Advanced Search Beta »
Basic Search Fields
Legends of Might and Magic PC
  • Publisher: 3DO
  • Release Date: Jun 18, 2001
Metascore
53 out of 100

Mixed or average reviews - based on 10 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 0 out of 10
  2. Mixed: 7 out of 10
  3. Negative: 3 out of 10
view
per page
  1. GameSpy
    69
    It is on the cusp of being a fun game, but the lack of editing capability and the omission of offline bots severely limit its replay value.
  2. Voodoo Extreme
    63
    An unbalanced and unoriginal game that has been done better many times before.
  3. Total Video Games
    60
    LoMaM isn’t a bad game it’s just unoriginal and stuck in mediocrity...lacks that little spark of magic to make it worth a purchase.
    All this publication's reviews
  4. GameSpot
    57
    With wizards and warriors replacing terrorists and counterterrorists (a la "Counter-Strike"), the game ends up a mediocre muddle rather than the novel game it could have been.
  5. IGN
    55
    A mediocre title that fails to make its mark in the annals of PC shooters. The developers drew off of a solid blueprint, but what you're left with in the end is an unexciting, lackadaisical "Counter-Strike" knock-off set in a fantasy world.
  6. Adrenaline Vault
    50
    A mediocre offering. While it has its fun moments, and some of the maps are intriguing, Legends ultimately comes across as lacking ingenuity.
  7. Game Revolution
    50
    Legends isn't so much bad as brutally derivative. Fans of Counter-Strike will certainly find some fun within these castle walls, but ultimately will likely opt for a more legendary adventure.
  8. ActionTrip
    44
    Nothing more than a total cock-up, an uninventive and technically poor copy of several games, primarily Counter-Strike, which was meant to achieve a lot and actually achieved nothing.
  9. Yahoo! Games
    40
    It's a shame that the whole thing seems so rushed and inexpertly executed.
  10. Computer Games Magazine
    40
    A feeling of been there, done that, with some poor game design choices that limit the fun.
prev next
Page:
  • 1

User Reviews

All reviews »
User Score
8.2 out of 10

Generally favorable reviews- based on 15 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 6 out of 9
  2. Mixed: 1 out of 9
  3. Negative: 2 out of 9
  1. HampusE.
    6
    I think it`s good but not great.
  2. JohnD.
    10
    This game rocks so for all the losers that rated this game 0 u suck.
  3. RayM.
    0
    This game is utter crap. I paid 5 bucks for it and feel ripped.
See all user reviews »