher just because Australians got the dumbed down version. I played the demo i didnt actually buy it. I found an uncensor for it but it didnt feel the same.
-
-
DarrylCDec 31, 20090This game is the worst I've bought in a long time. Metacritic ahs lost any respect I've ever had for them. This game could have been written by anyone 10 year's ago and it would still have been dreadful. And Valve is done in my book. HL2 and then this stinking pile of dung.
-
-
ChrisPDec 29, 20094
-
-
AlexDDec 27, 20094
-
-
StevenADec 26, 20094
-
-
lukegDec 18, 20093whats the point of this game if you dont like online gaming. there is no decent story and gameplay gets so repetative i was bored within 5 mins, levels are badly maped and AI are just a pain at times.
-
-
DickSDec 18, 20090
-
-
SteveHDec 15, 20094
-
-
AkaneDDec 7, 20090
-
-
DennisCDec 6, 20090
-
-
JackODec 3, 20090
-
-
LysanderSDec 3, 20090L4D1 all over again, but with *eugh* daylight... Nice how they've added weapons i've used countless times before in another, superior zombie game (KF). Still it's enjoyable to watch Valve sabaotage their own reputation from within.
-
-
HoundEyeDec 2, 20091New maps, (some) new weapons, new characters... slightly new mobs not worth the price tag...... well thats the review done please buy Killing floor if your looking for a good co-op zombie shooter.
-
-
Zachridw.Dec 2, 20092At first of all, this game isn't bad, although my rating says otherwise. But the reason why I've gave this game a "2", is because of the price of ~60$ / ~50
-
-
MarioXDec 1, 20090
-
-
AlexBNov 30, 20092I've done all of this before in the previous game... more then enough times. Additionally, the game feels almost unplayable, all the servers i join are laggy, and there's major performance issues compared to the first L4D. It's the same as the first game, but worse.
-
-
TBONENov 28, 20090Its all the DLC we were expecting in L4D1, for $50! I've played it. It's not that great. More stuff does make a game better. You know what makes it worse? Breaking your promise for content in L4D1. They gave the middle finger to PC gamers, now I'm giving them the middle finger right back.
-
-
TimotheeBNov 22, 20092
-
-
DonnieDarkoNov 20, 20094
-
-
KarstenTNov 17, 20094First of all, my english is not the best :P Valve sells a game for 50
-
-
ololNov 17, 20093
-
-
MikeJ.Nov 17, 20092More of the same with little change. Additions like melee weapons and dynamic weather feel like cop outs in a full release that plays more like a map pack with new models. Disappointing.
-
-
100L4D2 delivers multiple improvements over its predecessor, and I get to keep all my fingers and toes.
-
90It remains one of the most distinctive co-operative titles out there, and allows for some of the most nerve-searing team-based multiplayer gaming on the market.
-
90Whereas once we treated Left 4 Dead as a stopgap between Half-Lifes, this is no longer a weird little side project with modest expectations, and Valve is confident enough to play around with it, safe in the knowledge that you can trust your players. Left 4 Dead proved it. And whereas that game had a personality, this one is overflowing with it.